An orderly inactivation of intracellular retention signals controls surface expression of the T cell antigen receptor
http://www.100md.com
《实验药学杂志》
Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid 28049, Spain
CORRESPONDENCE Balbino Alarcón: Balarcon@cbm.uam.es
Exit from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an important checkpoint for proper assembly of multimeric plasma membrane receptors. The six subunits of the T cell receptor (TCR; TCR, TCR?, CD3, CD3, CD3, and CD3) are each endowed with ER retention/retrieval signals, and regulation of its targeting to the plasma membrane is therefore especially intriguing. We have studied the importance of the distinct ER retention signals at different stages of TCR intracellular assembly. To this end, we have characterized first the presence of ER retention signals in CD3. Despite the presence of multiple ER retention signals in CD3, dimers reach the cell surface when the single CD3 ER retention signal is deleted. Furthermore, inclusion of this CD3 mutant promoted plasma membrane expression of incomplete ? and ? complexes without CD3. It therefore appears that the CD3 ER retention signal is dominant and that it is only overridden upon the incorporation of CD3. We propose that the stepwise assembly of the TCR complex guarantees that all assembly intermediates have at least one functional ER retention signal and that only a full signaling-competent TCR complex is expressed on the cell surface.
Abbreviation used: MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
Multimeric plasma membrane protein complexes typically assemble early in the secretory pathway, in parallel with the synthesis and folding of individual subunits in the ER. Exit from the ER is an important checkpoint for many such complexes, as only fully assembled complexes are allowed to pass this control step (1). ER retention/retrieval signals (herein referred to as ER retention signals) are present in some receptor subunits, and the assembly of complexes is thought to mask the ER retention signal, permitting targeting to the membrane of the fully assembled complexes (2). The TCR is an especially complex model because it is formed by six different subunits that all contain ER retention determinants.
In the TCR, the TCR and TCR? subunits (or TCR and TCR in T cells) are responsible for the recognition of the MHC/antigen ligand. These are noncovalently bound to the signal-transducing subunits CD3, CD3, CD3, and CD3 (the CD3 subunit is CD247). During assembly, CD3 first dimerizes with either CD3 or CD3, and the resulting and dimers associate with the TCR and TCR? subunits (3–5). The resulting ? or ? complexes are either retained in the ER or degraded in lysosomes (6). Only when CD3 is incorporated into the complex is the TCR transported to the plasma membrane (6–8). In this way, expression of signal-transducing subunits independent of ligand-binding subunits or vice versa is tightly controlled. Indeed, in T cell mutants and knockout mice lacking TCR?, CD3, or CD3, TCR expression is severely impaired (9–12). In addition, T cell precursors in RAG-deficient and SCID mice that are unable to express the TCR gene subunits have a very low level of CD3 and dimer expression at the cell surface (13, 14), and their development is arrested at the most immature CD4– CD8– stage.
Removal of the ER retention signal in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 permits this subunit to reach the cell surface by itself (15, 16). This signal consists of an elongated helix followed by a ?I' turn and contains three important, closely spaced residues: tyrosine, leucine, and arginine. The presence of arginine in the ER retention signal is characteristic of type II proteins despite the fact that CD3 is a type I membrane protein (17–19). Other ER retention signals in the TCR have not been analyzed in detail, although TCR contains an ER retention signal in its transmembrane region (20) and TCR? in both its extracellular and transmembrane domains (21). With regard to the other CD3 subunits, CD3 has a conserved arginine residue in position –3 from the COOH terminus, and CD3 has either an arginine or a lysine residue at the same position. Their removal from Tac and Tac chimeras disrupts ER retention (22).
In addition to ER retention signals, binding of incompletely folded subunits and complexes to chaperonins such as calnexin can also influence ER retention (23). Moreover, endocytosis signals in several subunits of the TCR complex offer a further level of regulation (22, 24, 25). The CD3 subunit contains an important double leucine signal for endocytosis that is hidden in the complete TCR complex but unmasked by PKC-mediated phosphorylation of an upstream serine (26). In partial complexes, this double leucine signal is constitutively exposed and only masked upon integration of CD3 into the TCR complex (27, 28).
During assembly, all individual ER retention determinants in TCR subunits must be annulled before the TCR complex can be transported to the plasma membrane. The ER retention determinants may become progressively overridden as the TCR complex assembles or alternatively, all determinants might become inoperative at once, when all the TCR subunits are assembled. To study this process, we have characterized the ER retention signals in CD3 and analyzed the predominance of CD3 and CD3 signals in the dimer. All the determinants in CD3 are overridden when it assembles with CD3. However, the single ER retention signal in CD3 remains active in the dimer and only becomes inoperative upon completion of the last assembly step, i.e., the incorporation of CD3. These results support a model of sequential inactivation of ER retention signals during stepwise assembly.
Results
The cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains multiple intracellular trafficking signals
To identify ER retention signals in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3, a chimeric protein containing the CD3 cytoplasmic tail appended to the human CD4 extracellular and transmembrane domains was generated (chimera 44; Fig. 1 A). The chimera was transfected into COS cells, and cell surface expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. Expression of the 44 chimera at the cell surface was 2.5-fold lower than that of wild-type CD4 (Fig. 1 B). Furthermore, unlike CD4, the 44 chimera was predominantly located in the ER of transfected COS cells, with a similar distribution to CD3 (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1). These results indicated that the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains an ER retention signal.
Figure 1. Deletion mapping of ER retention sequences in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3. (A) Schematic representation of the 44 chimera with the extracellular and transmembrane domains of CD4 and the cytoplasmic tail of CD3. The full amino acid sequence of the CD3 tail is shown. The numbers refer to the position of cytoplasmic amino acids in CD3. The di-leucine endocytosis motif is underlined, the two tyrosines of the ITAM are circled, and the putative DxE ER export motif is in bold. The last amino acid in each of the five COOH-terminal deletions is indicated. (B) Surface expression of the 44 deletion mutants. COS cells were transfected with the indicated constructs and analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with anti-CD4 antibody. Normalized surface expression was calculated after multiplying the percentage (nonpermeabilized/permeabilized samples) by the MFI of CD4+ cells. (C) Surface expression of the 44 deletion mutants in the YT human NK cell line. 20–30 stable clones for each of the constructs was analyzed after staining with anti-CD4 and flow cytometry. Surface expression in the four clones with the highest anti-CD4 staining per construct is represented as MFI. (D) Acquisition of partial endo-H resistance of 44 deletion mutants. COS cells were transfected with the indicated constructs, pulse-labeled with 35S-methionine, and chased for the indicated times. Immunoprecipitation was performed with an anti-CD4 antibody. Each immunoprecipitate was split, and one half was digested with Endo-H. (E) The rate of ER export for 44 chimeras was calculated from the rate of conversion to partial endo-H resistance. The two bands appearing upon digestion with endo-H (D) represent a fully endo-H–sensitive (lower band) and a partly endo-H–resistant (upper band) form of 44. Both protein bands were quantified by densitometry and the ratio of the upper band to the sum of both bands was taken as the endo-H resistance conversion rate and as the rate of ER export.
To characterize this putative ER retention signal, five deletion mutants of the 44 chimera were generated and transfected into COS cells (Fig. 1 A). Deletion of the three COOH-terminal amino acids (441) promoted a moderate increase in surface expression of the chimera (Fig. 1 B). This effect was slightly accentuated when five or nine additional amino acids were deleted from the COOH-terminal end (442 and 443). In contrast, deletion of seven more amino acids (444) provoked an important reduction in 44 expression (Fig. 1 B), suggesting that a signal that facilitates transport to the plasma membrane might reside between amino acids 142 and 148. Finally, deletion of most of the cytoplasmic tail, including the double leucine endocytotic signal, enhanced surface expression to above the levels of wild-type CD4. This could be due to the 445 mutant lacking not only the double leucine endocytotic signal of CD3, but also that of the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 (29). The increase in surface expression of the mutant chimeras was coincident with a redistribution of the chimera to the Golgi apparatus, plasma membrane, and vesicular structures (Fig. S1).
The fact that some 44 chimera was detected at the plasma membrane might be due to excessive protein expression in transfected COS cells, thereby overriding the ER retention machinery. Hence, we studied the surface expression of the 44 chimera in stable transfectants of the human NK cell line YT. Several cell clones with each construct were studied to exclude clonal effects. Only the mutant 445 was expressed at the cell surface at a level that matched that of wild-type CD4 (Fig. 1 C). There was only a slight increase in surface expression of chimeras 441 through 443 and a marginal reduction of 444.
We determined how the rate of exit from the ER was affected in these 44 mutants. Human CD4 has two N-glycosylation sites, one of which is converted to the complex type in the mature protein (30). Hence, we assessed the acquisition of partial endo-H resistance of the 44 mutants after metabolic labeling of the COS cells. Export from the ER of the 441 and 442 chimeras was accelerated twofold. These mutants required 50 min to acquire 50% endo-H resistance (t1/2 = 50) compared with the 95 min for wild-type 44 (Fig. 1, D and E). Deletion of further amino acids reduced the exit rate to t1/2 = 115 min for 443, whereas the ER export of 444 and 445 was dramatically reduced (t1/2 >> 120 min). Thus, it seemed clear that signals other than those for ER retention also regulate the level of 44 chimera surface expression.
The cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains a di-leucine endocytotic motif (Fig. 1 A; reference 25) and a putative DxE ER export signal (31). The combination of ER retention, export, and endocytosis is ultimately responsible for the surface expression of the 44 mutants. Deletion of the ER retention signal in the COOH-terminal end of the chimera might explain the accelerated rate of ER export for 441 and 442, whereas removal of the putative DxE ER export signal would explain the decrease in ER export of 444 and 445. The diminished ER exit of 443 compared with 442 might be due to a positional effect on the DxE signal. Nevertheless, it seems that the di-leucine endocytotic signal is mainly responsible for regulating the surface levels of the 44 chimera. This could explain why only 445 is highly expressed at the surface despite the reduced rate of ER export (Fig. 1, B, C, and E).
CD3 contains ER retention determinants in its extracellular, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains
To further characterize this ER retention signal and to determine the impact this signal has on 44 chimera surface expression, point mutations of the last three amino acids were introduced. To avoid interference from the di-leucine internalization signal, leucine 131 was replaced by alanine. Expression of the double mutants at the cell surface was analyzed in transfected COS cells and in stable YT transfectants. In both cell types, mutation of the di-leucine motif alone (44L131A mutant) caused a two- (COS cells) to sixfold (YT cells) increase in surface expression of the 44 chimera (Fig. 2 A). Replacement of arginine 158 with alanine (44L131A/R158A mutant) resulted in an additional two- (COS cells) to fourfold (YT cells) increase in surface expression. In contrast, mutation of the other two COOH-terminal amino acids (44L131A/N160A and 44L131A/R159A mutants) did not have a major impact on cell surface expression. The effect of arginine 158 mutation was also reflected in the cellular redistribution of this 44 mutant (Fig. S2, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1). Thus, of the three amino acid residues deleted in mutant 441, only arginine 158 seems to be important for ER retention of 44.
Figure 2. CD3 contains ER retention determinants in its extracellular, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains. (A) Arginine to alanine substitution at position 158 increases the surface expression of the 44 chimera. Single or double point mutants of 44 were either transiently transfected in COS cells or stably transfected in YT cells, and cell surface expression of the chimera was analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) Intracellular distribution of mutants in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3. COS cells were transfected with constructs featuring single point mutations in either the double leucine endocytosis motif or the cytoplasmic ER retention signal, or with a double mutant (L131A/R158A), and their expression pattern was analyzed by confocal microscopy after staining with anti-HA mAb. A mutant of CD3 lacking the cytoplasmic domain (tr) was analyzed in the same way. (C) Domain-shuffling CD4-CD3 chimeras. The CD3 domains are dotted. (D) Intracellular distribution of domain- shuffling chimeras in COS cells. COS cells were transfected with the indicated chimeras and analyzed by confocal microscopy after staining with anti-CD4 (for CD4 and 44) or anti-HA (for HA-tagged 44 and 44). (E) Surface expression of domain-shuffled chimeras and CD3 point mutants. COS cells transfected as in B and D were analyzed by flow cytometry for surface expression after staining with anti-HA or anti-CD4 antibodies.
Once an ER retention signal had been identified in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3, we evaluated the role of this signal in the context of the whole CD3 molecule. Surprisingly, mutation of arginine 158 to alanine in CD3 did not prevent ER retention, because the mutant was exclusively located in the ER when examined by confocal microscopy (Fig. 2 B). Nor was CD3 redistributed to the plasma membrane when an additional mutation in the di-leucine motif was introduced (Fig. 2 B, L131A/R158A). These results suggested that CD3 contains other ER retention determinants in addition to the COOH-terminal signal. Furthermore, a truncated CD3 with only the first two cytoplasmic amino acids of CD3 was still retained in the ER in COS cells, suggesting that ER retention determinants were present in the extracellular and/or transmembrane domains (Fig. 2 B, tr). Indeed, two new domain shuffle chimeras were both retained in the ER: 44, with the extracellular domain of CD3, and 44, with the CD3 transmembrane domain (Fig. 2, C and D).
Expression of the CD4/CD3 chimeras and of the CD3 point mutants was also evaluated by flow cytometry. Surface expression of the single di-leucine motif mutant of CD3 (L131A) was slightly higher than the wild-type CD3 but lower than the mutant in the cytoplasmic ER retention signal (Fig. 2 E, R158A). The double mutation of the cytoplasmic ER and endocytotic signals (L131A/R158A) acted synergistically to increase the surface expression of CD3. Nevertheless, all CD4-CD3 chimeras and CD3 mutants were expressed at lower levels than CD4 (Fig. 2 E), further indicating that ER retention determinants reside not only in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3, but also in the transmembrane and extracellular domains. These extracellular and transmembrane retention determinants in CD3 could represent distinct sequence motifs or an unfolded state of the protein. In any case, it appears that in contrast to CD3, which contains a single ER retention signal (15), retention of free CD3 is regulated by multiple signals. It therefore seems that the expression of CD3 on the cell surface is tightly regulated.
Dimerization with CD3 abolishes all ER retention determinants in CD3
One of the earliest steps in TCR assembly is the dimerization of CD3 with either CD3 or CD3 (3, 4, 6). The resulting and dimers are retained in the ER unless they assemble with TCR, TCR?, and CD3. Because both CD3 and CD3 contain ER retention signals, we examined the relative contribution of each signal to dimer retention. COS cells were cotransfected with the CD3 mutants and CD4 chimeras (refer to Fig. 2) and either wild-type CD3 or a deletion mutant of CD3 lacking its single ER retention signal (mut; reference 15). The 44 chimera was excluded from this study because it lacks the extracellular domain of CD3 necessary for assembly with CD3 (32). Cellular distribution of the dimers was distinguished from that of the single chains by immunostaining with a CD3 dimer-specific antibody, UCHT1 (33). When associated with wild-type CD3, all CD3 chimeras and mutants were located in the ER, independent of the presence of CD3 ER retention and endocytotic signals (Fig. 3 A). However, transfection of mut resulted in export of the dimers from the ER and targeting to the plasma membrane (Fig. 3, A and B). The same effect was seen when wild-type CD3 and mut were expressed in COS cells (not depicted).
Figure 3. Deletion of the single ER retention signal in CD3 is sufficient for surface expression of the dimer. (A) Intracellular distribution of the dimer comprising combinations of wild-type and mutant CD3 and CD3. COS cells were transfected with combinations of either wild-type CD3 or the ER retention mutant mut and the indicated CD3 mutants. Cells were double stained with anti-HA antibody (green) to identify both free and CD3-associated CD3 and with UCHT1 (red) to identify the dimer. Cells transfected with wild-type CD3 or mut were stained with anti-CD3 antibody SP34. (B) Surface expression of the dimer. The transfected cells described in A were also analyzed for surface expression of the dimer by flow cytometry after staining with UCHT1.
In the absence of the CD3 ER retention signal, the dimer was transported to the cell surface regardless of the CD3 cytoplasmic ER retention signal (compare R158A with in Fig. 3 B). However, mutation of the CD3 di-leucine endocytosis signal increased cell surface expression of the dimer fourfold (Fig. 3 B, L131A). Expression did not increase further when the cytoplasmic ER retention signal of CD3 was mutated as well as the endocytotic signal (L131A/R158A), nor in the absence of the whole cytoplasmic tail (tr), nor in the absence of both the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains (44).
These results suggest that the only functional ER retention signal in the dimer is that in CD3, and all ER retention determinants in CD3 are abrogated upon dimerization with CD3. Therefore, the ER retention determinants in CD3 do not seem to play a major role in regulating expression at the cell surface. However, CD3 does contribute to this task by mediating the endocytosis of the dimer via its di-leucine signal.
The single ER retention signal of CD3 is only overridden during the last assembly step
Once (or ) dimers are assembled in the ER, they associate with the TCR and TCR? chains to form ? and ? complexes. These incomplete TCR–CD3 complexes remain in the ER or are degraded in lysosomes. The TCR complex can only reach the plasma membrane when the subunit is incorporated (6–8, 34). Indeed, reconstruction of the TCR complex in HeLa cells showed that transfection of the subunit was sufficient to drive transport of ? and ? complexes to the cell surface (35). Bearing this in mind, we studied whether the CD3 ER retention mutant promoted surface expression of the ? complex or whether assembly of was still required. COS cells were transfected with plasmids encoding these subunits, but the L131A mutant was used to avoid internalization of the ? complex. When transfected with the CD3 ER retention mutant, both the CD3 dimer and TCR? were transported to the plasma membrane, even in the absence of (Fig. 4 A). Two-color flow cytometry with anti-TCR? and anti-CD3 antibodies was used to quantify the ? complex on the cell surface. This showed that the ? complex is expressed at a high level independent of (Fig. 4 B). In contrast, when wild-type CD3 was transfected, TCR? and the CD3 dimer were predominantly found in the ER and were consequently practically undetectable at the cell surface (Fig. 4, A and B). Similar results were obtained when wild-type CD3 instead of the di-leucine mutant was used, although surface expression of the ? complex reached lower levels (Fig. S3, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1), probably because the ? complex was being endocytosed. These results show that mutation of the CD3 ER retention signal is sufficient for transport and expression of the incomplete ? complex to the cell surface. Interestingly, the presence of did not induce a major increase in the surface expression of complexes containing wild-type CD3, possibly due to the inefficient assembly of CD3 into the ? complex.
Figure 4. Deletion of the single ER retention signal in CD3 is sufficient for surface expression of the incomplete ? complex. (A) Intracellular distribution of the TCR–CD3 chains in cells transfected with wild-type CD3 or the mut ER retention mutant. COS cells were transfected with the constructs indicated on the right, permeabilized, and triple stained with the anti- antibody UCHT1 (green), anti-TCR? antibody Jovi.1 (red), and anti-CD3 antibody 448 (blue) before analyzing by confocal microscopy. A higher magnification of the area shown in the insets illustrates the presence of the TCR complexes in the ER or the plasma membrane. (B) Surface expression of the incomplete ? complex. Transfected cells described in A were double stained with mAbs specific for TCR? and the dimer in nonpermeabilized and detergent- permeabilized cells. The percentage of double labeled cells is indicated in each histogram. The percentage of surface expression was calculated from the surface to intracellular expression ratio.
To confirm that the CD3 ER retention signal is also dominant in the complexes lacking CD3 (? and ?) in T cells, we transfected human wild-type CD3 and human mut into the CD3-deficient mutant MA5.8 of the murine hybridoma 2B4 (36). Human CD3 can assemble with murine TCR chains, and its cell surface expression can be followed by flow cytometry with anti–human CD3 antibodies (37). Stable transfectants were analyzed by two-color flow cytometry using an anti–human CD3 dimer antibody and an anti-murine TCR? antibody. Transfection of human wild-type CD3 in -sufficient 2B4 cells led to its incorporation into a sizeable population that was not observed in -deficient MA5.8 cells (Fig. 5 A). However, transfection of mut led to its expression in both the -expressing and -deficient cell lines, although it was expressed less in the absence of CD3. The level of human CD3 expression on the cell surface was also examined with an anti-CD3 antibody in flow cytometry and compared with its intracellular expression in detergent-permeabilized cells. Wild-type CD3 clearly failed to reach the cell surface in -deficient cells despite the intracellular accumulation of the protein (Fig. 5 A). Finally, all the transfectants were surface biotinylated and the human CD3-containing complexes were recovered with an anti–human CD3 antibody. The immunoprecipitates were resolved by two-dimensional SDS-PAGE under nonreducing/reducing conditions and showed that mut was indeed expressed at the cell surface and was associated with the murine TCR, TCR?, CD3, CD3, and CD3 chains (Fig. 5 B). Wild-type human CD3 was again not detected in -deficient cells.
Figure 5. Deletion of the ER retention signal in CD3 is sufficient to allow surface expression of the TCR complex in -deficient T cells. (A) Surface expression of TCR complexes in -expressing and -deficient T cells. The parental murine T cell hybridoma 2B4 and its -deficient MA5.8 mutant were stably transfected with either wild-type human CD3 or with human mut. Cells were double stained with the anti-murine TCR? antibody H57-597 and the anti–human CD3 antibody Leu4 and analyzed by two-color flow cytometry (top). Representative clones for each condition are shown. The result of single staining with anti–human CD3 antibody SK7 of intact or detergent-permeabilized cells is shown in the middle and bottom rows. (B) The ER retention mutant of CD3 is expressed at the cell surface within a TCR complex. The human CD3-transfected clones were surface biotinylated and immunoprecipitated with Leu4 from Brij96 detergent lysates. The immunoprecipitates were resolved by two-dimensional nonreducing/reducing SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with streptavidin-peroxidase. The positions of human and murine TCR and CD3 chains are indicated.
Expression of TCR complexes containing the human CD3 ER retention mutant was clearly lower in -deficient than in -expressing cells (Fig. 5). This might reflect the fact that incorporation of CD3 is required to hide the di-leucine endocytosis signal in CD3 (27, 28). These results show that the TCR complex can be exported to the plasma membrane in the absence of CD3 when the CD3 ER retention signal is eliminated. Furthermore, the results confirm that the CD3 ER retention signal prevents cell surface expression of the incomplete ? and ? complexes and suggest that this signal becomes inoperative only upon completion of the last assembly step with the incorporation of CD3.
Masking of the CD3 ER retention signal upon CD3 assembly is position dependent
A prediction of the stepwise model of ER retention signal annulment is that silencing of a given ER retention signal must be position specific; e.g., if CD3 assembly overrides the ER retention signal in CD3, this must occur in the context of the specific topological position of CD3 in the TCR complex. To evaluate this hypothesis, we constructed two new CD3 chimeras. In one of the chimeras, the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 was substituted by the tail of CD3 (Fig. 6 A, chimera). The other chimera was generated by appending the ER retention signal of CD3 at the COOH-terminal end of CD3 (Fig. 6 A, ret). Next, we examined whether assembly of the CD3 chimeras with the ER retention mutant of CD3 resulted in expression of the dimer at the cell surface. As previously demonstrated (Fig. 3), assembly of wild-type CD3 with mut but not with wild-type CD3 allowed transport of the dimer to the cell surface (Fig. 6 B). In contrast, assembly of the CD3 chimeras and ret with mut prevented export of the dimer to the plasma membrane (Fig. 6 B) and retained the dimer in the ER (Fig. S4, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1). These results therefore show that abrogation of the ER retention signals during assembly of the dimer is dependent on both the sequence of the cytoplasmic tail and the position of the ER retention signals within the dimer.
Figure 6. Translocation of the CD3 ER retention signal to CD3 prevents dimer and TCR expression. (A) Scheme of CD3 chimeras where the CD3 domains are dotted. The presence of CD3-derived sequences (the whole cytoplasmic tail in or the last 15 amino acids in ret) is indicated with black boxes. The three constructs were HA tagged at their NH2 terminus. (B) Abrogation of the cytoplasmic ER retention signal in CD3 is position dependent. COS cells were transfected with combinations of either wild-type CD3 or the ER retention mutant mut and the indicated CD3 chimeras. Surface expression of the dimer was analyzed by two-color flow cytometry with anti-HA and anti-CD3 dimer (Leu4) antibodies in nonpermeabilized cells. Intracellular expression of the dimer was assessed by two-color flow cytometry of detergent-permeabilized cells (not depicted). The percentage of dimer-positive cells is indicated in the corresponding quadrants. (C) Abrogation of the CD3 ER retention signal upon CD3 assembly is position dependent. Jurkat CD3– R3.25 cells were stably transfected with the indicated CD3 constructs, and geneticin-resistant clones were analyzed for TCR expression by double color flow cytometry with anti-HA and anti-CD3 (Leu 4) antibodies. The seven clones with the highest TCR expression for each construct are represented at the bottom. Two-color flow cytometry histograms for the clones with highest TCR expression are shown at the top. The total number of clones analyzed was 42 for the wild-type CD3 construct, 14 for the ret construct, and 48 for the construct. NT, nontransfected.
To extend these results to the full TCR complex, a CD3– mutant of Jurkat was transfected with wild-type CD3 or with the or ret chimeras, and stable clones were selected. Transfection of wild-type CD3 but not the or ret chimeras reconstituted the surface expression of the TCR complex at high levels (Fig. 6 C). These results show that if the CD3 ER retention signal is misplaced (either at the position of the CD3 tail or at the tip of CD3), CD3 assembly can no longer silence it.
Discussion
In this study, we have tried to better understand the mechanisms that regulate expression of TCR–CD3 complexes at the cell surface and prevent nonassembled subunits and incomplete complexes from reaching or remaining in the plasma membrane. We found that removal of the CD3 ER retention signal is sufficient to permit expression of and dimers at the surface of transfected COS cells. Indeed, even though CD3 contains multiple ER retention signals, these signals all become inoperative upon assembly with CD3. Furthermore, our results show that the absence of the CD3 ER retention signal is sufficient to allow the expression of incomplete TCR complexes in the plasma membrane, even when lacking CD3.
Dual regulation through ER retention signals and proteasome-dependent degradation from the ER prevents TCR subunits from progressing through the secretory pathway (38, 39). ER retention signals have been described in CD3, TCR, TCR?, CD3, and CD3 (15, 20–22, and this study), and it could be considered that all ER retention signals are abrogated simultaneously when the full TCR complex is assembled. However, our findings indicate that there is a hierarchy among retention signals such that they become overridden progressively as the TCR complex assembles. Hence, we propose a model for the export of the TCR complex (Fig. 7) in which the ER retention signals of CD3, CD3, TCR, and TCR? become progressively inoperative as they assemble with CD3. The ER retention signal in CD3 remains dominant in these complexes.
Figure 7. Model of sequential inactivation of TCR retention signals. Surface expression of free CD3 is prevented by a single ER retention signal (triangle), whereas expression of free CD3 is prevented by several ER retention signals (triangles) and a di-leucine endocytosis signal (circle). CD3 may contain at least one cytoplasmic ER retention signal similar to those of CD3 and CD3 (triangle) and a di-leucine endocytosis signal (circle). Upon assembly of and dimers, the ER retention determinants of CD3 and CD3 are overridden, but surface expression of the and dimers is prevented by the CD3 ER retention signal that remains functional. The endocytosis signals in CD3 (and probably CD3) remain active in the and dimers and are responsible for the internalization and removal of the small amounts of dimer that somehow reach the cell membrane on their own. TCR and TCR? contain additional ER retention determinants, but these do not seem to be operative in the ? (and probably ?) complex. Only after assembly of CD3 does the CD3 ER retention signal become nonfunctional, thus allowing the full TCR–CD3 complex to reach the plasma membrane. The stability of the full complex on the cell surface is also increased because the CD3 and CD3 endocytotic signals are inactive. Removing both the CD3 ER retention signal and the CD3 endocytotic signal artificially increases surface expression of free dimers and incomplete ? complexes.
When is the ER retention signal in CD3 overridden? We postulate that this takes place after association of , which has been long known to be the last step in assembly (6–8). This idea was not confirmed by our reconstitution studies in COS cells, because efficient cell surface expression of the ? complex with wild-type CD3 was not observed. This might indicate that CD3 is mandatory for surface expression. However, our transfection experiments (not depicted) and the results of Kappes and Tonegawa (35) suggest that this is not the case. Moreover, transfection of all TCR subunits in non–T cells is sufficient to detect the full TCR complex at the cell surface (35, 40). This discrepancy might be explained by the greater sensitivity of radio iodination (40) compared with the flow cytometry used here, or by the fact that the transfected population underwent selection for high TCR expression (35). However, the poor efficiency of ER export and the weak surface expression of the wild-type CD3-containing ? complex might be better explained by the inefficient assembly of CD3 into the complex. Nevertheless, the results in COS cells and the model (Fig. 7) have been validated in -expressing and -deficient murine T cells transfected with human CD3 (Fig. 5). Human wild-type CD3 is targeted to the plasma membrane within the TCR complex only after assembly of CD3, whereas the human CD3 ER retention mutant can reach the membrane with and without CD3. Studies in CD3-deficient mice and cell lines show that TCR–CD3 surface expression is extremely low in the absence of this subunit (34, 41). Accordingly, our results show that the CD3 ER retention signal remains functional in the incomplete ? complex, preventing cell surface expression. These results also indicate that the orderly inactivation of intracellular retention signals serves to not only prevent surface expression of the CD3 dimer (or TCR dimer), but also that of TCR–CD3 complexes lacking CD3.
What then is the mechanism that overrides CD3's ER retention signal upon assembly of ? It has been proposed that the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 hides the otherwise exposed di-leucine endocytosis motif in CD3 by steric hindrance (28). Indeed, in -deficient cells it has recently been demonstrated that the TCR is more rapidly internalized and that expression of CD3, or a CD3 chimera with its cytoplasmic tail partially replaced by a foreign sequence, restores normal TCR internalization (27). Steric masking of the dilysine ER retention motif in the chain of the heterodimeric high affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E (FcRI) upon assembly with the chain has been proposed to regulate plasma membrane targeting (2). Similarly, steric hindrance by the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 could be responsible for annulling the CD3 ER retention signal, although other mechanisms involving CD3-dependent rearrangements of the TCR complex cannot be excluded. Interestingly, the chain of FcRI and CD3 are structural and functionally related, and indeed, the FcRI chain can take over the role of CD3 in TCR assembly in –/– mice (42–44). These results suggest a common mechanism underlying ER retention of immune receptor complexes by components of the CD3 family. In any case, masking of the CD3 ER retention signal by CD3 assembly is position dependent. Thus, either replacement of the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 by CD3 or apposition of an extra CD3 ER retention signal to the COOH-terminal end of CD3 prevents surface expression of the full TCR complex (Fig. 6).
We have shown that the di-leucine endocytosis signal of CD3, together with the ER retention signal in CD3, is also important to reduce the expression of the dimer on the cell surface. Thus, high level expression of the (and by extension ) dimer on the cell surface is prevented by impairing its export from the ER–Golgi and by stimulating the rapid endocytosis of dimers from the cell surface. This regulation of CD3 dimer and free CD3 subunit expression is required to prevent ligand-independent triggering of signaling cascades. It has been shown that small amounts of and dimers expressed on the surface of immature thymocytes, also known as clonotypic-independent complexes, can promote thymic differentiation and proliferation upon cross-linking with anti-CD3 antibodies (45). One might ask what would be the consequence of augmenting the expression of CD3 dimers at the cell surface on thymic maturation. Studies in which a TCR? transgene that lacks the variable region (46), or even all extracellular domains (47), was expressed in MHC class I– and II–deficient mice indicate that the pre-TCR function is independent of ligand recognition. The pre-TCR could therefore serve merely as a platform to express sufficiently high levels of the CD3 dimers at the cell surface to initiate ligand-independent signaling. Assembly of the CD3 dimers with TCR?, pT, and CD3 must override the CD3 ER retention signal as well as those in TCR? (21) and pT (48). In this regard, it should be noted that the addition of an extra ER retention signal to TCR? abolishes pre-TCR function (49). These results suggest that the pre-TCR must be expressed on the cell surface to carry out its signaling role. Furthermore, unlike the natural ER retention signals present in the TCR and CD3 subunits, the artificial signal introduced in TCR? does not appear to be annulled during assembly.
We have made an initial attempt to characterize the signals that regulate the intracellular retention of the CD3 chain. In accordance with previous observations (22), we found that the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains an ER retention signal at the COOH terminus. Although this sequence is reminiscent of the double arginine ER retention signal in type II membrane proteins (18, 19), we have discovered that only one of the two arginines in CD3 is important for ER retention. Thus, the cytoplasmic CD3 ER retention signal better resembles that of CD3, which contains only one important basic residue (arginine –3; references 15 and 16). In addition to the ER retention signal, the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains a putative ER export sequence of the DxE type (31) and a di-leucine endocytosis signal (22, 50). However, CD3 also contains ER retention determinants in its extracellular and transmembrane domains that have yet to be characterized. These extracellular and transmembrane retention determinants in CD3 could represent distinct sequence motifs or an unfolded state of the protein. In any case, it appears that in contrast to CD3, the retention of free CD3 is regulated by multiple signals.
In conclusion, the results presented here suggest that the TCR–CD3 complex is endowed with a complicated system of intracellular retention signals that become overridden in a stepwise fashion as assembly proceeds. Assembly is regulated in such a way that all intermediates have at least one functional retention signal. This system guarantees that only a full signaling-competent TCR–CD3 complex is expressed at the cell surface.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells
COS-7 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and grown in DMEM plus 5% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich). The human NK cell line YT was provided by M. López-Botet (Universidad Pompeu-Fabra, Barcelona, Spain), the murine 2B4 T cell hybridoma was from the ATCC, the CD3-deficient mutant MA5.8 of 2B4 was provided by J. Ashwell (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and the CD3-deficient mutant R3.25 of Jurkat was provided by B. Rubin (CNRS, Toulouse, France). All cells were grown in RPMI medium plus 5% FBS.
Constructs.
All constructs were generated by PCR using human cDNAs as templates. PCR products were cloned into the pSR or pSR-HA (unpublished data) vectors. The 44 chimera is composed of the extracellular and the transmembrane domains of CD4 (finishing in position V395 of the mature polypeptide) fused to the complete intracellular domain of CD3 (from position A115 of the mature polypeptide). 441 to 445 constructs have a stop codon at positions 157, 152, 148, 141, and 121, respectively, of the mature human CD3 protein. Truncated CD3 (tr) contains only the first two amino acids of the cytoplasmic tail. Wild-type human CD3 and the CD3 mutant lacking the last five COOH-terminal amino acids (mut) have been described (15, 51). Point mutants were generated by introducing the mutation encoding for alanine in the positions 131, 158, 159, and 160 of the mature human CD3 protein using 44 (44L131A, 44L131A/N160A, 44L131A/R159A, and 44L131A/R158A) or CD3 (L131A, R158A, and L131A/R158A) as template. The 44, 44, and constructs were created as isolated fragments by PCR, cloned into the intermediate vector pGEM-7Zf(+), and the chimeric cDNAs were subcloned into the pSR-HA vector. The ret construct was created by PCR using a 3' primer encoding for the last COOH-terminal 15 amino acids of human CD3 (KGQRDLYSGLNQRRI) appended to the last amino acid of CD3, and the PCR product was cloned into the pSR-HA vector.
Antibodies
The mAb anti–human SP34 that recognizes the CD3 extracellular domain, the mAb anti–human CD3 UCHT1, the mAb anti–human CD4 HP2/6, and the mAb anti–C? Jovi.1 were provided by C. Terhorst (Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Boston, MA), P. Beverley (The Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, Berkshire, UK), F. Sánchez-Madrid (Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain), and M. Owen (CRUK, London, UK), respectively. The anti-CD3 antiserum 448 has been described (5). The following mAbs were purchased as indicated: anti-HA epitope 12CA5 (Roche Diagnostics), anti-murine TCR? H57-597 and anti–human CD3 Leu4 (BD Biosciences), and anti–human CD3 SK7 (StemCell Technologies Inc.). All secondary fluorochrome-labeled antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences.
Cell transfections
COS cells were transiently transfected as described previously (32), and stable transfectants of YT, 2B4, MA5.8, and R3.25 cells were generated by electroporation and selection in geneticin.
Flow cytometry
24 h after transfection, COS cells were detached from the plate with 0.02% EDTA in PBS and divided into two aliquots for surface and intracellular staining. For intracellular staining, cells were first fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at 4°C and then permeabilized with 0.1% saponin in PBS at 4°C for 1 h. Permeabilized and nonpermeabilized cells were incubated with 4 μg/ml of the appropriate mAb for 30 min at 4°C and then with a secondary FITC- or PE-labeled antibody. For two-color staining, directly labeled antibodies were used. Surface expression is indicated as a percentage, as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), or by multiplying both parameters.
Confocal microscopy
Upon transfection, COS cells were plated on glass coverslips, fixed in paraformaldehyde at room temperature 24 h later, and then permeabilized with saponin as described above. The coverslips were mounted in Mowiol and examined with a confocal microscope (Radiance 2000; BioRad Laboratories).
Cell labeling and immunoprecipitation
48 h after transfection, COS cells were labeled with 35S-methionine for 15 min and then chased for different times in standard medium before lysing with 1% NP-40 lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 10 mM iodoacetamide, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, and 1 μg/ml leupeptin). Postnuclear lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-CD4 antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were resuspended in endo-H buffer (50 mM sodium citrate, pH 5.5, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, and 1 μg/ml leupeptin) before digesting half of the sample with endo-H. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography.
For surface biotinylation, 50 x 106 MA5.8 and 2B4 were incubated with 0.5 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce Chemical Co.) in PBS supplemented with 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 for 45 min on ice. After washing, surface complexes were recovered by incubating the labeled intact cells with human anti-CD3 antibody Leu4 before lysis. Protein G was added and immunoprecipitates were subjected to two-dimensional SDS-PAGE (first dimension under nonreducing and second dimension under reducing conditions), immunotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, hybridized with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc.), and developed by ECL (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows intracellular distribution of 44 deletional mutants. Fig. S2 shows intracellular distribution of the 44 point mutants. In Fig. S3, the ER retention signal in CD3 and the di-leucine endocytosis signal in CD3 both regulate surface expression of the incomplete ? complex. Fig. S4 illustrates the intracellular distribution of dimers. Figs. S1–S4 are available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Imo Akpan, Miguel Alonso, Hisse van Santen, Mark Sefton, and Gabrielle Siegers for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants SAF2002-03589 from CICYT, 08.3/0030.1/2001 from the Comunidad de Madrid, and by funds from the Fundación Ramón Areces to the Centro de Biología Molecular.
References
Margeta-Mitrovic, M. 2002. Assembly-dependent trafficking assays in the detection of receptor-receptor interactions. Methods. 27:311–317.
Letourneur, F., S. Hennecke, C. Demolliere, and P. Cosson. 1995. Steric masking of a dilysine endoplasmic reticulum retention motif during assembly of the human high affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E. J. Cell Biol. 129:971–978.
Alarcon, B., B. Berkhout, J. Breitmeyer, and C. Terhorst. 1988. Assembly of the human T cell receptor-CD3 complex takes place in the endoplasmic reticulum and involves intermediary complexes between the CD3-gamma.delta.epsilon core and single T cell receptor alpha or beta chains. J. Biol. Chem. 263:2953–2961.
Koning, F., W.L. Maloy, and J.E. Coligan. 1990. The implications of subunit interactions for the structure of the T cell receptor-CD3 complex. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:299–305.
San Jose, E., A.G. Sahuquillo, R. Bragado, and B. Alarcon. 1998. Assembly of the TCR/CD3 complex: CD3 epsilon/delta and CD3 epsilon/gamma dimers associate indistinctly with both TCR alpha and TCR beta chains. Evidence for a double TCR heterodimer model. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:12–21.
Minami, Y., A.M. Weissman, L.E. Samelson, and R.D. Klausner. 1987. Building a multichain receptor: synthesis, degradation, and assembly of the T-cell antigen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:2688–2692.
Manolios, N., F. Letourneur, J.S. Bonifacino, and R.D. Klausner. 1991. Pairwise, cooperative and inhibitory interactions describe the assembly and probable structure of the T-cell antigen receptor. EMBO J. 10:1643–1651.
Sancho, J., T. Chatila, R.C. Wong, C. Hall, R. Blumberg, B. Alarcon, R.S. Geha, and C. Terhorst. 1989. T-cell antigen receptor (TCR)-alpha/beta heterodimer formation is a prerequisite for association of CD3-zeta 2 into functionally competent TCR.CD3 complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 264:20760–20769.
Mombaerts, P., A.R. Clarke, M.A. Rudnicki, J. Iacomini, S. Itohara, J.J. Lafaille, L. Wang, Y. Ichikawa, R. Jaenisch, M.L. Hooper, et al. 1992. Mutations in T-cell antigen receptor genes alpha and beta block thymocyte development at different stages. Nature. 360:225–231.
Malissen, M., A. Gillet, L. Ardouin, G. Bouvier, J. Trucy, P. Ferrier, E. Vivier, and B. Malissen. 1995. Altered T cell development in mice with a targeted mutation of the CD3-epsilon gene. EMBO J. 14:4641–4653.
DeJarnette, J.B., C.L. Sommers, K. Huang, K.J. Woodside, R. Emmons, K. Katz, E.W. Shores, and P.E. Love. 1998. Specific requirement for CD3epsilon in T cell development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:14909–14914.
Koyasu, S., R.E. Hussey, L.K. Clayton, A. Lerner, R. Pedersen, P. Delany-Heiken, F. Chau, and E.L. Reinherz. 1994. Targeted disruption within the CD3 zeta/eta/phi/Oct-1 locus in mouse. EMBO J. 13:784–797.
Wiest, D.L., K.P. Kearse, E.W. Shores, and A. Singer. 1994. Developmentally regulated expression of CD3 components independent of clonotypic T cell antigen receptor complexes on immature thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 180:1375–1382.
Wiest, D.L., W.H. Burgess, D. McKean, K.P. Kearse, and A. Singer. 1995. The molecular chaperone calnexin is expressed on the surface of immature thymocytes in association with clonotype-independent CD3 complexes. EMBO J. 14:3425–3433.
Mallabiabarrena, A., M. Fresno, and B. Alarcon. 1992. An endoplasmic reticulum retention signal in the CD3 epsilon chain of the T-cell receptor. Nature. 357:593–596.
Mallabiabarrena, A., M.A. Jimenez, M. Rico, and B. Alarcon. 1995. A tyrosine-containing motif mediates ER retention of CD3-epsilon and adopts a helix-turn structure. EMBO J. 14:2257–2268.
Cosson, P., and F. Letourneur. 1994. Coatomer interaction with di-lysine endoplasmic reticulum retention motifs. Science. 263:1629–1631.
Hardt, B., and E. Bause. 2002. Lysine can be replaced by histidine but not by arginine as the ER retrieval motif for type I membrane proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 291:751–757.
Schutze, M.P., P.A. Peterson, and M.R. Jackson. 1994. An N-terminal double-arginine motif maintains type II membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 13:1696–1705.
Bonifacino, J.S., C.K. Suzuki, and R.D. Klausner. 1990. A peptide sequence confers retention and rapid degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science. 247:79–82.
Lee, S.J. 1998. Endoplasmic reticulum retention and degradation of T cell antigen receptor ? chain. Exp. Mol. Med. 30:159–164.
Letourneur, F., and R.D. Klausner. 1992. A novel di-leucine motif and a tyrosine-based motif independently mediate lysosomal targeting and endocytosis of CD3 chains. Cell. 69:1143–1157.
Rajagopalan, S., Y. Xu, and M.B. Brenner. 1994. Retention of unassembled components of integral membrane proteins by calnexin. Science. 263:387–390.
Borroto, A., J. Lama, F. Niedergang, A. Dautry-Varsat, B. Alarcon, and A. Alcover. 1999. The CD3 epsilon subunit of the TCR contains endocytosis signals. J. Immunol. 163:25–31.
Dietrich, J., X. Hou, A.M. Wegener, L.O. Pedersen, N. Odum, and C. Geisler. 1996. Molecular characterization of the di-leucine-based internalization motif of the T cell receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11441–11448.
Dietrich, J., X. Hou, A.M. Wegener, and C. Geisler. 1994. CD3 gamma contains a phosphoserine-dependent di-leucine motif involved in down-regulation of the T cell receptor. EMBO J. 13:2156–2166.
D'Oro, U., I. Munitic, G. Chacko, T. Karpova, J. McNally, and J.D. Ashwell. 2002. Regulation of constitutive TCR internalization by the zeta-chain. J. Immunol. 169:6269–6278.
Dietrich, J., and C. Geisler. 1998. T cell receptor zeta allows stable expression of receptors containing the CD3gamma leucine-based receptor-sorting motif. J. Biol. Chem. 273:26281–26284.
Aiken, C., J. Konner, N.R. Landau, M.E. Lenburg, and D. Trono. 1994. Nef induces CD4 endocytosis: requirement for a critical dileucine motif in the membrane-proximal CD4 cytoplasmic domain. Cell. 76:853–864.
Shin, J., R.L. Dunbrack Jr., S. Lee, and J.L. Strominger. 1991. Signals for retention of transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum studied with CD4 truncation mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:1918–1922.
Nishimura, N., and W.E. Balch. 1997. A di-acidic signal required for selective export from the endoplasmic reticulum. Science. 277:556–558.
Borroto, A., A. Mallabiabarrena, J.P. Albar, A.C. Martinez, and B. Alarcon. 1998. Characterization of the region involved in CD3 pairwise interactions within the T cell receptor complex. J. Biol. Chem. 273:12807–12816.
Salmeron, A., F. Sanchez-Madrid, M.A. Ursa, M. Fresno, and B. Alarcon. 1991. A conformational epitope expressed upon association of CD3-epsilon with either CD3-delta or CD3-gamma is the main target for recognition by anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies. J. Immunol. 147:3047–3052.
Weissman, A.M., S.J. Frank, D.G. Orloff, M. Mercep, J.D. Ashwell, and R.D. Klausner. 1989. Role of the zeta chain in the expression of the T cell antigen receptor: genetic reconstitution studies. EMBO J. 8:3651–3656.
Kappes, D.J., and S. Tonegawa. 1991. Surface expression of alternative forms of the TCR/CD3 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:10619–10623.
Sussman, J.J., J.S. Bonifacino, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, A.M. Weissman, T. Saito, R.D. Klausner, and J.D. Ashwell. 1988. Failure to synthesize the T cell CD3-zeta chain: structure and function of a partial T cell receptor complex. Cell. 52:85–95.
Transy, C., P.E. Moingeon, B. Marshall, C. Stebbins, and E.L. Reinherz. 1989. Most anti-human CD3 monoclonal antibodies are directed to the CD3 epsilon subunit. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:947–950.
Bonifacino, J.S., and J. Lippincott-Schwartz. 1991. Degradation of proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3:592–600.
Huppa, J.B., and H.L. Ploegh. 1997. The alpha chain of the T cell antigen receptor is degraded in the cytosol. Immunity. 7:113–122.
Hall, C., B. Berkhout, B. Alarcon, J. Sancho, T. Wileman, and C. Terhorst. 1991. Requirements for cell surface expression of the human TCR/CD3 complex in non-T cells. Int. Immunol. 3:359–368.
Shores, E.W., M. Ono, T. Kawabe, C.L. Sommers, T. Tran, K. Lui, M.C. Udey, J. Ravetch, and P.E. Love. 1998. T cell development in mice lacking all T cell receptor family members (, , and FcRI). J. Exp. Med. 187:1093–1101.
Malissen, M., A. Gillet, B. Rocha, J. Trucy, E. Vivier, C. Boyer, F. Kontgen, N. Brun, G. Mazza, E. Spanopoulou, et al. 1993. T cell development in mice lacking the CD3-zeta/eta gene. EMBO J. 12:4347–4355.
Liu, C.P., R. Ueda, J. She, J. Sancho, B. Wang, G. Weddell, J. Loring, C. Kurahara, E.C. Dudley, A. Hayday, et al. 1993. Abnormal T cell development in CD3-zeta–/– mutant mice and identification of a novel T cell population in the intestine. EMBO J. 12:4863–4875.
Liu, C.P., W.J. Lin, M. Huang, J.W. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1997. Development and function of T cells in T cell antigen receptor/CD3 zeta knockout mice reconstituted with Fc epsilon RI gamma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:616–621.
Levelt, C.N., P. Mombaerts, A. Iglesias, S. Tonegawa, and K. Eichmann. 1993. Restoration of early thymocyte differentiation in T-cell receptor beta-chain-deficient mutant mice by transmembrane signaling through CD3 epsilon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:11401–11405.
Jacobs, H., J. Iacomini, M. van de Ven, S. Tonegawa, and A. Berns. 1996. Domains of the TCR beta-chain required for early thymocyte development. J. Exp. Med. 184:1833–1843.
Irving, B.A., F.W. Alt, and N. Killeen. 1998. Thymocyte development in the absence of pre-T cell receptor extracellular immunoglobulin domains. Science. 280:905–908.
Carrasco, Y.R., A.R. Ramiro, C. Trigueros, V.G. de Yebenes, M. Garcia-Peydro, and M.L. Toribio. 2001. An endoplasmic reticulum retention function for the cytoplasmic tail of the human pre–T cell receptor (TCR) chain: potential role in the regulation of cell surface pre-TCR expression levels. J. Exp. Med. 193:1045–1058.
O'Shea, C.C., A.P. Thornell, I.R. Rosewell, B. Hayes, and M.J. Owen. 1997. Exit of the pre-TCR from the ER/cis-Golgi is necessary for signaling differentiation, proliferation, and allelic exclusion in immature thymocytes. Immunity. 7:591–599.
Dietrich, J., J. Kastrup, B.L. Nielsen, N. Odum, and C. Geisler. 1997. Regulation and function of the CD3 DxxxLL motif: a binding site for adaptor protein-1 and adaptor protein-2 in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 138:271–281.
Alarcon, B., S.C. Ley, F. Sanchez-Madrid, R.S. Blumberg, S.T. Ju, M. Fresno, and C. Terhorst. 1991. The CD3-gamma and CD3-delta subunits of the T cell antigen receptor can be expressed within distinct functional TCR/CD3 complexes. EMBO J. 10:903–912.(Pilar Delgado and Balbino)
CORRESPONDENCE Balbino Alarcón: Balarcon@cbm.uam.es
Exit from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an important checkpoint for proper assembly of multimeric plasma membrane receptors. The six subunits of the T cell receptor (TCR; TCR, TCR?, CD3, CD3, CD3, and CD3) are each endowed with ER retention/retrieval signals, and regulation of its targeting to the plasma membrane is therefore especially intriguing. We have studied the importance of the distinct ER retention signals at different stages of TCR intracellular assembly. To this end, we have characterized first the presence of ER retention signals in CD3. Despite the presence of multiple ER retention signals in CD3, dimers reach the cell surface when the single CD3 ER retention signal is deleted. Furthermore, inclusion of this CD3 mutant promoted plasma membrane expression of incomplete ? and ? complexes without CD3. It therefore appears that the CD3 ER retention signal is dominant and that it is only overridden upon the incorporation of CD3. We propose that the stepwise assembly of the TCR complex guarantees that all assembly intermediates have at least one functional ER retention signal and that only a full signaling-competent TCR complex is expressed on the cell surface.
Abbreviation used: MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
Multimeric plasma membrane protein complexes typically assemble early in the secretory pathway, in parallel with the synthesis and folding of individual subunits in the ER. Exit from the ER is an important checkpoint for many such complexes, as only fully assembled complexes are allowed to pass this control step (1). ER retention/retrieval signals (herein referred to as ER retention signals) are present in some receptor subunits, and the assembly of complexes is thought to mask the ER retention signal, permitting targeting to the membrane of the fully assembled complexes (2). The TCR is an especially complex model because it is formed by six different subunits that all contain ER retention determinants.
In the TCR, the TCR and TCR? subunits (or TCR and TCR in T cells) are responsible for the recognition of the MHC/antigen ligand. These are noncovalently bound to the signal-transducing subunits CD3, CD3, CD3, and CD3 (the CD3 subunit is CD247). During assembly, CD3 first dimerizes with either CD3 or CD3, and the resulting and dimers associate with the TCR and TCR? subunits (3–5). The resulting ? or ? complexes are either retained in the ER or degraded in lysosomes (6). Only when CD3 is incorporated into the complex is the TCR transported to the plasma membrane (6–8). In this way, expression of signal-transducing subunits independent of ligand-binding subunits or vice versa is tightly controlled. Indeed, in T cell mutants and knockout mice lacking TCR?, CD3, or CD3, TCR expression is severely impaired (9–12). In addition, T cell precursors in RAG-deficient and SCID mice that are unable to express the TCR gene subunits have a very low level of CD3 and dimer expression at the cell surface (13, 14), and their development is arrested at the most immature CD4– CD8– stage.
Removal of the ER retention signal in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 permits this subunit to reach the cell surface by itself (15, 16). This signal consists of an elongated helix followed by a ?I' turn and contains three important, closely spaced residues: tyrosine, leucine, and arginine. The presence of arginine in the ER retention signal is characteristic of type II proteins despite the fact that CD3 is a type I membrane protein (17–19). Other ER retention signals in the TCR have not been analyzed in detail, although TCR contains an ER retention signal in its transmembrane region (20) and TCR? in both its extracellular and transmembrane domains (21). With regard to the other CD3 subunits, CD3 has a conserved arginine residue in position –3 from the COOH terminus, and CD3 has either an arginine or a lysine residue at the same position. Their removal from Tac and Tac chimeras disrupts ER retention (22).
In addition to ER retention signals, binding of incompletely folded subunits and complexes to chaperonins such as calnexin can also influence ER retention (23). Moreover, endocytosis signals in several subunits of the TCR complex offer a further level of regulation (22, 24, 25). The CD3 subunit contains an important double leucine signal for endocytosis that is hidden in the complete TCR complex but unmasked by PKC-mediated phosphorylation of an upstream serine (26). In partial complexes, this double leucine signal is constitutively exposed and only masked upon integration of CD3 into the TCR complex (27, 28).
During assembly, all individual ER retention determinants in TCR subunits must be annulled before the TCR complex can be transported to the plasma membrane. The ER retention determinants may become progressively overridden as the TCR complex assembles or alternatively, all determinants might become inoperative at once, when all the TCR subunits are assembled. To study this process, we have characterized the ER retention signals in CD3 and analyzed the predominance of CD3 and CD3 signals in the dimer. All the determinants in CD3 are overridden when it assembles with CD3. However, the single ER retention signal in CD3 remains active in the dimer and only becomes inoperative upon completion of the last assembly step, i.e., the incorporation of CD3. These results support a model of sequential inactivation of ER retention signals during stepwise assembly.
Results
The cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains multiple intracellular trafficking signals
To identify ER retention signals in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3, a chimeric protein containing the CD3 cytoplasmic tail appended to the human CD4 extracellular and transmembrane domains was generated (chimera 44; Fig. 1 A). The chimera was transfected into COS cells, and cell surface expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. Expression of the 44 chimera at the cell surface was 2.5-fold lower than that of wild-type CD4 (Fig. 1 B). Furthermore, unlike CD4, the 44 chimera was predominantly located in the ER of transfected COS cells, with a similar distribution to CD3 (Fig. S1, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1). These results indicated that the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains an ER retention signal.
Figure 1. Deletion mapping of ER retention sequences in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3. (A) Schematic representation of the 44 chimera with the extracellular and transmembrane domains of CD4 and the cytoplasmic tail of CD3. The full amino acid sequence of the CD3 tail is shown. The numbers refer to the position of cytoplasmic amino acids in CD3. The di-leucine endocytosis motif is underlined, the two tyrosines of the ITAM are circled, and the putative DxE ER export motif is in bold. The last amino acid in each of the five COOH-terminal deletions is indicated. (B) Surface expression of the 44 deletion mutants. COS cells were transfected with the indicated constructs and analyzed by flow cytometry after staining with anti-CD4 antibody. Normalized surface expression was calculated after multiplying the percentage (nonpermeabilized/permeabilized samples) by the MFI of CD4+ cells. (C) Surface expression of the 44 deletion mutants in the YT human NK cell line. 20–30 stable clones for each of the constructs was analyzed after staining with anti-CD4 and flow cytometry. Surface expression in the four clones with the highest anti-CD4 staining per construct is represented as MFI. (D) Acquisition of partial endo-H resistance of 44 deletion mutants. COS cells were transfected with the indicated constructs, pulse-labeled with 35S-methionine, and chased for the indicated times. Immunoprecipitation was performed with an anti-CD4 antibody. Each immunoprecipitate was split, and one half was digested with Endo-H. (E) The rate of ER export for 44 chimeras was calculated from the rate of conversion to partial endo-H resistance. The two bands appearing upon digestion with endo-H (D) represent a fully endo-H–sensitive (lower band) and a partly endo-H–resistant (upper band) form of 44. Both protein bands were quantified by densitometry and the ratio of the upper band to the sum of both bands was taken as the endo-H resistance conversion rate and as the rate of ER export.
To characterize this putative ER retention signal, five deletion mutants of the 44 chimera were generated and transfected into COS cells (Fig. 1 A). Deletion of the three COOH-terminal amino acids (441) promoted a moderate increase in surface expression of the chimera (Fig. 1 B). This effect was slightly accentuated when five or nine additional amino acids were deleted from the COOH-terminal end (442 and 443). In contrast, deletion of seven more amino acids (444) provoked an important reduction in 44 expression (Fig. 1 B), suggesting that a signal that facilitates transport to the plasma membrane might reside between amino acids 142 and 148. Finally, deletion of most of the cytoplasmic tail, including the double leucine endocytotic signal, enhanced surface expression to above the levels of wild-type CD4. This could be due to the 445 mutant lacking not only the double leucine endocytotic signal of CD3, but also that of the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 (29). The increase in surface expression of the mutant chimeras was coincident with a redistribution of the chimera to the Golgi apparatus, plasma membrane, and vesicular structures (Fig. S1).
The fact that some 44 chimera was detected at the plasma membrane might be due to excessive protein expression in transfected COS cells, thereby overriding the ER retention machinery. Hence, we studied the surface expression of the 44 chimera in stable transfectants of the human NK cell line YT. Several cell clones with each construct were studied to exclude clonal effects. Only the mutant 445 was expressed at the cell surface at a level that matched that of wild-type CD4 (Fig. 1 C). There was only a slight increase in surface expression of chimeras 441 through 443 and a marginal reduction of 444.
We determined how the rate of exit from the ER was affected in these 44 mutants. Human CD4 has two N-glycosylation sites, one of which is converted to the complex type in the mature protein (30). Hence, we assessed the acquisition of partial endo-H resistance of the 44 mutants after metabolic labeling of the COS cells. Export from the ER of the 441 and 442 chimeras was accelerated twofold. These mutants required 50 min to acquire 50% endo-H resistance (t1/2 = 50) compared with the 95 min for wild-type 44 (Fig. 1, D and E). Deletion of further amino acids reduced the exit rate to t1/2 = 115 min for 443, whereas the ER export of 444 and 445 was dramatically reduced (t1/2 >> 120 min). Thus, it seemed clear that signals other than those for ER retention also regulate the level of 44 chimera surface expression.
The cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains a di-leucine endocytotic motif (Fig. 1 A; reference 25) and a putative DxE ER export signal (31). The combination of ER retention, export, and endocytosis is ultimately responsible for the surface expression of the 44 mutants. Deletion of the ER retention signal in the COOH-terminal end of the chimera might explain the accelerated rate of ER export for 441 and 442, whereas removal of the putative DxE ER export signal would explain the decrease in ER export of 444 and 445. The diminished ER exit of 443 compared with 442 might be due to a positional effect on the DxE signal. Nevertheless, it seems that the di-leucine endocytotic signal is mainly responsible for regulating the surface levels of the 44 chimera. This could explain why only 445 is highly expressed at the surface despite the reduced rate of ER export (Fig. 1, B, C, and E).
CD3 contains ER retention determinants in its extracellular, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains
To further characterize this ER retention signal and to determine the impact this signal has on 44 chimera surface expression, point mutations of the last three amino acids were introduced. To avoid interference from the di-leucine internalization signal, leucine 131 was replaced by alanine. Expression of the double mutants at the cell surface was analyzed in transfected COS cells and in stable YT transfectants. In both cell types, mutation of the di-leucine motif alone (44L131A mutant) caused a two- (COS cells) to sixfold (YT cells) increase in surface expression of the 44 chimera (Fig. 2 A). Replacement of arginine 158 with alanine (44L131A/R158A mutant) resulted in an additional two- (COS cells) to fourfold (YT cells) increase in surface expression. In contrast, mutation of the other two COOH-terminal amino acids (44L131A/N160A and 44L131A/R159A mutants) did not have a major impact on cell surface expression. The effect of arginine 158 mutation was also reflected in the cellular redistribution of this 44 mutant (Fig. S2, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1). Thus, of the three amino acid residues deleted in mutant 441, only arginine 158 seems to be important for ER retention of 44.
Figure 2. CD3 contains ER retention determinants in its extracellular, transmembrane, and cytoplasmic domains. (A) Arginine to alanine substitution at position 158 increases the surface expression of the 44 chimera. Single or double point mutants of 44 were either transiently transfected in COS cells or stably transfected in YT cells, and cell surface expression of the chimera was analyzed by flow cytometry. (B) Intracellular distribution of mutants in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3. COS cells were transfected with constructs featuring single point mutations in either the double leucine endocytosis motif or the cytoplasmic ER retention signal, or with a double mutant (L131A/R158A), and their expression pattern was analyzed by confocal microscopy after staining with anti-HA mAb. A mutant of CD3 lacking the cytoplasmic domain (tr) was analyzed in the same way. (C) Domain-shuffling CD4-CD3 chimeras. The CD3 domains are dotted. (D) Intracellular distribution of domain- shuffling chimeras in COS cells. COS cells were transfected with the indicated chimeras and analyzed by confocal microscopy after staining with anti-CD4 (for CD4 and 44) or anti-HA (for HA-tagged 44 and 44). (E) Surface expression of domain-shuffled chimeras and CD3 point mutants. COS cells transfected as in B and D were analyzed by flow cytometry for surface expression after staining with anti-HA or anti-CD4 antibodies.
Once an ER retention signal had been identified in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3, we evaluated the role of this signal in the context of the whole CD3 molecule. Surprisingly, mutation of arginine 158 to alanine in CD3 did not prevent ER retention, because the mutant was exclusively located in the ER when examined by confocal microscopy (Fig. 2 B). Nor was CD3 redistributed to the plasma membrane when an additional mutation in the di-leucine motif was introduced (Fig. 2 B, L131A/R158A). These results suggested that CD3 contains other ER retention determinants in addition to the COOH-terminal signal. Furthermore, a truncated CD3 with only the first two cytoplasmic amino acids of CD3 was still retained in the ER in COS cells, suggesting that ER retention determinants were present in the extracellular and/or transmembrane domains (Fig. 2 B, tr). Indeed, two new domain shuffle chimeras were both retained in the ER: 44, with the extracellular domain of CD3, and 44, with the CD3 transmembrane domain (Fig. 2, C and D).
Expression of the CD4/CD3 chimeras and of the CD3 point mutants was also evaluated by flow cytometry. Surface expression of the single di-leucine motif mutant of CD3 (L131A) was slightly higher than the wild-type CD3 but lower than the mutant in the cytoplasmic ER retention signal (Fig. 2 E, R158A). The double mutation of the cytoplasmic ER and endocytotic signals (L131A/R158A) acted synergistically to increase the surface expression of CD3. Nevertheless, all CD4-CD3 chimeras and CD3 mutants were expressed at lower levels than CD4 (Fig. 2 E), further indicating that ER retention determinants reside not only in the cytoplasmic tail of CD3, but also in the transmembrane and extracellular domains. These extracellular and transmembrane retention determinants in CD3 could represent distinct sequence motifs or an unfolded state of the protein. In any case, it appears that in contrast to CD3, which contains a single ER retention signal (15), retention of free CD3 is regulated by multiple signals. It therefore seems that the expression of CD3 on the cell surface is tightly regulated.
Dimerization with CD3 abolishes all ER retention determinants in CD3
One of the earliest steps in TCR assembly is the dimerization of CD3 with either CD3 or CD3 (3, 4, 6). The resulting and dimers are retained in the ER unless they assemble with TCR, TCR?, and CD3. Because both CD3 and CD3 contain ER retention signals, we examined the relative contribution of each signal to dimer retention. COS cells were cotransfected with the CD3 mutants and CD4 chimeras (refer to Fig. 2) and either wild-type CD3 or a deletion mutant of CD3 lacking its single ER retention signal (mut; reference 15). The 44 chimera was excluded from this study because it lacks the extracellular domain of CD3 necessary for assembly with CD3 (32). Cellular distribution of the dimers was distinguished from that of the single chains by immunostaining with a CD3 dimer-specific antibody, UCHT1 (33). When associated with wild-type CD3, all CD3 chimeras and mutants were located in the ER, independent of the presence of CD3 ER retention and endocytotic signals (Fig. 3 A). However, transfection of mut resulted in export of the dimers from the ER and targeting to the plasma membrane (Fig. 3, A and B). The same effect was seen when wild-type CD3 and mut were expressed in COS cells (not depicted).
Figure 3. Deletion of the single ER retention signal in CD3 is sufficient for surface expression of the dimer. (A) Intracellular distribution of the dimer comprising combinations of wild-type and mutant CD3 and CD3. COS cells were transfected with combinations of either wild-type CD3 or the ER retention mutant mut and the indicated CD3 mutants. Cells were double stained with anti-HA antibody (green) to identify both free and CD3-associated CD3 and with UCHT1 (red) to identify the dimer. Cells transfected with wild-type CD3 or mut were stained with anti-CD3 antibody SP34. (B) Surface expression of the dimer. The transfected cells described in A were also analyzed for surface expression of the dimer by flow cytometry after staining with UCHT1.
In the absence of the CD3 ER retention signal, the dimer was transported to the cell surface regardless of the CD3 cytoplasmic ER retention signal (compare R158A with in Fig. 3 B). However, mutation of the CD3 di-leucine endocytosis signal increased cell surface expression of the dimer fourfold (Fig. 3 B, L131A). Expression did not increase further when the cytoplasmic ER retention signal of CD3 was mutated as well as the endocytotic signal (L131A/R158A), nor in the absence of the whole cytoplasmic tail (tr), nor in the absence of both the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains (44).
These results suggest that the only functional ER retention signal in the dimer is that in CD3, and all ER retention determinants in CD3 are abrogated upon dimerization with CD3. Therefore, the ER retention determinants in CD3 do not seem to play a major role in regulating expression at the cell surface. However, CD3 does contribute to this task by mediating the endocytosis of the dimer via its di-leucine signal.
The single ER retention signal of CD3 is only overridden during the last assembly step
Once (or ) dimers are assembled in the ER, they associate with the TCR and TCR? chains to form ? and ? complexes. These incomplete TCR–CD3 complexes remain in the ER or are degraded in lysosomes. The TCR complex can only reach the plasma membrane when the subunit is incorporated (6–8, 34). Indeed, reconstruction of the TCR complex in HeLa cells showed that transfection of the subunit was sufficient to drive transport of ? and ? complexes to the cell surface (35). Bearing this in mind, we studied whether the CD3 ER retention mutant promoted surface expression of the ? complex or whether assembly of was still required. COS cells were transfected with plasmids encoding these subunits, but the L131A mutant was used to avoid internalization of the ? complex. When transfected with the CD3 ER retention mutant, both the CD3 dimer and TCR? were transported to the plasma membrane, even in the absence of (Fig. 4 A). Two-color flow cytometry with anti-TCR? and anti-CD3 antibodies was used to quantify the ? complex on the cell surface. This showed that the ? complex is expressed at a high level independent of (Fig. 4 B). In contrast, when wild-type CD3 was transfected, TCR? and the CD3 dimer were predominantly found in the ER and were consequently practically undetectable at the cell surface (Fig. 4, A and B). Similar results were obtained when wild-type CD3 instead of the di-leucine mutant was used, although surface expression of the ? complex reached lower levels (Fig. S3, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1), probably because the ? complex was being endocytosed. These results show that mutation of the CD3 ER retention signal is sufficient for transport and expression of the incomplete ? complex to the cell surface. Interestingly, the presence of did not induce a major increase in the surface expression of complexes containing wild-type CD3, possibly due to the inefficient assembly of CD3 into the ? complex.
Figure 4. Deletion of the single ER retention signal in CD3 is sufficient for surface expression of the incomplete ? complex. (A) Intracellular distribution of the TCR–CD3 chains in cells transfected with wild-type CD3 or the mut ER retention mutant. COS cells were transfected with the constructs indicated on the right, permeabilized, and triple stained with the anti- antibody UCHT1 (green), anti-TCR? antibody Jovi.1 (red), and anti-CD3 antibody 448 (blue) before analyzing by confocal microscopy. A higher magnification of the area shown in the insets illustrates the presence of the TCR complexes in the ER or the plasma membrane. (B) Surface expression of the incomplete ? complex. Transfected cells described in A were double stained with mAbs specific for TCR? and the dimer in nonpermeabilized and detergent- permeabilized cells. The percentage of double labeled cells is indicated in each histogram. The percentage of surface expression was calculated from the surface to intracellular expression ratio.
To confirm that the CD3 ER retention signal is also dominant in the complexes lacking CD3 (? and ?) in T cells, we transfected human wild-type CD3 and human mut into the CD3-deficient mutant MA5.8 of the murine hybridoma 2B4 (36). Human CD3 can assemble with murine TCR chains, and its cell surface expression can be followed by flow cytometry with anti–human CD3 antibodies (37). Stable transfectants were analyzed by two-color flow cytometry using an anti–human CD3 dimer antibody and an anti-murine TCR? antibody. Transfection of human wild-type CD3 in -sufficient 2B4 cells led to its incorporation into a sizeable population that was not observed in -deficient MA5.8 cells (Fig. 5 A). However, transfection of mut led to its expression in both the -expressing and -deficient cell lines, although it was expressed less in the absence of CD3. The level of human CD3 expression on the cell surface was also examined with an anti-CD3 antibody in flow cytometry and compared with its intracellular expression in detergent-permeabilized cells. Wild-type CD3 clearly failed to reach the cell surface in -deficient cells despite the intracellular accumulation of the protein (Fig. 5 A). Finally, all the transfectants were surface biotinylated and the human CD3-containing complexes were recovered with an anti–human CD3 antibody. The immunoprecipitates were resolved by two-dimensional SDS-PAGE under nonreducing/reducing conditions and showed that mut was indeed expressed at the cell surface and was associated with the murine TCR, TCR?, CD3, CD3, and CD3 chains (Fig. 5 B). Wild-type human CD3 was again not detected in -deficient cells.
Figure 5. Deletion of the ER retention signal in CD3 is sufficient to allow surface expression of the TCR complex in -deficient T cells. (A) Surface expression of TCR complexes in -expressing and -deficient T cells. The parental murine T cell hybridoma 2B4 and its -deficient MA5.8 mutant were stably transfected with either wild-type human CD3 or with human mut. Cells were double stained with the anti-murine TCR? antibody H57-597 and the anti–human CD3 antibody Leu4 and analyzed by two-color flow cytometry (top). Representative clones for each condition are shown. The result of single staining with anti–human CD3 antibody SK7 of intact or detergent-permeabilized cells is shown in the middle and bottom rows. (B) The ER retention mutant of CD3 is expressed at the cell surface within a TCR complex. The human CD3-transfected clones were surface biotinylated and immunoprecipitated with Leu4 from Brij96 detergent lysates. The immunoprecipitates were resolved by two-dimensional nonreducing/reducing SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with streptavidin-peroxidase. The positions of human and murine TCR and CD3 chains are indicated.
Expression of TCR complexes containing the human CD3 ER retention mutant was clearly lower in -deficient than in -expressing cells (Fig. 5). This might reflect the fact that incorporation of CD3 is required to hide the di-leucine endocytosis signal in CD3 (27, 28). These results show that the TCR complex can be exported to the plasma membrane in the absence of CD3 when the CD3 ER retention signal is eliminated. Furthermore, the results confirm that the CD3 ER retention signal prevents cell surface expression of the incomplete ? and ? complexes and suggest that this signal becomes inoperative only upon completion of the last assembly step with the incorporation of CD3.
Masking of the CD3 ER retention signal upon CD3 assembly is position dependent
A prediction of the stepwise model of ER retention signal annulment is that silencing of a given ER retention signal must be position specific; e.g., if CD3 assembly overrides the ER retention signal in CD3, this must occur in the context of the specific topological position of CD3 in the TCR complex. To evaluate this hypothesis, we constructed two new CD3 chimeras. In one of the chimeras, the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 was substituted by the tail of CD3 (Fig. 6 A, chimera). The other chimera was generated by appending the ER retention signal of CD3 at the COOH-terminal end of CD3 (Fig. 6 A, ret). Next, we examined whether assembly of the CD3 chimeras with the ER retention mutant of CD3 resulted in expression of the dimer at the cell surface. As previously demonstrated (Fig. 3), assembly of wild-type CD3 with mut but not with wild-type CD3 allowed transport of the dimer to the cell surface (Fig. 6 B). In contrast, assembly of the CD3 chimeras and ret with mut prevented export of the dimer to the plasma membrane (Fig. 6 B) and retained the dimer in the ER (Fig. S4, available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1). These results therefore show that abrogation of the ER retention signals during assembly of the dimer is dependent on both the sequence of the cytoplasmic tail and the position of the ER retention signals within the dimer.
Figure 6. Translocation of the CD3 ER retention signal to CD3 prevents dimer and TCR expression. (A) Scheme of CD3 chimeras where the CD3 domains are dotted. The presence of CD3-derived sequences (the whole cytoplasmic tail in or the last 15 amino acids in ret) is indicated with black boxes. The three constructs were HA tagged at their NH2 terminus. (B) Abrogation of the cytoplasmic ER retention signal in CD3 is position dependent. COS cells were transfected with combinations of either wild-type CD3 or the ER retention mutant mut and the indicated CD3 chimeras. Surface expression of the dimer was analyzed by two-color flow cytometry with anti-HA and anti-CD3 dimer (Leu4) antibodies in nonpermeabilized cells. Intracellular expression of the dimer was assessed by two-color flow cytometry of detergent-permeabilized cells (not depicted). The percentage of dimer-positive cells is indicated in the corresponding quadrants. (C) Abrogation of the CD3 ER retention signal upon CD3 assembly is position dependent. Jurkat CD3– R3.25 cells were stably transfected with the indicated CD3 constructs, and geneticin-resistant clones were analyzed for TCR expression by double color flow cytometry with anti-HA and anti-CD3 (Leu 4) antibodies. The seven clones with the highest TCR expression for each construct are represented at the bottom. Two-color flow cytometry histograms for the clones with highest TCR expression are shown at the top. The total number of clones analyzed was 42 for the wild-type CD3 construct, 14 for the ret construct, and 48 for the construct. NT, nontransfected.
To extend these results to the full TCR complex, a CD3– mutant of Jurkat was transfected with wild-type CD3 or with the or ret chimeras, and stable clones were selected. Transfection of wild-type CD3 but not the or ret chimeras reconstituted the surface expression of the TCR complex at high levels (Fig. 6 C). These results show that if the CD3 ER retention signal is misplaced (either at the position of the CD3 tail or at the tip of CD3), CD3 assembly can no longer silence it.
Discussion
In this study, we have tried to better understand the mechanisms that regulate expression of TCR–CD3 complexes at the cell surface and prevent nonassembled subunits and incomplete complexes from reaching or remaining in the plasma membrane. We found that removal of the CD3 ER retention signal is sufficient to permit expression of and dimers at the surface of transfected COS cells. Indeed, even though CD3 contains multiple ER retention signals, these signals all become inoperative upon assembly with CD3. Furthermore, our results show that the absence of the CD3 ER retention signal is sufficient to allow the expression of incomplete TCR complexes in the plasma membrane, even when lacking CD3.
Dual regulation through ER retention signals and proteasome-dependent degradation from the ER prevents TCR subunits from progressing through the secretory pathway (38, 39). ER retention signals have been described in CD3, TCR, TCR?, CD3, and CD3 (15, 20–22, and this study), and it could be considered that all ER retention signals are abrogated simultaneously when the full TCR complex is assembled. However, our findings indicate that there is a hierarchy among retention signals such that they become overridden progressively as the TCR complex assembles. Hence, we propose a model for the export of the TCR complex (Fig. 7) in which the ER retention signals of CD3, CD3, TCR, and TCR? become progressively inoperative as they assemble with CD3. The ER retention signal in CD3 remains dominant in these complexes.
Figure 7. Model of sequential inactivation of TCR retention signals. Surface expression of free CD3 is prevented by a single ER retention signal (triangle), whereas expression of free CD3 is prevented by several ER retention signals (triangles) and a di-leucine endocytosis signal (circle). CD3 may contain at least one cytoplasmic ER retention signal similar to those of CD3 and CD3 (triangle) and a di-leucine endocytosis signal (circle). Upon assembly of and dimers, the ER retention determinants of CD3 and CD3 are overridden, but surface expression of the and dimers is prevented by the CD3 ER retention signal that remains functional. The endocytosis signals in CD3 (and probably CD3) remain active in the and dimers and are responsible for the internalization and removal of the small amounts of dimer that somehow reach the cell membrane on their own. TCR and TCR? contain additional ER retention determinants, but these do not seem to be operative in the ? (and probably ?) complex. Only after assembly of CD3 does the CD3 ER retention signal become nonfunctional, thus allowing the full TCR–CD3 complex to reach the plasma membrane. The stability of the full complex on the cell surface is also increased because the CD3 and CD3 endocytotic signals are inactive. Removing both the CD3 ER retention signal and the CD3 endocytotic signal artificially increases surface expression of free dimers and incomplete ? complexes.
When is the ER retention signal in CD3 overridden? We postulate that this takes place after association of , which has been long known to be the last step in assembly (6–8). This idea was not confirmed by our reconstitution studies in COS cells, because efficient cell surface expression of the ? complex with wild-type CD3 was not observed. This might indicate that CD3 is mandatory for surface expression. However, our transfection experiments (not depicted) and the results of Kappes and Tonegawa (35) suggest that this is not the case. Moreover, transfection of all TCR subunits in non–T cells is sufficient to detect the full TCR complex at the cell surface (35, 40). This discrepancy might be explained by the greater sensitivity of radio iodination (40) compared with the flow cytometry used here, or by the fact that the transfected population underwent selection for high TCR expression (35). However, the poor efficiency of ER export and the weak surface expression of the wild-type CD3-containing ? complex might be better explained by the inefficient assembly of CD3 into the complex. Nevertheless, the results in COS cells and the model (Fig. 7) have been validated in -expressing and -deficient murine T cells transfected with human CD3 (Fig. 5). Human wild-type CD3 is targeted to the plasma membrane within the TCR complex only after assembly of CD3, whereas the human CD3 ER retention mutant can reach the membrane with and without CD3. Studies in CD3-deficient mice and cell lines show that TCR–CD3 surface expression is extremely low in the absence of this subunit (34, 41). Accordingly, our results show that the CD3 ER retention signal remains functional in the incomplete ? complex, preventing cell surface expression. These results also indicate that the orderly inactivation of intracellular retention signals serves to not only prevent surface expression of the CD3 dimer (or TCR dimer), but also that of TCR–CD3 complexes lacking CD3.
What then is the mechanism that overrides CD3's ER retention signal upon assembly of ? It has been proposed that the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 hides the otherwise exposed di-leucine endocytosis motif in CD3 by steric hindrance (28). Indeed, in -deficient cells it has recently been demonstrated that the TCR is more rapidly internalized and that expression of CD3, or a CD3 chimera with its cytoplasmic tail partially replaced by a foreign sequence, restores normal TCR internalization (27). Steric masking of the dilysine ER retention motif in the chain of the heterodimeric high affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E (FcRI) upon assembly with the chain has been proposed to regulate plasma membrane targeting (2). Similarly, steric hindrance by the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 could be responsible for annulling the CD3 ER retention signal, although other mechanisms involving CD3-dependent rearrangements of the TCR complex cannot be excluded. Interestingly, the chain of FcRI and CD3 are structural and functionally related, and indeed, the FcRI chain can take over the role of CD3 in TCR assembly in –/– mice (42–44). These results suggest a common mechanism underlying ER retention of immune receptor complexes by components of the CD3 family. In any case, masking of the CD3 ER retention signal by CD3 assembly is position dependent. Thus, either replacement of the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 by CD3 or apposition of an extra CD3 ER retention signal to the COOH-terminal end of CD3 prevents surface expression of the full TCR complex (Fig. 6).
We have shown that the di-leucine endocytosis signal of CD3, together with the ER retention signal in CD3, is also important to reduce the expression of the dimer on the cell surface. Thus, high level expression of the (and by extension ) dimer on the cell surface is prevented by impairing its export from the ER–Golgi and by stimulating the rapid endocytosis of dimers from the cell surface. This regulation of CD3 dimer and free CD3 subunit expression is required to prevent ligand-independent triggering of signaling cascades. It has been shown that small amounts of and dimers expressed on the surface of immature thymocytes, also known as clonotypic-independent complexes, can promote thymic differentiation and proliferation upon cross-linking with anti-CD3 antibodies (45). One might ask what would be the consequence of augmenting the expression of CD3 dimers at the cell surface on thymic maturation. Studies in which a TCR? transgene that lacks the variable region (46), or even all extracellular domains (47), was expressed in MHC class I– and II–deficient mice indicate that the pre-TCR function is independent of ligand recognition. The pre-TCR could therefore serve merely as a platform to express sufficiently high levels of the CD3 dimers at the cell surface to initiate ligand-independent signaling. Assembly of the CD3 dimers with TCR?, pT, and CD3 must override the CD3 ER retention signal as well as those in TCR? (21) and pT (48). In this regard, it should be noted that the addition of an extra ER retention signal to TCR? abolishes pre-TCR function (49). These results suggest that the pre-TCR must be expressed on the cell surface to carry out its signaling role. Furthermore, unlike the natural ER retention signals present in the TCR and CD3 subunits, the artificial signal introduced in TCR? does not appear to be annulled during assembly.
We have made an initial attempt to characterize the signals that regulate the intracellular retention of the CD3 chain. In accordance with previous observations (22), we found that the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains an ER retention signal at the COOH terminus. Although this sequence is reminiscent of the double arginine ER retention signal in type II membrane proteins (18, 19), we have discovered that only one of the two arginines in CD3 is important for ER retention. Thus, the cytoplasmic CD3 ER retention signal better resembles that of CD3, which contains only one important basic residue (arginine –3; references 15 and 16). In addition to the ER retention signal, the cytoplasmic tail of CD3 contains a putative ER export sequence of the DxE type (31) and a di-leucine endocytosis signal (22, 50). However, CD3 also contains ER retention determinants in its extracellular and transmembrane domains that have yet to be characterized. These extracellular and transmembrane retention determinants in CD3 could represent distinct sequence motifs or an unfolded state of the protein. In any case, it appears that in contrast to CD3, the retention of free CD3 is regulated by multiple signals.
In conclusion, the results presented here suggest that the TCR–CD3 complex is endowed with a complicated system of intracellular retention signals that become overridden in a stepwise fashion as assembly proceeds. Assembly is regulated in such a way that all intermediates have at least one functional retention signal. This system guarantees that only a full signaling-competent TCR–CD3 complex is expressed at the cell surface.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cells
COS-7 cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and grown in DMEM plus 5% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich). The human NK cell line YT was provided by M. López-Botet (Universidad Pompeu-Fabra, Barcelona, Spain), the murine 2B4 T cell hybridoma was from the ATCC, the CD3-deficient mutant MA5.8 of 2B4 was provided by J. Ashwell (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD), and the CD3-deficient mutant R3.25 of Jurkat was provided by B. Rubin (CNRS, Toulouse, France). All cells were grown in RPMI medium plus 5% FBS.
Constructs.
All constructs were generated by PCR using human cDNAs as templates. PCR products were cloned into the pSR or pSR-HA (unpublished data) vectors. The 44 chimera is composed of the extracellular and the transmembrane domains of CD4 (finishing in position V395 of the mature polypeptide) fused to the complete intracellular domain of CD3 (from position A115 of the mature polypeptide). 441 to 445 constructs have a stop codon at positions 157, 152, 148, 141, and 121, respectively, of the mature human CD3 protein. Truncated CD3 (tr) contains only the first two amino acids of the cytoplasmic tail. Wild-type human CD3 and the CD3 mutant lacking the last five COOH-terminal amino acids (mut) have been described (15, 51). Point mutants were generated by introducing the mutation encoding for alanine in the positions 131, 158, 159, and 160 of the mature human CD3 protein using 44 (44L131A, 44L131A/N160A, 44L131A/R159A, and 44L131A/R158A) or CD3 (L131A, R158A, and L131A/R158A) as template. The 44, 44, and constructs were created as isolated fragments by PCR, cloned into the intermediate vector pGEM-7Zf(+), and the chimeric cDNAs were subcloned into the pSR-HA vector. The ret construct was created by PCR using a 3' primer encoding for the last COOH-terminal 15 amino acids of human CD3 (KGQRDLYSGLNQRRI) appended to the last amino acid of CD3, and the PCR product was cloned into the pSR-HA vector.
Antibodies
The mAb anti–human SP34 that recognizes the CD3 extracellular domain, the mAb anti–human CD3 UCHT1, the mAb anti–human CD4 HP2/6, and the mAb anti–C? Jovi.1 were provided by C. Terhorst (Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital, Boston, MA), P. Beverley (The Edward Jenner Institute for Vaccine Research, Berkshire, UK), F. Sánchez-Madrid (Hospital de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain), and M. Owen (CRUK, London, UK), respectively. The anti-CD3 antiserum 448 has been described (5). The following mAbs were purchased as indicated: anti-HA epitope 12CA5 (Roche Diagnostics), anti-murine TCR? H57-597 and anti–human CD3 Leu4 (BD Biosciences), and anti–human CD3 SK7 (StemCell Technologies Inc.). All secondary fluorochrome-labeled antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences.
Cell transfections
COS cells were transiently transfected as described previously (32), and stable transfectants of YT, 2B4, MA5.8, and R3.25 cells were generated by electroporation and selection in geneticin.
Flow cytometry
24 h after transfection, COS cells were detached from the plate with 0.02% EDTA in PBS and divided into two aliquots for surface and intracellular staining. For intracellular staining, cells were first fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 min at 4°C and then permeabilized with 0.1% saponin in PBS at 4°C for 1 h. Permeabilized and nonpermeabilized cells were incubated with 4 μg/ml of the appropriate mAb for 30 min at 4°C and then with a secondary FITC- or PE-labeled antibody. For two-color staining, directly labeled antibodies were used. Surface expression is indicated as a percentage, as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), or by multiplying both parameters.
Confocal microscopy
Upon transfection, COS cells were plated on glass coverslips, fixed in paraformaldehyde at room temperature 24 h later, and then permeabilized with saponin as described above. The coverslips were mounted in Mowiol and examined with a confocal microscope (Radiance 2000; BioRad Laboratories).
Cell labeling and immunoprecipitation
48 h after transfection, COS cells were labeled with 35S-methionine for 15 min and then chased for different times in standard medium before lysing with 1% NP-40 lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.8, 10 mM iodoacetamide, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, and 1 μg/ml leupeptin). Postnuclear lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-CD4 antibody, and the immunoprecipitates were resuspended in endo-H buffer (50 mM sodium citrate, pH 5.5, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM PMSF, 1 μg/ml aprotinin, and 1 μg/ml leupeptin) before digesting half of the sample with endo-H. The samples were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by autoradiography.
For surface biotinylation, 50 x 106 MA5.8 and 2B4 were incubated with 0.5 mg/ml sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce Chemical Co.) in PBS supplemented with 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2 for 45 min on ice. After washing, surface complexes were recovered by incubating the labeled intact cells with human anti-CD3 antibody Leu4 before lysis. Protein G was added and immunoprecipitates were subjected to two-dimensional SDS-PAGE (first dimension under nonreducing and second dimension under reducing conditions), immunotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, hybridized with streptavidin horseradish peroxidase (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Inc.), and developed by ECL (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows intracellular distribution of 44 deletional mutants. Fig. S2 shows intracellular distribution of the 44 point mutants. In Fig. S3, the ER retention signal in CD3 and the di-leucine endocytosis signal in CD3 both regulate surface expression of the incomplete ? complex. Fig. S4 illustrates the intracellular distribution of dimers. Figs. S1–S4 are available at http://www.jem.org/cgi/content/full/jem.20041133/DC1.
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to Imo Akpan, Miguel Alonso, Hisse van Santen, Mark Sefton, and Gabrielle Siegers for critical reading of the manuscript.
This work was supported by grants SAF2002-03589 from CICYT, 08.3/0030.1/2001 from the Comunidad de Madrid, and by funds from the Fundación Ramón Areces to the Centro de Biología Molecular.
References
Margeta-Mitrovic, M. 2002. Assembly-dependent trafficking assays in the detection of receptor-receptor interactions. Methods. 27:311–317.
Letourneur, F., S. Hennecke, C. Demolliere, and P. Cosson. 1995. Steric masking of a dilysine endoplasmic reticulum retention motif during assembly of the human high affinity receptor for immunoglobulin E. J. Cell Biol. 129:971–978.
Alarcon, B., B. Berkhout, J. Breitmeyer, and C. Terhorst. 1988. Assembly of the human T cell receptor-CD3 complex takes place in the endoplasmic reticulum and involves intermediary complexes between the CD3-gamma.delta.epsilon core and single T cell receptor alpha or beta chains. J. Biol. Chem. 263:2953–2961.
Koning, F., W.L. Maloy, and J.E. Coligan. 1990. The implications of subunit interactions for the structure of the T cell receptor-CD3 complex. Eur. J. Immunol. 20:299–305.
San Jose, E., A.G. Sahuquillo, R. Bragado, and B. Alarcon. 1998. Assembly of the TCR/CD3 complex: CD3 epsilon/delta and CD3 epsilon/gamma dimers associate indistinctly with both TCR alpha and TCR beta chains. Evidence for a double TCR heterodimer model. Eur. J. Immunol. 28:12–21.
Minami, Y., A.M. Weissman, L.E. Samelson, and R.D. Klausner. 1987. Building a multichain receptor: synthesis, degradation, and assembly of the T-cell antigen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84:2688–2692.
Manolios, N., F. Letourneur, J.S. Bonifacino, and R.D. Klausner. 1991. Pairwise, cooperative and inhibitory interactions describe the assembly and probable structure of the T-cell antigen receptor. EMBO J. 10:1643–1651.
Sancho, J., T. Chatila, R.C. Wong, C. Hall, R. Blumberg, B. Alarcon, R.S. Geha, and C. Terhorst. 1989. T-cell antigen receptor (TCR)-alpha/beta heterodimer formation is a prerequisite for association of CD3-zeta 2 into functionally competent TCR.CD3 complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 264:20760–20769.
Mombaerts, P., A.R. Clarke, M.A. Rudnicki, J. Iacomini, S. Itohara, J.J. Lafaille, L. Wang, Y. Ichikawa, R. Jaenisch, M.L. Hooper, et al. 1992. Mutations in T-cell antigen receptor genes alpha and beta block thymocyte development at different stages. Nature. 360:225–231.
Malissen, M., A. Gillet, L. Ardouin, G. Bouvier, J. Trucy, P. Ferrier, E. Vivier, and B. Malissen. 1995. Altered T cell development in mice with a targeted mutation of the CD3-epsilon gene. EMBO J. 14:4641–4653.
DeJarnette, J.B., C.L. Sommers, K. Huang, K.J. Woodside, R. Emmons, K. Katz, E.W. Shores, and P.E. Love. 1998. Specific requirement for CD3epsilon in T cell development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 95:14909–14914.
Koyasu, S., R.E. Hussey, L.K. Clayton, A. Lerner, R. Pedersen, P. Delany-Heiken, F. Chau, and E.L. Reinherz. 1994. Targeted disruption within the CD3 zeta/eta/phi/Oct-1 locus in mouse. EMBO J. 13:784–797.
Wiest, D.L., K.P. Kearse, E.W. Shores, and A. Singer. 1994. Developmentally regulated expression of CD3 components independent of clonotypic T cell antigen receptor complexes on immature thymocytes. J. Exp. Med. 180:1375–1382.
Wiest, D.L., W.H. Burgess, D. McKean, K.P. Kearse, and A. Singer. 1995. The molecular chaperone calnexin is expressed on the surface of immature thymocytes in association with clonotype-independent CD3 complexes. EMBO J. 14:3425–3433.
Mallabiabarrena, A., M. Fresno, and B. Alarcon. 1992. An endoplasmic reticulum retention signal in the CD3 epsilon chain of the T-cell receptor. Nature. 357:593–596.
Mallabiabarrena, A., M.A. Jimenez, M. Rico, and B. Alarcon. 1995. A tyrosine-containing motif mediates ER retention of CD3-epsilon and adopts a helix-turn structure. EMBO J. 14:2257–2268.
Cosson, P., and F. Letourneur. 1994. Coatomer interaction with di-lysine endoplasmic reticulum retention motifs. Science. 263:1629–1631.
Hardt, B., and E. Bause. 2002. Lysine can be replaced by histidine but not by arginine as the ER retrieval motif for type I membrane proteins. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 291:751–757.
Schutze, M.P., P.A. Peterson, and M.R. Jackson. 1994. An N-terminal double-arginine motif maintains type II membrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. EMBO J. 13:1696–1705.
Bonifacino, J.S., C.K. Suzuki, and R.D. Klausner. 1990. A peptide sequence confers retention and rapid degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Science. 247:79–82.
Lee, S.J. 1998. Endoplasmic reticulum retention and degradation of T cell antigen receptor ? chain. Exp. Mol. Med. 30:159–164.
Letourneur, F., and R.D. Klausner. 1992. A novel di-leucine motif and a tyrosine-based motif independently mediate lysosomal targeting and endocytosis of CD3 chains. Cell. 69:1143–1157.
Rajagopalan, S., Y. Xu, and M.B. Brenner. 1994. Retention of unassembled components of integral membrane proteins by calnexin. Science. 263:387–390.
Borroto, A., J. Lama, F. Niedergang, A. Dautry-Varsat, B. Alarcon, and A. Alcover. 1999. The CD3 epsilon subunit of the TCR contains endocytosis signals. J. Immunol. 163:25–31.
Dietrich, J., X. Hou, A.M. Wegener, L.O. Pedersen, N. Odum, and C. Geisler. 1996. Molecular characterization of the di-leucine-based internalization motif of the T cell receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271:11441–11448.
Dietrich, J., X. Hou, A.M. Wegener, and C. Geisler. 1994. CD3 gamma contains a phosphoserine-dependent di-leucine motif involved in down-regulation of the T cell receptor. EMBO J. 13:2156–2166.
D'Oro, U., I. Munitic, G. Chacko, T. Karpova, J. McNally, and J.D. Ashwell. 2002. Regulation of constitutive TCR internalization by the zeta-chain. J. Immunol. 169:6269–6278.
Dietrich, J., and C. Geisler. 1998. T cell receptor zeta allows stable expression of receptors containing the CD3gamma leucine-based receptor-sorting motif. J. Biol. Chem. 273:26281–26284.
Aiken, C., J. Konner, N.R. Landau, M.E. Lenburg, and D. Trono. 1994. Nef induces CD4 endocytosis: requirement for a critical dileucine motif in the membrane-proximal CD4 cytoplasmic domain. Cell. 76:853–864.
Shin, J., R.L. Dunbrack Jr., S. Lee, and J.L. Strominger. 1991. Signals for retention of transmembrane proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum studied with CD4 truncation mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:1918–1922.
Nishimura, N., and W.E. Balch. 1997. A di-acidic signal required for selective export from the endoplasmic reticulum. Science. 277:556–558.
Borroto, A., A. Mallabiabarrena, J.P. Albar, A.C. Martinez, and B. Alarcon. 1998. Characterization of the region involved in CD3 pairwise interactions within the T cell receptor complex. J. Biol. Chem. 273:12807–12816.
Salmeron, A., F. Sanchez-Madrid, M.A. Ursa, M. Fresno, and B. Alarcon. 1991. A conformational epitope expressed upon association of CD3-epsilon with either CD3-delta or CD3-gamma is the main target for recognition by anti-CD3 monoclonal antibodies. J. Immunol. 147:3047–3052.
Weissman, A.M., S.J. Frank, D.G. Orloff, M. Mercep, J.D. Ashwell, and R.D. Klausner. 1989. Role of the zeta chain in the expression of the T cell antigen receptor: genetic reconstitution studies. EMBO J. 8:3651–3656.
Kappes, D.J., and S. Tonegawa. 1991. Surface expression of alternative forms of the TCR/CD3 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 88:10619–10623.
Sussman, J.J., J.S. Bonifacino, J. Lippincott-Schwartz, A.M. Weissman, T. Saito, R.D. Klausner, and J.D. Ashwell. 1988. Failure to synthesize the T cell CD3-zeta chain: structure and function of a partial T cell receptor complex. Cell. 52:85–95.
Transy, C., P.E. Moingeon, B. Marshall, C. Stebbins, and E.L. Reinherz. 1989. Most anti-human CD3 monoclonal antibodies are directed to the CD3 epsilon subunit. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:947–950.
Bonifacino, J.S., and J. Lippincott-Schwartz. 1991. Degradation of proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 3:592–600.
Huppa, J.B., and H.L. Ploegh. 1997. The alpha chain of the T cell antigen receptor is degraded in the cytosol. Immunity. 7:113–122.
Hall, C., B. Berkhout, B. Alarcon, J. Sancho, T. Wileman, and C. Terhorst. 1991. Requirements for cell surface expression of the human TCR/CD3 complex in non-T cells. Int. Immunol. 3:359–368.
Shores, E.W., M. Ono, T. Kawabe, C.L. Sommers, T. Tran, K. Lui, M.C. Udey, J. Ravetch, and P.E. Love. 1998. T cell development in mice lacking all T cell receptor family members (, , and FcRI). J. Exp. Med. 187:1093–1101.
Malissen, M., A. Gillet, B. Rocha, J. Trucy, E. Vivier, C. Boyer, F. Kontgen, N. Brun, G. Mazza, E. Spanopoulou, et al. 1993. T cell development in mice lacking the CD3-zeta/eta gene. EMBO J. 12:4347–4355.
Liu, C.P., R. Ueda, J. She, J. Sancho, B. Wang, G. Weddell, J. Loring, C. Kurahara, E.C. Dudley, A. Hayday, et al. 1993. Abnormal T cell development in CD3-zeta–/– mutant mice and identification of a novel T cell population in the intestine. EMBO J. 12:4863–4875.
Liu, C.P., W.J. Lin, M. Huang, J.W. Kappler, and P. Marrack. 1997. Development and function of T cells in T cell antigen receptor/CD3 zeta knockout mice reconstituted with Fc epsilon RI gamma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 94:616–621.
Levelt, C.N., P. Mombaerts, A. Iglesias, S. Tonegawa, and K. Eichmann. 1993. Restoration of early thymocyte differentiation in T-cell receptor beta-chain-deficient mutant mice by transmembrane signaling through CD3 epsilon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:11401–11405.
Jacobs, H., J. Iacomini, M. van de Ven, S. Tonegawa, and A. Berns. 1996. Domains of the TCR beta-chain required for early thymocyte development. J. Exp. Med. 184:1833–1843.
Irving, B.A., F.W. Alt, and N. Killeen. 1998. Thymocyte development in the absence of pre-T cell receptor extracellular immunoglobulin domains. Science. 280:905–908.
Carrasco, Y.R., A.R. Ramiro, C. Trigueros, V.G. de Yebenes, M. Garcia-Peydro, and M.L. Toribio. 2001. An endoplasmic reticulum retention function for the cytoplasmic tail of the human pre–T cell receptor (TCR) chain: potential role in the regulation of cell surface pre-TCR expression levels. J. Exp. Med. 193:1045–1058.
O'Shea, C.C., A.P. Thornell, I.R. Rosewell, B. Hayes, and M.J. Owen. 1997. Exit of the pre-TCR from the ER/cis-Golgi is necessary for signaling differentiation, proliferation, and allelic exclusion in immature thymocytes. Immunity. 7:591–599.
Dietrich, J., J. Kastrup, B.L. Nielsen, N. Odum, and C. Geisler. 1997. Regulation and function of the CD3 DxxxLL motif: a binding site for adaptor protein-1 and adaptor protein-2 in vitro. J. Cell Biol. 138:271–281.
Alarcon, B., S.C. Ley, F. Sanchez-Madrid, R.S. Blumberg, S.T. Ju, M. Fresno, and C. Terhorst. 1991. The CD3-gamma and CD3-delta subunits of the T cell antigen receptor can be expressed within distinct functional TCR/CD3 complexes. EMBO J. 10:903–912.(Pilar Delgado and Balbino)