当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《医药产业资讯》 > 2012年第3期 > 正文
编号:12176754
中药联合电脑脉冲穴位按摩治疗功能性便秘的临床研究(1)
http://www.100md.com 2012年1月25日 林振文 程珠琴 郑立升 朱子奇 李晟 严子兴 林满遍
第1页
第7页

    参见附件(3223KB,7页)。

     [摘要] 目的 观察中药联合电脑脉冲穴位按摩治疗功能性便秘的临床疗效。 方法 选取符合诊断及纳入标准的功能性便秘患者68例,将其分为治疗组38例和对照组30例,治疗组以四磨汤合木香郁金散加减,同时给予电脑脉冲治疗仪按摩左侧天枢和大肠俞治疗,与口服枸橼酸莫沙必利及双歧杆菌四联活菌片对照,疗程同为4周。观察治疗前后排便次数、粪便性状的变化,判定临床疗效。 结果 治疗组大便性状恢复正常31例,占81.6%,对照组18例,占60.0%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗组总疗效为92.1%,对照组总疗效83.3%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);治疗组显效率为65.8%,对照组显效率为40.0%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。 结论 中药联合电脑脉冲穴位按摩治疗功能性便秘,临床效果良好,副作用少,适宜推广应用。

    [关键词] 功能性便秘;中药;电脑脉冲穴位按摩

    [中图分类号] R256.35 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2012)01(c)-0111-03

    Cinical study on Chinese herbal medicine combined with point massage of electronic pulse in the treatment of functional constipatio

    LIN Zhenwen CHENG Zhuqin ZHENG Lisheng ZHU Ziqi LI Sheng YAN Zixing LIN Manbian

    Department of Medicine, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Fuzhou City, Fujiang Province, Fuzhou 350001, China

    [Abstract] Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine medicine combined with point massage of electronic pulse in the treatment of functional constipation (FC). Methods 68 patients with FC were involved in this study and divided into the treatment group (38 cases) and the control group (30 cases). The treatment group was treated Simo Decoction and Muxiang Yujin Powder combined with point massage of electronic pulse in the Tianshu and Dachangshu. At the same time, the control group was treated with Mosapride Citrate and Bifidobacterium Tetravaccine Tablets. The effect of two groups about the defecation frequency and stool changes were observed after 4 weeks therapy. Results Defecate properties back to normal of patients in the treatment were 31 cases, accounted for 81.6%, that of control group were 18 cases, accounted for 60.0%, there was no significant difference between two groups (P < 0.05). The total curative effect was 92.1% in the treatment group and 83.3% in the control groups, with no significant differences between two groups (P > 0.05). The differences in efficiency rate (treatment group was 65 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(3223KB,7页)