当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《新英格兰医药杂志》 > 2004年第12期 > 正文
编号:11306744
Was Rembrandt Stereoblind?
http://www.100md.com 《新英格兰医药杂志》
     To the Editor: Stereopsis is an important cue for depth perception, yet it can be a hindrance to an artist trying to depict a three-dimensional scene on a flat surface. Art teachers often instruct students to close one eye in order to flatten what they see. Therefore, stereoblindness might not be a handicap — and might even be an asset — for some artists. Stereopsis requires precise alignment of the two eyes. We examined a number of self-portraits of Rembrandt, an artist known for his astute powers of observation, and noticed that many of them show his eyes as exotropic, some to a degree that would be incompatible with normal stereopsis. We wondered whether the gaze angle of the eyes in Rembrandt's self-portraits was random or whether the gaze deviation was systematic, as it would be if he were accurately portraying a feature of his physiognomy.

    We examined high-resolution images of the oil paintings and etchings listed in a comprehensive catalogue of self-portraits spanning Rembrandt's career.1 Most show one eye gazing directly at the viewer and the other eye deviating laterally (Figure 1). We quantified this pattern in all the Rembrandt self-portraits in which both eyes can be seen well enough to estimate the position of the pupil (or the center of the iris) within the opening between the eyelids (24 oil paintings and 12 etchings). For each portrait, we aligned an ellipse with the eye contour, then aligned a circle with the circumference of the iris, and then measured the horizontal position of the circle along the eye contour. We found that Rembrandt portrayed his eyes as exotropic in 35 of the 36 self-portraits. In 23 of the 24 paintings, the eye on the right side of the painting tends to look straight ahead and the other eye deviates outward, whereas in all 12 etchings, this asymmetry is reversed (Figure 2).

    Figure 1. Self-Portrait Leaning on a Stone Wall (Detail).

    The etching was done by Rembrandt in 1639. Reprinted with the permission of the British Museum.

    Figure 2. Position of the Iris within the Eye.

    The deviation from straight ahead is expressed as a percentage of the width of the visible part of the eye. Zero represents a gaze direction of straight ahead, with the pupil centered in the eye contour; if the center of the iris deviated all the way to the edge of the visible part of the eye, the deviation would be 50 percent. If the eyes were orthotropic, the symbols would be superimposed and the deviation would reflect the gaze direction. Solid lines connect divergent eyes, and the dotted line connects convergent eyes. Means (±SEM) are indicated by large circles. The symbol pairs from bottom to top correspond to the following catalogue numbers1: 18, 26, 33, 35, 36, 37, 39, 40, 51, 54, 57, 59, 60, 65, 68, 69, 71, 73, 74, 79, 80, 81, 84, and 86 for the paintings, and 3, 11, 20, 27, 38, 41, 42, 44, 49, 53, 62, and 64 for the etchings.

    Because an etching is made by scratching lines on a metal plate that is used to make a print, what you see in the print is reversed, left to right, from what the artist drew on the plate. The fact that the eye that deviates outward in the etchings is the opposite eye from the one that deviates outward in most of the paintings suggests that Rembrandt actually did have a unilateral strabismus — otherwise, the deviating eye would be random. One oil self-portrait2 shows an asymmetry in the eyes that contradicts the pattern, so we wonder whether Rembrandt painted it from an etching, or whether it was painted by a student looking directly at Rembrandt, and not at a mirror image.

    Margaret S. Livingstone, Ph.D.

    Bevil R. Conway, Ph.D.

    Harvard Medical School

    Boston, MA 02115

    References

    White C, Buvelot Q, eds. Rembrandt by himself. London: National Gallery, 1999.

    Rembrandt HR. Self-portrait. Berlin: Staatliche Museen, 1634 (oil painting).

    Related Letters:

    Was Rembrandt Stereoblind?

    Marmor M. F., Shaikh S., Livingstone M. S., Conway B. R.