当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《上海医药》 > 202019
编号:13830304
窄治疗指数药物安全性的再认识(8)
http://www.100md.com 2020年7月5日 《上海医药》 202019
     [71] Bird ST, Flowers N, Zhao Y, et al. Healthy user bias in comparative safety studies for brand-name vs. generic products: the example of warfarin [J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2019, 106(5): 1037-1045.

    [72] Dentali F, Donadini MP, Clark N, et al. Brand name versus generic warfarin: a systematic review of the literature [J]. Pharmacotherapy, 2011, 31(4): 386-393.

    [73] Holtkamp M, Theodore WH. Generic antiepileptic drugs -safe or harmful in patients with epilepsy? [J]. Epilepsia, 2018, 59(7): 1273-1281.

    [74] Gagne JJ, Kesselheim AS, Choudhry NK, et al. Comparative effectiveness of generic versus brand-name antiepileptic medications [J]. Epilepsy Behav, 2015, 52(Pt A): 14-18.

    [75] Atif M, Azeem M, Sarwar MR. Potential problems and recommendations regarding substitution of generic antiepileptic drugs: a systematic review of literature [J/ OL]. Springerplus, 2016, 5: 182 [2020-07-01]. doi: 10.1186/ s40064-016-1824-2.

    [76] Paveliu MS, Bengea S, Paveliu FS. Generic substitution issues: brand-generic substitution, generic-generic substitution, and generic substitution of narrow therapeutic index (NTI)/critical dose drugs [J]. Maedica (Buchar), 2011, 6(1): 52-58.

    [77] Chong CP, Hassali MA, Bahari MB, et al. Exploring community pharmacists’ views on generic medicines: a nationwide study from Malaysia [J]. Int J Clin Pharm, 2011, 33(1): 124-131., 百拇医药(陈志东)
上一页1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8