舌苔快速尿素酶试验检测方法对比研究(1)
参见附件(12kb)。
(广东省中山市坦背医院内镜中心 广东 中山 528412)
【摘要】目的：研究舌苔快速尿素酶试验(TRUT)的临床应用价值。方法：采用直接法、PH筛选法、乙醇法对受检患者取舌苔行快速尿素酶试验并与胃粘膜快速尿素酶试验(GRUT)结果进行比较。结果 直接法500例，TRUT阳性274例，阴性226例；GRUT阳性149例，阴性351例。PH筛选法400例，TRUT阳性171例，阴性229例；GRUT阳性115例，阴性285例。乙醇法230例，TRUT阳性92例，阴性138例；GRUT阳性73例，阴性157例。三种方法敏感度均为100%，特异度分别为64.39%、80.35%、89.20%。阴性预测值均为100%，阳性预测值分别为54.38%、67.26%、79.34%。结论乙醇法和PH筛选法的实验结果更接近GRUT，TRUT作为幽门螺杆菌(HP)的一种筛查方法可供临床应用。
【关键词】HP； 舌苔RUT； 方法； 研究
To study the method of the examination with contrast in the rapid urease test of tongue
Li Xiong Xiue DanWu Jinchang Lu Haoqing
【Abstract】 Objection To study the value of clinical application for the rapid urease test of tongue (TRUT).Methods The Direct method,PH select method and Alcohol method were adopt in the TRUT,the result of the these methods was clmpare by the the gastric mucosa urease test(GRUT).Result Direct method 500 cases:TRUT positive 274 cases,negative 226 cases,GRUT positive 149 cases, negative 351 cases.PH select method 400 cases: TRUT positive 171 cases,negative 229 cases,GRUT positive 115 cases, negative 285 cases. Alcohol method 320 cases: TRUT positive 92 case,negative 138 cases,GRUT positive 73 case, negative 157 cases.the sensitivity of three methods was 100%, the specificity of three methods was into 64.39%,80.35%,89.20%.the negative predictive value all was 100%,the positive predictive value was into 54.38%,67.26%,79.34%.Conclusion The result of the Alcohol method and PH select method even nears to the GRUT. the TRUT is a kind of check method of the Helicobacter pylori(HP) and cans supply the clinical application.
【Key Words】Helicobacter pyloriRapid urease test of tongueMethodStudy
【中图分类号】R573【文献标识码】A【文章编号】1008-6455(2011)06-0031-02
幽门螺杆菌与胃十二指肠疾病密切相关 ......
(广东省中山市坦背医院内镜中心 广东 中山 528412)
【摘要】目的：研究舌苔快速尿素酶试验(TRUT)的临床应用价值。方法：采用直接法、PH筛选法、乙醇法对受检患者取舌苔行快速尿素酶试验并与胃粘膜快速尿素酶试验(GRUT)结果进行比较。结果 直接法500例，TRUT阳性274例，阴性226例；GRUT阳性149例，阴性351例。PH筛选法400例，TRUT阳性171例，阴性229例；GRUT阳性115例，阴性285例。乙醇法230例，TRUT阳性92例，阴性138例；GRUT阳性73例，阴性157例。三种方法敏感度均为100%，特异度分别为64.39%、80.35%、89.20%。阴性预测值均为100%，阳性预测值分别为54.38%、67.26%、79.34%。结论乙醇法和PH筛选法的实验结果更接近GRUT，TRUT作为幽门螺杆菌(HP)的一种筛查方法可供临床应用。
【关键词】HP； 舌苔RUT； 方法； 研究
To study the method of the examination with contrast in the rapid urease test of tongue
Li Xiong Xiue DanWu Jinchang Lu Haoqing
【Abstract】 Objection To study the value of clinical application for the rapid urease test of tongue (TRUT).Methods The Direct method,PH select method and Alcohol method were adopt in the TRUT,the result of the these methods was clmpare by the the gastric mucosa urease test(GRUT).Result Direct method 500 cases:TRUT positive 274 cases,negative 226 cases,GRUT positive 149 cases, negative 351 cases.PH select method 400 cases: TRUT positive 171 cases,negative 229 cases,GRUT positive 115 cases, negative 285 cases. Alcohol method 320 cases: TRUT positive 92 case,negative 138 cases,GRUT positive 73 case, negative 157 cases.the sensitivity of three methods was 100%, the specificity of three methods was into 64.39%,80.35%,89.20%.the negative predictive value all was 100%,the positive predictive value was into 54.38%,67.26%,79.34%.Conclusion The result of the Alcohol method and PH select method even nears to the GRUT. the TRUT is a kind of check method of the Helicobacter pylori(HP) and cans supply the clinical application.
【Key Words】Helicobacter pyloriRapid urease test of tongueMethodStudy
【中图分类号】R573【文献标识码】A【文章编号】1008-6455(2011)06-0031-02
幽门螺杆菌与胃十二指肠疾病密切相关 ......
您现在查看是摘要介绍页，详见PDF附件(12kb)。