当前位置: 首页 > 医学版 > 期刊论文 > 内科学 > 糖尿病学杂志 > 2005年 > 第3期 > 正文
编号:11256320
Effect of Dehydroepiandrosterone Replacement on Insulin Sensitivity and Lipids in Hypoadrenal Women
     the Endocrine Research Unit, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota

    ABSTRACT

    DHEA (dehydroepiandrosterone) replacement is not part of the current standard of care in hypoadrenal subjects. Animal studies have shown that DHEA administration prevents diabetes. To determine the physiological effect of DHEA replacement on insulin sensitivity in adrenal-deficient women, we performed a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 28 hypoadrenal women (mean age 50.2 ± 2.87 years) who received a single 50-mg dose of DHEA daily or placebo. After 12 weeks, insulin sensitivity was assessed using a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. DHEA replacement significantly increased DHEA-S (sulfated ester of DHEA), bioavailable testosterone, and androstenedione and reduced sex hormoneeCbinding globulin levels. Fasting plasma insulin and glucagon were lower with DHEA (42 ± 4.94 vs. 53 ± 6.58 pmol/l [P = 0.005] and 178 ± 11.32 vs. 195.04 ± 15 pmol/l [P = 0.02], respectively). The average amount of glucose needed to maintain similar blood glucose levels while infusing the same insulin dosages was higher during DHEA administration (358 ± 24.7 vs. 320 ± 24.6 mg/min; P < 0.05), whereas endogenous glucose production was similar. DHEA also reduced total cholesterol (P < 0.005), triglycerides (P < 0.011), LDL cholesterol (P < 0.05), and HDL cholesterol (P < 0.005). In conclusion, replacement therapy with 50 mg of DHEA for 12 weeks significantly increased insulin sensitivity in hypoadrenal women, thereby suggesting that DHEA replacement could have a potential impact in preventing type 2 diabetes.

    Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated ester (DHEA-S) are the most abundant circulating steroid hormones in healthy individuals. They are derived from the zona reticularis of the adrenal glands. They are prehormones, converted into androgens and estrogens in peripheral tissues in an intracrine manner (1). In men, testosterone is produced throughout life; the contribution of DHEA to the circulating androgen pool has been estimated to be 30eC50% in surgically or medically castrated subjects (2). There remains controversy, however, about the origin of circulating androgens in postmenopausal women. Some authors suggest that these androgens are derived from DHEA, with very little being of ovarian origin (3,4), whereas others state that the ovaries remain an important source of testosterone (5,6). In either case, women with adrenal insufficiency suffer from chronic DHEA deficiency, as routine replacement therapy for these women includes only glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids and fails to restore DHEA-derived androgens (7).

    DHEA is widely available in retail stores in the U.S., where it is marketed as a health food supplement. Claims abound in the lay press regarding the ability of DHEA to ameliorate or prevent a number of conditions such as diabetes, cancer, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Many of these claims have been derived from rodent data (8). However, the rodent data cannot be translated to the human physiology because most mammals other than higher primates produce little or no DHEA; thus, any DHEA given to other animals is suprapharmacological.

    There is conflicting evidence in the literature about the effects of supplemental DHEA on glucose metabolism in healthy humans (9eC12). Previous studies in hypoadrenal individuals have failed to show any conclusive effect of DHEA administration on insulin sensitivity (13eC16). Many of these studies used indirect measures of insulin sensitivity such as fasting insulin and glucose levels or oral glucose tolerance tests. In addition, none of these studies standardized the subjects onto a single glucocorticoid. The purpose of the current study was to test the hypothesis that DHEA administration for 12 weeks in hypoadrenal women on a standardized glucocorticoid regimen would result in improved insulin sensitivity during a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp.

    RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

    The protocol was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, Rochester, MN. Informed verbal and written consent was obtained from each volunteer before commencement of the study.

    All subjects were Caucasian. The mean (±SE) age of the 28 women who completed the study was 50.25 ± 5.93 years; 14 of the women (50%) were postmenopausal, and 14 (50%) were taking estrogen, either as hormone replacement therapy (n = 9) or in an oral contraceptive pill (n = 5). The average length of time since diagnosis of adrenal deficiency was 12.25 ± 1.9 years. Of the 28 women, 20 (71%) had Addison disease and 8 (29%) had had bilateral adrenalectomies for Cushing disease (pituitary adenomas, n = 5; Carney complex, n = 1), bilateral pheochromocytomas (n = 1), or congenital adrenal hyperplasia (n = 1).

    Study participants were women age 18 years who had been hypoadrenal (from various causes) for >24 months. Women of childbearing age in whom estrogen status had been steady for >6 months and women on other forms of hormone replacement therapy (e.g., thyroxine) whose dosage had remained the same for >6 months were eligible.

    Exclusion criteria included BMI >35 kg/m2, a fasting blood glucose >120 mg/dl, or a history of sex hormoneeCdependent malignancy. Women with a history of cerebrovascular disease, cardiovascular disease (other than hypertension), polycythemia, or liver or renal disease were also excluded. Women who were pregnant or breast-feeding or postmenopausal women who had been on hormone replacement therapy for <6 months were not eligible to participate.

    After the initial screening, 33 subjects were randomized into the study. In all, five subjects did not complete the study; one withdrew after 10 weeks in the first arm of the study as she suffered from diarrhea, which stopped when the drug (DHEA) was withdrawn; two finished the first arm of the study, but declined to complete the second half (both on placebo); one withdrew at 11 weeks, citing work pressure (on DHEA); and one unblinded herself by having blood levels taken (on DHEA). Thus, complete data are presented on 28 subjects.

    This was a single-center, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study. Study participants self-administered 50 mg of micronized pharmaceutical-grade DHEA (Spectrum Chemicals and Laboratory Products, Gardena, CA) or an identically encapsulated placebo (Clinical Encapsulation Services, Schenectady, NY) as a single daily dose for 12 weeks. There was a 2-week washout period between treatment phases. At screening, subjects underwent a physical examination that including a graded submaximal treadmill exercise test with continuous electrocardiogram monitoring to exclude ischemic heart disease. Blood was drawn for fasting glucose, complete blood count, and renal and liver function tests. All subjects were standardized onto divided doses of hydrocortisone as their glucocorticoid replacement therapy (mean dosage 24.4 ± 7.0 mg).

    Randomization was done by the Division of Biostatistics at Mayo Clinic. Subjects began the first 12-week phase of the study at least 3 weeks after hydrocortisone standardization. At the end of the 12-week period, subjects were admitted overnight to the General Clinical Research Center at Mayo Clinic. After an overnight fast, blood samples were collected for measurements of glucose, DHEA-S, cortisol, androstenedione, IGF-I, IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and -3, lipid profile, and bioavailable testosterone. Body composition was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry.

    Subjects were fasted from 10:00 P.M. the night before the clamp until completion of the study the next day. At 4:00 A.M., a 3-mg/kg fat-free body mass (FFM) bolus of [616-2H2]glucose (CIL, Boston, MA) was given intravenously as a priming dose into an indwelling forearm catheter. Next, a 3-h infusion of [2H2]glucose at 3 mg · kg FFMeC1 · heC1 was given to measure fasting endogenous glucose production (EGP). At 7:00 A.M., the deuterated glucose infusion was stopped and an intravenous insulin infusion was begun at 1.5 mU · kg FFMeC1 · mineC1 for 7 h. A retrograde intravenous cannula was placed in the distal forearm. This hand was placed in a hotbox, as previously described, to allow measurement of arterialized plasma glucose (17) every 10 min (Beckman Instruments, Fullerton, CA). The infusion rate of the 40% glucose solution was adjusted to maintain euglycemia at 85eC95 mg/dl (18).

    After the initial 12-week trial period, there was a 2-week washout period, followed by another 12-week trial period on the alternative drug. At the end of the second trial period, subjects were studied in the same manner as after the first trial period.

    Hormone measurements.

    Plasma concentrations of DHEA-S were measured by a competitive chemiluminescent immunoassay on the Immulite automated immunoassay system (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA). Bioavailable testosterone was measured with a differential precipitation of sex hormoneeCbinding globulin (SHBG) by ammonium sulfate after equilibration of the serum sample with tracer amounts of tritium-labeled testosterone. Androstenedione was measured by a two-site immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) (Diagnostic Systems, Webster, TX). SHBG was measured with a solid-phase, two-site chemiluminescent immunometric assay on the Immulite automated immunoassay system (Diagnostic Products).

    Insulin and cortisol concentrations were measured using a two-site immunoenzymatic assay performed on the Access automated immunoassay system (Beckman, Chaska, MN). Glucagon concentrations were measured by a direct, double-antibody radioimmunoassay (RIA) (Linco Research, St. Charles, MO). IGFBP-1 and -3 were measured by a two-site IRMA (Diagnostic Systems). Estradiol levels were measured by the Estradiol double-antibody RIA (Diagnostic Products).

    Glucose measurements.

    Plasma glucose was measured using an enzymatic technique. Plasma [2H2]glucose enrichment was measured as previously described using a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer (19). EGP was measured using tracer dilution technique using steady-state plasma [2H2]glucose meter ratios (19).

    Lipids.

    Total cholesterol was measured on the Hitachi 912 chemistry analyzer using a Technicon cholesterol reagent (Bayer, Tarrytown, NY). HDL cholesterol was measured on the Hitachi 912 chemistry analyzer using direct HDL-C plus reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Triglycerides were measured on the Hitachi 912 chemistry analyzer using a Technicon triglyceride reagent (Bayer).

    Statistical analysis.

    A paired t test was performed to determine whether there were any differences between various outcome measures after DHEA treatment and placebo in all subjects. We also performed two-way repeated- measures ANOVAs with the factors treatment sequence (S), indicating which treatment was given first, the particular treatment (T; DHEA or placebo), and the interaction of these two main effects, thereby indicating whether the effects of DHEA varied depending on whether the drug preceded or followed placebo (S x T). Data are given as means ± SE.

    RESULTS

    DHEA effect on body composition.

    DHEA had no significant effect on body weight, fat mass, or FFM (data not given). Body weights were 72.5 ± 2.31 kg at the end of the placebo period and 72.3 ± 2.5 kg at the end of the DHEA period (P = 0.72).

    Effects associated with treatment sequence.

    No significant effects associated with the sequence in which treatments were administered were noted, except for aspartate transferase (AST) and alkaline phosphatase (AP), so the results of the other end points are reported using the paired analysis. For both AST and AP, a statistically significant interaction was observed, indicating that the nature of the observed effects depended on which treatment was given first. In both instances, it appears that the observed effects of DHEA were less when it preceded placebo; when statistical tests were performed for DHEA effect separately for each sequence, the effect was significant when DHEA was given second or nonsignificant when it was given first.

    Hormone levels.

    DHEA administration significantly increased DHEA-S, total and bioavailable testosterone, and androstenedione levels, whereas it reduced SHBG levels (Table 1). DHEA also significantly reduced fasting plasma insulin and glucagon levels, whereas it tended to increase IGF-I and estradiol levels (P = 0.058 and 0.051, respectively).

    Plasma lipids, liver enzymes, and hematological data.

    DHEA significantly decreased total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels (Table 2). DHEA did not affect hematocrit, hemoglobin, or liver enzymes.

    Glucose levels, glucose kinetics, and glucose clamp results.

    Fasting glucose levels showed a trend to be lower during DHEA than during placebo administration (4.67 ± 0.54 vs. 4.83 ± 0.56 mmol/l), but the difference was not significant. EGP in the postabsorptive state during DHEA and placebo administration was similar (19.93 ± 0.56 vs. 19.94 ± 0.49 eol · kg FFMeC1 · mineC1; P = 0.996) .

    During the glucose clamp (Fig. 1), the circulating insulin and glucose levels were similar. In contrast, plasma glucagon levels fell during insulin infusion (P < 0.0001) and during the three time points when the levels were lower (P < 0.0001) in the subjects during DHEA replacement than during placebo replacement. The average amount of dextrose infused from 180 to 420 min to maintain similar glucose levels were higher during DHEA compared with placebo administration (358 ± 24.7 vs. 320 ± 24.6 mg/min; P < 0.05). The total volume of 40% dextrose infused to maintain similar glucose levels was higher during the DHEA period compared with the placebo period (305 ± 22.5 vs. 276 ± 22.3 ml; P < 0.05).

    DISCUSSION

    The important finding of the current study is the enhanced insulin sensitivity observed in hypoadrenal subjects receiving replacement doses of DHEA. The fasting insulin levels were also lower during DHEA replacement than with placebo, despite no significant change in plasma glucose. The rate of EGP did not change with DHEA replacement, despite a lower fasting glucagon, demonstrating that DHEA had no effect on EGP. In contrast, although plasma insulin levels were identical during glucose clamp in both studies, the amount of glucose required to maintain similar glucose levels was higher after DHEA replacement. These results suggest that DHEA replacement results in enhanced insulin-induced glucose disposal, thus reflecting enhanced insulin sensitivity. We did not measure EGP during insulin infusion and, therefore, we cannot categorically exclude the possibility that the different rate of glucose infusion was due entirely to glucose disposal. However, based on previous reports, the amount of insulin we infused should have completely suppressed EGP (20).

    The duration of DHEA administration and the differences in methodologies used to assess insulin sensitivity may explain the differences between the current study and many previous studies. The current study used the classic euglycemic glucose clamp (18), which is a sensitive approach to measuring insulin sensitivity. All subjects were admitted to the General Clinical Research Center on the day before the study and were kept on a similar diet and similar activity levels. In addition, we also standardized the replacement to a single glucocorticoid in all study subjects. Through these means, the measurement of insulin sensitivity was likely to have been more sensitive than in many other studies.

    Previous studies administering 50eC200 mg DHEA in similar groups of subjects have not shown significant changes in glucose tolerance (13eC16). A few studies looking at the effects of DHEA in healthy elderly subjects have shown improvements using indirect measures of insulin sensitivity (12,21). These elderly people, unlike the subjects in the current study, were not completely DHEA deficient. Diamond et al. (21), using a 10% topical formulation of DHEA for 12 months, found an 11% reduction in fasting glucose associated with a 17% reduction in fasting insulin; however, the 75-g oral glucose tolerance testing results were unchanged between treatment groups.

    There is additional evidence suggesting that DHEA has a role in reducing age-related increases in insulin levels, insulin resistance, and blood glucose (22). Jakubowicz et al. (12) studied 22 healthy men (mean age 57 years) using 100 mg DHEA per day. In this group, serum insulin decreased from 35.3 to 25.8 mU/ml, whereas serum glucose declined from 93.4 to 88.9 mg/ml, suggesting an improvement in insulin sensitivity. Serum insulin and glucose did not change significantly in the placebo group. However, no formal tests of insulin sensitivity were done. Kawano et al. (23) reported an improvement in insulin sensitivity measured by a fasting glucose measurement in 24 hypercholesterolemic but otherwise healthy men age 54 ± 1 years after 12 weeks on 25 mg of oral DHEA. There was no change in fasting insulin levels compared with placebo.

    In contrast to the above studies, observational studies have demonstrated that low DHEA-S levels are associated with hyperglycemia and insulin resistance (24,25). Animal studies have demonstrated a significant effect of DHEA in preventing diabetes (8), but these are pharmacological effects. In contrast to the animal data, results from studies in healthy human volunteers (8) have been inconclusive. The human studies have shown that DHEA may improve insulin sensitivity (11,12,21,23), has no effect on it (9,10,26eC28), or actually worsens it (29). The current study, based on a crossover design in the same subjects using the hyperinsulinemic glucose clamp, clearly demonstrated that DHEA replacement enhances insulin action. The current findings have to be interpreted in the context of DHEA replacement in women who have no adrenal gland. It is not clear from the current study whether patients receiving DHEA in pharmacological dosages or elderly patients with reduced DHEA levels receiving DHEA replacement respond in a similar manner. In general, women have low testosterone levels, so that in adrenalectomized women, we anticipated seeing more of an effect of DHEA replacement than in men. It remains to be determined if a similar effect can be observed in adrenalectomized men as well. Elderly men and women have lower DHEA levels than younger people (30). However, elevating DHEA from the levels of elderly people to that of young people may have a differential effect in men and women.

    Further issues arise when comparing the absolute DHEA deficiency in hypoadrenal subjects and the relative DHEA deficiency in healthy elderly patients. These differences increase the difficulty of inferring results from one group to another. However, the premise of several studies looking at DHEA replacement in both groups is that both DHEA-deficient conditions are interchangeable. This link between the relative DHEA deficiency seen with normal aging and the absolute state seen in hypoadrenal subjects is compounded by the similar findings of studies, such as those looking at different measures of general well-being, libido, and mood (9,10,13,31). The results of our study, therefore, may be important in other groups of relatively hypoadrenal subjects, such as those in intensive care, because it is in this group that adrenal insufficiency is common (32) and in whom insulin therapy has been shown to improve outcomes (33).

    We measured other hormone levels that can impact insulin action such as glucagon, cortisol, and IGF-I. Although plasma glucagon levels in the postabsorptive state decreased with DHEA administration, we did not observe any decrease in EGP. In contrast, IGF-I levels tended to increase, which may have contributed to the increased insulin sensitivity (34) that occurred after DHEA administration.

    Another observation of great interest is the decrease in triglyceride and total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol levels after DHEA administration. Reductions in total and HDL cholesterol levels have been reported by some authors (28,31,35), but not others (11,26). Although the mechanisms by which this occurs are not fully understood, these reductions are thought to be mediated by the effects of androgens on increasing hepatic lipase activity, thus impairing hepatic cholesterol formation (36). This may be a reflection on administering DHEA orally, thus increasing hepatic levels. Although systemic levels of testosterone remain relatively low, the levels of the androgenic metabolites of DHEA undergoing a hepatic first-pass effect may be sufficient to cause these changes. This may explain the relative lack of effect on serum lipids when DHEA was given transdermally or sublingually (21,27). Overall, the totaleCtoeCHDL cholesterol ratio remained unchanged between the two arms of the study (4.75 ± 0.33 vs. 4.64 ± 0.34, DHEA vs. placebo; P = 0.25). The mechanism for the reduction in triglycerides remains unclear, as the increase in activity in peroxisome proliferatoreCactivated receptor- activity reported with DHEA administration would not account for the magnitude of change seen (37).

    In summary, the current study clearly demonstrated that 12 weeks of supplemental DHEA results in an increase in insulin sensitivity. This conclusion is based on the increased glucose infusion rate required after DHEA administration to maintain similar glucose levels during identical insulin administration after both placebo and DHEA in hypoadrenal women. Based on the current results, serious consideration for DHEA replacement in deficient states is warranted, but further work is needed before the use of DHEA can be routinely recommended in hypoadrenal subjects. Alterations in triglyceride and LDL levels may also benefit in preventing cardiovascular death.

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    This work was made possible by support from National Institutes of Health Grant MO1RR00585 and General Clinical Research Center Grant AG-PO114383 and AG-RO109531.

    We are indebted to Dr. Ann Oberg and Dr. Peter O’Brien for advice on the statistical analysis. We thank the staff of the General Clinical Research Center at Mayo Clinic for their invaluable help during this study, and Jean Feehan and Barb Norby for their assistance during the inpatient work. Recruitment was aided by Erin Foley at the National Adrenal Disease Foundation (www.medhelp.org/www/nadf), Joan Hoffman at Addison News, Melanie Wong from the Northern Illinois Addison Disease Support Group, the National Organization for Rare Diseases, the Cushing Disease Support and Research Foundation (http://world.std.com/csrf), and Internet self-help groups for hypoadrenal subjects (www.healinglight.com and http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Addisons_Disease).

    AP, alkaline phosphatase; AST, aspartate transferase; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEA-S, sulfated ester of DHEA; EGP, endogenous glucose production; FFM, fat-free body mass; IGFBP, IGF binding protein; IRMA, immunoradiometric assay; RIA, radioimmunoassay; SHBG, sex hormoneeCbinding globulin

    REFERENCES

    Labrie F: Intracrinology. Mol Cell Endocrinol78 :C113 eCC118,1991

    Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger AM: In Important Advances in Oncology. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott,1985

    Cumming DC, Rebar RW, Hopper BR, Yen SS: Evidence for an influence of the ovary on circulating dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab54 :1069 eC1071,1982

    Vermeulen A: The hormonal activity of the postmenopausal ovary. J Clin Endocrinol Metab42 :247 eC253,1976

    Judd HL, Judd GE, Lucas WE, Yen SS: Endocrine function of the postmenopausal ovary: concentration of androgens and estrogens in ovarian and peripheral vein blood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab39 :1020 eC1024,1974

    Judd HL, Lucas WE, Yen SS: Effect of oophorectomy on circulating testosterone and androstenedione levels in patients with endometrial cancer. Am J Obst Gynecol118 :793 eC798,1974

    Oelkers W: Adrenal insufficiency. N Engl J Med335 :1206 eC1212,1996

    Baulieu E-E: Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA): a fountain of youth J Clin Endocrinol Metab81 :3147 eC3151,1996

    Morales AJ, Nolan JJ, Nelson JC, Yen SSC: Effects of replacement dose of dehydroepiandrosterone in men and women of advancing age. J Clin Endocrinol Metab78 :1360 eC1367,1994

    Yen SSC, Morales AJ, Khorram O: Replacement of DHEA in aging men and women: potential remedial effects. Ann N Y Acad Sci774 :128 eC148,1995

    Lasco A, Frisina N, Morabito N, Gaudio A, Morini E, Trifiletti A, Basile G, Nicita-Mauro V, Cucinotta D: Metabolic effects of dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. Eur J Endocrinol145 :457 eC461,2001

    Jakubowicz D, Beer N, Rengifo R: Effect of dehydroepiandrosterone on cyclic-guanosine monophosphate in men of advancing age. Ann N Y Acad Sci774 :312 eC315,1995

    Hunt PJ, Gurnell EM, Huppert FA, Richards C, Prevost AT, Wass JAH, Herbert J, Chatterjee VKK: Improvement in mood and fatigue after dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in Addison’s disease in a randomized, double blind trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab85 :4650 eC4656,2000

    Callies F, Fassnacht M, van Vlijmen JC, Koehler I, Huebler D, Seibel MJ, Arlt W, Allolio B: Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in women with adrenal insufficiency: effects on body composition, serum leptin, bone turnover, and exercise capacity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab86 :1968 eC1972,2001

    Christiansen JJ: Short term restoration of androgen levels with dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in female adrenal insufficiency does not affect insulin sensitivity (Abstract). Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting of the Endocrine Society, San Francisco, CA, June2002

    Gebre-Medhin G, Husebye ES, Mallmin H, Helstrom L, Berne C, Karlsson FA, Kampe O: Oral dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) replacement therapy in women with Addison’s disease. Clin Endocrinol52 :775 eC780,2000

    Copeland KC, Kenney FA, Nair KS: Heated dorsal hand vein sampling for metabolic studies: a reappraisal. Am J Physiol263 :E1010 eCE1014,1992

    DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R: Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol237 :E214 eCE223,1979

    Moller N, Rizza RA, Ford GC, Nair KS: Assessment of postabsorptive renal glucose metabolism in humans with multiple glucose tracers. Diabetes50 :747 eC751,2001

    Rizza RA, Mandarino LJ, Gerich J: Dose-response characteristics for effects of insulin on production and utilization of glucose in man. Am J Physiol3 :E630 eCE639,1981

    Diamond P, Cusan L, Gomez JL, Belanger A, Labrie F: Metabolic effects of 12-month percutaneous dehydroepiandrosterone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women. J Endocrinol150 (Suppl.) :S43 eCS50,1996

    Paolisso G, Ammendola S, Rotondi M, Gambardella A, Rizzo MR, Mazziotti G, Tagliamonte MR, Carella C, Varricchio M: Insulin resistance and advancing age: what role for dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate Metabolism46 :1281 eC1286,1997

    Kawano H, Yasue H, Kitagawa A, Hirai N, Yoshida T, Soejima H, Miyamoto S, Nakano M, Ogawa H: Dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation improves endothelial function and insulin sensitivity in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab88 :3190 eC3195,2003

    Barrett-Connor E: Lower endogenous androgen levels and dyslipidemia in men with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med117 :807 eC811,1992

    Herranz L, Megia A, Grande C, Gonzalez-Gancedo P, Pallardo F: Dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, body fat distribution and insulin in obese men. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord19 :57 eC60 1995

    Morales AJ, Haubrich RH, Hwang JY, Asakura H, Yen SS: The effect of six months treatment with a 100 mg daily dose of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on circulating sex steroids, body composition and muscle strength in age-advanced men and women. Clin Endocrinol49 :421 eC432,1998

    Vogiatzi MG, Boeck MA, Vlachopapadopoulou E, el Rashid R, New MI: Dehydroepiandrosterone in morbidly obese adolescents: effects on weight, body composition lipids, and insulin resistance. Metabolism45 :1011 eC1015,1996

    Nestler JE, Barlascini CO, Clore JN, Blackard WG: Dehydroepiandrosterone reduces serum low density lipoprotein levels and body fat but does not alter insulin sensitivity in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab66 :57 eC61,1988

    Mortola JF, Yen SS: The effects of oral dehydroepiandrosterone on endocrine-metabolic parameters in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab71 :696 eC704,1990

    Orentreich N, Brind JL, Rizer RL, Vogelman JH: Age changes and sex differences in serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate concentrations throughout adulthood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab59 :551 eC555,1984

    Arlt W, Callies F, van Vlijmen JC, Koehler I, Reincke M, Bidlingmaier M, Huebler D, Oettel M, Ernst M, Schulte HM, Allolio B: Dehydroepiandrosterone replacement in women with adrenal insufficiency. N Engl J Med341 :1013 eC1020,1999

    Barquist E, Kirton O: Adrenal insufficiency in the surgical intensive care unit patient. J Trauma42 :27 eC31,1997

    Van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R: Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med345 :1359 eC1367,2001

    Elahi D, McAloon-Dyke M, Fukagawa NK, Sclater AL, Wong GA, Shannon RP, Minaker KL, Miles JM, Rubenstein AH, Vandepol CJ, Guler H-P, Good WR, Seaman JJ, Wolfe RR: Effects of recombinant human IGF-I on glucose and leucine kinetics in men. Am J Physiol265 :E831 eCE838,1993

    Barnhart KT, Freeman E, Grisso JA, Rader DJ, Sammel M, Kapoor S, Nestler JE: The effect of dehydroepiandrosterone supplementation to symptomatic perimenopausal women on serum endocrine profiles, lipid parameters, and health-related quality of life. J Clin Endocrinol Metab84 :3896 eC3902,1999

    Tan KC, Shiu SW, Pang RW, Kung AW: Effects of testosterone replacement on HDL subfractions and apolipoprotein A-I containing lipoproteins. Clin Endocrinol48 :187 eC194,1998

    Kajita K, Ishizuka T, Mune T, Miura A, Ishizawa M, Kanoh Y, Kawai Y, Natsume Y, Yasuda K: Dehydroepiandrosterone down-regulates the expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in adipocytes. Endocrinology144 :253 eC259,2003(Ketan Dhatariya, Maureen )