Axonal damage accumulates in the progressive phase of multiple sclerosis: three year follow up study
http://www.100md.com
《神经病学神经外科学杂志》
1 Institute of Neurology, Department of Neuroinflammation, London, UK
2 Department of Neurology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Correspondence to:
A Petzold
Institute of Neurology, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; a.petzold@ion.ucl.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
Background: Neurofilament phosphoforms (Nf) are principal components of the axoskeleton released during axonal injury. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Nf phosphoforms might be useful surrogate markers for disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), aid in distinguishing clinical subtypes, and provide valuable prognostic information.
Method: Thirty four patients with MS were included in a three year follow up study along with 318 controls with other non-inflammatory neurological diseases. CSF levels of two Nf heavy chain (NfH) phosphoforms (NfHSMI35, NfHSMI34) were quantified at baseline and three year follow up using new ELISA techniques. Levels of NfH phosphoforms, the degree of phosphorylation (NfHSMI34:NfHSMI35 ratio), and changes in NfH levels between baseline and follow up (NfH) were related to the clinical phenotype (RR or SP/PP), to three clinical scales (Kurtzke’s EDSS, ambulation index (AI), and nine hole peg test (9HPT)), and to progression of disability.
Results: A significantly higher proportion (59%) of patients with SP/PPMS experienced an increase in NfHSMI35 levels between baseline and follow up compared with those with RRMS (14%, p<0.05). CSF NfHSMI34 levels at baseline were higher in patients with SP/PP (11 pg/ml) compared with RR (7 pg/ml, p<0.05) and NfHSMI35 levels were higher at follow up in SP/PP (129 pg/ml) compared with levels below assay sensitivity in RR (p<0.05). NfHSMI35 correlated with the EDSS (rs = 0.54, p<0.01), the AI (rs = 0.42, p<0.05), and the 9HPT (rs = 0.59, p<0.01) at follow up.
Conclusion: The increase in NfH during the progressive phase of the disease together with the correlation of NfHSMI35 with all clinical scales at follow up suggests that cumulative axonal loss is responsible for sustained disability and that high NfHSMI35 levels are a poor prognostic sign.
Abbreviations: 9HPT, nine hole PEG test; AI, ambulation index; BSP, brain specific proteins; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CTRL, control; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; IEF, isoelectric focusing; MS, multiple sclerosis; Nf, neurofilament; NfH, neurofilament heavy chain; NfHSMI34, NfH detected with SMI34 antibody; NfHSMI35, NfH detected with SMI35 antibody; NfL, neurofilament light chain; OND, other neurological diseases; PP, primary progressive; RR, relapsing remitting; SP, secondary progressive
Keywords: neurofilament phosphoforms; multiple sclerosis; prognosis; disease subtype; disability; axonal injury
Axonal pathology remains the "Achilles heel" of neurology. New insights from recent studies into the "axonal death cascade"1 in multiple sclerosis (MS) are that a high number of transected axons are already present in acute lesions2,3 (independent of demyelination4), in patients with a short clinical course,2,5 and as a result of electrical activity in a hostile microenvironment.6 Axonal loss results in atrophy of the spinal cord,7 cerebellum,8 and cortex,9 all of which correlate with disability.7–9 In vivo quantification of axonal damage is a key tool for monitoring and understanding axonal pathology in complex diseases such as MS.
Neurofilaments (Nf) constitute a major component of the axoskeleton and are promising candidates for quantification of axonal damage because axonal transection results in disintegration of the distal axon membrane and Nf breakdown.10,11 Nf are released into the adjacent compartment—that is, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), where they can be measured.12,13
This prospective study was stimulated by three questions.14,15
Can clinical subtypes of MS be distinguished on the basis of axonal damage (disease heterogeneity16)?
Does disability correlate with markers of axonal pathology?
Can we predict loss of function by using biomarkers for axonal injury?
METHODS
The present study was approved by the local ethics committees, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Patients
A total of 34 patients from a previously reported cohort17,18 with clinically definite MS19 were followed up after three years. A second CSF sample was available for 29 patients at the time of study. The patients with MS were classified as having relapsing remitting (RR, n = 11), or progressive (n = 23, SP/PP) disease.20 For the CSF analysis patients with primary (PP) and secondary (SP) progressive disease were pooled because of small numbers. However, we will also present a detailed subgroup analysis for classification of patients with RR (n = 10), SP (n = 16) and PP (n = 3) MS at baseline and at follow up. Nine patients had been started on treatment with interferon beta (IFN?) since recruitment in 1996. The control group consisted of 318 patients with other non-inflammatory neurological diseases (OND) from the National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. Restricted sample volume meant not all assays could be performed on each sample and the numbers available for each comparison are presented in table 1.
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients
Clinical assessment
All patients were assessed within one week of each lumbar puncture using:
the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)21: ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis)
an ambulation index (AI): ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 9 (restricted to wheelchair without independent transfer)
the nine hole peg test (9HPT) measuring upper limb motor function.22
The patients were classified as clinically advancing if they worsened on the EDSS scale by at least 1 point for an EDSS <5.5 or at least 0.5 point for an EDSS 5.5.
Assays
Samples of CSF were obtained by routine lumbar puncture. Aliquots of CSF were stored at –70 °C until assayed. Levels of NfH phosphoforms were quantified using an in-house enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique based on commercially available antibodies.23 This ELISA has been optimised for the capture antibody SMI35 which recognises a range of NfH phosphoforms (170 kDa, pI 6.2 to 210 kDa, pI 5.1). In contrast, the capture antibody SMI34 only recognises extensively phosphorylated NfH.24 Unfortunately non-phosphorylated Nf are susceptible to proteases,24–26 of which the CSF is a rich source. For this reason NfHSMI32 was not measured in the present study and a ratio of NfHSMI34 to NfHSMI35 was used to approximate the phosphorylation status (see below). Albumin in CSF and serum was determined by standard Laurell "rocket" electroimmunoassay.
Data analysis
All statistical analyses and graphs were done using SAS software (version 8.2, SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Because of non-Gaussian distribution, median values and the 25–75% interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated. Independent variables were compared using the non-parametric two sample exact Wilcoxon’s rank sum test. If significance was based on small numbers the results were checked by the one tailed Fisher’s exact test. The linear relationship between continuous variables was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Multiple correlations were corrected using the Bonferroni method. Linear regression analysis was performed using the least squares method.
The change in NfH levels between baseline and follow up was expressed as the difference:
NfH = NfHfollow up–NfHbaseline.
A positive number indicated an increase in the NfH level at follow up. Because the interassay coefficient of variation for NfH is 10.6%, only an increase of at least 11% was considered for further statistical analysis.23
The phosphoform ratio is an estimate of the degree of phosphorylation and was expressed as a cross-sectional measure:
Ratio = (NfHSMI34/NfHSMI35)x10.
A decrease in the ratio indicated an overall reduction in the level of phosphorylation. Values with zero denominator (or NfH at baseline and follow up below assay sensitivity) could not be used for calculations and were excluded from this analysis.
RESULTS
The demographic data at baseline are shown in table 1. As expected at baseline, EDSS, AI, and 9HPT were worse in patients with SP/PP disease than in those with RR disease. The CSF levels of NfHSMI35baseline were higher in patients with OND than in those with MS (p<0.001, table 2). The CSF levels of NfHSMI34baseline were similar in both groups. No correlations were found between the Nf phosphoforms or their ratio and age, disease duration, time from last relapse, relapse frequency, or the CSF albumin:serum albumin ratio (data not shown). The shortest relapse free time was three months at baseline in two patients. At follow up one patient with SP/PPMS experienced a superimposed relapse two weeks prior to the CSF sampling. There was no correlation with time from relapse in patients with SP/PPMS or RRMS at either sampling point.
Table 2 CSF levels and ratio of NfH phosphoforms, EDSS, AI, and 9HPT at baseline in patients with MS and OND (controls), and CSF levels and ratio of NfH phosphoforms, EDSS, AI, and 9HPT, and change over time (NfH) at follow up in patients with MS. Values are median (interquartile range)
Axonal damage accumulates in SP/PP disease
A significant increase in NfHSMI35 from baseline to follow up was observed in a higher proportion of patients with SP/PPMS (13/22, 59%, fig 1) when compared with patients with RRMS (1/7, 14%, p<0.05). At follow up the median CSF level of NfHSMI35 was higher for patients with SP/PP disease compared with patients with RR disease (see table 2, p<0.05).
Figure 1 (A) CSF NfHSMI35 levels and (B) CSF NfHSMI34 levels in patients with relapsing remitting (RR) and secondary/primary progressive (SP/PP) forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). A significantly higher proportion of patients with SP/PPMS (13/22) had an increase in CSF NfHSMI35 levels between baseline and follow up (straight lines) when compared with patients with RRMS (1/7, p<0.05, Fisher’s exact test).
An increase of NfHSMI34 levels was observed in a similar proportion of patients with RR (5/7, 71%) and with SP disease (15/22, 68%). The CSF levels of NfHSMI34baseline were higher in patients with SP/PP than with RR disease (table 2, p<0.05). The proportion of patients with RR (5/7, 71%) in whom NfHSMI34 increased was higher than the proportion with an increase in NfHSMI35 (1/7, 14%, p<0.05). The NfHSMI34:NfHSMI35 ratio decreased in 6/7 (86%) of patients with RR and 12/22 (55%) with SP disease. Neither of these comparisons reached statistical significance.
Axonal injury correlates with disability
NfHSMI35 levels correlated with all three clinical scales at follow up (fig 2). The correlation was strongest for the 9HPT (rs = 0.59, p = 0.001), followed by the EDSS (rs = 0.54, p <0.01), and the AI (rs = 0.42, p<0.05). The correlation with the AI was lost after Bonferroni correction. One outlier was observed for the 9HPT (fig 2C), but its exclusion did not change the significance of the correlation (rs = 0.55, p<0.01). The NfH phosphoform ratio correlated with the EDSS (rs = 0.52, p<0.05) at follow up, but this significance was lost after the Bonferroni correction. No significant correlation was found between either NfH phosphoform and the change in EDSS, AI, or 9HPT over the three year period (data not shown). At baseline, no such correlations were found after Bonferroni correction for either of the NfH phosphoforms or their ratio.
Figure 2 Correlation between the CSF NfHSMI35 levels and (A) the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), (B) the ambulation index (AI), and (C) the 9HPT (nine hole peg test; log transformed scale) at follow up.
Axonal injury and prognosis
The median CSF NfHSMI35 level (107 pg/ml) of patients with MS who progressed on the EDSS scale within three years showed a tendency to be higher compared with the median level of those who remained stable (38 pg/ml). However, this difference did not reach statistical significance for either the total MS cohort or the clinical subtypes (table 3). However, using an arbitrary cut-off level of 20 pg/ml (assay sensitivity) on the baseline cohort, the positive predictive value of high NfHSMI35 levels for predicting progression of patients on the EDSS scale within three years was 100% for RRMS and 20% for SP/PPMS with specificity of 100% and 20% and sensitivity of 87.5% and 75%, respectively.
Table 3 CSF levels and ratio of NfH phosphoforms for clinically progressive versus stable patients at baseline. Values are median (interquartile range)
Three patients who had RR disease converted to SP disease in the three year observation period. These patients had a higher median CSF NfHSMI35baseline level (123 pg/ml) when compared with non-converting RR patients (49 pg/ml). Again this difference did not reach statistical significance.
Patients treated with IFN? had a lower median EDSS at baseline (2.0 v 5.5; p<0.05) and follow up (4.0 v 4.5; p<0.05) and were less progressive (improvement by a median of 1.5 points on the EDSS v no change; p<0.05) compared with untreated patients. The patients treated with IFN? had lower CSF NfHSMI34baseline levels (7 pg/ml) compared with non-treated patients (11 pg/ml, p <0.01). No such differences were found for NfHSMI35baseline or the NfH phosphoform ratio.
Subgroup analysis
Since there are differences in pathogenesis between SPMS and PPMS, particularly with reference to the degree of inflammation, CSF levels of NfHSMI35, NfHSMI34, and their ratio were also examined for all individual subgroups.
At baseline, there was a significant difference between these groups for NfHSMI34 (F2,26 = 5.00, p<0.05). The post hoc analysis revealed that CSF NfHSMI34 levels were higher in patients with PP disease (mean 26.6 pg/ml) compared with patients with SP (mean 10.19 pg/ml, p<0.01) or RR disease (mean 9.30 pg/ml, p<0.01).
At follow up no such difference was found, probably due to the small numbers and therefore no post hoc analysis was performed.
DISCUSSION
The present study:
provides evidence that accumulation of axonal damage as estimated by serial CSF NfHSMI35 levels predominates in SP/PPMS
reveals a correlation between CSF levels of NfHSMI35 and the degree of disability on three clinical scales (EDSS, AI, 9HPT)
failed to demonstrate that CSF NfH phosphoforms might predict the development of new disability in patients with MS.
We interpret these findings on the basis of the epidemiologically supported hypothesis that axonal damage is a gradual cumulative process during the course of the disease27,28 and that loss of neurological function is a direct consequence of axonal injury.2,14,15
Firstly, NfHSMI35 levels increased from baseline to the three year follow up sampling in about half of our patients with MS. A significantly higher proportion of these patients had SP/PP than RR disease. Additionally, the median NfHSMI35follow up level was significantly higher in SP/PP rather than in RR disease. The marked increase of NfHSMI34 levels suggests that NfH phosphorylation may increase with disease duration. This interpretation contrasts with the consistent immunocytochemical observation that injured and demyelinated axons stain for non-phosphorylated NfH (NfHSMI32).2,29–32 However, none of these studies presented quantitative data comparing the number of axons staining for phosphorylated versus non-phosphorylated NfH. A further complicating factor is that proteolytic enzyme activity is a prominent feature of the MS plaque33,34 and potentially affects the levels, particularly of non-phosphorylated NfH, which is susceptible to proteolysis.24–26 To address this question we are currently analysing the quantitative distribution of NfH phosphoforms (NfHSMI32, NfHSMI34, and NfHSMI35) in microdissected brain tissue homogenates from a previously published cohort.17,35,36 An increase in NfH phosphorylation supports our finding and can be explained by targeted phosphorylation of the KSP repeats of the NfH and NfM tail domains by ERK1/2.37 Fibrin upregulates ERK1/238 and has shown to be deposited on injured axons.35,36,39 Additionally the mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinases SAPKs and ERK1/2 are activated by glutamate40–44 which in turn leads to Ca influx, slowing of axonal Nf transport, and increased Nf phosphorylation.45,46 Glutamate toxicity is an important pathological feature in MS, metabotropic glutamate receptor group I alpha is upregulated on axons in MS29 and experimental treatment with the AMPA/kainate antagonist NBQX reduces axonal damage in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.30 The present CSF results are also consistent with the postmortem observation that axonal damage increases with time in SP/PPMS patients,47 with additional support from brain imaging48 and epidemiological studies.28
Secondly, we found a correlation between CSF NfHSMI35 and three clinical scales. This finding indirectly confirms two previous reports on a different Nf subunit (the 68 kDa light chain, NfL).12,13 Lycke et al reported CSF NfL correlated with the EDSS at baseline (r = 0.27) and follow up (r = 0.34) in patients with RRMS.12 Semra et al found CSF NfL correlated with the EDSS (r = 0.41) in patients progressive MS.13 However, no such correlations were found at baseline in our original study,18 the present follow up cohort, or a recent study on patients with RRMS and SPMS.49 Because clinically, some of our patients with SP/PP disease improved a degree of disability at baseline, it is likely that conduction block and demyelination which are, in contrast to axonal loss, reversible, contributed to the deficit.
Thirdly, a tendency for higher median CSF NfHSMI35baseline and NfHSMI34baseline levels were observed in those patients with MS who progressed clinically on the EDSS scale. This was most marked for patients with RR disease and suggests that axonal damage during the course of MS is a poor prognostic feature. However, the study failed to show statistical difference. The high positive predictive value and sensitivity suggest that this might be due to the small sample size. It is important to note that axonal loss is not the dominant pathological feature in MS compared with other neurological diseases.23,50 Nevertheless, the demonstrated slow accumulation of axonal loss seems a logical explanation for the development of sustained disability in the progressive course of the disease.
When interpreting the present data one needs to consider that the patient group is population based and the numbers small. Clinically, there was no significant change in the EDSS of the patients with SP/PPMS within three years. This represents a benign course compared with the more rapid progression observed in other cohorts of patients selected from hospital populations. Additionally the low median CSF NfHSMI35 level of the RRMS cohort at follow up would suggest that these patients might have a benign disease course. The results must be interpreted with caution and will need to be cross-validated in other longitudinal studies with different cohorts of patients.
Taking all these observations together, the results of the present study are in accordance with the current concept of progressive axonal degeneration in MS which is based on evidence from animal,51,52 human postmortem,2,3,5,36,47,53 magnetic resonance spectroscopy,54 magnetic resonance imaging,7–9,55 and epidemiological studies.28,56
In conclusion, the findings of our prospective three year study support the idea that CSF NfH phosphoforms might be valuable surrogate markers which have the potential to be used as new secondary outcome measures in trials of MS treatment.
REFERENCES
Waxman SG. Nitric oxide and the axonal death cascade. Ann Neurol 2003;53:150–3.
Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, et al. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:278–85.
Ferguson B, Matyszak MK, Esiri MM, et al. Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain 1997;120:393–9.
Bitsch A, Schuchard J, Bunkowski S, et al. Acute axonal injury in multiple sclerosis: correlation with demyelination and inflammation. Brain 2000;123:1174–83.
Bjartmar C, Kinkel RP, Kidd G, et al. Axonal loss in normal-appearing white matter in a patient with acute MS. Neurology 2001;57:1248–52.
Kapoor R, Davies M, Blaker PA, et al. Blockers of sodium and calcium entry protect axons from nitric oxide-mediated degeneration. Ann Neurol 2003;53:174–80.
Losseff NA, Webb SL, O’Riordan JI, et al. Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis. A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. Brain 1996;119:701–8.
Losseff NA, Wang L, Lai HM, et al. Progressive cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a serial MRI study. Brain 1996;119:2009–19.
Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, et al. Brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: fractional volumetric analysis of gray matter and white matter. Radiology 2001;220:606–10.
Zhai Q, Wang J, Kim A, et al. Involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the early stages of Wallerian degeneration. Neuron 2003;39:217–25.
Griffin JW, George EB, Hsieh ST, et al. Axonal degeneration and disorders of the axonal cytoskeleton. In: Waxman SG, Kocsis JD, Stys PK, eds. The axon: structure, function and pathophysiology. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995:375–90.
Lycke JN, Karlsson JE, Andersen O, et al. Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a potential marker of activity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:402–4.
Semra YK, Seidi OA, Sharief MK. Heightened intrathecal release of axonal cytoskeletal proteins in multiple sclerosis is associated with progressive disease and clinical disability. J Neuroimmunol 2002;122:132–9.
McDonald WI. Relapse, remission, and progression in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1486–7.
Waxman SG. Demyelinating diseases—new pathological insights, new therapeutic targets. N Engl J Med 1998;338:323–5.
Lucchinetti C, Bruck W, Parisi J, et al. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann Neurol 2000;47:707–17.
Petzold A, Eikelenboom MJ, Gveric D, et al. Markers for different glial cell responses in multiple sclerosis: clinical and pathological correlations. Brain 2002;125:1462–73.
Eikelenboom MJ, Petzold A, Lazeron RH, et al. Multiple sclerosis: neurofilament light chain antibodies are correlated to cerebral atrophy. Neurology 2003;60:219–23.
McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–7.
Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46:907–11.
Kurtzke JF. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52.
Kalkers NF, Bergers E, Castelijns JA, et al. Optimizing the association between disability and biological markers in MS. Neurology 2001;57:1253–8.
Petzold A, Keir G, Green AJE, et al. A specific ELISA for measuring neurofilament heavy chain phosphoforms. J Immunol Methods 2003;278:179–90.
Sternberger LA, Sternberger NH. Monoclonal antibodies distinguish phosphorylated and non phosphorylated forms of neurofilaments in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983;82:6126–30.
Goldstein ME, Sternberger NH, Sternberger LA. Phosphorylation protects neurofilaments against proteolysis. J Neuroimmunol 1987;14:149–60.
Pant HC. Dephosphorylation of neurofilament proteins enhances their susceptibility to degradation by calpain. Biochem J 1988;256:665–8.
McDonald WI, Miller DH, Barnes D. The pathological evolution of multiple sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1992;18:319–34.
Confavreux C, Vukusic S, Moreau T, et al. Relapses and progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1430–8.
Geurts JJ, Wolswijk G, Bo L, et al. Altered expression patterns of group I and II metabotropic glutamate receptors in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2003;126:1755–66.
Pitt D, Werner P, Raine CS. Glutamate excitotoxicity in a model of multiple sclerosis. Nat Med 2000;6:67–70.
Gilgun-Sherki Y, Panet H, Melamed E, et al. Riluzole suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: implications for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Brain Res 2003;989:196–204.
Werner P, Pitt D, Raine CS. Multiple sclerosis: altered glutamate homeostasis in lesions correlates with oligodendrocyte and axonal damage. Ann Neurol 2001;50:169–80.
Cuzner ML, Davison AN, Rudge P. Proteolytic enzyme activity of blood leukocytes and cerebrospinal fluid in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1978;4:337–44.
Adams CW. The onset and progression of the lesion in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1975;25:165–82.
Gveric D, Hanemaaijert R, Newcombe J, et al. Plasminogen activators in multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the inflammatory response and axonal damage. Brain 2001;124:1978–88.
Gveric D, Herrera B, Petzold A, et al. Impaired fibrinolysis in multiple sclerosis: a role for tissue plasminogen activator inhibitors. Brain 2003;126:1590–8.
Grant P, Pant HC. Neurofilament protein synthesis and phosphorylation. J Neurocytol 2000;29:843–72.
Akassoglou K, Yu WM, Akpinar P, et al. Fibrin inhibits peripheral nerve remyelination by regulating Schwann cell differentiation. Neuron 2002;33:861–75.
Akassoglou K, Kombrinck KW, Degen JL, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis protects against axonal degeneration and demyelination after sciatic nerve injury. J Cell Biol 2000;149:1157–66.
Brownlees J, Yates A, Bajaj NP, et al. Phosphorylation of neurofilament heavy chain side-arms by stress activated protein kinase-1b/jun n-terminal kinase-3. J Cell Sci 2000;113:401–7.
Kurino M, Fukunaga K, Ushio Y, et al. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in cultured rat hippocampal neurons by stimulation of glutamate receptors. J Neurochem 1995;65:1282–9.
Schwarzschild MA, Cole RL, Meyers MA, et al. Contrasting calcium dependencies of SAPK and ERK activations by glutamate in cultured striatal neurons. J Neurochem 1999;72:2248–55.
Schwarzschild MA, Cole RL, Hyman SE. Glutamate, but not dopamine, stimulates stress-activated protein kinase and AP-1-mediated transcription in striatal neurons. J Neurosci 1997;17:3455–66.
Xia Z, Dudek H, Miranti CK, et al. Calcium influx via the NMDA receptor induces immediate early gene transcription by a MAP kinase/ERK-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci 1996;16:5425–36.
Ackerley S, Grierson AJ, Brownlees J, et al. Glutamate slows axonal transport of neurofilaments in transfected neurons. J Cell Biol 2000;150:165–76.
Ackerley S, Thornhill P, Grierson AJ, et al. Neurofilament heavy chain side arm phosphorylation regulates axonal transport of neurofilaments. J Cell Biol 2003;161:489–95.
Kuhlmann T, Lingfeld G, Bitsch A, et al. Acute axonal damage in multiple sclerosis is most extensive in early disease stages and decreases over time. Brain 2002;125:2202–12.
Barkhof F. The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2002;15:239–45.
Malmestrom C, Haghighi S, Rosengren L, et al. Neurofilament light protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biological markers in MS. Neurology 2003;61:1720–5.
Petzold A, Hinds N, Keir G, et al. CSF neurofilament protein levels predict the primary pathology (axonal versus demyelinating) in Guillain–Barré syndrome. J Neurol Sci 2002;199 (suppl 1) :S119.
Petzold A, Baker D, Pryce G, et al. Quantification of neurodegeneration by measurement of brain-specific proteins. J Neuroimmunol 2003;138:45–8.
Pryce G, Ahmed Z, Hankey DJ, et al. Cannabinoids inhibit neurodegeneration in models of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2003:2191–202.
Kornek B, Storch MK, Weissert R, et al. Multiple sclerosis and chronic autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a comparative quantitative study of axonal injury in active, inactive, and remyelinated lesions. Am J Pathol 2000;157:267–76.
van Waesberghe JH, Kamphorst W, De Groot CJ, et al. Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability. Ann Neurol 1999:747–54.
Truyen L, van Waesberghe JH, van Waldervaan MA, et al. Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T1 spin echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1996;47:1469–76.
Runmarker B, Andersen O. Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with twenty-five years of follow-up. Brain 1993;116:117–34.(A Petzold1, M J Eikelenbo)
2 Department of Neurology, VU Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Correspondence to:
A Petzold
Institute of Neurology, Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK; a.petzold@ion.ucl.ac.uk
ABSTRACT
Background: Neurofilament phosphoforms (Nf) are principal components of the axoskeleton released during axonal injury. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of Nf phosphoforms might be useful surrogate markers for disability in multiple sclerosis (MS), aid in distinguishing clinical subtypes, and provide valuable prognostic information.
Method: Thirty four patients with MS were included in a three year follow up study along with 318 controls with other non-inflammatory neurological diseases. CSF levels of two Nf heavy chain (NfH) phosphoforms (NfHSMI35, NfHSMI34) were quantified at baseline and three year follow up using new ELISA techniques. Levels of NfH phosphoforms, the degree of phosphorylation (NfHSMI34:NfHSMI35 ratio), and changes in NfH levels between baseline and follow up (NfH) were related to the clinical phenotype (RR or SP/PP), to three clinical scales (Kurtzke’s EDSS, ambulation index (AI), and nine hole peg test (9HPT)), and to progression of disability.
Results: A significantly higher proportion (59%) of patients with SP/PPMS experienced an increase in NfHSMI35 levels between baseline and follow up compared with those with RRMS (14%, p<0.05). CSF NfHSMI34 levels at baseline were higher in patients with SP/PP (11 pg/ml) compared with RR (7 pg/ml, p<0.05) and NfHSMI35 levels were higher at follow up in SP/PP (129 pg/ml) compared with levels below assay sensitivity in RR (p<0.05). NfHSMI35 correlated with the EDSS (rs = 0.54, p<0.01), the AI (rs = 0.42, p<0.05), and the 9HPT (rs = 0.59, p<0.01) at follow up.
Conclusion: The increase in NfH during the progressive phase of the disease together with the correlation of NfHSMI35 with all clinical scales at follow up suggests that cumulative axonal loss is responsible for sustained disability and that high NfHSMI35 levels are a poor prognostic sign.
Abbreviations: 9HPT, nine hole PEG test; AI, ambulation index; BSP, brain specific proteins; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CTRL, control; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; IEF, isoelectric focusing; MS, multiple sclerosis; Nf, neurofilament; NfH, neurofilament heavy chain; NfHSMI34, NfH detected with SMI34 antibody; NfHSMI35, NfH detected with SMI35 antibody; NfL, neurofilament light chain; OND, other neurological diseases; PP, primary progressive; RR, relapsing remitting; SP, secondary progressive
Keywords: neurofilament phosphoforms; multiple sclerosis; prognosis; disease subtype; disability; axonal injury
Axonal pathology remains the "Achilles heel" of neurology. New insights from recent studies into the "axonal death cascade"1 in multiple sclerosis (MS) are that a high number of transected axons are already present in acute lesions2,3 (independent of demyelination4), in patients with a short clinical course,2,5 and as a result of electrical activity in a hostile microenvironment.6 Axonal loss results in atrophy of the spinal cord,7 cerebellum,8 and cortex,9 all of which correlate with disability.7–9 In vivo quantification of axonal damage is a key tool for monitoring and understanding axonal pathology in complex diseases such as MS.
Neurofilaments (Nf) constitute a major component of the axoskeleton and are promising candidates for quantification of axonal damage because axonal transection results in disintegration of the distal axon membrane and Nf breakdown.10,11 Nf are released into the adjacent compartment—that is, the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), where they can be measured.12,13
This prospective study was stimulated by three questions.14,15
Can clinical subtypes of MS be distinguished on the basis of axonal damage (disease heterogeneity16)?
Does disability correlate with markers of axonal pathology?
Can we predict loss of function by using biomarkers for axonal injury?
METHODS
The present study was approved by the local ethics committees, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Patients
A total of 34 patients from a previously reported cohort17,18 with clinically definite MS19 were followed up after three years. A second CSF sample was available for 29 patients at the time of study. The patients with MS were classified as having relapsing remitting (RR, n = 11), or progressive (n = 23, SP/PP) disease.20 For the CSF analysis patients with primary (PP) and secondary (SP) progressive disease were pooled because of small numbers. However, we will also present a detailed subgroup analysis for classification of patients with RR (n = 10), SP (n = 16) and PP (n = 3) MS at baseline and at follow up. Nine patients had been started on treatment with interferon beta (IFN?) since recruitment in 1996. The control group consisted of 318 patients with other non-inflammatory neurological diseases (OND) from the National Hospital of Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK. Restricted sample volume meant not all assays could be performed on each sample and the numbers available for each comparison are presented in table 1.
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patients
Clinical assessment
All patients were assessed within one week of each lumbar puncture using:
the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)21: ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis)
an ambulation index (AI): ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 9 (restricted to wheelchair without independent transfer)
the nine hole peg test (9HPT) measuring upper limb motor function.22
The patients were classified as clinically advancing if they worsened on the EDSS scale by at least 1 point for an EDSS <5.5 or at least 0.5 point for an EDSS 5.5.
Assays
Samples of CSF were obtained by routine lumbar puncture. Aliquots of CSF were stored at –70 °C until assayed. Levels of NfH phosphoforms were quantified using an in-house enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique based on commercially available antibodies.23 This ELISA has been optimised for the capture antibody SMI35 which recognises a range of NfH phosphoforms (170 kDa, pI 6.2 to 210 kDa, pI 5.1). In contrast, the capture antibody SMI34 only recognises extensively phosphorylated NfH.24 Unfortunately non-phosphorylated Nf are susceptible to proteases,24–26 of which the CSF is a rich source. For this reason NfHSMI32 was not measured in the present study and a ratio of NfHSMI34 to NfHSMI35 was used to approximate the phosphorylation status (see below). Albumin in CSF and serum was determined by standard Laurell "rocket" electroimmunoassay.
Data analysis
All statistical analyses and graphs were done using SAS software (version 8.2, SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). Because of non-Gaussian distribution, median values and the 25–75% interquartile ranges (IQR) were calculated. Independent variables were compared using the non-parametric two sample exact Wilcoxon’s rank sum test. If significance was based on small numbers the results were checked by the one tailed Fisher’s exact test. The linear relationship between continuous variables was evaluated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. Multiple correlations were corrected using the Bonferroni method. Linear regression analysis was performed using the least squares method.
The change in NfH levels between baseline and follow up was expressed as the difference:
NfH = NfHfollow up–NfHbaseline.
A positive number indicated an increase in the NfH level at follow up. Because the interassay coefficient of variation for NfH is 10.6%, only an increase of at least 11% was considered for further statistical analysis.23
The phosphoform ratio is an estimate of the degree of phosphorylation and was expressed as a cross-sectional measure:
Ratio = (NfHSMI34/NfHSMI35)x10.
A decrease in the ratio indicated an overall reduction in the level of phosphorylation. Values with zero denominator (or NfH at baseline and follow up below assay sensitivity) could not be used for calculations and were excluded from this analysis.
RESULTS
The demographic data at baseline are shown in table 1. As expected at baseline, EDSS, AI, and 9HPT were worse in patients with SP/PP disease than in those with RR disease. The CSF levels of NfHSMI35baseline were higher in patients with OND than in those with MS (p<0.001, table 2). The CSF levels of NfHSMI34baseline were similar in both groups. No correlations were found between the Nf phosphoforms or their ratio and age, disease duration, time from last relapse, relapse frequency, or the CSF albumin:serum albumin ratio (data not shown). The shortest relapse free time was three months at baseline in two patients. At follow up one patient with SP/PPMS experienced a superimposed relapse two weeks prior to the CSF sampling. There was no correlation with time from relapse in patients with SP/PPMS or RRMS at either sampling point.
Table 2 CSF levels and ratio of NfH phosphoforms, EDSS, AI, and 9HPT at baseline in patients with MS and OND (controls), and CSF levels and ratio of NfH phosphoforms, EDSS, AI, and 9HPT, and change over time (NfH) at follow up in patients with MS. Values are median (interquartile range)
Axonal damage accumulates in SP/PP disease
A significant increase in NfHSMI35 from baseline to follow up was observed in a higher proportion of patients with SP/PPMS (13/22, 59%, fig 1) when compared with patients with RRMS (1/7, 14%, p<0.05). At follow up the median CSF level of NfHSMI35 was higher for patients with SP/PP disease compared with patients with RR disease (see table 2, p<0.05).
Figure 1 (A) CSF NfHSMI35 levels and (B) CSF NfHSMI34 levels in patients with relapsing remitting (RR) and secondary/primary progressive (SP/PP) forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). A significantly higher proportion of patients with SP/PPMS (13/22) had an increase in CSF NfHSMI35 levels between baseline and follow up (straight lines) when compared with patients with RRMS (1/7, p<0.05, Fisher’s exact test).
An increase of NfHSMI34 levels was observed in a similar proportion of patients with RR (5/7, 71%) and with SP disease (15/22, 68%). The CSF levels of NfHSMI34baseline were higher in patients with SP/PP than with RR disease (table 2, p<0.05). The proportion of patients with RR (5/7, 71%) in whom NfHSMI34 increased was higher than the proportion with an increase in NfHSMI35 (1/7, 14%, p<0.05). The NfHSMI34:NfHSMI35 ratio decreased in 6/7 (86%) of patients with RR and 12/22 (55%) with SP disease. Neither of these comparisons reached statistical significance.
Axonal injury correlates with disability
NfHSMI35 levels correlated with all three clinical scales at follow up (fig 2). The correlation was strongest for the 9HPT (rs = 0.59, p = 0.001), followed by the EDSS (rs = 0.54, p <0.01), and the AI (rs = 0.42, p<0.05). The correlation with the AI was lost after Bonferroni correction. One outlier was observed for the 9HPT (fig 2C), but its exclusion did not change the significance of the correlation (rs = 0.55, p<0.01). The NfH phosphoform ratio correlated with the EDSS (rs = 0.52, p<0.05) at follow up, but this significance was lost after the Bonferroni correction. No significant correlation was found between either NfH phosphoform and the change in EDSS, AI, or 9HPT over the three year period (data not shown). At baseline, no such correlations were found after Bonferroni correction for either of the NfH phosphoforms or their ratio.
Figure 2 Correlation between the CSF NfHSMI35 levels and (A) the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), (B) the ambulation index (AI), and (C) the 9HPT (nine hole peg test; log transformed scale) at follow up.
Axonal injury and prognosis
The median CSF NfHSMI35 level (107 pg/ml) of patients with MS who progressed on the EDSS scale within three years showed a tendency to be higher compared with the median level of those who remained stable (38 pg/ml). However, this difference did not reach statistical significance for either the total MS cohort or the clinical subtypes (table 3). However, using an arbitrary cut-off level of 20 pg/ml (assay sensitivity) on the baseline cohort, the positive predictive value of high NfHSMI35 levels for predicting progression of patients on the EDSS scale within three years was 100% for RRMS and 20% for SP/PPMS with specificity of 100% and 20% and sensitivity of 87.5% and 75%, respectively.
Table 3 CSF levels and ratio of NfH phosphoforms for clinically progressive versus stable patients at baseline. Values are median (interquartile range)
Three patients who had RR disease converted to SP disease in the three year observation period. These patients had a higher median CSF NfHSMI35baseline level (123 pg/ml) when compared with non-converting RR patients (49 pg/ml). Again this difference did not reach statistical significance.
Patients treated with IFN? had a lower median EDSS at baseline (2.0 v 5.5; p<0.05) and follow up (4.0 v 4.5; p<0.05) and were less progressive (improvement by a median of 1.5 points on the EDSS v no change; p<0.05) compared with untreated patients. The patients treated with IFN? had lower CSF NfHSMI34baseline levels (7 pg/ml) compared with non-treated patients (11 pg/ml, p <0.01). No such differences were found for NfHSMI35baseline or the NfH phosphoform ratio.
Subgroup analysis
Since there are differences in pathogenesis between SPMS and PPMS, particularly with reference to the degree of inflammation, CSF levels of NfHSMI35, NfHSMI34, and their ratio were also examined for all individual subgroups.
At baseline, there was a significant difference between these groups for NfHSMI34 (F2,26 = 5.00, p<0.05). The post hoc analysis revealed that CSF NfHSMI34 levels were higher in patients with PP disease (mean 26.6 pg/ml) compared with patients with SP (mean 10.19 pg/ml, p<0.01) or RR disease (mean 9.30 pg/ml, p<0.01).
At follow up no such difference was found, probably due to the small numbers and therefore no post hoc analysis was performed.
DISCUSSION
The present study:
provides evidence that accumulation of axonal damage as estimated by serial CSF NfHSMI35 levels predominates in SP/PPMS
reveals a correlation between CSF levels of NfHSMI35 and the degree of disability on three clinical scales (EDSS, AI, 9HPT)
failed to demonstrate that CSF NfH phosphoforms might predict the development of new disability in patients with MS.
We interpret these findings on the basis of the epidemiologically supported hypothesis that axonal damage is a gradual cumulative process during the course of the disease27,28 and that loss of neurological function is a direct consequence of axonal injury.2,14,15
Firstly, NfHSMI35 levels increased from baseline to the three year follow up sampling in about half of our patients with MS. A significantly higher proportion of these patients had SP/PP than RR disease. Additionally, the median NfHSMI35follow up level was significantly higher in SP/PP rather than in RR disease. The marked increase of NfHSMI34 levels suggests that NfH phosphorylation may increase with disease duration. This interpretation contrasts with the consistent immunocytochemical observation that injured and demyelinated axons stain for non-phosphorylated NfH (NfHSMI32).2,29–32 However, none of these studies presented quantitative data comparing the number of axons staining for phosphorylated versus non-phosphorylated NfH. A further complicating factor is that proteolytic enzyme activity is a prominent feature of the MS plaque33,34 and potentially affects the levels, particularly of non-phosphorylated NfH, which is susceptible to proteolysis.24–26 To address this question we are currently analysing the quantitative distribution of NfH phosphoforms (NfHSMI32, NfHSMI34, and NfHSMI35) in microdissected brain tissue homogenates from a previously published cohort.17,35,36 An increase in NfH phosphorylation supports our finding and can be explained by targeted phosphorylation of the KSP repeats of the NfH and NfM tail domains by ERK1/2.37 Fibrin upregulates ERK1/238 and has shown to be deposited on injured axons.35,36,39 Additionally the mitogen activated protein (MAP) kinases SAPKs and ERK1/2 are activated by glutamate40–44 which in turn leads to Ca influx, slowing of axonal Nf transport, and increased Nf phosphorylation.45,46 Glutamate toxicity is an important pathological feature in MS, metabotropic glutamate receptor group I alpha is upregulated on axons in MS29 and experimental treatment with the AMPA/kainate antagonist NBQX reduces axonal damage in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.30 The present CSF results are also consistent with the postmortem observation that axonal damage increases with time in SP/PPMS patients,47 with additional support from brain imaging48 and epidemiological studies.28
Secondly, we found a correlation between CSF NfHSMI35 and three clinical scales. This finding indirectly confirms two previous reports on a different Nf subunit (the 68 kDa light chain, NfL).12,13 Lycke et al reported CSF NfL correlated with the EDSS at baseline (r = 0.27) and follow up (r = 0.34) in patients with RRMS.12 Semra et al found CSF NfL correlated with the EDSS (r = 0.41) in patients progressive MS.13 However, no such correlations were found at baseline in our original study,18 the present follow up cohort, or a recent study on patients with RRMS and SPMS.49 Because clinically, some of our patients with SP/PP disease improved a degree of disability at baseline, it is likely that conduction block and demyelination which are, in contrast to axonal loss, reversible, contributed to the deficit.
Thirdly, a tendency for higher median CSF NfHSMI35baseline and NfHSMI34baseline levels were observed in those patients with MS who progressed clinically on the EDSS scale. This was most marked for patients with RR disease and suggests that axonal damage during the course of MS is a poor prognostic feature. However, the study failed to show statistical difference. The high positive predictive value and sensitivity suggest that this might be due to the small sample size. It is important to note that axonal loss is not the dominant pathological feature in MS compared with other neurological diseases.23,50 Nevertheless, the demonstrated slow accumulation of axonal loss seems a logical explanation for the development of sustained disability in the progressive course of the disease.
When interpreting the present data one needs to consider that the patient group is population based and the numbers small. Clinically, there was no significant change in the EDSS of the patients with SP/PPMS within three years. This represents a benign course compared with the more rapid progression observed in other cohorts of patients selected from hospital populations. Additionally the low median CSF NfHSMI35 level of the RRMS cohort at follow up would suggest that these patients might have a benign disease course. The results must be interpreted with caution and will need to be cross-validated in other longitudinal studies with different cohorts of patients.
Taking all these observations together, the results of the present study are in accordance with the current concept of progressive axonal degeneration in MS which is based on evidence from animal,51,52 human postmortem,2,3,5,36,47,53 magnetic resonance spectroscopy,54 magnetic resonance imaging,7–9,55 and epidemiological studies.28,56
In conclusion, the findings of our prospective three year study support the idea that CSF NfH phosphoforms might be valuable surrogate markers which have the potential to be used as new secondary outcome measures in trials of MS treatment.
REFERENCES
Waxman SG. Nitric oxide and the axonal death cascade. Ann Neurol 2003;53:150–3.
Trapp BD, Peterson J, Ransohoff RM, et al. Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 1998;338:278–85.
Ferguson B, Matyszak MK, Esiri MM, et al. Axonal damage in acute multiple sclerosis lesions. Brain 1997;120:393–9.
Bitsch A, Schuchard J, Bunkowski S, et al. Acute axonal injury in multiple sclerosis: correlation with demyelination and inflammation. Brain 2000;123:1174–83.
Bjartmar C, Kinkel RP, Kidd G, et al. Axonal loss in normal-appearing white matter in a patient with acute MS. Neurology 2001;57:1248–52.
Kapoor R, Davies M, Blaker PA, et al. Blockers of sodium and calcium entry protect axons from nitric oxide-mediated degeneration. Ann Neurol 2003;53:174–80.
Losseff NA, Webb SL, O’Riordan JI, et al. Spinal cord atrophy and disability in multiple sclerosis. A new reproducible and sensitive MRI method with potential to monitor disease progression. Brain 1996;119:701–8.
Losseff NA, Wang L, Lai HM, et al. Progressive cerebral atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a serial MRI study. Brain 1996;119:2009–19.
Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, et al. Brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: fractional volumetric analysis of gray matter and white matter. Radiology 2001;220:606–10.
Zhai Q, Wang J, Kim A, et al. Involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the early stages of Wallerian degeneration. Neuron 2003;39:217–25.
Griffin JW, George EB, Hsieh ST, et al. Axonal degeneration and disorders of the axonal cytoskeleton. In: Waxman SG, Kocsis JD, Stys PK, eds. The axon: structure, function and pathophysiology. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995:375–90.
Lycke JN, Karlsson JE, Andersen O, et al. Neurofilament protein in cerebrospinal fluid: a potential marker of activity in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:402–4.
Semra YK, Seidi OA, Sharief MK. Heightened intrathecal release of axonal cytoskeletal proteins in multiple sclerosis is associated with progressive disease and clinical disability. J Neuroimmunol 2002;122:132–9.
McDonald WI. Relapse, remission, and progression in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1486–7.
Waxman SG. Demyelinating diseases—new pathological insights, new therapeutic targets. N Engl J Med 1998;338:323–5.
Lucchinetti C, Bruck W, Parisi J, et al. Heterogeneity of multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the pathogenesis of demyelination. Ann Neurol 2000;47:707–17.
Petzold A, Eikelenboom MJ, Gveric D, et al. Markers for different glial cell responses in multiple sclerosis: clinical and pathological correlations. Brain 2002;125:1462–73.
Eikelenboom MJ, Petzold A, Lazeron RH, et al. Multiple sclerosis: neurofilament light chain antibodies are correlated to cerebral atrophy. Neurology 2003;60:219–23.
McDonald WI, Compston A, Edan G, et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50:121–7.
Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996;46:907–11.
Kurtzke JF. Rating neurological impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444–52.
Kalkers NF, Bergers E, Castelijns JA, et al. Optimizing the association between disability and biological markers in MS. Neurology 2001;57:1253–8.
Petzold A, Keir G, Green AJE, et al. A specific ELISA for measuring neurofilament heavy chain phosphoforms. J Immunol Methods 2003;278:179–90.
Sternberger LA, Sternberger NH. Monoclonal antibodies distinguish phosphorylated and non phosphorylated forms of neurofilaments in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983;82:6126–30.
Goldstein ME, Sternberger NH, Sternberger LA. Phosphorylation protects neurofilaments against proteolysis. J Neuroimmunol 1987;14:149–60.
Pant HC. Dephosphorylation of neurofilament proteins enhances their susceptibility to degradation by calpain. Biochem J 1988;256:665–8.
McDonald WI, Miller DH, Barnes D. The pathological evolution of multiple sclerosis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1992;18:319–34.
Confavreux C, Vukusic S, Moreau T, et al. Relapses and progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000;343:1430–8.
Geurts JJ, Wolswijk G, Bo L, et al. Altered expression patterns of group I and II metabotropic glutamate receptors in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2003;126:1755–66.
Pitt D, Werner P, Raine CS. Glutamate excitotoxicity in a model of multiple sclerosis. Nat Med 2000;6:67–70.
Gilgun-Sherki Y, Panet H, Melamed E, et al. Riluzole suppresses experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: implications for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Brain Res 2003;989:196–204.
Werner P, Pitt D, Raine CS. Multiple sclerosis: altered glutamate homeostasis in lesions correlates with oligodendrocyte and axonal damage. Ann Neurol 2001;50:169–80.
Cuzner ML, Davison AN, Rudge P. Proteolytic enzyme activity of blood leukocytes and cerebrospinal fluid in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1978;4:337–44.
Adams CW. The onset and progression of the lesion in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 1975;25:165–82.
Gveric D, Hanemaaijert R, Newcombe J, et al. Plasminogen activators in multiple sclerosis lesions: implications for the inflammatory response and axonal damage. Brain 2001;124:1978–88.
Gveric D, Herrera B, Petzold A, et al. Impaired fibrinolysis in multiple sclerosis: a role for tissue plasminogen activator inhibitors. Brain 2003;126:1590–8.
Grant P, Pant HC. Neurofilament protein synthesis and phosphorylation. J Neurocytol 2000;29:843–72.
Akassoglou K, Yu WM, Akpinar P, et al. Fibrin inhibits peripheral nerve remyelination by regulating Schwann cell differentiation. Neuron 2002;33:861–75.
Akassoglou K, Kombrinck KW, Degen JL, et al. Tissue plasminogen activator-mediated fibrinolysis protects against axonal degeneration and demyelination after sciatic nerve injury. J Cell Biol 2000;149:1157–66.
Brownlees J, Yates A, Bajaj NP, et al. Phosphorylation of neurofilament heavy chain side-arms by stress activated protein kinase-1b/jun n-terminal kinase-3. J Cell Sci 2000;113:401–7.
Kurino M, Fukunaga K, Ushio Y, et al. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase in cultured rat hippocampal neurons by stimulation of glutamate receptors. J Neurochem 1995;65:1282–9.
Schwarzschild MA, Cole RL, Meyers MA, et al. Contrasting calcium dependencies of SAPK and ERK activations by glutamate in cultured striatal neurons. J Neurochem 1999;72:2248–55.
Schwarzschild MA, Cole RL, Hyman SE. Glutamate, but not dopamine, stimulates stress-activated protein kinase and AP-1-mediated transcription in striatal neurons. J Neurosci 1997;17:3455–66.
Xia Z, Dudek H, Miranti CK, et al. Calcium influx via the NMDA receptor induces immediate early gene transcription by a MAP kinase/ERK-dependent mechanism. J Neurosci 1996;16:5425–36.
Ackerley S, Grierson AJ, Brownlees J, et al. Glutamate slows axonal transport of neurofilaments in transfected neurons. J Cell Biol 2000;150:165–76.
Ackerley S, Thornhill P, Grierson AJ, et al. Neurofilament heavy chain side arm phosphorylation regulates axonal transport of neurofilaments. J Cell Biol 2003;161:489–95.
Kuhlmann T, Lingfeld G, Bitsch A, et al. Acute axonal damage in multiple sclerosis is most extensive in early disease stages and decreases over time. Brain 2002;125:2202–12.
Barkhof F. The clinico-radiological paradox in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2002;15:239–45.
Malmestrom C, Haghighi S, Rosengren L, et al. Neurofilament light protein and glial fibrillary acidic protein as biological markers in MS. Neurology 2003;61:1720–5.
Petzold A, Hinds N, Keir G, et al. CSF neurofilament protein levels predict the primary pathology (axonal versus demyelinating) in Guillain–Barré syndrome. J Neurol Sci 2002;199 (suppl 1) :S119.
Petzold A, Baker D, Pryce G, et al. Quantification of neurodegeneration by measurement of brain-specific proteins. J Neuroimmunol 2003;138:45–8.
Pryce G, Ahmed Z, Hankey DJ, et al. Cannabinoids inhibit neurodegeneration in models of multiple sclerosis. Brain 2003:2191–202.
Kornek B, Storch MK, Weissert R, et al. Multiple sclerosis and chronic autoimmune encephalomyelitis: a comparative quantitative study of axonal injury in active, inactive, and remyelinated lesions. Am J Pathol 2000;157:267–76.
van Waesberghe JH, Kamphorst W, De Groot CJ, et al. Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability. Ann Neurol 1999:747–54.
Truyen L, van Waesberghe JH, van Waldervaan MA, et al. Accumulation of hypointense lesions ("black holes") on T1 spin echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1996;47:1469–76.
Runmarker B, Andersen O. Prognostic factors in a multiple sclerosis incidence cohort with twenty-five years of follow-up. Brain 1993;116:117–34.(A Petzold1, M J Eikelenbo)