当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国美容医学》 > 2011年第1期 > 正文
编号:11987194
三种方法去除金属托槽粘结剂对牙面影响的研究(3)
http://www.100md.com 2011年1月1日 陈骊,张菊菊,赵丙姣
第1页

    参见附件(2350KB,4页)。

     [参考文献]

    [1]Neslihan Eminkahyagil,Ayca Arman,Alev Ceinsahin,et al. Effect of resin-removal method on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets[J].Angle Orthodontist,2006,76(2):314-321.

    [2]杨建浩.不同方法去除正畸粘结剂对牙釉质影响的扫描电镜观察[J].中国美容医学,2008,17(11):1658-1659.

    [3]K. Zzrrinnia N.M. Eid,M. J. Kehoe.The effect of different debonding techniques on the enamel surface: An in vitro qualitative study[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1995,108(3):284-293.

    [4]严 宏,张瑞强,苏杰华.不同釉质黏结剂去除方法对牙面作色影像分析[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2009,2(9):544-546.

    [5]郑铁丽,黄 翠,张智星,等.离体牙储存方式对牙本质粘结剂微拉伸强度的影响[J].上海口腔医学,2005,14(2):147-150.

    [6]Pus MD,Way DC.Enamel loss to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques [J].Am J Orthod,1980,77(3):269-283.

    [7]Brown CRL,Way DC.Enamel loss during orthodontic bonding and subsequent loss during removal of filled and unfilled adhesives[J].Am J Orthod,1978,74(6):663-671.

    [8]Thompson RE,Way DC.Enamel loss due to prophylasis and multiple bonding/debonding of orthodontic brackets[J].Am J Orthod,1981,79(3):282-295.

    [9]舒 广,罗 旭,许天民.四种方法去除牙面正畸树脂粘结剂的效果评价[J].口腔正畸学,2007,14(3):117-120.

    [10]Krell KV,Courey JM,Bsihara SE.Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamel loss, and time requirements[J].Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop,1993,103(3):258-266.

    [11]付善民,丁 寅,王海雪,等.正畸托槽去除后两种釉质抛光法对比研究-釉质扫描电镜观察[J].牙体牙髓牙周病杂志,2004,14(6):319-321.

    [12]胡艾燕,宋振才.超声波洁牙最佳输出功率的选择与研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,1997,13(4):63-64.

    [收稿日期]2010-12-04 [修回日期]2010-12-31

    编辑/何志斌

    共3页

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(2350KB,4页)