当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《毒物学科学杂志》 > 2005年第2期 > 正文
编号:11409362
Use of a Rainbow Trout Oligonucleotide Microarray to Determine Transcr
http://www.100md.com 《毒物学科学杂志》
     Department of Environmental & Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

    Marine & Freshwater Biomedical Sciences Center, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

    The Linus Pauling Institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

    Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

    Center for Gene Research and Biotechnology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331

    ABSTRACT

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide, and its occurrence is associated with a number of environmental factors including ingestion of the dietary contaminant aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). Research over the last 40 years has revealed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) to be an excellent research model for study of AFB1-induced hepatocarcinogenesis; however, little is known about changes at the molecular level in trout tumors. We have developed a rainbow trout oligonucleotide array containing 1672 elements representing over 1400 genes of known or probable relevance to toxicology, comparative immunology, carcinogenesis, endocrinology, and stress physiology. In this study, we applied microarray technology to examine gene expression of AFB1-induced HCC in the rainbow trout tumor model. Carcinogenesis was initiated in trout embryos with 50 ppb AFB1, and after 13 months control livers, tumors, and tumor-adjacent liver tissues were isolated from juvenile fish. Global gene expression was determined in histologically confirmed HCCs compared to noncancerous adjacent tissue and sham-initiated control liver. We observed distinct gene regulation patterns in HCC compared to noncancerous tissue including upregulation of genes important for cell cycle control, transcription, cytoskeletal formation, and the acute phase response and downregulation of genes involved in drug metabolism, lipid metabolism, and retinol metabolism. Interestingly, the expression profiles observed in trout HCC are similar to the transcriptional signatures found in human and rodent HCC, further supporting the validity of the model. Overall, these findings contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism of AFB1-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in trout and identify conserved genes important for carcinogenesis in species separated evolutionarily by more than 400 million years.

    Key Words: hepatocellular carcinoma; aflatoxin B1; rainbow trout; oligonucleotide microarray; gene regulation.

    INTRODUCTION

    Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignancies in humans worldwide, particularly in Southeast Asia, Japan, and Africa. Even the relatively low incidence of HCC in the United States is rising and exhibits the fastest increase among solid tumors (El-Serag and Mason, 1999). The prevalence of HCC has been correlated with a number of environmental factors including chronic inflammatory liver diseases caused by viral infection and dietary exposure to aflatoxin B1 (AFB1), a fungal metabolite that contaminates grain and legume supplies in the same parts of the world. Aflatoxin B1 is a potent carcinogen in certain animal models, and epidemiological studies support the conclusion that it is also hepatocarcinogenic in humans (Chen et al., 1996; Groopman et al., 1996). Despite the fact that HCC is one of the few human cancers with known etiology, the molecular mechanisms involved in tumorigenesis are poorly understood and have only recently been investigated (Choi et al., 2004; Graveel et al., 2001; Meyer et al., 2003; Okabe et al., 2001).

    The carcinogenicity of aflatoxins was first recognized in rainbow trout (Sinnhuber et al., 1968), which have subsequently proven to be an excellent research model for the study of human hepatocarcinogenesis induced by AFB1 and other environmental carcinogens. The strengths of the trout model include its sensitivity to many classes of carcinogens, low spontaneous background tumor incidence, and low-cost husbandry for large-scale statistically valuable studies. More importantly, certain mechanisms of carcinogenesis have been well characterized in trout, including carcinogen metabolism, DNA adduction and repair, oncogene activation, and tumor pathology (reviewed by Bailey et al., 1996). Results from the study of tumor promotion and chemoprevention by environmental and dietary factors in AFB1-initiated trout (Breinholt et al., 1995; Oganesian et al., 1999) have also been confirmed and extended in rodent studies (Manson et al., 1998; Stoner et al., 2002), as well as human clinical intervention trials (Egner et al., 2001). At present, however, the molecular mechanisms involved during tumorigenesis have not been described in trout and are not well understood in lower vertebrate models in general.

    In this study, we describe construction of a custom rainbow trout 70-mer oligonucleotide array containing genes important for carcinogenesis, immunology, environmental toxicology, stress physiology, and endocrinology. Trout are a well-established and sensitive model for the evaluation of these different processes, and existence of an array targeted to these mechanisms will provide a powerful tool with which to evaluate global molecular changes in the trout model. We applied the arrays to assess molecular changes in trout tumorigenesis by examining transcriptional patterns in AFB1-induced HCC compared to noncancerous adjacent liver and sham-initiated control liver. Transcriptional changes observed in this study were interpreted within the context of previously compiled data for pathological, physiological, and biochemical changes during carcinogenesis. Recent studies have suggested that comparative analyses of gene profiles across diverse species are more likely to highlight functional gene interactions important in key mechanisms of carcinogenesis (Segal et al., 2005). Global analysis of molecular signatures in trout tumors not only provided information about these processes in an important model for environmental carcinogenesis, but also the analyses were extended to identify mechanisms of tumorigenesis conserved throughout vertebrate evolution by comparing gene profiles in trout HCC with rodent and human HCC. Overall, we observed regulation of genes in a number of distinct functional classes important for carcinogenesis in trout, some of which indicate trout as a relevant model for invasive cancers and chronic inflammatory liver disease.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Experimental animals and treatments.

    Mt. Shasta strain rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) were hatched and reared at the Oregon State University Sinnhuber Aquatic Research Laboratory in 14°C carbon-filtered flowing well water on a 12:12 h light:dark cycle. All animal protocols were performed in accordance with Oregon State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Approximately 400 embryos were initiated at 21 days post-fertilization with an aqueous exposure of 50 ppb AFB1 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 30 min. Sham-exposed embryos were exposed to vehicle alone (0.01% ethanol) and served as non-initiated controls. After hatching, fry were fed Oregon Test Diet, a semi-purified casein-based diet, ad libitum (2.8–5.6% body wt) 5 days per week for 50 weeks (Lee et al., 1991). Initiated and sham-exposed fish were maintained separately at a density of 100 fish per 400 l tank under the same conditions as described for rearing. At 13 months of age, trout were sampled for liver tumors over a 2-day period.

    Necropsy and histopathology.

    At termination, fish were euthanized by deep anesthesia with 250 ppm tricaine methanesulfonate. Fish body weights were recorded and livers were removed, weighed, and inspected for neoplasms under a dissecting microscope. After the size and location of all surface tumors was marked, a portion of each tumor and 100–200 mg of adjacent liver tissue were collected, placed separately in TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), and quick frozen in liquid nitrogen for gene expression analysis. Precautions were taken to avoid contamination of adjacent liver samples with tumor tissue, and samples were frozen within minutes of removal. The remaining liver was fixed in Bouin's solution for 2–7 days for histological analysis. Fixed livers were then cut into 1-mm slices with a razor blade to retrieve previously marked tumors. At least one piece of liver from each tumor-bearing fish was then processed by routine histological evaluation and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Neoplasms were classified by the criteria of Hendricks et al. (1984) as either HCC or mixed carcinoma, and only HCC tumors were used for microarray analysis.

    Microarray construction and quality control.

    A rainbow trout 70-mer oligonucleotide array (OSUrbt ver. 2.0) containing 1672 elements representing approximately 1400 genes was created at Oregon State University (see Table 1 of the Supplementary Data online; also see http://www.science.oregonstate.edu/mfbsc/facility/micro.htm). Human sequences known to be involved in the physiological processes of carcinogenesis, immunology, endocrinology, toxicology, and other stress responses were chosen for the array based on several methods, including interrogation of literature, use of commercially available targeted microarray gene lists, and consultation of experts in respective fields for additional genes relevant for each process. The human full-length amino acid sequences for each gene were then blasted (tBLASTn) into GenBank and The Institute for Genome Research (TIGR) rainbow trout database (http://www.tigr.org/tdb/tgi/rtgi). Trout sequences with an E-value <10–10 were chosen as putative homologs. Oligonucleotides of 70 bases were designed for unique regions of each gene using ProbeSelect (Li and Stormo, 2001). Other oligonucleotide design considerations to minimize cross-hybridizations included proximity to the 3' end of the gene, avoidance of internal self-annealing structures, and a narrow Tm range across the entire oligonucleotide set. For each gene, at least one 70-mer oligonucleotide was selected; however, for several genes, more than one distinct 70-mer oligonucleotide was included in the array. Oligonucleotides were synthesized by Operon Technologies (Alameda, CA) and Sigma Genosys (The Woodlands, TX).

    Oligonucleotides were resuspended in spotting buffer (3x SSC and 1.5 M betaine) at 25 μM final concentration and were printed onto Corning UltraGap slides (Acton, MA) using a Biorobotics Microgrid II arrayer (Genomic Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI) with 16 pins. The trout 70-mer oligonucleotides were each printed in duplicate, and a set of 10 SpotReport Alien Oligos (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) were printed 16 times (once per block) on the array. Buffer-only spots were included as negative controls. Test hybridizations of samples without alien spiking controls indicated that experimental cDNA does not cross-hybridize to alien spots on the array. After printing, slides were desiccated for 24–48 h and cross-linked with UV Stratalinker (Stratagene) at 600 mJ. Desiccation was chosen over baking as a post-processing method for drying slides, based on resulting spot quality as determined by morphology and spot criteria in test hybridizations (data not shown). To assess printing quality and oligonucleotide retention, all slides were scanned for red reflectance using a ScanArray 4000 scanner (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA), and at least one slide from each printing was stained with Syto 61 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and scanned at 633 nm. Slides were stored under desiccation for no longer than 6 months prior to use.

    RNA isolation.

    Total RNA was isolated from three individual trout HCC tumors and from corresponding adjacent liver tissue using TRIzol Reagent, followed by clean-up with RNeasy Mini Kits (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. RNA was isolated from only those tumors that were histologically identified as HCC and that were of adequate size to yield at least 20 μg total RNA. RNA was also isolated from individual livers of 10 sham-initiated trout, and aliquots were pooled in equal amounts (μg) for use as a reference sample. RNA quality and quantity were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometric absorbance at 260/280 nm.

    Microarray hybridization and analysis.

    Hybridizations were performed with the Genisphere Array 350 kit and instructions (Hatfield, PA) using standard reference design with dye-swapping. Briefly, 7 μg total RNA were reverse-transcribed with Superscript II (Invitrogen) using the Genisphere oligo d(T) primer containing a capture sequence for the Cy3 or Cy5 labelling reagents. Each reaction was spiked with a range of concentrations (0.0049 – 2.5 ng/μl) of the 10 SpotReport Alien Oligo controls (Stratagene). Each cDNA sample containing the capture sequence for the Cy3 or Cy5 label was combined with equal amounts of reference cDNA (pooled from sham-initiated controls) containing the capture sequence for the opposite label. cDNA from two of the three biological replicates were dye-swapped and hybridized to two slides as technical replicates. cDNA from the reference sample was also hybridized to dye-swapped slides (against itself) following the same protocol as experimental samples for use as a negative control. Prior to hybridization, microarrays were processed post-printing by washing twice in 0.1% SDS for 5 min, 2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 47°C for 20 min, 0.1x SSC for 5 min, water for 3 min, then dried by centrifugation. The cDNAs (25 μl) were hybridized to arrays in formamide buffer (50% formamide, 8x SSC, 1% SDS, 4x Denhardt's solution) for 16 h at 47°C with 22 x 25 mm Lifterslips (Erie Scientific, Portsmouth, NH). Arrays were then washed once in 2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 47°C for 10 min, twice in 2x SSC, 0.1% SDS for 5 min, twice in 1x SSC for 5 min, twice in 0.1x SSC for 5 min and dried by centrifugation. Shaded from light, the Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent molecules (3DNA capture reagent, Genisphere) were hybridized in formamide buffer for 3 h at 49°C to the corresponding capture sequences on cDNAs bound to the arrays. Arrays were washed in the dark with SSC containing 0.1 M DTT and dried as described earlier.

    Scanned images (5 μm) were acquired with ScanArray Express (PerkinElmer) at an excitation of 543 nm for Cy3 and 633 nm for Cy5 and at 90% power. The photomultiplier tube (PMT) settings for each fluor were set based on intensity of spiked internal alien controls to normalize among all slides in the experiment. Image files were quantified in QuantArray (PerkinElmer; see Table 2 of the Supplementary Data online), and raw median signal and background values were exported to BioArray Software Environment (BASE; Saal et al., 2002) for analysis. Data were background subtracted and normalized by LOWESS, which is recommended for two-color experiments to eliminate dye-related artifacts and produce ratios that are not affected by signal intensity values (see Table 3 of the Supplementary Data online). Stringent criteria were used to filter for genes that were regulated at least twofold consistently in all features from biological replicates (n = 3 per treatment) and had a p value <0.05 by Welch's t-test (GeneSpring v.6, Silicon Genetics, Redwood City, CA). The genes that met these criteria were minimally categorized based on function using the Gene Ontology and Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) databases for putative homolog descriptions. Hierarchical clustering of gene expression profiles was performed in BASE; further filtering to identify similarities was performed with Array File Maker 4.0 (AFM; Breitkreutz et al., 2001), and comparisons of microarray and real time PCR gene regulation were performed with GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).

    Real time RT-PCR.

    To assess the authenticity of results from the microarray analyses, mRNAs for select genes were also analyzed by real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Genes for confirmation were chosen from each functional category, as determined by Gene Ontology, and were differentially upregulated or downregulated or resulted in no change. Total RNA was isolated as described previously and was treated with DNase (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's protocol. cDNA was synthesized from 2 μg RNA with an oligo (dT)18 primer using SuperScript II (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's instructions, with a final volume of 100 μl. Synthesized cDNAs (1 μl) were used as templates for amplification of specific gene products in total volumes of 20 μl containing 1x SYBR Green master mix (DyNAmo qPCR kit, Finnzymes, Finland) and 0.3 μM of each primer. Primer sequences were as follows: 5'-GCTGCCTCCTCTTCCTCTCT-3' and 5'-GTGTTGGCGTACAGGTCTT-3' for -actin; 5'-GGATCACTTCTCACGTCCAC-3' and 5'-TTAAACACAGTAAGCCCATC-3' for chemotaxin; 5'-CTTTGTTTGACTCCGACACG-3' and 5'-GAGAAATTTGCTTTTTGTGC-3' for CD63; 5'-CAGCCACCTGTGGAATGCAC-3' and 5'-AAAAATGGGATTCAATAGCC-3' for urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (UPAR); 5'-CAAATACAGACGCGTTGGAC-3' and 5'-GGCTGGTTCGTGACGGATGG-3' for retinol binding protein; 5'-TTGCCTTTGCCAACATCGAC-3' and 5'-CGGACATTGACGTATGCTTT-3' for vitellogenin; 5'-GATGTCTTTCTCACTGCAACCT-3' and 5'-GCTGTCTTTTTCCTGGTCACT-3' for hepcidin; 5'-CCTGCGGCACGGTCTT-3' and 5'-CTGACATCTTCATGCATCTCTTG-3' for differentially regulated trout protein (DRTP). Primer sequences were chosen so that the product contained the 70-mer array oligonucleotide sequence to ensure validation of the microarray experiment, except for -actin which was used only for normalization purposes. Polymerase chain reaction was performed with a DNA Engine Cycler and Opticon 2 Detector (MJ Research, Waltham, MA). Polymerase chain reaction was carried out for 35 cycles with denaturation at 94°C for 10 s, annealing at optimum temperature for primers (54°–60°C) for 20 s, and extension at 72°C for 12 s. DNA amplification was quantified (pg) from the C(T) value based on standard curves to ensure that quantification was within a linear range. Standards were created from gel-purified PCR products (QIAX II, Qiagen, Valencia, CA) for each primer set after quantification with a PicoGreen dsDNA Quantification Kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and serial dilutions ranging from 0.25 to100 ng DNA. All signals were normalized against -actin, and ratios were calculated for treated samples compared to sham-initiated control as for the microarray analysis. Expression of -actin was not altered by treatment based on either microarray analysis or RT-PCR and so was found to be an appropriate housekeeping gene for normalization in this study.

    RESULTS

    Liver Histopathology

    Exposure of trout embryos to 50 ppb AFB1 resulted in 5% liver tumor incidence with only one tumor per animal at 13 months of age, whereas no tumors were observed in sham-initiated fish. This frequency is similar to what would be expected from historical AFB1 exposure data (Oganesian et al., 1999). Tumors were determined to be approximately 30% HCC and 70% mixed carcinoma by histopathological examination, and only HCC tumors were further evaluated for gene expression profiles. Histological examination showed distinct structural differences between HCC and non-tumor tissues (Fig. 1). The trout liver from both non-initiated controls and noncancerous adjacent liver showed hepatocytes oriented in tubules with only two hepatocytes between adjacent sinusoids. However, HCC samples showed both increased basophilia and cellularity between adjacent sinusoids. These structural differences provided distinct borders between the HCC tissue and the surrounding liver.

    Gene Expression Analysis

    The rainbow trout 70-mer spotted oligonucleotide array, OSUrbt v2.0, has been developed in a collaboration between the Marine and Freshwater Biomedical Sciences Center and the Center for Gene Research and Biotechnology at Oregon State University. The OSUrbt v2.0 array contains 1672 elements representing over 1400 genes important for processes of carcinogenesis, environmental toxicology, comparative immunology, endocrinology, and stress physiology. Existence of an array targeted to these mechanisms provides a powerful tool with which to evaluate global molecular changes in the trout model. The 70-mer oligonucleotides were designed for trout using multiple BLAST searches against annotated databases in GenBank and TIGR, and the resulting oligos are annotated by sequence homology based on the top BLAST hit (E-value <10–10; Table 1 and Table 4 of the Supplementary Data online). We report methods for spotting, post-processing, and hybridization of trout arrays for strong sensitivity and technical reproducibility (Fig. 2). Analyses of technical controls indicate that dye-swapped replicates have a high level of reproducibility, as do the duplicate spots printed on each slide. The correlation coefficients, r-values, were 0.93 (r2 = 0.86) and 0.96 (r2 = 0.93) for the duplicate slides and duplicate spots within an array, respectively, p < 0.001.

    Hepatic gene expression was analyzed using the OSUrbt v2.0 array to characterize the mRNA profiles for AFB1-initiated HCC compared to noncancerous adjacent liver and sham-initiated control liver. As described in Materials and Methods, RNA from individual HCC and adjacent liver tissue was hybridized to arrays with dye-swapping. Gene expression was examined in tumors and liver samples, and genes were considered to be differentially expressed if their mRNA levels were consistently changed 2.0- or 0.5-fold and there was a p value <0.05 (Welch's t-test) among biological replicates (n = 3). Hierarchical clustering was used as a visualization tool to identify similarities among biological replicates within a treatment and differences in gene expression between treatments. Bidirectional hierarchical clustering of all genes on the array (Fig. 3A) and a filtered subset of genes that were differentially regulated within a treatment (Fig. 3B) revealed distinct separations among the treatments by Pearson correlation. The HCC samples and noncancerous adjacent liver samples were clustered to separate nodes in both instances, indicating that there were distinct gene expression patterns between the treatment groups.

    Overall, 55 elements were differentially regulated between HCC and the noncancerous adjacent liver tissue (Table 1). Similarly, 40 elements were found to be regulated in HCC compared to sham-initiated control liver, whereas only 6 elements were expressed differentially in the noncancerous adjacent liver samples compared to sham-initiated controls. Most elements on the array represent different genes; however, a few elements represent distinct oligonucleotide sequences for the same gene. For example, vitellogenin, prostaglandin D synthase, UPAR, retinol binding protein, and DRTP are represented by multiple elements on the array and can serve to provide internal validation of our microarray results. In our negative control arrays, where the reference sample was hybridized against itself and dye-swapped, no genes were found to be differentially regulated. These arrays served to provide a technical validation of our microarray results.

    The genes most highly upregulated in HCC included those known to be involved in regulation of cell growth, formation and maintenance of the extracellular matrix, immunoregulation, and the acute phase response. Some immune-relevant genes, such as chemotaxin, were upregulated in HCC, but downregulated in the noncancerous adjacent liver, resulting in strong expression of these genes in HCC, 5- to 30-fold above the adjacent tissue. Genes commonly downregulated in HCC included those involved in drug, lipid, glucose, and retinol metabolism, immunoregulation, and vitellogenesis (estrogen-responsive liver proteins). The few genes differentially expressed in the noncancerous adjacent tissue compared to sham controls included prostaglandin D synthase and chemotaxin. Thus, expression of genes from distinct functional classes are altered during AFB1-initiated HCC in rainbow trout compared to noncancerous adjacent or non-initiated liver and may be characteristic of molecular pathways important for tumorigenesis.

    Real-Time PCR Confirmation

    The expression profiles of selected genes that were found to be differentially increased or decreased in the microarray analysis, including chemotaxin, CD63, retinol binding protein, vitellogenin, UPAR, hepcidin, and DRTP, were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR using SYBR Green (Fig. 4). The same RNA preparations were used for each technique, and the mean expression ratios for all samples in each treatment (n = 3 biological replicates) were compared. Values for duplicate spots and dye-swapped slides were averaged prior to analysis of biological replicates for microarray data. Reverse transcriptase PCR was more sensitive in several cases than microarray analysis and detected greater changes, but it also resulted in higher variability among biological replicates in some of our assays. Overall, we were able to confirm gene expression profiles measured by oligonucleotide microarray analysis by RT-PCR. These data indicate that our strict criteria for determining differential gene regulation by array, including the twofold change in all biological replicates with p < 0.05, resulted in detection of meaningful changes that could be validated by other methods.

    DISCUSSION

    Evaluation of Gene Expression Profiles in Trout HCC

    Rainbow trout have been used as a research model for environmental carcinogenesis for over 40 years. The strengths of this model have been described previously and include sensitivity to a number of carcinogens, low-cost husbandry, and well-described tumor pathology, carcinogen metabolism, DNA adduction, and mutational oncogene activation (Bailey et al., 1996). Recently, a number of studies supporting the strength of this model in biomedical research have been published; those studies have employed microarray technology in trout and other salmonid models to examine gene expression patterns and functional classes important for stress responses, chemical toxicology, and immune function (Krasnov et al., 2005a, 2005b; Rise et al., 2004). In this study, we applied the OSUrbt v2.0 array to further evaluate trout as a model for carcinogenesis based on molecular changes in AFB1-induced HCC compared to noncancerous adjacent liver and sham-initiated control liver. Tumorigenesis is a multistage process that involves a number of genetic alterations during initiation, promotion, and progression of the disease. We detected distinct gene expression patterns in HCC compared to noncancerous tissue in rainbow trout; these are summarized in Table 1 and Figure 3. In our study, the noncancerous tissue surrounding HCC showed few transcriptional differences compared to non-initiated control liver, indicating that it still maintained a relatively "normal" phenotype. This observation is further supported by the structural similarities observed between the two noncancerous tissue types by histopathology (Fig. 1). Consequently, the genes regulated in HCC compared to both types of noncancerous tissue were very similar and included genes relevant for cell proliferation, synthesis of the extracellular matrix, vascularization, oxidative stress, immune response, and drug, lipid, and retinol metabolism and homeostasis.

    Genes encoding some proteins important for cell signaling and proliferation were upregulated in trout HCC. JunB, a proto-oncogene involved in cell cycle regulation, was the only oncogene transcriptionally upregulated in our study. Previous studies have found that hepatic tumors in trout initiated by AFB1 and other carcinogens have a high incidence (71–100%) of mutationally activated Ki-ras oncogenic alleles (Bailey et al., 1996). However, in this study, we did not observe transcriptional upregulation of the Ki-ras oncogene in HCC tumors. Also of interest was upregulation of the B-cell translocation gene 2 (BTG2), which is an effector protein of tumor suppressor genes important for regulation of the cell cycle. The B-cell translocation gene is an antiproliferative factor whose expression is upregulated in response to growth signals during tumorigenesis to promote cell cycle arrest, thereby helping to provide a "growth brake" (Ficazzola et al., 2001).

    A number of genes associated with metabolism and homeostasis of drugs, lipids, glucose, and retinol were downregulated in trout HCC. Also downregulated were the liver-specific proteins involved in vitellogenesis. These transcriptional profiles suggest changes in normal liver function and differentiation in trout HCCs. Dedifferentiation in neoplastic development is supported by the step-wise progression from foci to benign to malignant tumors and has been well documented in rodents (Pitot et al., 1996). Histopathological evidence exists for a similar type of progression in fish models; for example, HCC has been observed to develop within benign adenomas in trout liver (Bailey et al., 1996; Okihiro and Hinton, 1999). The present data suggest that transcriptional profiles also support the process of dedifferentiation in trout neoplasia. Of particular interest is the decrease in expression of retinol-binding protein, which provides cellular storage for vitamin A in the liver. Low serum retinol, retinol binding protein, or vitamin A has been correlated with neoplastic HCC (Okabe et al., 2001; Schmitt-Graff et al., 2003). Retinol and vitamin A therapy have been applied to patients with HCC or chronic liver disease (Moriwaki et al., 2000), suggesting that reduced expression of these genes may play a crucial role in hepatocarcinogenesis.

    Molecular Indicators of Metastatic Potential

    A number of genes altered in trout HCC are involved in matrix-membrane associations, cell migration, and metastasis and may be indicative of tumor invasive potential. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor, which was strongly upregulated, is a serine protease and part of the plasminogen activation system responsible for cell migration and matrix–membrane interactions important for cancer progression. Urokinase plasminogen activator receptor is on the cell membrane and promotes degradation of the extracellular matrix, which is considered to be an early step in the invasion and metastasis of cancer (Zheng et al., 2000). Two cysteine proteases, cathepsin L and pro-cathepsin B, were also upregulated in trout HCC. Like UPAR, these proteases function in protein stability, and their activity is attributed to the ability of tumor cells to invade the extracellular matrix (Graveel et al., 2001; Tumminello et al., 1996). A member of the transmembrane 4 superfamily, CD63, which regulates cell growth and motility, was strongly upregulated, and it also appears to influence tumor progression and metastasis in other models, serving as a good prognostic marker for disease (Graveel et al., 2001; Meyer et al., 2003). Other factors involved in coagulation and leukocyte aggregation were downregulated in trout HCC and have been indicated in tumor metastasis. For example, CD9, which is also a member of the transmembrane superfamily 4, is important for platelet aggregation. Downregulation of CD9 has been associated with tumor invasiveness and metastatic potential in a number of cancers (Kanetaka et al., 2001; Sauer et al., 2003). Also, the pro-inflammatory cytokine, IL-8, which was upregulated in trout HCC, has been found to promote angiogenesis in human HCC and may be important for vascularization required in both invasion and metastasis (Akiba et al., 2001).

    These transcriptional profiles indicate that AFB1-induced HCC in trout is of an invasive and potentially aggressive nature, which further enhances the merits of the trout as a model for human HCC. Trout HCCs are composed of broad tubules with many basophilic hepatocytes between adjacent sinusoids (Fig. 1) that are capable of distant metastasis and direct growth into surrounding tissues (Bailey et al., 1996). However, invasior is more common in trout over 2 years of age, and histopathological analysis of HCC tumors in this study does not indicate invasive growth. Therefore, the genes expressed in malignant trout tumors at this stage may be early predictors of metastasis and could provide molecular targets for treatment.

    Trout as a Model for Chronic Liver Disease and Inflammation

    Also of interest was the regulation of genes found to be important in chronic liver disease and inflammation, including cytokines, chemokines, and acute phase response proteins. Teleosts have a robust acute phase response, and several of their acute phase proteins are known to exist in mammals, where they function in innate immunity and inflammatory responses. Acute phase proteins are generally synthesized as an initial stress response to tissue injury, including such processes as malignant growth, and they were upregulated in trout HCC. Hepcidin, for example, is a liver hormone induced during inflammation that controls iron homeostasis by negatively regulating intestinal iron absorption; it was recently observed to be important in anemia of chronic liver disease (Leong and Lnnerdal, 2004). Iron-refractory anemia has been observed in liver adenomas of patients with glycogen storage disease caused by a deficiency in glucose-6-phosphatase, which results in an inability to maintain glucose homeostasis (Weinstein et al., 2002). We have previously observed disruption of iron homeostasis in trout neoplasms in studies where hepatocytes from carcinogen altered-foci and tumors were resistant to iron loading and were deficient in glucose-6-phosphatase (Hendricks et al., 1984; Lee et al., 1989). In this study, hepcidin upregulation was also correlated with transcriptional downregulation of glucose-6-phosphatase along with downregulation of ferritin subunits in HCC tumors. Although the molecular basis of anemia in chronic liver disease is not well understood, production of cytokines and interferons during inflammation has been correlated with anemia in patients and animal models. In our study a number of chemokines and cytokines were upregulated in trout HCC, which can regulate cell growth, differentiation, and inflammation during carcinogenesis. These data indicate that rainbow trout may also provide a novel and relevant model for the study of anemia and inflammation in chronic liver disease.

    Trout as a Model for Human HCC

    One of the inherent strengths of microarray platforms is the ability to extrapolate data across multiple species. Such comparative analyses can highlight mechanisms that have a key role in processes such as carcinogenesis. Studies that have examined the relationship of gene profiles across diverse species found that transcriptional responses conserved across evolution were more likely to correspond to true functional interactions (Segal et al., 2005). In this study, we found that most genes or gene classes differentially expressed in the trout tumor samples are conserved in human and rodent HCC or in other cancers (Table 1; Choi et al., 2004; Graveel et al., 2001; Meyer et al., 2003; Okabe et al., 2001). The fact that these studies used HCC of different etiologies (many viral) supports the likelihood that some processes of HCC pathogenesis have been conserved during long periods of evolutionary time.

    In summary, we applied a novel rainbow trout oligonucleotide array to examine gene expression profiles in trout HCC compared to adjacent noncancerous tissue and identified distinct gene classes important in hepatocarcinogenesis in trout. Genes whose altered expression were identified through our microarray studies were typical of those observed in HCC in humans and other mammalian models. This finding is consistent with the notion that HCC pathogenesis has been conserved during vertebrate evolution. The genes that were regulated seem to indicate that AFB1-induced HCC in trout is of an invasive and aggressive nature and may also be indicative of changes observed during chronic inflammatory liver diseases, which further enhances the merits of the trout as a model for human HCC. Future work will evaluate gene expression during progression over time of HCC in trout and examine how gene expression profiles are altered in the presence of dietary tumor modulators.

    SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

    Supplemental data are available online at www.toxsci.oupjournals.org and Geo Expression Omnibus at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    The authors thank Eric Johnson and Greg Gonnerman for care and maintenance of fish and Sheila Cleveland for histological preparation. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants ES07060, ES03850, ES00210, ES11267, and CA90890.

    REFERENCES

    Akiba, J., Yano, H., Ogasawara, S., Higaki, K., and Kojiro, M. (2001). Expression and function of interleukin-8 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 18, 257–264.

    Bailey, G. S., Williams, D. E., and Hendricks, J. D. (1996). Fish models for environmental carcinogenesis: The rainbow trout. Environ. Health Perspect. 104(Suppl), 5–19.

    Bjorge, L., Hakulinen, J., Vintermyr, O. K., Jarva, H., Jensen, T. S., Iversen, O. E., and Meri, S. (2005). Ascitic complement system in ovarian cancer. Br. J. Cancer 14, 895–905.

    Borlak, J., Meier, T., Halter, R., Spanel, R., and Spanel-Borowski, K. (2005). Epidermal growth factor–induced hepatocellular carcinoma: Gene expression profiles in precursor lesions, early stage and solitary tumours. Oncogene 10, 1809–1819.

    Breinholt, V., Hendricks, J. D., Pereira, C. B., Arbogast, D., and Bailey, G. S. (1995). Dietary chlorophyllin is a potent inhibitor of aflatoxin B1 hepatocarcinogenesis in rainbow trout. Cancer Res. 55, 57–62.

    Breitkreutz, B. J., Jorgensen, P., Breitkreutz, A., and Tyers, M. (2001). AFM 4.0: A toolbox for DNA microarray analysis. Genome Biol. 2, software0001.1–0001.3.

    Carruba, G., Cocciadiferro, L., Bellavia, V., Rizzo, S., Tsatsanis, C., Spandidos, D., Muti, P., Smith, C., Mehta, P., and Castagnetta, L. (2004). Intercellular communication and human hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1028, 202–212.

    Chen, C. J., Wang, L. Y., Lu, S. N., Wu, M. H., Lou, S. L., Zhang, Y. J., Wang, L. W., and Santella, R. M. (1996). Elevated aflatoxin exposure and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 24, 38–42.

    Chen, W., Cai, M. Y., Wei, D. P., and Wang, X. (2005). Pivotal molecules of MHC I pathway in human primary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 11, 3297–3299.

    Choi, J. K., Choi, J. Y., Kim, D. G., Choi, D. W., Kim, B. Y., Lee, K. H., Yeom Y. I., Yoo, H. S., Yoo, O. J., and Kim, S. (2004). Integrative analysis of multiple gene expression profiles applied to liver cancer study. FEBS Lett. 565, 93–100.

    Ding, S., Gong, B. D., Yu, J., Gu, J., Zhang, H. Y., Shang, Z. B., Fei, Q., Wang, P., and Zhu, J. D. (2004). Methylation profile of the promoter CpG islands of 14 "drug-resistance" genes in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 10, 3433–3440.

    Egner, P., Wang, J., Zhu, Y., Zhang, B., Wu, Y., Zhang, Q., Qian, G. S., Kuang, Y. S., Gange, S. J., Jacobson, L. P., et al. (2001). Chlorophyllin intervention reduces aflatoxin-DNA adducts in individuals at high risk for liver cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 98, 14601–14606.

    El-Serag, H. B., and Mason, A. C. (1999). Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 340, 745–750.

    Ficazzola, M. A., Fraiman, M., Gitlin, J., Woo, K., Melamed, J., Rubin, M. A., and Walden, P. D. (2001). Antiproliferative B cell translocation gene 2 protein is down-regulated post-transcriptionally as an early event in prostate carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 22, 1271–1279.

    Graveel, C. R., Jatkoe, T., Madore, S. J., Holt, A. L., and Farnham, P. J. (2001). Expression profiling of novel genes in hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncogene 20, 2704–2712.

    Groopman, J. D., Scholl, P., and Wang, J. S. (1996). Epidemiology of human aflatoxin exposures and their relationship to human liver cancer. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 74, 203–209.

    Hendricks, J. D., Meyers, T. R., and Shelton, D. W. (1984). Histological progression of hepatic neoplasia in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). Monogr. Natl. Cancer Inst. 65, 321–336.

    Jazaeri, A. A., Yee, C. J., Sotiriou, C., Brantley, K. R., Boyd, J., and Liu, E. T. (2002). Gene expression profiles of BRCA1-linked, BRCA2-linked, and sporadic ovarian cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 94, 990–1000.

    Kakhlon, O., Gruenbaum, Y., and Cabantchik, Z. I. (2001). Repression of ferritin expression increases the labile iron pool, oxidative stress, and short-term growth of human erythroleukemia cells. Blood 97, 2863–2871.

    Kanetaka, K., Sakamoto, M., Yamamoto, Y., Yamasaki, S., Lanza, F., Kanematsu, T., and Hirohashi, S. (2001). Overexpression of tetraspanin CO-029 in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 35, 637–642.

    Krasnov, A., Koskinen, H., Pehkonen, P., Rexroad, C. E., III, Afanasyev, S., and Molsa, H. (2005a). Gene expression in the brain and kidney of rainbow trout in response to handling stress. BMC Genomics 6, 3.

    Krasnov, A., Koskinen, H., Rexroad, C., Afanasyev, S., Molsa, H., and Oikari, A. (2005b). Transcriptome responses to carbon tetrachloride and pyrene in the kidney and liver of juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquatic Toxicol. 74, 70–81.

    Lee, B. C., Hendricks, J. D., and Bailey, G. S. (1989). Iron resistance of hepatic lesions and nephroblastoma in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) exposed to MNNG. Toxicol. Pathol. 17, 474–482.

    Lee, B. C., Hendricks J. D., Bailey G. S. (1991). Toxicity of mycotoxins in the feed of fish. In Mycotoxins and Animal Feedstuff: Natural Occurrence, Toxicity and Control (J. E. Smith, Ed.), pp. 607–626. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Leong, W. I., and Lonnerdal, B. (2004). Hepcidin, the recently identified peptide that appears to regulate iron absorption. J. Nutr. 134, 1–4.

    Li, F., and Stormo, G. D. (2001). Selection of optimal DNA oligos for gene expression arrays. Bioinformatics 17, 1067–1076.

    Lodygin, D., Epanchintsev, A., Menssen, A., Diebold, J., and Hermeking, H. (2005). Functional epigenomics identifies genes frequently silenced in prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 65, 4218–4227.

    Lu, Z. L., Luo, D. Z., and Wen, J. M. (2005). Expression and significance of tumor-related genes in HCC. World J. Gastroenterol. 11, 3850–3854.

    Manson, M. M., Hudson, E. A., Ball, H. W. L., Barrett, M. C., Clark, H. L., Judah, D. J. Verschoyle, R. D., and Neal, G. E. (1998). Chemoprevention of aflatoxin B1-induced carcinogenesis by indole-3-carbinol in rat liver—Predicting the outcome using early biomarkers. Carcinogenesis 19, 1829–1836.

    Meyer, K., Lee, J. S., Dyck, P. A., Cao, W. Q., Rao, M. S., Thorgeirsson, S. S., and Reddy, J. K. (2003). Molecular profiling of hepatocellular carcinomas developing spontaneously in acyl-CoA oxidase deficient mice: Comparison with liver tumors induced in wild-type mice by a peroxisome proliferator and a genotoxic carcinogen. Carcinogenesis 24, 975–984.

    Moriwaki, H., Tajika, M., Miwa, Y., Kato, M., Yasuda, I., Shiratori, Y., Okuno, M., Kato, T., Ohnishi, H., and Muto, Y. (2000). Nutritional pharmacotherapy of chronic liver disease: From support of liver failure to prevention of liver cancer. J. Gastroenterol. 35(Suppl 12), 13–17.

    Neo, S. Y., Leow, C. K., Vega, V. B., Long, P. M., Islam, A. F. M., Lai, P. B. S., Liu, E. T., and Ren, E. C. (2004). Identification of discriminators of hepatoma by gene expression profiling using a minimal dataset approach. Hepatology 39, 944–953.

    Oganesian, A., Hendricks, J. D., Pereira, C. B., Orner, G. A., Bailey, G. S., and Williams, D. E. (1999). Potency of dietary indole-3-carbinol as a promoter of aflatoxin B1-initiated hepatocarcinogenesis: Results from a 9000 animal tumor study. Carcinogenesis 20, 453–458.

    Oka, R., Sasagawa, T., Ninomiya, I., Miwa, K., Tanii, H., and Saijoh, K. (2001). Reduction in the local expression of complement component 6 (C6) and 7 (C7) mRNAs in oesophageal carcinoma. Eur. J. Cancer 37, 1158–1165.

    Okabe, H., Satoh, S., Kato, T., Kitahara, O., Yanagawa, R., Yamaoka, Y., Tsunoda, T., Furukawa, Y., and Nakamura, Y. (2001). Genome-wide analysis of gene expression in human hepatocellular carcinomas using cDNA microarray: Identification of genes involved in viral carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Cancer Res. 61, 2129–2137.

    Okihiro, M. S., and Hinton, D. E. (1999). Progression of hepatic neoplasia in medaka (Oryzias latipes) exposed to diethylnitrosamine. Carcinogenesis 20, 933–940.

    Ouyang, G. L., Li, Q. F., Peng, X. X., Liu, Q. R., and Hong S. G. (2002). Effects of tachyplesin on proliferation and differentiation of human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells. World J. Gastroenterol. 8, 1053–1058.

    Ovejero, C., Cavard, C., Perianin, A., Hakvoort, T., Vermeulen, J., Godard, C., Fabre, M., Chafey, P., Suzuki, K., Romagnolo, B., et al. (2004). Identification of the leukocyte cell–derived chemotaxin 2 as a direct target gene of -catenin in the liver. Hepatology 40, 167–176.

    Pitot, H. C., Dragan, Y. P., Teeguarden, J., Hsia, S., and Campbell, H. (1996). Quantitation of multistage carcinogenesis in rat liver. Toxicol. Pathol. 24, 119–128.

    Poon, R. T. P., Lau, C. P. Y., Ho, J. W. Y., Yu, W. C., Fan, S. T., and Wong, J. (2003). Tissue factor expression correlates with tumor angiogenesis and invasiveness in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 9, 5339–5345.

    Rise, M. L., Jones, S. R. M., Brown, G. D., von Schalburg, K. R., Davidson, W. S., and Koop, B. F. (2004). Microarray analyses identify molecular biomarkers of Atlantic salmon macrophage and hematopoietic kidney response to Piscirickettsia salmonis infection. Physiol. Genomics 20, 21–35.

    Saal, H. L., Troein, C., Vallon-Christersson, J., Gruverger, S., Borg, A., and Peterson, C. (2002). BioArray Software Environment: A platform for comprehensive management and analysis of microarray data. Genome Biol. 3, software0003.1–0003.6.

    Sauer, G., Windisch, J., Kurzeder, C., Heilmann, V., Kreienberg, R., and Deissler, H. (2003). Progression of cervical carcinomas is associated with down-regulation of CD9 but strong local re-expression at sites of transendothelial invasion. Clin Cancer Res. 9, 6426–6431.

    Schmitt-Graff, A., Ertelt, V., Allgaier, H. P., Koelbe, K., Olschewski, M., Nitschke, R., Bochaton-Piallat, M. L., Gabbiani, G., and Blum, H. E. (2003). Cellular retinol-binding protein-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with beta-catenin, Ki-67 index, and patient survival. Hepatology 38, 470–480.

    Segal, E., Friedman, N., Kaminski, N., Regev, A., and Koller, D. (2005). From signatures to models: Understanding cancer using microarrays. Nat. Genet. 37, 538–545.

    Sinnhuber, R. O., Wales, J. H., Ayres, J. L., Engebrecht, R. H., and Amend, D. L. (1968). Dietary factors and hepatoma in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). 1. Aflatoxins in vegetable protein feedstuffs. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 41, 711–718.

    Stoner, G., Casto, B., Ralston, S., Roebuck, B., Pereira, C., and Bailey, G. (2002). Development of a multi-organ rat model for evaluating chemopreventive agents: Efficacy of indole-3-carbinol. Carcinogenesis 23, 265–272.

    Su, B., Guan, M., Xia, J., and Lu, Y. (2003). Stimulation of lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase by retinoic acid coincides with inhibition of proliferation in human 3AO ovarian cancer cells. Cell Biol. Int. 27, 587–592.

    Thirunavukkarasu, C., Singh, J. P. V., Selvendiran, K., and Sakthisekaran, D. (2001). Chemoprotective efficacy of selenium against N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced hepatoma in albino rats. Cell Biochem. Funct. 19, 265–271.

    Tumminello, F. M., Leto, G., Pizzolanti, G., Candiloro, V., Crescimanno, M., Crosta, L., Flandina, C., Montalto, G., Soresi, M., Carroccio, A., et al. (1996). Cathepsin D, B and L circulating levels as prognostic markers of malignant progression. Anticancer Res. 16, 2315–2319.

    Weinstein, D. A., Roy, C. N., Fleming, M. D., Loda, M. F., Wolfsdorf, J. I., and Andrews, N. C. (2002). Inappropriate expression of hepcidin is associated with iron refractory anemia: Implications for anemia of chronic disease. Blood 100, 3776–3781.

    Zheng, Q., Tang, Z. Y., Xue, Q., Shi, D. R., Song, H. Y., and Tang, H. B. (2000). Invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in relation to urokinase-type plasminogen activator, its receptor and inhibitor. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 126, 641–646.(Susan C. Tilton, Lena G. Gerwick, Jerry )