当前位置: 首页 > 医学版 > 期刊论文 > 临床医学 > 中华急诊医学杂志 > 2010年 > 第11期 > 第9期 > 正文
编号:11975733
帕瑞昔布钠抑制瑞芬太尼麻醉后痛觉过敏的临床研究(1)
http://www.100md.com 2010年9月1日 周少朋 候冰宗 欧珊珊 范东毅 肖笑雨
第1页

    参见附件(1964KB,3页)。

     【摘要】 目的 探讨帕瑞昔布钠对瑞芬太尼麻醉后痛敏反应的抑制作用,为临床合理应用瑞芬太尼提供理论指导。方法 选择ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级腹腔镜手术患者60例,随机分为对照组(A组)和帕瑞昔布钠组(B组)两组,每组30例。均采用静吸复合麻醉,两组诱导方法相同,以0.2~0.4 μg/(kg•min) 瑞芬太尼和1.5%~3%七氟烷维持麻醉。B组在缝皮前静脉给予帕瑞昔布钠40 mg,记录两组术前(T0)、术毕(T1)、苏醒(T2)、拔管即刻(T3)、拔管后10 min(T4)及拔管后30 min(T5)血压(MAP)、心率(HR)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)以及术后苏醒时间、拔管时间、Ramsay评分、口述疼痛评分(VRS)和不良反应。结果 A组患者T2、T3、T4及T5时点的MAP、HR均高于T0(P<0.05),且高于B组(P<0.05)。B组患者苏醒时Ramsay评分和VRS评分均明显优于A组(P<0.05)。两组患者术后均无明显的呼吸抑制和恶心呕吐的发生,但B组患者术后躁动率明显低于A组(P<0.05)。结论 帕瑞昔布钠对瑞芬太尼麻醉后的痛觉过敏有明显的抑制作用,且不增加不良反应。

    【关键词】 帕瑞昔布钠;瑞芬太尼;痛觉过敏

    The suppressive effects of parecoxib on the patients with postoperative hyperalgesia after remifentanil-based Anesthesia

    ZHOU Shao-peng,HOU Bing-zong,OU Shan-shan,et al.Department of Anesthesiology,Fifth Hospital Affiliated of Sun Yat-Sen Univetsity,Zhuhai 519000,China

    【Abstract】 Objective To study the suppressive effects of parecoxib on postoperative hyperalgesia after remifentanil-based anesthesia.Methods 60 ASA gradeⅠ-Ⅱ patients undergoing selective laparoscopic operations were randomly divided into two groups (n=30):controlled group(group A) and parecoxib group B(group B).Midazolam(0.05 mg/kg),remifentanil (1μg/kg),propofol (2 mg/kg) and atracrium (0.6 mg/kg) were administered for anesthesia induction,and 0.2~0.4μg/(kg•min) remifentanil and 1.5%~3%sevoflurane were given for anesthesia maintenance in the two groups.At skin closure parecoxib 40 mg was intravenous injected in group B,and group A received no drug infusion.MAP,HR and SpO2 was recorded at the time points of entering the operation room (T0),completion of the operation(T1),wake up(T2),extubation (T3), 10 minutes after extubation (T4) and 30 minutes after extubation (T5).The time of awake,the time of extubation and the adverse effects were recorded.The Ramsay sedation score and VRS score were evaluated.Results In group A,MAP and HR of T2,T3 T4 and T5 were remarkable higher than T0(P<0.05),and also higher than those of group B(P<0 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(1964KB,3页)