当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《浙江临床医学》 > 2000年第1期
编号:10217227
急性心肌梗塞溶栓后早期T波倒置的临床意义
http://www.100md.com 《浙江临床医学》 2000年第1期
     作者:陈达开 张建华 陈晓曙 王晓秋

    单位:325000 温州市第三人民医院心内科

    关键词:T波倒置;冠状动脉再通;溶栓

    浙江临床医学000106

    摘 要:目的:探讨急性心肌梗塞(AMI)溶栓后早期T波倒置的临床意义。方法:对30例AMI接受溶栓治疗的患者分24小时内T波倒置组(14例)和未倒置组(16例)。依据临床间接血管再通标准观察两组再通情况,同时观察两组患者住院期间临床表现。结果:①两组再通分别为85.7%(12例)和37.5%(6例)(P<0.01)。②两组心血管事件发生率分别为7.1%(1例)和37.5%(6例)(P<0.05)。结论:早期T波倒置提示溶栓成功,血管事件发生率低。

    Implication of Early T-wave Inversion after Thrombolysis for Acute Myocardial Infarcton

    Chen Dakai

    Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the implication of early T-wave inversion following thrombolysis in patient with acute meocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: Following thrombombolysis, thirty patients with AMI were divided into 2 groups: 1. T-wave inversion occurred within 24 hours. 2. Without T-wave inversion. The state of reeannalization in the thrombosed artery were assessed by clinical indirect criteria. Results: The coronary artery patency rate in the two groups was 85.7% (12/14) and 37.5% (6/16) respectively (P<0.01). Cardiac event occurred in 7.1% ( 1/14) and 37.5% (6/16) respectively (P<0.05). Conclusion: Early T-wave inversion after thrombolysis may signify the patency of infarcted coronary artery, and indicates that the incidence of acrdiac event may be reduced.

    Keywords:T-wave inversion coronary artery patency thrombelysis

    参考文献:

    [1]中华心血管病杂志编委会.急性心肌梗塞溶栓疗法参考方案.中华心血管病杂志,1996,24:329.

    [2]Gani W,Buchbinder,Marcus H et al.Intmcoronary thrombolysis in evolving mvocardia infarction.Am Heart J1981,101:4~13.

    [3]Tunmis C1.Electrocantiographic effectofrepeffusion.Cantiochin, 1987,5:427~445.

    [4]Matrtzky S,Rogers WJ,Rciner JS,et al.Earlier Ahe repeffusion of vnfarct related coronary artery.J Am Coll Cardiol,1994,24:378~383.

    [5]中华心血管病杂志编委会.全国急性心肌梗塞再灌不治疗研究会纪要.中华心血管病杂志,1996,24:325., 百拇医药