当前位置: 首页 > 期刊 > 《中国当代医药》 > 2012年第27期 > 正文
编号:12314990
经皮肾镜取石术和后腹腔镜输尿管上段切开取石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石的临床对比分析(1)
http://www.100md.com 2012年9月25日 张能勇
第1页

    参见附件。

     [摘要] 目的 比较分析经皮肾镜取石术和后腹腔镜输尿管上段切开取石术对复杂性输尿管上段结石的临床疗效。 方法 180例输尿管上段结石患者随机平分为治疗组与对照组,各90例,治疗组行经皮肾镜取石术,对照组行后腹腔镜输尿管上段切开取石术。 结果 治疗组的手术时间、出血量和住院时间都高于对照组,但是差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。治疗组的并发症发生率明显少于对照组(P < 0.05),结石清除率明显高于对照组(P < 0.05)。 结论 经皮肾镜取石术和后腹腔镜输尿管上段切开取石术治疗复杂性输尿管上段结石各有利弊,需在熟练操作的前提下,严格掌握适应证,合理选择手术方式。

    [关键词] 复杂性输尿管上段结石;经皮肾镜;后腹腔镜;临床对比分析

    [中图分类号] R693+.4 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674—4721(2012)09(c)—0039—02

    Clinical comparison analysis of percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi

    ZHANG Nengyong

    Department of Urology Surgery, the Second People′s Hospital of Yueyang City in Hu′nan Province, Yueyang 414000, China

    [Abstract] Objective To compare the clinical effects between percutaneous nephrolithotomy lithotomy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the treatment of complicated upper ureteral calculi. Methods One hundred and eighty cases of patients with upper ureteral calculi were selected, and randomly divided into the treatment group and control group, each group had 90 cases. The treatment group was given percutaneous nephrostomy lithotomy treatment, the control group was given retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy treatment. Results The operative time, amount of bleeding and hospital stays of the treatment group were higher than those of the control group, but the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). The incidence of complications in the treatment group was lower than that of the control group (P < 0.05), and the calculi clearance rate of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0 ......

您现在查看是摘要介绍页,详见PDF附件(1839kb)