当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国健康月刊》 > 2011年第3期 > 正文
编号:12292212
综合治疗对口腔扁平苔藓生存质量的影响研究(1)
http://www.100md.com 2011年3月1日 熊波 关午 全主见 张志汉
第1页

    参见附件。

     【摘要】目的:应用sF-36量表评价综合治疗对口腔扁平苔藓生存质量的影响研究。方法:98例男性RGH患者被单盲随机分为46例治疗组,46例对照组。两组均以连续治疗观察2个疗程程。先对sF-36量表的信度和效度进行评价,然后开展口腔扁平苔藓患者治疗前后的生存质量调查评估。结果:sF-36各维度得分及总分两次评估的相关系数均≥0.85以上,Cronbach'α系数均>0.8,生理因子和心理因子的实际结构与量表的理论结构基本一致。治疗前比较,两组口腔扁平苔藓患者的各维度得分和综合评分均显著低于中国常模(P<0.05);治疗前后比较,治疗组各维度得分和综合评分均显著升高(P <0.05),而对照组中总体健康(GH)和社会功能(sv)得分差异无显著性(P>0. 05),其它也均显著提高(P<0.05);治疗后比较,两组间,两组间躯体疼痛(BP)与心理健康(MH)得分差异无显著性(P>0.05),其它均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:SF-36量表的信度和效度良好,适用于对口腔扁平苔藓生存质量的评价。综合治疗在改善患者生存质量方面,与对照组相比存在明显优势,值得临床推广应用,同时为研制适合中国国情的口腔的心理量表研制作了一点有益的探索。

    【关键词】口腔扁平苔藓:生存质量;sF-36量表;综合治疗

    Comprehensive treatment of oral quality of life of

    【Abstract】 Objective: Evaluation of 36 sF a comprehensive treatment of oral lichen planus Quality of Life Research. Methods: 98 male patients with RGH patients with linen blind treatment group were randomly divided into 46 cases, 46 cases of control group. Continuous treatment of the two groups are observed two treatment process. SF a 36 on the first letter of evaluation of reliability and validity, and then carry out oral quality of life of patients before and after the investigation and assessment. Results: sF a 36 out of the two assessments scores and correlation coefficients were ≥ 0.85 or more, Cronbach'α coefficient> 0.8, and physiological factors and psychological factors in the actual structure of the basic theoretical structure and scale consistent. Before treatment, two groups of patients with oral lichen planus scores and overall score of each were significantly lower than the Chinese norm (P <0.05); after treatment, the treatment group scores and overall scores were significantly higher (P <0.05), while the control group, general health (GH) and social function (sv) scores showed no significant (P> 0 05), others were also significantly increased (P <0.05); treatment comparison between the two groups between the two groups bodily pain (BP) and mental health (MH) scores showed no significant (P> 0.05), there were significant differences in other (P <0 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(4012kb)