当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《细胞生物学杂志》 > 2006年第9期 > 正文
编号:11447077
Activation of Estrogen Receptor- Reduces Aortic Smooth Muscle Differentiation
http://www.100md.com Christine R. Montague, Melissa G. Hunter
    参见附件。

     the Department of Medicine (C.R.M., M.G.H., M.A.G., C.B.M.), Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus

    Center for Biostatistics (G.S.P.), Ohio State University, Columbus

    School of Medicine (P.J.G.-C.), University of Miami, Fla.

    Abstract

    Women are at high risk of dying from unrecognized cardiovascular disease. Many differences in cardiovascular disease between men and women appear to be mediated by vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC). Because estrogen reduces the proliferation of SMC, we hypothesized that activation of estrogen receptor- (ER) by agonists or by growth factors altered SMC function. To determine the effect of growth factors, estrogen, and ER expression on SMC differentiation, human aortic SMC were cultured in serum-free conditions for 10 days. SMC from men had lower spontaneous expression of ER and higher levels of the differentiation markers calponin and smooth muscle -actin than SMC from women. When SMC containing low expression of ER were transduced with a lentivirus containing ER, activation of the receptor by ligands or growth factors reduced differentiation markers. Conversely, inhibiting ER expression by small interfering RNA (siRNA) in cells expressing high levels of ER enhanced the expression of differentiation markers. ER expression and activation reduced the phosphorylation of Smad2, a signaling molecule important in differentiation of SMC and initiated cell death through cleavage of caspase-3. We conclude that ER activation switched SMC to a dedifferentiated phenotype and may contribute to plaque instability.

    Key Words: apoptosis cardiovascular disease gene expression nuclear receptors smooth muscle differentiation

    Introduction

    Since 1984, more women than men have died from cardiovascular diseases, although the prevalence of diagnosed disease is lower among women.1 Women have higher rates of stable angina, high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, and stroke but have less angiographic evidence of atherosclerotic plaques and have fewer myocardial infarctions than men.1 The inhibition of collagen production, smooth muscle proliferation, and endothelial dysfunction by estrogen may delay the formation of plaques in women until after menopause.2 Hormone replacement therapy started more than 10 years after menopause increases a woman’s risk for myocardial infarction,3,4 although therapy initiated near menopause may be more effective in preventing coronary heart disease.5 Additionally, because of gender differences in symptoms during acute coronary events and in response to interventional strategies, it is difficult to correctly diagnose and treat women.6,7

    A few studies comparing vascular wall properties and disease presentation of men and women with symptoms of coronary artery disease provide insight into the complicated effects of female hormones and their receptors in vascular cells. Although women with acute coronary syndromes are often free of angiographically visible stenoses, testing of coronary flow reserve demonstrates endothelial and smooth muscle dysfunction.8,9 Younger women who die from coronary artery thrombosis are more likely than men or postmenopausal women to have plaque erosion, rather than rupture of a lipid-rich plaque.10,11 Plaque erosions are characterized by loss of endothelial cells covering a nonocclusive, smooth muscle cell (SMC)- and hyaluronan-rich plaque with few inflammatory cells or type I collagen.12 It is speculated that migration of dedifferentiated SMC and expression of hyaluronan weakens endothelial cell adhesion and predisposes the coronary arteries for thrombotic events.12

    After menopause, women experience a dramatic rise in aortic stiffness, which may cause hypertension.13 In those who develop coronary artery disease, the plaques become more numerous with larger lipid cores and thinner fibrous caps marked by calcification.11 It is uncertain how matrix deposition and plaque stability are affected by the lack of estrogen or by growth factors that activate the estrogen receptor (ER).2

    Because SMC are responsible for many of the differences in coronary disease noted between men and women, such as microvessel dysfunction, plaque erosion, and matrix deposition, we sought to understand the role of ER in smooth muscle differentiation in estrogen- or growth factor-rich environments to mimic gender or menopausal effects. In this study, we obtained aortic SMC from male and female donors and determined the effects of ER expression, estrogen, and growth factors on differentiation, survival, and adherence of these cells.

    Materials and Methods

    Explantation and SM -Actin Detection

    Following informed consent, sections of aorta were obtained from heart transplant donors and recipients at The Ohio State University Medical Center, as approved by the institutional review board. Aortic slices were stripped of endothelium and adventitia, rinsed, and cut into small bits. The average age (±SEM) for females and males examined in this study was 32.6±6.39 and 47.4±8.62, respectively (n=5 each). No statistical difference in age was observed between the donors and recipients or between genders. The SMC were expanded in growth media with amphotericin and gentamicin (Clonetics/Cambrex, Walkersville, Md, and Cascade Biologics, Portland, Ore), then tested for smooth muscle (SM) -actin expression using FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif). Cell populations containing at least 85% positive staining for SM -actin were used for subsequent studies.

    Real-Time PCR for ER

    ER mRNA was analyzed by real-time PCR in SMC from 5 male donors and 5 female donors that were starved for 5 days to allow ER upregulation. TaqMan primers and probe designed by Primer 3 software (http://frodo.wi.mit.edu/cgi-bin/primer3/primer3_www.cgi14) were synthesized by Applied Biosystems (Foster City, Calif). The following primers were used to detect ER: forward, 5'-agctcctcctcatcctctcc-3'; reverse, 5'-tctccagcagcaggtcatag-3'; and probe 5'-6FAM-tcaggcacatgagtaacaaaggca-TAMRA-3'. RNA was isolated using NucleoSpin RNA II (BD Clontech, Mountain View, Calif), and cDNA generated using random hexamers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif). A 111-bp product from ER was amplified over 40 cycles with 18S RNA as internal control using the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems).

    Cloning of ER into EGFP-pLenti6/V5 Plasmid and Transduction

    The pLenti6/V5-D-TOPO vector (Invitrogen) was engineered to contain an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) surrounded by additional restriction sites and designated pLenti-EGFP (generously provided by Mark Wewers, Ohio State University). cDNA for ER was amplified by PCR from a pBK-CMV/ER plasmid kindly provided by Robert Brueggemeier (Ohio State University), introducing EcoRI and EcoRV restriction sites. EGFP was removed from pLenti-EGFP by digestion with EcoRI and EcoRV and replaced with ER to generate pLenti-ER. pLenti vector lacking EGFP was used as a control. Purified pLenti-ER or empty vector control (3 μg) were transfected with 2 μg of pMD.G and 10 μg of pCMVR8.2 helper plasmids (kindly provided by Dr K. Boris-Lawrie, Ohio State University) into HEK293FT cells according to the directions for the ViraPower Lentiviral Expression System. Virus secreted into the media was concentrated (Vivaspin 100 000 MWCO; Vivascience, Germany) and titered in SMC cultures, with blasticidin (2 μg/mL) for selection. SMC were then transduced with the virus for each experiment at approximately 5 multiplicity of infection and incubated overnight in growth media containing 6 μg/mL polybrene.

    Transfection of Small Interfering RNA Plasmids

    SMC (1x106) were transfected with 10 μg of control or ER small interfering RNA (siRNA) plasmid (Panomics, Redwood City, Calif) using nucleofection (Amaxa, Gaithersburg, Md). Transfection efficiency was monitored using 2 μg of pmaxGFP plasmid (Amaxa).

    SMC Differentiation and Activation

    Differentiation experiments were performed on SMC in the following groups, seeded in an 8-well plate as noted: native cells expressing endogenous ER (7x104 cells per well), cells with low expression of ER to be transduced with ER lentivirus (8x104), and cells with high ER levels transfected with ER siRNA (1.8x105). After recovery, the cells were starved overnight in phenol red and serum-free basal media (EBM-PRF) (Clonetics/Cambrex) and exposed for 10 days to vehicle control (either 4 μmol/L HCL or 1:400 000 dilution ethanol), 17-estradiol (10 nmol/L; Sigma, St Louis, Mo), the ER agonist propyl pyrazole triol (PPT) (10 nmol/L; Tocris Cookson, Ellisville, Mo), epidermal growth factor (EGF) (10 ng/mL, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) (10 ng/mL; R&D Systems), or transforming growth factor-1 (TGF1) (5 ng/mL; R&D Systems) in EBM-PRF. Agonists or vehicle controls were added each day and then cells were lysed in cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Mass). Samples of the culture media at the end of the experiment were quantitated for active TGF1 by ELISA (Quantikine, R&D Systems). Activation studies were performed on SMC stably transduced with pLenti control or ER (7x104 cells per well or 2x105 cells per 25-cm2 flask), incubated for the times indicated using agonists as listed above, then lysed with cell lysis buffer or CelLytic NuCLEAR Extraction Kit (Sigma). Equal protein amounts (20 to 50 μg) were subjected to Western blot analysis and detected with SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Pierce, Rockford, Ill) and the Fluor S-Max system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif). Smooth muscle (SM) -actin, -actin, and calponin antibodies were obtained from Sigma. Antibodies to phospho-ER and cleaved caspase-3 were from Cell Signaling Technology. Cyclin D1 (clone DCS-6), Erk2 and ER (HC20) antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, Calif).

    ER Transcriptional Activation

    Stably transduced SMC were transfected with an estrogen response element (ERE) reporter construct producing secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) (Clontech/BD Biosciences) using Effectene (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif). The SEAP signal was obtained over 3 days and normalized as a percentage of the maximum signal achieved.

    Immunofluorescence for ER

    Virally transduced SMC were fixed in 70% ETOH, permeabilized and blocked with 0.05% triton/1% goat serum. Cells were incubated overnight with ER antibody (Ab-16, Lab Vision-Neomarkers, Fremont, Calif) in 1% goat serum. ER was detected with Alexa Fluor 568 anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen) and a DP-11 digital camera connected to an IX-50 inverted microscope with 10x objective (Olympus, Melville, NY).

    Cell Density

    Phase contrast images were taken using identical settings at day 10 of the differentiation experiments using the DP-11 digital camera and IX-50 inverted microscope with 4x objective (Olympus). Quantity One colony counting software (Bio-Rad) was used to detect live cells (gray) but exclude apoptotic cells (white). Numbers were normalized to vehicle control samples for each cell population or control transfection/transduction cells.

    Statistics

    Real-time PCR results for ER expression were analyzed using longitudinal regression over 10 experiments to test the difference in cycle times, which are normally distributed. Western blot densitometry ratios for contractile proteins in starved or PDGF-stimulated SMC from 6 people were compared using a mixed model regression to account for correlation within cell lines. Densitometry values from the remaining immunoblots were normalized to loading controls and by the vehicle control sample for the control group, compared by 2-factor ANOVA (Stata version 9; StataCorp, College Station, Tex), and pairwise comparisons were adjusted using the Holm’s method.15

    Results

    Low-Level Expression of ER in Human Aortic Smooth Muscle

    Estrogen receptors are present in healthy aortic SMC and regulate growth.2 Because genes that affect cell growth often change cell differentiation, and ER enhances proliferation in transformed cells, we hypothesized that the expression and activation of SMC ER modulated cell differentiation. The ER mRNA level, stated as a fold induction above the SMC population containing the lowest level of ER, was &4.3 times higher on average for female donors than for male donors (P<0.001, Figure 1A). By comparison, serving as a positive control, the ER level for the breast cancer line MCF7 was &1000 times higher than SMC containing the lowest ER levels, whereas as a negative control, the colon cancer cell line HT29 had little to no ER detected by PCR. For subsequent studies, we used SMC from either the female donor with the greatest amount of ER or the male donor with the lowest ER expression. We confirmed proportional ER protein expression in these 2 cell populations (Figure 1B).

    SMC Containing ER Failed to Differentiate

    Because growth factors activate ER and TGF1 causes differentiation of SMC,16,17 SMC expressing the highest ER levels and the lowest ER levels were treated with these growth factors as well as ER ligands (PPT and 17-estradiol). As shown, cells with high ER levels had little expression of the differentiation markers SM -actin or calponin except in the presence of TGF1 (Figure 2A). In contrast, cells with lower levels of ER retained both SM -actin and calponin in all conditions except when incubated with EGF or PDGF (Figure 2A). We observed that low ER cells had significantly greater amounts of calponin (P<0.0001 overall) and greater amounts of SM -actin (P=0.0001 overall) compared with high ER-expressing cells (Figure 2B). Individual comparisons are as shown in Figure 2B.

    Because SMC from the low ER (male) donor had more differentiation markers than the high ER (female) donor, we further characterized basal differentiation of SMC from other male or female donors (n=3 each). As shown in Figure 2C, vehicle control-stimulated SMC from male donors had high levels of calponin but lost much of this marker on PDGF stimulation, similar to cells in Figure 2A. In contrast, female donor SMC expressed only low levels of calponin in either condition. Consequently, the average calponin ratio was significantly higher for SMC from men than for SMC from women (P=0.0281).

    Transduction of ER Inhibited SMC Differentiation

    Because ER expression correlated with SMC dedifferentiation, we examined whether induced expression of ER in low ER-containing cells directly inhibited SMC differentiation. Transduction efficiency was determined by ER immunofluorescent staining (Figure 3A).Transduction of ER lowered calponin (P<0.0001) and SM -actin (P<0.0001) expression overall. ER-expression reduced SM -actin in response to 17-estradiol, PPT, and TGF1 treatment and reduced calponin in response to vehicle, 17-estradiol, or PPT (Figure 3B and 3C, probability values as shown). In contrast to these cell markers, cyclin D increased on transduction of ER (P=0.0001 overall).

    Interruption of ER by siRNA Augmented TGF1-Induced Differentiation

    Because high native levels of ER correlated with low levels of SMC differentiation markers, we next reduced ER expression through siRNA to enhance their differentiation program. High transfection efficiency was obtained using pmaxGFP plasmid DNA in cotransfections (Figure 4A). A reduction in ER protein was confirmed in the siRNA-transfected cells compared with the empty vector control (Figure 4A).

    We found that reduced ER expression led to higher levels of differentiation markers. ER siRNA upregulated calponin expression overall (P=0.0038), with significant pairwise difference occurring in TGF1-treated cells (Figure 4B and C). Although ER siRNA slightly raised SM -actin levels in cells incubated with TGF1, the increase was not significant (P=0.1542).

    Ligand Activation of ER Inhibited Smad2 Phosphorylation

    We next investigated ligand-dependent ER activation by 17-estradiol and PPT, and the ligand-independent activation by EGF and PDGF. A low level of ER phosphorylation was observed in the ER-transduced cells in the vehicle-treated condition, whereas 17-estradiol and PPT preferentially phosphorylated ERS118, and EGF and PDGF phosphorylated ERS167 (Figure 5A). TGF1 caused no activation above vehicle control of either serine residue.

    In contrast to the activation by phosphorylation seen with EGF and PDGF, only 17-estradiol and PPT activated transcription of an ERE reporter construct (Figure 5B, P=0.0013 for 17-estradiol and P=0.0008 for PPT compared with vehicle). Activation for up to ten days with EGF, PDGF-BB or TGF1 caused no detectable signal above vehicle control samples (data not shown). As a partial explanation for the transcriptional inactivity of ER phosphorylated by growth factors, we found that stimulating the cells with 17-estradiol, but not EGF, PDGF-BB or TGF1, for 20 to 60 minutes caused nuclear translocation of ER (Figure 5B and data not shown).

    Because our differentiation analysis suggested that TGF1 elevated SMC differentiation markers in the presence of ER but full expression of these markers required lower levels of ER, we examined whether ER inhibited TGF signaling by interfering with Smad activation, as previously described.18 Because 17-estradiol or PPT potently reduced SMC differentiation, we determined whether 17-estradiol inhibited TGF1 signaling through Smads. TGF1 induced the phosphorylation of Smad2 in pLenti or ER-transduced SMC for up to 60 minutes (Figure 5C). However, Smad2 phosphorylation was reduced if the ER-transduced cells were preincubated with 17-estradiol 30 minutes before activation. The relevance of TGF1 to the differentiation of SMC was examined by measuring whether the cells spontaneously produced TGF1 and whether this production correlated to cellular differentiation. Active TGF1 was detected in the supernatant of pLenti-transduced SMC at 49.0±27.9 pg/mL in the vehicle control condition and 67.2±45.4 and 110.7±42.1 after 17-estradiol or PPT incubation, respectively (no significant differences, n=2, mean±SEM). Transduction of ER in the cells did not alter TGF1 production suggesting ER expression altered the response to TGF1 (45.6±23.1, 49.8±33.6 and 112.0±39.7 for vehicle, 17-estradiol, and PPT exposed cells, respectively, n=2).

    Ligand Activation of ER Initiated Apoptosis

    Because estrogen inhibits the growth of SMC and causes apoptosis,2,19 we examined the initiation of apoptosis in the presence of ER agonists. Indeed, SMC transduced to express ER had evidence of caspase-3 activity when stimulated with 17-estradiol or PPT (Figure 6A, P=0.0231 and P=0.0646, respectively; n=2).

    The effects of ER expression on cell growth were apparent by cell detachment when ER-transduced SMC were treated with 17-estradiol (Figure 6B, lower right) or PPT (not shown), indicating that cells were undergoing apoptosis. Consequently, fewer ER-transduced cells were counted after 17-estradiol or PPT treatment compared with pLenti-transduced cells (P=0.0006 overall; Figure 6D, i). Consistent with this observation, cells natively expressing high levels of ER had significantly lower cell densities than the low-ER cells when treated with 17-estradiol or PPT (P=0.0003 overall; Figure 6D, ii). Finally, a small increase in cell density was found overall (P=0.0274) when the high-ER SMC were transfected with ER siRNA, although no individual paired comparisons were significant (Figure 6C and 6D, iii).

    Discussion

    The present study extends the role of ER in vascular SMC beyond its ability to inhibit growth. To understand differences in SMC status between men and women, we characterized aortic SMC differentiation and ER expression in these 2 groups. We detected significantly higher levels of ER in SMC from our female donors compared with SMC from male donors. The inverse was true for differentiation markers, however, as cells from men expressed greater levels of SM -actin and calponin protein under starved conditions, providing a connection between ER expression and differentiation.

    We analyzed the effect of 2 ER ligands and 3 growth factors on cell populations containing the lowest and highest levels of ER. SMC differentiation markers remained high for cells natively expressing low amounts of ER whether incubated with vehicle, ER agonists, or TGF1. However, EGF and PDGF decreased SM -actin and calponin levels in these cells, similar to published accounts.20 In contrast, cells expressing high native ER had a low level of SM -actin and calponin under most conditions except when treated with TGF1. Similar findings were observed in cells virally transduced with ER, which resulted in their dedifferentiation. Only TGF1 could partially overcome the inhibitory effect of ER. These data indicated that ER may play a role in causing the low contractile protein levels detected in SMC from women. The ability of ER to inhibit differentiation was unexpected, because ER is known to inhibit growth and would be expected to induce differentiation. In contrast, ER caused an increase in cyclin D1 expression, indicating that growth inhibition did not align with quiescence. To confirm this biological role for ER, we found that reduction in ER resulted in greater contractile protein expression, especially in the presence of TGF1.

    Several possible pathways could be involved in the reduced SMC differentiation caused by ER. Inhibition of cell cycle regulators and activation of proliferation genes such as cyclin D are known to occur in ER-positive breast cancer cells exposed to 17-estradiol.21 Similar changes in SMC could induce a phenotypic switch from differentiated to proliferating or migratory SMC. Alternatively, ER may inhibit transcription by shunting coactivator proteins such as p300/CBP away from other transcription factors, some of which are necessary for smooth muscle gene expression.22–24 ER activates transcription at estrogen response elements on DNA, but is known to suppress the TGF1/Smad pathway by binding to and repressing Smad2 and -3, positive regulators of contractile protein transcription in SMC.18,25 In agreement, Smad2 phosphorylation was inhibited by estrogen in ER-transduced SMC in the current study. Because the SMC released detectable levels of active TGF1, the ability of ER to inhibit Smad-regulated differentiation is a likely mechanism of action.

    Cytoplasmic signaling pathways activated by ER including phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Akt, growth factor receptor autophosphorylation, mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), and src kinases can contribute to SMC dedifferentiation.19,26–28 A positive-feedback loop also exists in which S118 of ER is phosphorylated by 17-estradiol and MAPK, whereas S167 of ER is phosphorylated through the Akt pathway.16,29,30 Depending on the stimulus, we saw preferential phosphorylation of ER epitopes in SMC, indicating that upstream and downstream signaling events likely differed in these cells. Only ER ligands caused nuclear translocation and transcriptional activity at an ERE.

    Many studies show that 17-estradiol induces apoptosis through ER in SMC.2,19 We found that 17-estradiol and PPT significantly reduced cell density of native and transduced cells expressing high levels of ER, whereas inhibition of ER by siRNA increased cell density.

    Our results may explain some differences in coronary events in women and men. ER activation in an affected coronary artery may cause the dedifferentiation and migration of SMC into the intima, causing microvessel dysfunction. Our observation of apoptosis of SMC after estrogen exposure could partly explain why postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy causes higher rates of myocardial infarction through thinning of collagen and rupture of plaques.

    Acknowledgments

    We acknowledge the advice of Arthur R. Strauch and Tim D. Eubank, both of Ohio State University.

    Sources of Funding

    This work was supported by NIH grants HL63800-05, HL67176-04, HL70294-03 and HL066108-04 (to C.B.M.); and NIH Individual National Research Service Award 5F32 HL09550 and American Heart Association Ohio Affiliate Postdoctoral Fellowship Award 9920597V (to C.R.M.).

    Disclosures

    None.

    Footnotes

    Original received June 2, 2006; revision received July 3, 2006; accepted July 17, 2006.

    References

    American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2005 Update. Dallas, Tex: American Heart Association; 2005. Available at: http://www.americanheart.org.

    Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. Molecular and cellular basis of cardiovascular gender differences. Science. 2005; 308: 1583–1587.

    Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J. Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women’s Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002; 288: 321–333.

    Hulley S, Grady D, Bush T, Furberg C, Herrington D, Riggs B, Vittinghoff E. Randomized trial of estrogen plus progestin for secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) Research Group. JAMA. 1998; 280: 605–613.

    Grodstein F, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ. Hormone therapy and coronary heart disease: the role of time since menopause and age at hormone initiation. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2006; 15: 35–44. [Order article via Infotrieve]

    Patel H, Rosengren A, Ekman I. Symptoms in acute coronary syndromes: does sex make a difference Am Heart J. 2004; 148: 27–33. [Order article via Infotrieve]

    Clayton TC, Pocock SJ, Henderson RA, Poole-Wilson PA, Shaw TR, Knight R, Fox KA. Do men benefit more than women from an interventional strategy in patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction The impact of gender in the RITA 3 trial. Eur Heart J. 2004; 25: 1641–1650.

    Bugiardini R, Bairey Merz CN. Angina with "normal" coronary arteries: a changing philosophy. JAMA. 2005; 293: 477–484.

    Hochman JS, Tamis JE, Thompson TD, Weaver WD, White HD, Van de WF, Aylward P, Topol EJ, Califf RM. Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes IIb Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341: 226–232.

    Farb A, Burke AP, Tang AL, Liang TY, Mannan P, Smialek J, Virmani R. Coronary plaque erosion without rupture into a lipid core. A frequent cause of coronary thrombosis in sudden coronary death. Circulation. 1996; 93: 1354–1363.

    Burke AP, Farb A, Malcom G, Virmani R. Effect of menopause on plaque morphologic characteristics in coronary atherosclerosis. Am Heart J. 2001; 141: S58–S62. [Order article via Infotrieve]

    Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Weber DK, Kutys R, Wight TN, Virmani R. Differential accumulation of proteoglycans and hyaluronan in culprit lesions: insights into plaque erosion. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002; 22: 1642–1648.

    Waddell TK, Dart AM, Gatzka CD, Cameron JD, Kingwell BA. Women exhibit a greater age-related increase in proximal aortic stiffness than men. J Hypertens. 2001; 19: 2205–2212. [Order article via Infotrieve]

    Rozen S, Skaletsky HJ. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In: Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Krawetz S, Misener S, eds. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000; 132: 365–386.

    Sankoh AJ, Huque MF, Dubey SD. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1997; 16: 2529–2542. [Order article via Infotrieve]

    Kato S, Endoh H, Masuhiro Y, Kitamoto T, Uchiyama S, Sasaki H, Masushige S, Gotoh Y, Nishida E, Kawashima H. Activation of the estrogen receptor through phosphorylation by mitogen-activated protein kinase. Science. 1995; 270: 1491–1494.

    Hautmann MB, Madsen CS, Owens GK. A transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) control element drives TGFbeta-induced stimulation of smooth muscle alpha-actin gene expression in concert with two CArG elements. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272: 10948–10956.

    Matsuda T, Yamamoto T, Muraguchi A, Saatcioglu F. Cross-talk between transforming growth factor-beta and estrogen receptor signaling through Smad3. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 42908–42914.

    Mori-Abe A, Tsutsumi S, Takahashi K, Toya M, Yoshida M, Du B, Kawagoe J, Nakahara K, Takahashi T, Ohmichi M, Kurachi H. Estrogen and raloxifene induce apoptosis by activating p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade in synthetic vascular smooth muscle cells. J Endocrinol. 2003; 178: 417–426.

    Dandre F, Owens GK. Platelet-derived growth factor-BB and Ets-1 transcription factor negatively regulate transcription of multiple smooth muscle cell differentiation marker genes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2004; 286: H2042–H2051.

    Frasor J, Danes JM, Komm B, Chang KC, Lyttle CR, Katzenellenbogen BS. Profiling of estrogen up- and down-regulated gene expression in human breast cancer cells: insights into gene networks and pathways underlying estrogenic control of proliferation and cell phenotype. Endocrinology. 2003; 144: 4562–4574.

    Speir E, Yu ZX, Takeda K, Ferrans VJ, Cannon RO III. Competition for p300 regulates transcription by estrogen receptors and nuclear factor-kappaB in human coronary smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 2000; 87: 1006–1011.

    Cao D, Wang Z, Zhang CL, Oh J, Xing W, Li S, Richardson JA, Wang DZ, Olson EN. Modulation of smooth muscle gene expression by association of histone acetyltransferases and deacetylases with myocardin. Mol Cell Biol. 2005; 25: 364–376.

    Nishihara A, Hanai JI, Okamoto N, Yanagisawa J, Kato S, Miyazono K, Kawabata M. Role of p300, a transcriptional coactivator, in signalling of TGF-beta. Genes Cells. 1998; 3: 613–623.

    Hu B, Wu Z, Phan SH. Smad3 mediates transforming growth factor-beta-induced alpha-smooth muscle actin expression. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003; 29: 397–404.

    Haynes MP, Li L, Sinha D, Russell KS, Hisamoto K, Baron R, Collinge M, Sessa WC, Bender JR. Src kinase mediates phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent rapid endothelial nitric-oxide synthase activation by estrogen. J Biol Chem. 2003; 278: 2118–2123.

    Kahlert S, Nuedling S, van Eickels M, Vetter H, Meyer R, Grohe C. Estrogen receptor alpha rapidly activates the IGF-1 receptor pathway. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275: 18447–18453.

    Kawai-Kowase K, Sato H, Oyama Y, Kanai H, Sato M, Doi H, Kurabayashi M. Basic fibroblast growth factor antagonizes transforming growth factor-beta1-induced smooth muscle gene expression through extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 signaling pathway activation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004; 24: 1384–1390.

    Chen D, Washbrook E, Sarwar N, Bates GJ, Pace PE, Thirunuvakkarasu V, Taylor J, Epstein RJ, Fuller-Pace FV, Egly JM, Coombes RC, Ali S. Phosphorylation of human estrogen receptor alpha at serine 118 by two distinct signal transduction pathways revealed by phosphorylation-specific antisera. Oncogene. 2002; 21: 4921–4931. [Order article via Infotrieve]

    Campbell RA, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Patel NM, Constantinidou D, Ali S, Nakshatri H. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT-mediated activation of estrogen receptor alpha: a new model for anti-estrogen resistance. J Biol Chem. 2001; 276: 9817–9824.

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见ORG附件