当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《医药产业资讯》 > 2011年第32期 > 正文
编号:12150483
不同护理模式在短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者中的护理效果比较(1)
http://www.100md.com 2011年11月15日 郝其玲
第1页

    参见附件(1810KB,2页)。

     [摘要] 目的:探讨比较不同护理模式在短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者中的护理效果。方法:选取2007年12月~2010年11月于本院进行治疗的66例短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者为研究对象,将其随机分为A组(常规护理组)和B组(人性化护理组),每组各33例,将两组患者护理前后的汉密顿焦虑量表(HAMA)、汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、发作频率、发作时间及患者满意率、治疗依从性进行统计及比较。结果:护理后,B组的HAMA[(3.5±1.3)分]、HAMD[(3.6±1.5)分]评分优于A组[(6.4±1.8)、(6.5±1.5)分](t=6.852、7.145,P<0.05),发作频率[(1.7±0.8)次/月]低于A组[(3.2±1.5)次/月](t=6.589,P<0.05),发作时间[(5.0±1.5)min]短于A组[(7.2±1.8)min](t=8.145,P<0.05)。B组患者治疗依从性(93.94%)好于A组(78.79%)(χ2=6.471,P<0.05),患者满意率(100.00%)高于A组(87.88%)(χ2=7.125,P<0.05)。结论:人性化护理在短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者中的护理效果较好,优于常规护理模式。

    [关键词] 人性化护理;常规护理;短暂性脑缺血反复发作;护理效果

    [中图分类号] R743.31 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2011)11(b)-111-02

    The comparison on the nursing effects of different nursing modes in transient ischemic repeated attack

    HAO Qiling

    Department of Neurology, the People's Hospital of Xinyi City, Jiangsu Province, Xinyi 221400, China

    [Abstract] Objective: To study and compare the nursing effects of different nursing modes in transient ischemic repeated attack. Methods: 66 patients with transient ischemic repeated attack in our hospital from December 2007 to November 2010 were selected as research object and randomly divided into group A (routine nursing mode group) and group B (humanized nursing mode group), each group had 33 cases, then the HAMA score, HAMD score, seizure frequency, attack time and satisfaction rate, treatment compliance of the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results: The HAMA score [(3.5±1.3) points], HAMD score [(3.6±1.5) points] of group B were better than those of group A [(6.4±1.8), (6.5±1.5) points] (t=6.852, 7.145, P<0.05), seizure frequency [(1.7±0.8) times/month] was lower than group A [(3.2±1.5) times/month] (t=6.589, P<0.05), attack time [(5.0±1.5) min] was shorter than group A [(7.2±1.8) min] (t=8.145, P<0.05). The treatment compliance (93.94%) was better than group A (78.79%) (χ2=6.471, P<0.05), the satisfaction rate (100.00%) was higher than group A (87.88%) (χ2=7.125, P<0.05). Conclusion: The nursing effect of humanized nursing in transient ischemic repeated attack is better and it is superior to routine nursing mode.

    [Key words] Humanized nursing; Routine nursing; Transient ischemic repeated attack; Nursing effects

    短暂性脑缺血反复发作一般发作频率较高,且患者因疾病反复发作对其的治疗信心及治疗依从性造成极大地不良影响,从而极大地影响到患者的治疗效果[1],排除治疗的因素,护理在改善患者的这些方面的效果有着积极的作用。本文中笔者就不同护理模式在短暂性脑缺血反复发作患者中的护理效果进行比较 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(1810KB,2页)