当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《分子药理学杂志》 > 2005年第8期
编号:11273388
cAMP and Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Signaling in Response to D-Amphetamine and Methylphenidate in the Prefrontal Cortex in Vivo:
http://www.100md.com 《分子药理学杂志》 2005年第8期
     Signal Transduction and Plasticity in the Nervous System, Unitee Mixte Recherche 536, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale and Universitee Pierre et Marie Curie, Institut du Fer e?Moulin, Paris, France (V.P., E.V., J.-C.C., A.-G.C., J.-A.G., D.H.)

    Chaire de Neuropharmacologie, Unitee Mixte Recherche 114, Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale and Colleege de France, Paris, France (J.-P.T.)

    Abstract

    D-Amphetamine and methylphenidate are widely used in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Both drugs increase extracellular norepinephrine and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex, where they are believed to exert their therapeutic effects. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying their action are poorly understood. To investigate the intracellular signaling pathways activated by D-amphetamine and methylphenidate in the prefrontal cortex in vivo in mice, we measured the cAMP-dependent Ser845 phosphorylation of -amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor GluR1 subunit and the active form of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Administration of D-amphetamine (5eC10 mg/kg) or methylphenidate (10eC20 mg/kg) increased phosphorylation of GluR1. Basal and D-amphetamineeCinduced GluR1 phosphorylation was reduced by propranolol, a general -adrenoceptor antagonist, and betaxolol, a 1-antagonist, but not by (±)-1-[2,3-(dihydro-7-methyl-1H-inden-4-yl)oxy]-3-[(1-methylethyl)amino]-2-butanol (ICI-118,515), a 2-antagonist. The effect of methylphenidate was also blocked by propranolol and betaxolol. The D-amphetamine effect was slightly potentiated by prazosin, an 1-adrenoceptor antagonist, and mimicked by yohimbine, an 2 antagonist. Blockade of dopamine or N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or serotonin depletion had no effect on D-amphetamineeCinduced GluR1 phosphorylation. D-amphetamine but not methylphenidate increased ERK phosphorylation. This effect required multiple signaling pathways because it was blocked by 1- and 1-adrenoceptor antagonists, by dizocilpine maleate (MK801), an NMDA antagonist, and by serotonin depletion. In contrast, blockade of dopamine receptors had no effect on D-amphetamineeCinduced ERK phosphorylation. Propranolol and betaxolol increased the hyperlocomotion produced by D-amphetamine and methylphenidate. Thus, both D-amphetamine and methylphenidate potently activate the cAMP pathway in the prefrontal cortex through 1-adrenergic receptors. This activation could have behavioral consequences and contribute to the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    D-Amphetamine (D-amph) and methylphenidate (MPH) (here referred to as psychostimulants) are widely used in children and adults for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (Wilens et al., 2002). At higher doses, D-amph and, to a lesser degree, MPH have a potential risk for abuse (Swanson and Volkow, 2003). It is therefore important to try and distinguish the molecular basis of therapeutic efficacy and abuse liability of these drugs. D-amph and MPH competitively block monoamine transport at plasma and vesicle membranes with various potencies and promote monoamines release in brain (Sulzer et al., 1995; Gatley et al., 1996). Microdialysis experiments have shown that both D-amph and MPH elevate the extracellular concentrations of dopamine (DA) and norepinephrine (NE) in various brain regions (Kuczenski and Segal, 1997). D-amph also enhances extracellular serotonin (5HT) with a relatively high efficacy, whereas MPH has a poor affinity for the 5HT transporter and does not alter the extracellular concentration of 5HT, even at high doses (Gatley et al., 1996; Kuczenski and Segal, 1997). Strong evidence implicates DA neurotransmission in the etiology of ADHD and in the therapeutic action of psychostimulants (Wilens et al., 2002). Although less thoroughly investigated, the role of NE is also plausible because selective NE reuptake inhibitors (Biederman and Spencer, 1999; Bymaster et al., 2002) and 2-adrenergic agonists (Arnsten et al., 1996) have therapeutic effects in ADHD. In addition, some evidence suggests the possible involvement of 5HT in the beneficial effects of psychostimulants (Gainetdinov et al., 1999). On the other hand, the addictive properties of these drugs, which are mainly attributed to their action on DA, particularly in the ventral striatum, are also known to be significantly modulated by their effects on NE and 5HT (Di Chiara and Imperato, 1988; Auclair et al., 2004).

    The prefrontal cortex is an important site of action of psychostimulants. Neuropsychological tests and brain imaging studies suggest that ADHD is associated with alterations in prefrontal cortex and related subcortical circuits (Wilens et al., 2002). Psychostimulants increase cortical arousal in patients with ADHD, normalizing their brain activity (Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003). Cortical DA and NE have been linked to attention and cognitive functions that are clearly altered in ADHD, supporting their role in the therapeutic effects of psychostimulants (Wilens et al., 2002; Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003). The action of psychostimulants in the prefrontal cortex is also implicated in the development of locomotor sensitization, a behavioral change believed to underlie certain aspects of drug addiction (Vanderschuren and Kalivas, 2000). Thus, psychostimulants could produce their therapeutic effects in ADHD and some of their effects on the development of drug abuse by elevating monoamine extracellular concentrations in the prefrontal cortex. Monoamines activate numerous subtypes of DA, NE, and 5HT receptors that are expressed in abundance in this brain region. Yet little is known about the intracellular signaling events triggered by receptor activation in the prefrontal cortex and about their implications in the functional effects of psychostimulants (Svenningsson et al., 2003).

    Here, we studied the effects of D-amph and MPH on two major signaling pathways in the mouse prefrontal cortex in vivo: the cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signaling cascades, using a procedure that prevents postmortem dephosphorylation of proteins. We measured the phosphorylation of GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptor on Ser845, a residue specifically phosphorylated by PKA (Roche et al., 1996). Phosphorylation of Ser845 is likely to have important functional consequences because it markedly increases the peak current of AMPA receptors (Roche et al., 1996). Phosphorylation of GluR1 on Ser845 is increased by psychostimulants in the striatum, whereas its regulation in the prefrontal cortex is not known (Snyder et al., 2000). In the same samples, we measured the active form of ERK (i.e., doubly phosphorylated in its activation loop). The ERK pathway is critical for long-lasting alterations of synaptic properties (Derkinderen et al., 1999; Thomas and Huganir, 2004) and is activated in selective brain regions in response to many drugs, including cocaine and D-amphetamine (Valjent et al., 2005). We found that D-amph induced a strong phosphorylation of both GluR1 and ERK2, whereas MPH increased only the phosphorylation of GluR1. Using pharmacological tools, we demonstrated an important contribution of NE transmission predominantly via activation of 1-adrenoreceptor (AR). In addition, we found that activation of 1-AR contributed to the behavioral effects of D-amph and MPH, suggesting a possible role of these receptors in the context of ADHD treatment.

    Materials and Methods

    Animals. Male 8-week-old C57BL/6J mice (Charles River France, L'Arbresle, France) were kept at least 1 week in our animal house in stable conditions of temperature (22°C) and humidity (60%) with a constant 12-h light/dark cycle and free access to food and water. All experiments on mice were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the French Agriculture and Forestry Ministry for handling animals (decree 87849, license A 75-05-22).

    Drugs. (+)--Methylphenethylamine (D-amphetamine) sulfate salt, methylphenidate hydrochloride, propranolol, betaxolol, ICI-118,515, prazosin, yohimbine, SCH23390 haloperidol, ritanserin, SDZ 205,557, and MK801 were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Drugs were dissolved in 0.9% (w/v) NaCl (saline) and i.p. injected.

    Treatment. During the 3 days preceding the experiment, mice were habituated to injections by daily i.p. saline administration. Pharmacological treatments were carried out with saline, D-amph (5 or 10 mg/kg), or MPH (10 or 20 mg/kg). The various antagonists were injected 30 min before saline or D-amph (10 mg/kg) injection. Propranolol and betaxolol were administered 15 and 30 min before saline or MPH (10 mg/kg) for biochemical and behavioral analysis, respectively. The 5HT synthesis inhibitor 4-chloro-phenylalanine (300 mg/kg) was i.p. injected daily during the 3 days preceding the D-amph treatment.

    Tissue Preparation. At the indicated times after treatment, mice were decapitated, and their heads were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen (12 s). When the animals were pretreated with receptor antagonists before D-amph or MPH, they were killed 15 min after the D-amph or MPH injection. The frozen heads were cut into 210-e thick slices with a cryostat, and eight frozen microdisks (1.4 mm diameter) were punched out bilaterally from the median prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1A) and stored at -80°C.

    Western Blot Analysis. Micropunches were homogenized by the addition of a hot solution (maintained in a boiling water bath) of 1% SDS (v/v) and 1 mM sodium orthovanadate in water, immediate sonication, and incubation at 100°C for 5 min to inactivate phosphatases and proteases. Equal amounts of protein (100 e蘥) were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10%) before electrophoretic transfer onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond Pure; Amersham Biosciences Inc., Piscataway, NJ). Membranes were blocked for 1 h at room temperature in Tris-buffered saline (100 mM NaCl and 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5) with 0.05% Tween 20 for detection of phospho-ERK or 5% nonfat dry milk for phospho-GluR1, respectively. Membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies. Bound antibodies were detected with horseradish peroxydase-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies (diluted 1:4000; Amersham Biosciences) and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescent detection (ECL; Amersham Biosiences). The same membranes were probed for proteins independently of their phosphorylation state after stripping in a buffer containing 100 mM glycine, pH 2.5, 200 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (v/v), and 0.1% (v/v) -mercaptoethanol for 45 min at room temperature, followed by extensive washing in Tris-buffered saline and incubation in blocking buffer. The relevant immunoreactive bands were quantified with laser-scanning densitometry using Image software (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD). The results normalized for each membrane were expressed as percentages of saline-treated controls. The following phospho-specific antibodies were used for Western blotting: rabbit antiphospho-GluR1 (phospho-Ser845, 1:500; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY), and monoclonal antiphospho-ERK1/2 (phospho-Thr183-Tyr185, 1:1000; Sigma-Aldrich). Rabbit polyclonal anti-GluR1 (1:500; Upstate Biotechnology) and anti-ERK1/2 (1:1000; Upstate Biotechnology), were used to measure the total amount of these proteins in tissue samples.

    Behavioral Analysis. Mice were injected with saline and placed for 30 min in the locomotor box during 3 consecutive days (days 1eC3) for habituation before the actual experiment was performed on day 4. Locomotor responses were evaluated using a circular corridor with four infrared beams placed every 90° (Imetronic, Pessac, France) in a low-luminosity environment. Locomotor activity was counted as travels through one quarter of the circular corridor as detected by consecutive interruption of two adjacent beams. The effects of propranolol (20 mg/kg i.p.) and betaxolol (20 mg/kg) on acute locomotor responses induced by D-amph (2 mg/kg i.p.) and MPH (10 mg/kg i.p.) were evaluated on day 4 as follows: spontaneous activity during 15 min; locomotor activity after administration of saline, propranolol, or betaxolol during 30 min; and locomotor activity after injection of D-amph or MPH during 60 min. Locomotor activity was measured at 5-min intervals, and cumulative counts during the 60 min after D-amph or MPH injection were used for data analysis.

    Statistical Analysis. Results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. One-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls and two-way ANOVA with treatment and time were performed with Prism 3.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

    Results

    D-amph and Methylphenidate Increase Phosphorylation of GluR1 and ERK in the Prefrontal Cortex. Treatment with 10 mg/kg D-amph increased phosphorylation of GluR1 on Ser845 (P-GluR1) and combined phosphorylation of ERK on Thr183 and Tyr185 (P-ERK) in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 1B). ERK2 phosphorylation was much more pronounced than phosphorylation of ERK1, which was not always detectable (Fig. 1B). After D-amph injection, GluR1 and ERK2 phosphorylation increased rapidly (10 min) and remained elevated at least until 30 min (Fig. 1, C and D). For each time point, the increased GluR1 phosphorylation was more marked at 10 than at 5 mg/kg D-amph (Fig. 1C), whereas ERK phosphorylation was significant only at 10 mg/kg (Fig. 1D). In all of these experiments, there was no change in the levels of GluR1 and ERK measured with an antibody recognizing both the phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of GluR1 or ERK (Fig. 1B).

    Fifteen minutes after injection of 10 or 20 mg/kg MPH, GluR1 phosphorylation on Ser845 (P-GluR1) was strongly increased in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 2, A and B). In contrast, both doses of MPH failed to activate ERK2 phosphorylation, which remained at the baseline level (Fig. 2, C and D). The total levels of GluR1 and ERK were unchanged (Fig. 2, A and C).

    -Adrenoceptors Play a Critical Role in the Phosphorylation of GluR1 by D-amph and Methylphenidate. In the prefrontal cortex, D-amph and MPH share the ability to increase extracellular DA and NE (Berridge and Stalnaker, 2002). The PKA-dependent phosphorylation of GluR1 could result from the stimulation of dopamine D1/D5 receptors or -AR because both receptor types stimulate adenylyl cyclase activity upon agonist activation and are expressed in significant amounts in the prefrontal cortex (Savasta et al., 1986; Nicholas et al., 1996). To test the contribution of DA receptors, haloperidol (0.5 mg/kg), a nonselective dopamine antagonist, or SCH23390(0.25 mg/kg), a D1/D5-selective antagonist, was given 30 min before the injection of D-amph (10 mg/kg) or saline. Surprisingly, these treatments had no effect on the basal GluR1 phosphorylation or on its increase by D-amph (Fig. 3, A and B). These results clearly showed that after D-amph administration in vivo, activation of D1/D5 receptors or D2-type receptors (blocked by haloperidol) had no appreciable consequence on the level of GluR1 phosphorylation in the prefrontal cortex.

    We then evaluated the contribution of adenylyl cyclase-coupled -AR to the PKA-dependent phosphorylation of GluR1. For this purpose, 30 min before D-amph or saline injection, mice were pretreated with propranolol at a dose (20 mg/kg i.p.) known to efficiently block all subtypes of brain -AR (Stone et al., 1996). Propranolol decreased basal GluR1 phosphorylation and completely prevented the effects of D-amph in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 3C). The role of 1-ARs was examined using a selective antagonist, betaxolol (20 mg/kg i.p.) (Stone et al., 1996). Betaxolol also decreased the basal GluR1 phosphorylation and completely abolished the response to D-amph in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 3D). In contrast, ICI-118,551 (4 mg/kg i.p.), a selective 2-AR antagonist, failed to alter basal or D-ampheCinduced GluR1 phosphorylation at a dose known to be efficient in mouse brain (Stone et al., 1996) (Fig. 3D).

    The dramatic effects of 1-AR blockers indicated the major role played by NE transmission in the D-amph effect on GluR1 phosphorylation. We also assessed the effects of blockade of -ARs, which are involved in some behavioral effects of D-amph (Auclair et al., 2004). Pretreatment by the selective 1-AR antagonist prazosin (2 mg/kg i.p.) slightly but significantly enhanced the GluR1 phosphorylation produced by D-amph treatment in the prefrontal cortex without altering the basal GluR1 phosphorylation (Fig. 3E). In 1b-AR-null mice, D-amph effects on GluR1 phosphorylation were also enhanced compared with wild-type littermates (V. Pascoli, E. Valgent, and D. Hervee, unpublished observations), showing that the absence of 1b-AR had effects similar to those observed with prazosin pretreatment. In contrast, after pretreatment with the 2-AR antagonist yohimbine (3 mg/kg i.p.), basal GluR1 phosphorylation was significantly increased (Fig. 3F), and no additional effect of D-amph was detected (Fig. 3F).

    Given the key role played by 1-AR activation in the D-amph effect, we investigated its implication in MPH-induced phosphorylation of GluR1. We found that the MPH effects were completely prevented by blocking the 1-AR either not selectively with propranolol or selectively with betaxolol (Fig. 4).

    Altogether, these results revealed that in the prefrontal cortex, both D-amph and MPH-induced phosphorylation of GluR1 and its basal phosphorylation resulted mainly from the activation of 1-AR but not significantly from that of dopamine receptors. It is interesting that NE neurotransmission seemed also to modulate the levels of GluR1 phosphorylation via 1-AR and 2-AR.

    Regulation of ERK2 Phosphorylation in the Prefrontal Cortex by D-amph Involves Multiple Adrenoceptors. We investigated the respective role of dopamine receptors and ARs in the control of D-ampheCinduced ERK2 phosphorylation in the prefrontal cortex. Pretreatment with haloperidol or SCH23390slightly decreased the basal phosphorylation of ERK2, because this effect was significant for haloperidol but not for SCH23390(Fig. 5, A and B). However, these compounds did not prevent the increase in ERK2 phosphorylation produced by D-amph (Fig. 5, A and B). In contrast, pretreatment with the nonselective -AR antagonist propranolol markedly reduced the effects of D-amph on ERK2 activation (Fig. 5C). This effect resulted from the blockade of 1-AR, because the selective 1-AR antagonist betaxolol (20 mg/kg i.p.) also decreased D-amph response, whereas the selective 2-AR antagonist ICI-118,551 (4 mg/kg i.p.) was ineffective (Fig. 5D). Pretreatment with prazosin (2 mg/kg i.p.) decreased significantly D-ampheCstimulated phosphorylation of ERK2 (Fig. 5E) and tended to reduce the basal levels of ERK2 phosphorylation. After blockade of 2-AR by yohimbine (3 mg/kg i.p.), D-amph remained able to increase ERK phosphorylation in the prefrontal cortex, although its effect was slightly reduced (Fig. 5F). Altogether, these results revealed a major role of 1-AR in ERK2 activation in the prefrontal cortex after systemic D-amph administration and a significant contribution of 1-AR and 2-AR. The important role of NE receptors contrasted with the absence of significant implication of dopamine receptors.

    Contribution of Serotonin Receptors to the Effects of D-amph. Because D-amph has the capacity to increase the extracellular concentration of 5HT (Kuczenski and Segal, 1997), GluR1 and ERK2 phosphorylation was investigated after inhibition of 5HT synthesis or blockade of 5-HT4 or 5-HT2 receptors (Table 1). These treatments, including blockade of 5-HT4 receptors positively coupled to adenylyl cyclase, did not alter the PKA-dependent phosphorylation of GluR1 in the prefrontal cortex of saline or D-ampheCtreated animals. In contrast, 5-HT depletion prevented D-ampheCinduced ERK2 activation without modifying basal ERK2 phosphorylation (Table 1). The blockade of 5-HT4 or 5-HT2 receptors did not alter the basal or D-ampheCinduced ERK2 phosphorylation (Table 1).

    Role of Glutamate NMDA Receptor in the Effects of D-amph. We have reported previously that after D-amph administration, ERK activation but not GluR1 phosphorylation was dependent on glutamate NMDA receptor stimulation in the striatum and nucleus accumbens (Valjent et al., 2005). Therefore, we analyzed whether NMDA receptor could also play a role in the effects of D-amph on ERK and GluR1 phosphorylation in the prefrontal cortex. As illustrated in Fig. 6A, pretreatment with MK801 (0.5 mg/kg i.p.), an antagonist of NMDA receptor, decreased the basal phosphorylation of ERK2 and totally prevented the increase of ERK2 phosphorylation produced by D-amph. In contrast, we found that NMDA receptor blockade did not affect significantly basal or D-ampheCinduced GluR1 phosphorylation in the prefrontal cortex (Fig. 6B).

    Role of 1-Adrenoceptors in the Acute Locomotor Response Induced by D-amph and MPH. Because our results revealed the importance of activation of 1-AR in the biochemical effects of D-amph in the prefrontal cortex, we investigated the possible role of these receptors in the behavioral effects of D-amph and MPH. We examined the consequences of 1-AR blockade on locomotor activation induced by these drugs. To avoid the stereotypies seen after the administration of 5 and 10 mg/kg D-amph and to obtain purely locomotor responses, we used 2 mg/kg D-amph for these experiments. Pretreatment with propranolol (20 mg/kg) or betaxolol (20 mg/kg) increased the locomotor activity induced by D-amph (Fig. 7, A and B) or MPH (Fig. 7, C and D). This enhancement seemed especially pronounced on the effects of MPH compared with those of D-amph (Fig. 7). In contrast, pretreatment with the 2-AReCselective antagonist ICI-118,551 (4 mg/kg i.p.) had no effect on acute locomotor responses induced by D-amph (data not shown).

    Discussion

    In the present work, we sought to gain insight into the mechanisms of action of D-amph and MPH in the prefrontal cortex by studying the effects of these drugs on cAMP- and ERK-mediated signaling pathways. We found that both drugs activated cAMP-regulated phosphorylation of AMPA receptor and that D-amph also activated ERK. Our results revealed a prominent role of NE and 1-AR activation in the actions of D-amph and MPH on AMPA receptor. They also showed that 1-AR activation reduced the hyperlocomotor effects of D-amph and MPH, suggesting its relevance for the therapeutic properties of these drugs in the treatment of ADHD.

    Mechanisms of D-ampheC and MPH-Induced Phosphorylation in the Prefrontal Cortex: Role of Noradrenergic Transmission. In the prefrontal cortex, D-amph has the ability to elevate the extracellular concentrations of NE, DA, and 5HT, whereas MPH increases only NE and DA without altering 5HT (Kuczenski and Segal, 1997; Berridge and Stalnaker, 2002). Thus, elevation of NE and/or DA could theoretically account for the PKA-mediated phosphorylation of GluR1 in response to D-amph or MPH. In the striatum, GluR1 Ser845 phosphorylation in response to psychostimulants involves the activation of D1/5 DA receptors and inhibition of protein phosphatase-1 by dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein (Mr 32,000) (Snyder et al., 2000). In contrast, our study reveals that D-amph and MPH-induced GluR1 phosphorylation in the prefrontal cortex depends mostly on NE. The effects of D-amph on GluR1 phosphorylation were unaltered by DA receptor antagonists but were mediated by 1-AR, which is the main subtype of -AR expressed in the cerebral cortex (Nicholas et al., 1996). The role of dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein (Mr 32,000) in these effects in the prefrontal cortex remains to be tested because it has been shown to be phosphorylated at a PKA-specific site after administration of D-amph or various psychotomimetics (Svenningsson et al., 2003). 1-AR stimulation seemed to have a small inhibitory influence on the PKA-dependent phosphorylation of GluR1 because the phosphorylation was enhanced by the blockade of 1-ARs. A possible explanation of this role of 1-AR is that the intracellular Ca2+ mobilized by activation of these receptors stimulates a Ca2+-dependent protein phosphatase able to dephosphorylate GluR1 in cortical neurons (Ehlers, 2000). Finally, blockade of 2-AR enhanced basal GluR1 phosphorylation, presumably because NE release is markedly increased when 2-AR presynaptic receptors are blocked (Florin et al., 1994). This explanation is supported by the lack of additivity between the effects of yohimbine and those of D-amph.

    D-amph at 10 mg/kg but not MPH activated ERK in the prefrontal cortex. In the present study, the activation of 1-AR and -AR resulting from elevation of extracellular NE seemed to mainly contribute to the ERK activation in the prefrontal cortex in response to D-amph. We cannot exclude a contribution of D1 receptors in the activation of ERK in specific neuronal populations of the prefrontal cortex because we reported previously that ERK activation by cocaine or other drugs of abuse was prevented in the deep layers of the prefrontal cortex by SCH23390(Valjent et al., 2004). However, the effect was localized and probably quantitatively small because it was not detected in the present study, which used immunoblotting of the whole prefrontal cortex.

    In contrast to the phosphorylation of GluR1 Ser845, the regulation of ERK seemed to require active glutamate NMDA receptors in addition to active ARs. Such a requirement has also been reported for the stimulation of ERK phosphorylation by CB1 receptors in the prefrontal cortex and in the hippocampus (Barbara et al., 2003; Derkinderen et al., 2003) and by dopamine D1 receptors in the striatum (Valjent et al., 2000). These results are consistent with the view that ERK activation is a coincidence detector that needs the combination of glutamate with other neurotransmitters (Valjent et al., 2005), the nature of which depends on brain regions: NE or endocannabinoids in prefrontal cortex, DA in the striatum, and endocannabinoids in the hippocampus. Additional mechanisms involving 5HT receptors could also contribute to ERK activation by D-amph in prefrontal cortex because it was prevented by 5HT depletion. The lack of effect of MPH on extracellular 5HT (Kuczenski and Segal, 1997) may account in part for its inability to stimulate ERK.

    Possible Functional Consequences of Stimulation of cAMP- and ERK-Controlled Signaling Pathways by -AR in the Prefrontal Cortex. Several lines of evidence suggest the implication of NE neurotransmission in the ability of psychostimulants to decrease hyperactivity and enhance attention in patients with ADHD. NE acting on -ARs modulates the firing rate of cortical neurons in a way that increases the signal-to-noise ratio, an effect which may enhance attention and arousal (Berridge and Waterhouse, 2003). Drugs such as atomoxetine, desipramine, or nortriptyline, which block NE transporter more selectively than D-amph or MPH, were reported to be useful for treating hyperactivity in ADHD (Biederman and Spencer, 1999; Bymaster et al., 2002). In rat, MPH was reported to reduce locomotion particularly during the dark (active for rat) phase of the circadian cycle when orally administered at low doses that increase extracellular NE without significantly affecting dopamine (Kuczenski and Segal, 2002). In the present study, we found that blockade of -ARs enhanced the hyperlocomotor effects of both D-amph and MPH, revealing the clear role of these receptors in the regulation of locomotor behavior in mice. This finding is consistent with previous results showing an increased response to cocaine (Harris et al., 1996) and D-amph (Vanderschuren et al., 2003) after -AR blockade in the rat. The hyperlocomotor responses to D-amph or MPH are believed to result mostly from the activation of dopamine receptors in the ventral striatum (Di Chiara and Imperato, 1988) and to require also 1b-AR and 5-HT2 receptors (Auclair et al., 2004). The present results suggest that 1-AR activation has an opposite action and tends to reduce the locomotor activity of mice. We propose that this action of 1-AR opposing locomotor activation could be particularly relevant in the context of ADHD and could contribute to the paradoxical calming effects of D-amph and MPH in this condition.

    1-AReCdependent phosphorylation of GluR1 could be directly implicated in the therapeutic effects of psychostimulants because it is induced by both D-amph and MPH, two drugs of choice for treating ADHD. GluR1 phosphorylation at Ser845 enhances the AMPA channel currents and thereby could increase neuronal activity in the prefrontal cortex (Banke et al., 2000). In addition, GluR1 phosphorylation is involved in synaptic plasticity, as demonstrated in the hippocampus, in which phosphorylation of GluR1 at Ser845 is modulated during long-term potentiation and long-term depression, and seems to regulate membrane insertion and recycling of GluR1-containing AMPA receptors (Lissin et al., 1999; Lee et al., 2003). Mice bearing point mutations in two GluR1 phosphorylation sites including Ser845 display memory defects in spatial learning tasks (Lee et al., 2003). Thus, by analogy, the increase in GluR1 phosphorylation at Ser845 produced by D-amph and MPH treatment could have positive effects on synaptic plasticity in the prefrontal cortex and on related learning processes.

    Several studies have shown that various memory tasks require the activation of ERK within specific brain regions for the consolidation of long-term memory but not for short-term memory or acquisition (Derkinderen et al., 1999; Thomas and Huganir, 2004). Long-term memory storage takes place in the prefrontal cortex and involves ERK activation (Runyan et al., 2004). It is interesting that a recent study in human subjects supports the positive role of D-amph on synaptic plasticity in the cortex (Nitsche et al., 2004). Thus, our results raise the possibility that D-ampheCinduced ERK activation mimics processes involved in long-term memory formation in the prefrontal cortex. However, this effect was apparent only with the highest dose of D-amph used and was not observed with MPH, a very effective compound for improving cognitive functions in patients with ADHD. In contrast, D-amph seems more addictive than MPH, and it is possible that the effect of D-amph on ERK is more related to its addictive properties than to its therapeutic effects. In support of this hypothesis, a common effect of numerous drugs of abuse is the activation of ERK in neurons of deep layers of the prefrontal cortex, in addition to the nucleus accumbens (Valjent et al., 2004, 2005). This activation is functionally relevant because the blockade of ERK activation in brain abolished the cocaine-conditioned place preference, a test of the rewarding properties of cocaine (Valjent et al., 2000) and D-amph (Gerdjikov et al., 2004). Although it is not possible to determine the relative contributions of prefrontal cortex and ventral striatum in these effects, these results are consistent with a role of ERK in the addictive properties of psychostimulants.

    In conclusion, the results reported here provide evidence that peripheral administration of D-amph or MPH potently activates cAMP-dependent intracellular signaling in the prefrontal cortex in vivo. This is caused by the stimulation of noradrenergic transmission, mostly through 1-AR. Our finding that 1-AR blockade potentiates the locomotor activation induced by D-amph or MPH suggests that stimulation of these receptors may contribute to the therapeutic effects of D-amph and MPH in patients with ADHD. In contrast, the activation of ERK by D-amph might be more related to its addictive properties.

    Acknowledgements

    We thank Novartis Pharma AG (Basel, Switzerland) for providing methylphenidate hydrochloride.

    V.P. was supported by Cephalon France (Maisons-Alfort, France), E.V. was supported by a Fondation pour la Recherche Meedicale fellowship, and J.-C.C. was supported by an Institut National de la Santee et de la Recheche Meedicale fellowship. This work was supported by Institut National de la Santee et de la Recheche Meedicale and by grants from Fondation pour la Recherche Meedicale, Fondation Schlumberger pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche, Fondation Liliane Betten-court, Mission Interministeerielle pour la Lutte contre la Drogue et la Toxicomanie, Action Concerteee Incitative Physiologie et Deeveloppement (to J.-A.G.).

    V.P. and E.V. contributed equally to this work.

    doi:10.1124/mol.105.011809.

    References

    Arnsten AF, Steere JC, and Hunt RD (1996) The contribution of alpha2-noradrenergic mechanisms of prefrontal cortical cognitive function. Potential significance for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 53: 448-455.

    Auclair A, Drouin C, Cotecchia S, Glowinski J, and Tassin JP (2004) 5-HT2A and alpha1b-adrenergic receptors entirely mediate dopamine release, locomotor response and behavioural sensitization to opiates and psychostimulants. Eur J Neurosci 20: 3073-3084.

    Banke TG, Bowie D, Lee H, Huganir RL, Schousboe A, and Traynelis SF (2000) Control of GluR1 AMPA receptor function by cAMP-dependent protein kinase. J Neurosci 20: 89-102.

    Barbara JG, Auclair N, Roisin MP, Otani S, Valjent E, Caboche J, Soubrie P, and Crepel F (2003) Direct and indirect interactions between cannabinoid CB1 receptor and group II metabotropic glutamate receptor signalling in layer V pyramidal neurons from the rat prefrontal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 17: 981-990.

    Berridge CW and Stalnaker TA (2002) Relationship between low-dose amphetamine-induced arousal and extracellular norepinephrine and dopamine levels within prefrontal cortex. Synapse 46: 140-149.

    Berridge CW and Waterhouse BD (2003) The locus coeruleus-noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 42: 33-84.

    Biederman J and Spencer T (1999) Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) as a noradrenergic disorder. Biol Psychiatry 46: 1234-1242.

    Bymaster FP, Katner JS, Nelson DL, Hemrick-Luecke SK, Threlkeld PG, Heiligenstein JH, Morin SM, Gehlert DR, and Perry KW (2002) Atomoxetine increases extracellular levels of norepinephrine and dopamine in prefrontal cortex of rat: a potential mechanism for efficacy in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 27: 699-711.

    Derkinderen P, Enslen H, and Girault JA (1999) The ERK/MAP-kinases cascade in the nervous system. Neuroreport 10: R24-R34.

    Derkinderen P, Valjent E, Toutant M, Corvol JC, Enslen H, Ledent C, Trzaskos J, Caboche J, and Girault JA (2003) Regulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase by cannabinoids in hippocampus. J Neurosci 23: 2371-2382.

    Di Chiara G and Imperato A (1988) Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 5274-5278.

    Ehlers MD (2000) Reinsertion or degradation of AMPA receptors determined by activity-dependent endocytic sorting. Neuron 28: 511-525.

    Florin SM, Kuczenski R, and Segal DS (1994) Regional extracellular norepinephrine responses to amphetamine and cocaine and effects of clonidine pretreatment. Brain Res 654: 53-62.

    Gainetdinov RR, Wetsel WC, Jones SR, Levin ED, Jaber M, and Caron MG (1999) Role of serotonin in the paradoxical calming effect of psychostimulants on hyperactivity. Science (Wash DC) 283: 397-401.

    Gatley SJ, Pan D, Chen R, Chaturvedi G, and Ding YS (1996) Affinities of methylphenidate derivatives for dopamine, norepinephrine and serotonin transporters. Life Sci 58: 231-239.

    Gerdjikov TV, Ross GM, and Beninger RJ (2004) Place preference induced by nucleus accumbens amphetamine is impaired by antagonists of ERK or p38 MAP kinases in rats. Behav Neurosci 118: 740-750.

    Harris GC, Hedaya MA, Pan WJ, and Kalivas P (1996) beta-adrenergic antagonism alters the behavioral and neurochemical responses to cocaine. Neuropsychopharmacology 14: 195-204.

    Kuczenski R and Segal DS (1997) Effects of methylphenidate on extracellular dopamine, serotonin and norepinephrine: comparison with amphetamine. J Neurochem 68: 2032-2037.

    Kuczenski R and Segal DS (2002) Exposure of adolescent rats to oral methylphenidate: preferential effects on extracellular norepinephrine and absence of sensitization and cross-sensitization to methamphetamine. J Neurosci 22: 7264-7271.

    Lee HK, Takamiya K, Han JS, Man H, Kim CH, Rumbaugh G, Yu S, Ding L, He C, Petralia RS, et al. (2003) Phosphorylation of the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit is required for synaptic plasticity and retention of spatial memory. Cell 112: 631-643.

    Lissin DV, Carroll RC, Nicoll RA, Malenka RC, and von Zastrow M (1999) Rapid, activation-induced redistribution of ionotropic glutamate receptors in cultured hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 19: 1263-1272.

    Nicholas AP, Hokfelt T, and Pieribone VA (1996) The distribution and significance of CNS adrenoceptors examined with in situ hybridization. Trends Pharmacol Sci 17: 245-255.

    Nitsche MA, Grundey J, Liebetanz D, Lang N, Tergau F, and Paulus W (2004) Catecholaminergic consolidation of motor cortical neuroplasticity in humans. Cereb Cortex 14: 1240-1245.

    Roche KW, O'Brien RJ, Mammen AL, Bernhardt J, and Huganir RL (1996) Characterization of multiple phosphorylation sites on the AMPA receptor GluR1 subunit. Neuron 16: 1179-1188.

    Runyan JD, Moore AN, and Dash PK (2004) A role for prefrontal cortex in memory storage for trace fear conditioning. J Neurosci 24: 1288-1295.

    Savasta M, Dubois A, and Scatton B (1986) Autoradiographic localization of D1 dopamine receptors in the rat brain with [3H]SCH 23390. Brain Res 375: 291-301.

    Snyder GL, Allen PB, Fienberg AA, Valle CG, Huganir RL, Nairn AC, and Greengard P (2000) Regulation of phosphorylation of the GluR1 AMPA receptor in the neostriatum by dopamine and psychostimulants in vivo. J Neurosci 20: 4480-4488.

    Stone EA, Manavalan JS, and Quartermain D (1996) Delayed arousal from anesthesia: a further similarity between stress and beta-1 adrenoceptor blockade. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 55: 131-133.

    Sulzer D, Chen TK, Lau YY, Kristensen H, Rayport S, and Ewing A (1995) Amphetamine redistributes dopamine from synaptic vesicles to the cytosol and promotes reverse transport. J Neurosci 15: 4102-4108.

    Svenningsson P, Tzavara ET, Carruthers R, Rachleff I, Wattler S, Nehls M, McKinzie DL, Fienberg AA, Nomikos GG, and Greengard P (2003) Diverse psychotomimetics act through a common signaling pathway. Science (Wash DC) 302: 1412-1415.

    Swanson JM and Volkow ND (2003) Serum and brain concentrations of methylphenidate: implications for use and abuse. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 27: 615-621.

    Thomas GM and Huganir RL (2004) MAPK cascade signalling and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 5: 173-183.

    Valjent E, Corvol JC, Pages C, Besson MJ, Maldonado R, and Caboche J (2000) Involvement of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase cascade for cocaine-rewarding properties. J Neurosci 20: 8701-8709.

    Valjent E, Pages C, Herve D, Girault JA, and Caboche J (2004) Addictive and non-addictive drugs induce distinct and specific patterns of ERK activation in mouse brain. Eur J Neurosci 19: 1826-1836.

    Valjent E, Pascoli V, Svenningsson P, Paul S, Enslen H, Corvol JC, Stipanovich A, Caboche J, Lombroso PJ, Nairn AC, et al. (2005) Regulation of a protein phosphatase cascade allows convergent dopamine and glutamate signals to activate ERK in the striatum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 491-496.

    Vanderschuren LJ, Beemster P, and Schoffelmeer AN (2003) On the role of noradrenaline in psychostimulant-induced psychomotor activity and sensitization. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 169: 176-185.

    Vanderschuren LJ and Kalivas PW (2000) Alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmission in the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization: a critical review of preclinical studies. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 151: 99-120.

    Wilens TE, Biederman J, and Spencer TJ (2002) Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder across the lifespan. Annu Rev Med 53: 113-131., http://www.100md.com(Vincent Pascoli, Emmanuel)