当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《临床心血管病杂志》 > 2000年第2期
编号:10233865
糖尿病并发急性心肌梗死溶栓后冠状动脉开通者的近期预后
http://www.100md.com 《临床心血管病杂志》 2000年第2期
     作者:马礼坤 李昭骥 王家森 陆东风

    单位:马礼坤(安徽省立医院心内科(合肥,230001));王家森(安徽省立医院心内科(合肥,230001));李昭骥(广州医学院附属第二医院心内科);陆东风(广州医学院附属第二医院心内科)

    关键词:糖尿病;心肌梗死;血栓溶解疗法;冠状动脉造影

    临床心血管病杂志000203 摘 要:目的:研究糖尿病并发急性心肌梗死(AMI)溶栓治疗冠状动脉完全开通后的近期预后。方法:对21例糖尿病并发AMI溶栓后,急诊冠状动脉造影显示梗死冠状动脉开通者的冠状动脉造影结果进行分析,并于梗死后3~4周内行核素心室造影和24 h动态心电图检查,观察心功能、心肌缺血和心律失常的情况,且随访梗死后3~5周内心绞痛等并发症的发生率,并与37例非糖尿病AMI溶栓后冠状动脉开通者进行比较。结果:与非糖尿病组相比,糖尿病组冠状动脉的残余狭窄较重,冠状动脉病变积分较高;梗死后近期左室功能较差,心肌缺血的发生率较高。结论:糖尿病并发AMI溶栓后冠状动脉开通者冠状动脉病变仍然较重,近期预后较差。
, http://www.100md.com
    The early prognosis of diabetic patients complicated

    with acute myocardial infarction after reperfusion of

    coronary artery by thrombolytic therapy

    MA Li-kun WANG Jia-seng

    (Anhui Provincial Hospital,Hefei 230001)

    LI Zhao-ji LU Dong-feng

    (Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical College)
, http://www.100md.com
    Abstract:Objective:To compare the difference of the early prognosis between diabetic and non-diabetic patients complicated with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) after complete reperfusion of coronary artery by thrombolytic therapy.Method:The angiographic manifestation of 21 cases of diabetic and 37 cases of non-diabetic patients complicated with AMI who received thrombolysis and the infarct-related coronary artery were re-opened indicated by emergency coronary angiography after thrombolysis were analysed.24 hours ambulatery electrocardiogram and radionuclide ventriculography were tested 3~4 weeks after infarction,and all patients were received 4~5 weeks follow-up.Result:In diabetic group,the residual stenosis of infarct-related artery and the coronary artery disease score were (93.10±2.62)% and (10.14±1.98),significantly higher than control group 〔(76.05±9.42)% and (5.78±3.16)% respectively〕 (P<0.01).Three-vessel diseases were most common in diabetic patients,but in non-diabetic patients,single-vessel diseases were more than two-and three-vessel diseases.After infarction,in diabetic group,LVEF were (0.57±0.28)%,lower than non-diabetic group (0.71±0.12)% (P<0.05);but the rate of myocardial ischemia attack were 52.38%,higher than non-diabetic group (9.52%) (P<0.05).Conclusion:In diabetic patient with AMI,although the infarct-related coronary artery is re-opened by thrombolysis,the disease of coronary artery is still severe and the early prognosis is worse compare with non-diabetic patient.
, http://www.100md.com
    Key words:Diabetes Acute myocardial infarction Thrombolytic therapy Coronary angiography

    为研究糖尿病并发急性心肌梗死(AMI)溶栓治疗冠状动脉开通后的近期预后,我们分析比较了21例糖尿病和37例非糖尿病AMI者溶栓治疗冠状动脉开通后冠状动脉造影的改变及其对近期预后的影响。

    1 对象与方法

    1.1 对象

    因AMI住院接受溶栓治疗的患者中,经急诊冠状动脉造影证实溶栓后梗死冠状动脉开通者58例,其中按WHO诊断标准确诊为非胰岛素依赖性糖尿病者21例,男20例,女1例,年龄51~72(平均64.9)岁;非糖尿病者37例,男31例,女6例,年龄39~75(平均66.1)岁。
, 百拇医药
    1.2 方法

    入院后静脉给予尿激酶(100~150万u/30~60 min)或链激酶(150 万u/60 min)溶栓治疗。开始溶栓距症状发作的时间小于12 h。常规检测溶栓前后心电图、心肌酶学的变化,并于溶栓结束后60~90 min内行急诊冠状动脉造影。参照TIMI标准〔1〕,以TIMI 3级血流为完全开通。冠状动脉的狭窄程度以紧临狭窄段近端和远端正常或无明显病变的冠状动脉直径为100%,狭窄处血管直径减少的百分数为狭窄程度。采用Friesinger冠状动脉病变积分法〔2〕评定冠状动脉残余狭窄的程度和范围。溶栓后给予肝素、阿司匹林、硝酸甘油等治疗,糖尿病者在心肌梗死急性期给予胰岛素治疗,病情稳定后改口服降糖药控制血糖。于梗死后3~4周行99mTc-RBC平衡法心室造影,测定左室射血分数(LVEF);行24 h动态心电图检查,了解心肌缺血及频发室性期前收缩、短阵室性心动过速、严重的窦性心动过缓、窦性停搏和Ⅱ度Ⅱ型以上房室传导阻滞等的发生情况。并随访梗死后3~5周内心绞痛、心力衰竭和再梗死的发生率及病死率等情况。
, 百拇医药
    1.3 统计学处理

    计量资料采用t检验,以±s表示;计数资料采用χ2检验。

    2 结果

    2.1 两组患者临床一般情况

    两组患者临床一般情况见表1。开始溶栓时间糖尿病组为(6.4±3.2)h,非糖尿病组为(7.1±2.8)h,两组相比无显著性差异。

    表1 两组患者临床一般情况 例数(%)

    糖尿病组

    非糖尿病组

    高血压史
, 百拇医药
    5(23.81)

    10(27.03)

    吸烟史

    6(28.57)

    9(24.32)

    高脂血症

    10(47.62)

    9(24.32)

    梗死部位

    前间壁

    4(19.05)

    8(21.62)
, 百拇医药
    前壁

    7(33.33)

    12(27.43)

    广泛前壁

    2(9.52)

    7(18.92)

    侧壁

    3(14.29)

    3(8.11)

    下、后壁

    5(23.81)

    7(18.92)
, 百拇医药
    梗死相关血管

    左前降支

    13(61.90)

    27(72.97)

    左回旋支

    3(14.29)

    4(10.81)

    右冠状动脉

    5(23.81)

    6(16.22)

    2.2 两组冠状动脉造影结果

    两组冠状动脉造影结果见表2。
, 百拇医药
    表2 两组冠状动脉造影结果 %,±s 冠状动脉病变

    糖尿病组

    非糖尿病组

    冠状动脉残余狭窄

    93.10±2.622)

    76.05±9.42

    冠状动脉病变积分

    10.14±1.982)

    5.78±3.16

    单支病变
, 百拇医药
    4.761)

    51.32

    二支病变

    23.81

    36.65

    三支病变

    71.431)

    12.05

    与非糖尿病组相比1)P<0.05,2)P<0.012.3 两组梗死后近期心功能及并发症的发生率

    两组梗死后近期心功能及并发症的发生率见表3。
, 百拇医药
    表3 两组梗死后心功能及并发症的发生率 %,±s

    糖尿病组

    非糖尿病组

    LVEF

    0.57±0.281)

    0.71±0.12

    心肌缺血

    52.381)

    9.52

    恶性心律失常
, 百拇医药
    42.86

    14.29

    梗死后心绞痛

    19.05

    9.52

    心力衰竭

    28.57

    19.05

    再梗死

    14.29

    0

    病死率

    9.52
, 百拇医药
    5.40

    与非糖尿病组相比1)P<0.053 讨论

    冠状动脉造影的结果表明糖尿病者冠状动脉病变的发生率较高,且以多支和弥漫性病变多见。与一般人群相比,糖尿病者发生心肌梗死的危险性较大,心肌梗死后的死亡率也较高。尽管AMI后早期溶栓使梗死相关冠状动脉再通能明显改善其预后,然而与非糖尿病相比,糖尿病并发AMI溶栓后近期病死率仍然较高〔3〕。本文通过对糖尿病和非糖尿病并发AMI溶栓再通后的冠状动脉造影和梗死后近期心功能、心肌缺血等的研究表明,糖尿病并发AMI溶栓后尽管梗死相关冠状动脉再通,但残余狭窄仍较重,冠状动脉病变积分仍高,以多支和弥漫性病变多见。与非糖尿病相比,梗死后心功能较差,近期心肌缺血的发生率较高,提示预后较差。此外,梗死后近期恶性心律失常、心绞痛、心力衰竭、再梗死的发生率以及病死率均显示糖尿病组较高,但可能由于病例数有限,差异缺乏统计学意义。
, http://www.100md.com
    糖尿病者AMI溶栓再通者近期预后较差的原因可能与梗死血管残余狭窄较重以及同时存在多支血管病变有关。此外,心肌梗死前因弥漫的冠状动脉病变可能引起糖尿病性心肌病也是导致心功能差的原因之一。另外,糖尿病患者血小板功能异常,体内一些促凝血因子的水平增高以及血液粘稠度增加〔4〕,可能使梗死后心肌缺血等并发症的发生率增高,从而进一步影响心肌梗死的预后。

    参考文献:

    1 Chesebro J H,Knatterud G,Rorberts R,et al.Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial phase:A comparison between intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and intravenous streptokinase.Circulation,1987,76:142~154
, 百拇医药
    2 Ringqvist L,Fisher L D,Mock M,et al.Prognostic value of angiographic in dices of coronary artery disease from the coronary artery surgery study (CASS).J Clin Invest,1983,71:1854~1866

    3 Mueller H S,Cohen L S,Braunwald E,et al.Predictors of early morbility and mortality after thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction:Analyses of patient subgroups in the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) trial:Phase Ⅱ.Circulation,1992,85:1254~1264

    4 Ostermann H,Van de Loo J.Factors of the hemostatic system in diabetic patients.Haemostasis,1986,16:386~406

    收稿日期:1999-05-19

    修稿日期:1999-10-19, 百拇医药