当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国美容医学·综合版》 > 2011年第6期 > 正文
编号:12166336
醒脑开窍配合益气活血通络法治疗气虚血瘀证中风病恢复期140例(1)
http://www.100md.com 2011年6月1日 廖秀莲 欧阳强波 孙洁 张露芬
第1页

    参见附件。

     【摘要】目的:观察醒脑开窍合益气活血通络法治疗中风病恢复期的临床疗效。方法:根据《中药新药临床研究指导原则(试行)》中医证候诊断标准,结合中风诊断要点及临床经验,采用醒脑开窍针法配合益气活血通络针刺法治疗140例符合气虚血瘀证中风病恢复期条件的中风患者,每周治疗2次, 3个月为1疗程,观察其临床疗效。结果:男女两组间发病年龄、病情轻重程度分布差异不显著(P>0.05);男女两组间性别与年龄分布比较差异不显著(P>0.05);患者性别与病情轻重分布相关性明显,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。疗程与疗效比较,两个疗程的有效率较一个疗程升高,有显著性差异(P<0.01);经3个月治疗的中风患者,临床症状基本治愈率达69.3%,经6个月治疗的患者,临床症状基本治愈率达97.1%;治疗后患者的生活能力与治疗前比较有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:醒脑开窍合益气活血通络针刺法治疗中风气虚血瘀证有确切疗效,且疗程越长,疗效越佳,患者性别与病情轻重程度相关,女性患者居多,且病情重者居多,为临床治疗气虚血瘀证中风病恢复期辨证、取穴提供了依据。

    【关键词】中风;气虚血瘀;醒脑开窍;益气活血

    【中图分类号】R255.2 【文献标识码】A 【文章编号】1008-6455(2011)12-0027-03

    Acupuncture Treatment to 140 cases of stroke patients thru Resuscitation of Brain cum Restoring the Function of qi and blood

    Liao Xiulan Ouyang Xiangbo Sun Jie Zhang Lufen 【Abstract】Objective:To observe the Efficacy Rate of Resuscitation of Brain cum Restoring the Function of qi and blood to Stroke patients. Methods:Guided by the diagnosis standard of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) theory of “Clinical Study Theory of Chinese Medicine and New Medicine (trial version)”. Co-reference with key Stroke diagnosis symptoms and TCM theory of ‘Syndrome Differentiation and Treatment’. Apply acupuncture treatment thru Resuscitation of Brain cum Restoring the Function of qi and blood to 140 Stroke patients who caused under the condition of qi deficiency & blood stasis, twice per week, 3 months per session, and observe the efficacy rate. Results:There is no significant difference on distribution of Age Group and Degree of illness between Male and Female Group (P>0.05), the two groups are competitive. There is also no significant difference on distribution of Gender and the Age Group between Male and Female Group (P>0.05). However, there is correlation between Gender and Degree of illness, the significant difference level is (P<0.05). There is significant correlation between the Length of Treatment and Efficacy Rate, the significant difference level is (P<0.01); Patients who underwent 3 months of treatment achieved Efficacy Rate of 69.3%. Patients who underwent 6 months of treatment achieved Efficacy Rate of 97 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(4076kb)