Assembly and function of AP-3 complexes in cells expressing mutant sub
http://www.100md.com
《细胞学杂志》
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK
Address correspondence to Margaret S. Robinson, University of Cambridge, CIMR, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK. Tel.: (44) 1223-330163. Fax: (44) 1223-762640. E-mail: msr12@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Abstract
The mouse mutants mocha and pearl are deficient in the AP-3 and ?3A subunits, respectively. We have used cells from these mice to investigate both the assembly of AP-3 complexes and AP-3 function. In mocha cells, the ?3 and μ3 subunits coassemble into a heterodimer, whereas the 3 subunit remains monomeric. In pearl cells, the and 3 subunits coassemble into a heterodimer, whereas μ3 gets destroyed. The yeast two hybrid system was used to confirm these interactions, and also to demonstrate that the A (ubiquitous) and B (neuronal-specific) isoforms of ?3 and μ3 can interact with each other. Pearl cell lines were generated that express ?3A, ?3B, a ?3A?2 chimera, two ?3A deletion mutants, and a ?3A point mutant lacking a functional clathrin binding site. All six constructs assembled into complexes and were recruited onto membranes. However, only ?3A, ?3B, and the point mutant gave full functional rescue, as assayed by LAMP-1 sorting. The ?3A?2 chimera and the ?3A short deletion mutant gave partial functional rescue, whereas the ?3A truncation mutant gave no functional rescue. These results indicate that the hinge and/or ear domains of ?3 are important for function, but the clathrin binding site is not needed.
Key Words: coated vesicles; adaptors; clathrin; mocha; pearl
Introduction
Adaptor proteins (APs)* are heterotetrameric complexes that facilitate cargo selection and coated vesicle budding from different membrane compartments. Four such complexes have been identified in mammals, all of which consist of two large subunits: a ? subunit and a more divergent, complex-specific subunit (, , , or ); a medium-sized or μ subunit; and a small or subunit. The subunits are assembled into a structure resembling Mickey Mouse, with a brick-like "head," consisting of the NH2-terminal domains of the two large subunits, the medium subunit, and the small subunit, out of which protrude the COOH-terminal "ear" domains of the large subunits, connected by flexible hinges. The AP-1 and AP-2 complexes were identified first as abundant components of clathrin-coated vesicles. More recently, the AP-3 and AP-4 complexes were identified, primarily by finding homologues of the AP-1 and AP-2 subunits in the EST database, raising antibodies against recombinant proteins, and showing by coimmunoprecipitation experiments that the proteins were assembled into two novel complexes (Robinson and Bonifacino, 2001).
Although the AP-3 complex was identified relatively recently, it has been much more amenable to genetic analysis than the AP-1 or AP-2 complexes. When the subunit of the complex was first cloned, it was found to be the mammalian homologue of the protein encoded in Drosophila by the garnet gene, one of the classical eye color genes (Ooi et al., 1997; Simpson et al., 1997). garnet mutants have defective pigment granules, and because of similarities between pigment granules and lysosomes, this suggested a role for the AP-3 complex in the trafficking of proteins destined for lysosomes and related organelles. Subsequent studies in yeast showed that deleting any of the four AP-3 subunit genes causes missorting of a subset of proteins normally destined for the vacuole, the yeast equivalent of the lysosome (Cowles et al., 1997; Stepp et al., 1997). Two naturally occurring mouse mutants have also been identified with mutations in AP-3 subunits. The mocha (mh) mouse has a null mutation in the subunit of the complex (Kantheti et al., 1998), whereas the pearl (pe) mouse has effectively a null mutation in the ?3A subunit (small amounts of mRNA can be detected which encode a trunctated protein, missing the last 125 amino acids, but the protein has not been detected on Western blots) (Feng et al., 1999; Zhen et al., 1999). The mouse mutants have a similar phenotype to the human genetic disorder Hermansky Pudlak syndrome (HPS), and indeed a subset of HPS patients has been identified with mutations in ?3A (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999). In both the mice and the humans, AP-3 deficiency results in hypopigmentation because of abnormalities in melanosomes, prolonged bleeding because of deficiencies in platelet dense granules, and reduced secretion of lysosomal enzymes into the urine. AP-3–deficient fibroblasts appear relatively normal, but several studies have revealed that lysosomal membrane proteins in these cells show increased trafficking via the plasma membrane (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999, 2000; Le Borgne et al., 1998). The mh mouse also has neurological defects, although the pe mouse and the ?3A-deficient humans are neurologically normal. This is presumably because there is a second ?3 isoform, ?3B, which is specifically expressed in neurons and neuroendocrine cells (Kantheti et al., 1998). Together, these findings indicate that the AP-3 complex facilitates the trafficking of certain types of cargo to lysosomes and lysosome-related organelles.
Whether or not AP-3 is associated with clathrin is still somewhat controversial. Unlike AP-1 and AP-2, AP-3 is not enriched in purified clathrin-coated vesicles (Newman et al., 1995; Simpson et al., 1996). However, a clathrin-binding consensus sequence, L, has been identified in the hinge domains of ?1 and ?2, and similar sequences are found in ?3A and ?3B which can interact with clathrin in vitro (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; ter Haar et al., 2000). AP-3 is also able to coassemble with clathrin in vitro and to support clathrin recruitment onto liposomes (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; Drake et al., 2000). On the other hand, an in vitro system for the budding of synaptic-like microvesicles from endosomes has been shown to require AP-3 but not clathrin (Shi et al., 1998), indicating that the two can function independently. In addition, gene deletion studies in yeast indicate that AP-3 and clathrin function on different pathways; however, yeast ?3 does not contain a clathrin binding motif. Immunolocalization studies, at both the light and the electron microscope level, have yielded conflicting results (Simpson et al., 1996, 1997; Dell'Angelica et al., 1998). Thus, the question of whether or not there is an obligatory coupling between AP-3 and clathrin in mammalian cells has not yet been resolved.
Here we have taken advantage of the mouse mutants to address two questions. First, what happens to the other AP-3 subunits if one of them is missing? And second, to what extent can we rescue the phenotype of mocha and pearl cells by transfecting them with either a wild-type copy of the missing subunit, or alternatively with one that has been altered in some manner? In particular, are ?3A subunits that no longer have the clathrin binding motif still functional? These studies provide insights into the assembly and function not only of the AP-3 complex, but of the other AP complexes as well.
Results
Assembly of AP-3 complexes in mh and pe cells
To investigate the mocha (mh) and pearl (pe) phenotypes at the cellular level, we have established an mh cell line and made use of a previously established pe cell line. Fig. 1 a shows Western blots of extracts from these cells probed for the four AP-3 subunits: , ?3, μ3, and 3. In the cells from the mocha homozygote (mh/mh), , ?3, and μ3 are all undetectable, while 3 is detectable but at reduced levels. In the pearl cells (pe/pe), ?3 and μ3 are both undetectable, while and 3 are both detectable at reduced levels. When the cells are labeled for immunofluorescence using a -specific antibody, the typical punctate pattern can be seen in control cells (+), the mh cells are unlabeled, and the pe cells show diffuse cytoplasmic labeling, indicating that although is present in pe cells, it is unable to associate with membranes in the absence of the ?3 and/or μ3 subunits (Fig. 1, b–d).
Figure 1. AP-3 subunits in mh and pe cells. (a) Western blots of lysates from the mh and pe cells, as well as a wild-type control cell line (melan-a cells), were probed with antibodies against all four AP-3 subunits and with an antibody against the AP-1 subunit as a control. Only the 3 subunit is detectable in the mh cells under these conditions, while only the and 3 subunits are detectable in the pe cells. (b–d) The same cells were labeled for immunofluorescence with an antibody against the AP-3 subunit. Control cells (b) have the typical punctate pattern, mh cells (c) show no labeling, and pe cells (d) have diffuse cytoplasmic labeling, indicating that although the subunit is detectable, it is cytosolic rather than membrane-associated. Bar, 20 μm.
Previous studies have shown that in mh and pe mice, mRNAs encoding the three nonmutated subunits are expressed normally, indicating that the subunits are synthesized at wild-type levels but then get degraded because they are unstable (Kantheti et al., 1998; Feng et al., 1999). Thus, trace amounts of the nonmutated subunits may be present in the mh and pe cells, which are below the limit of detection on whole cell Western blots. To try to concentrate the subunits, and to determine whether they are associated with each other, we immunoprecipitated cell extracts with antibodies against the , ?3, and 3 subunits under nondenaturing conditions, and with anti-μ3, which only recognizes the denatured protein, in samples that had been denatured by boiling in SDS. Western blots of the immunoprecipitates were then probed with antibodies against all four of the AP-3 subunits, as well as with an antibody against the subunit of AP-1 as a control.
Fig. 2 (left) shows that under these conditions both ?3 and μ3 can be detected in the mh cells, and furthermore that they assemble into a heterodimer since both subunits come down with anti-?3. In contrast, the 3 in these cells appears to exist as a monomer, since it does not coimmunoprecipitate with any of the other subunits. In the pe cells (Fig. 2, middle), and 3 form heterodimers which come down with antibodies against both subunits, and in addition, a small amount of μ3 can be detected which coprecipitates with the /3 dimers. This suggests either that the μ3 may be assembling with the and 3 subunits into a heterotrimer, or alternatively, since the pe mutation is not a true null, that there are small amounts of truncated ?3A expressed in these cells which can form heterotetramers. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we immunoprecipitated extracts from pe spleen under nondenaturing conditions with a ?3A-specific antibody (the reason for using spleen for this experiment is that it is possible to get a more highly concentrated extract from tissues than from cultured cells, and AP-3 is known to be expressed at particularly high levels in spleen). Fig. 2 (right) demonstrates that there are indeed small amounts of truncated ?3A made in pe cells which can coassemble with the other three subunits to form a heterotetramer, although we cannot rule out the possibility that some of the μ3 may also be assembled into a heterotrimer. Together, these studies indicate that ?3 and μ3 can interact with each other, forming heterodimers in mh cells, and that and 3 also interact with each other, forming heterodimers in pe cells. The interactions that we can detect in the mutant cells are shown diagrammatically in the bottom part of Fig. 2.
Figure 2. Immunoprecipitates and Western blots of AP-3 subunits from mh and pe cells. Extracts of cultured mh cells (left), cultured pe cells (middle), and spleens from both pe and control mice (right) were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibody. Most immunoprecipitations were performed under nondenaturing conditions, with the exception of the anti-μ3 immunoprecipitations, which were performed in the presence of SDS. The gels were then blotted onto nitrocellulose and probed with the indicated antibody. An antibody against the AP-1 subunit was included as a control. The mh cells can be seen to express trace amounts of ?3 and μ3, which form a dimer, whereas the 3 subunit appears to be monomeric. The and 3 expressed in the pe cells also form a dimer, and in addition a small amount of complete heterotetramer is made. The various subcomplexes that form in the mh and pe cells are indicated diagrammatically.
Subunit interactions
To investigate interactions between the AP-3 subunits further, and also to determine whether the A and B isoforms of the various subunits can associate with each other, we cloned the cDNAs into the vectors pGBT9 and pGAD424 for analysis using the yeast two-hybrid system. Fig. 3, a and b, shows that interacts under these conditions with 3A and 3B, both of which are expressed ubiquitously. In addition, ?3A interacts both with the ubiquitously expressed μ3A and with the neuronal-specific μ3B (Fig. 3 c), and ?3B interacts with μ3A (Fig. 3 d). For reasons that are not clear, we were unable to detect any interaction between ?3B and μ3B (unpublished data). However, the observations that ?3A can interact with μ3B and that ?3B can interact with μ3A suggest that, instead of having a neuronal-specific complex and a nonneuronal-specific complex, the subunits can "mix and match" if they are coexpressed in the same cell. The interactions involving the AP-3 subunits appear to be complex-specific, as we could detect no interactions between ?3 and μ1 (Fig. 3 c), or between and 1 (unpublished data). Other pairs of subunits were also tested, but the only interactions we were able to detect were those shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 3. Subunit interactions between AP-3 subunits detected using the yeast two-hybrid system. Yeast cells were transformed with cDNAs in either pGBT9 or pGAD424, as indicated, and interactions were assayed by growth in the absence of histidine. Panels a and b show that the subunit interacts with both 3A and 3B, panel c shows that the ?3A subunit interacts with both μ3A and μ3B, and panel d shows that the ?3B subunit interacts with μ3A.
Sorting of lysosomal membrane proteins
Previous studies have shown that the steady-state distribution of lysosomal membrane proteins, such as LAMP-1, LIMP-2, and CD63, appears normal in AP-3–deficient cells, but that they follow different trafficking routes to the lysosome. Le Borgne et al. (1998) demonstrated that cells that had been depleted of μ3 by incubation with antisense oligonucleotides showed increased endocytosis of antibodies against LAMP-1 and LIMP-2 that had been added to the culture medium, indicating that these proteins had been rerouted to the cell surface. Dell'Angelica et al. (1999)( 2000) reported similar findings on primary cultures of fibroblasts from ?3A-deficient patients and from mh and pe mice. We have also found that antibodies against LAMP-1 are readily endocytosed by both the mh and the pe cell lines (see Figs. 4 and 8). However, because all cell lines are different from each other, we needed to confirm that the antibody endocytosis was a direct result of the AP-3 deficiency. Thus, we transiently transfected the cells with a wild-type copy of the defective subunit. Cells transfected with both the and the ?3A constructs could be identified with a -specific antibody: the nontransfected mh cells were unlabeled, whereas the nontransfected pe cells gave diffuse rather than punctate labeling with the anti- antibody (see Fig. 1). Fig. 4 shows transiently transfected mh cells labeled for (a), endocytosed anti-LAMP-1 (b), and endocytosed WGA (c). The cell expressing has taken up significantly less anti–LAMP-1 than its nontransfected neighbors, while all of the cells have taken up similar amounts of WGA, indicating that endocytosis in general is not impaired in the -expressing cell. Similar results were obtained with pe cells transfected with ?3A (see Fig. 8 a).
Figure 4. Phenotype of rescued and nonrescued mh cells. mh cells were transiently transfected with wild-type , then incubated with a mixture of rat anti–LAMP-1(b) and fluorescent WGA (c) for 6 h. Triple labeling shows that the cell in the field that is expressing has taken up less anti–LAMP-1 than its neighbors, indicating that there is less misrouting of LAMP-1 to the plasma membrane in this cell. Uptake of WGA is similar in all of the cells. Bar, 20 μm.
Figure 8. Functional rescue of pe cells by the various ?3 constructs. (a) A mixture of cells transfected with empty vector and cells expressing ?3A were incubated 6 h with anti–LAMP-1 directly conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, then double labeled with anti-. ?3A-expressing cells (arrow), which could be identified by the punctate, perinuclear distribution of , took up less anti–LAMP-1 than cells transfected with empty vector. (b) Anti–LAMP-1 uptake analyzed by flow cytometry. The control peak shows the fluorescence intensity of a ?3A-expressing cell line incubated with a control antibody (anti-KLH) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. The empty-vector peak shows the level of fluorescence intensity when a nonexpressing pe cell line was incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody, whereas the ?3A peak shows the level of fluorescence intensity when the pe cell line expressing ?3A was incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody. Anti–LAMP-1 uptake in the ?3A-expressing cell line was 27% that of the empty vector–transfected line. (c) Graph of the results obtained by flow cytometry. In each case three different cell lines, stably expressing each of the six constructs were analyzed, as well as three cell lines transfected with empty vector. In each experiment, 10,000 cells were counted and the experiments were repeated on different days and the results for each cell line were averaged. The values were obtained by dividing the geometric mean fluorescent intensity of cells incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody by that of cells incubated with the control antibody. Error bars show the standard deviation from the mean. ?3A, ?3B, and ?3A817AAA constructs all gave good rescue (P 0.0001); ?3A?2 and ?3A807–831 both gave partial rescue (P = 0.0059 and P = 0.0015, respectively); and ?3A807 stop gave no significant rescue (P = 0.2523). P values were obtained using a one-tailed unpaired t test. Bar, 20 μm.
Introduction of altered subunits
The availability of an assay for AP-3–mediated sorting means that we can now test whether not only wild-type subunits, but also subunits that have been altered in some way, are functional. Because some such subunits might be expected to give intermediate rescue, we developed a quantitative assay based on FACS analysis for use on stably transfected cells (see below). Unfortunately, we have so far been unable to obtain any mh cell lines that were homogeneously expressing ; thus, we decided to concentrate on pe cells. In addition to cells expressing wild-type ?3A, we have established pe cell lines expressing ?3B, a ?3A-?2 chimera containing the ?3A NH2-terminal domain (amino acids 1–686) but the ?2 hinge and ear domains (?3A?2); two ?3A deletion mutants (?3A807–831 and ?3A807 stop); and a ?3A point mutant (?3A817AAA). The ?3A807–831 mutant is missing a fragment of the distal part of the hinge, including the clathrin binding domain (amino acids 817–822), whereas the ?3A807stop mutant is missing the distal part of the hinge, including the clathrin binding domain, and all of the ear. In the ?3A817AAA mutant, the clathrin binding motif has been mutated from SLLDLD to AAADLD. This same mutation has been shown to abolish clathrin binding in vitro (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; unpublished data). Schematic diagrams of the constructs are shown in Fig. 5 a.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagrams of six ?3-based constructs that were stably transfected into pe cells. (b) Extracts from cell lines expressing each of the six constructs, as well as a cell line stably transfected with empty vector, were immunoprecipitated with anti-, and blots were probed with antibodies against , the construct itself (in most cases anti-?3A, although the last two lanes were probed with antibodies against ?3B and ?2, respectively), μ3, and 3. Only and 3 can be detected in the immunoprecipitate from the cell line transfected with the empty vector, whereas all four subunits can be detected in the cell lines expressing the six constructs, indicating that complete heterotetramers have been formed.
We first investigated whether the constructs were capable of assembling into AP-3 complexes by immunoprecipitating cell extracts with an antibody against the subunit, then probing Western blots of the immunoprecipitates with antibodies against the other three subunits. Fig. 5 b shows that in the nontransfected cells, only 3 coprecipitated with at detectable levels (see also Figs. 1 and 2), while in cells transfected with ?3A, all three of the other subunits were detectable, indicating that the ?3A had assembled into complexes together with μ3, thus protecting the μ3 subunit from degradation. Similarly, in cells transfected with the other five constructs, the construct itself and the μ3 subunit came down with the and 3 subunits. These results are consistent with studies on the AP-1 and AP-2 complexes, which indicate that the NH2-terminal domains of the ? subunits are incorporated into the "head," where they can interact with the other subunits, while the hinge and ear domains have other functions. The μ3 subunit in all of the immunoprecipitates is presumably μ3A, since μ3B is only expressed in neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Thus, this result is consistent with results from the two-hybrid experiments, which indicate that although ?3B is normally only expressed in the same cells that express μ3B, it can interact with the ubiquitously expressed μ3A.
To determine whether the complexes could be recruited onto membranes, cells expressing each of the six constructs were labeled for immunofluorescence with anti-. In nontransfected pe cells, has a diffuse cytoplasmic distribution (Fig. 1 d); however, in cells expressing each of the five constructs, the labeling was punctate, indicating that it was associated with membranes (Fig. 6). We also compared the distribution of AP-3 in cells expressing the various constructs with that of clathrin, using a confocal microscope (Fig. 7; AP-3 is green and clathrin is red). In cells expressing wild-type ?3A, AP-3 and clathrin were found to have distinct distributions: (a) they are often in the same general vicinity, and in some cases there may be overlap (yellow), but much of the AP-3 labeling is negative for clathrin. In contrast, when cells are double labeled for the AP-1 adaptor complex and clathrin (b), essentially all of the structures that are positive for AP-1 (green) are also positive for clathrin (red; note that there is extensive yellow labeling and very little green). In cells expressing the various constructs, the extent of overlap between AP-3 and clathrin was very similar to that in cells expressing wild-type ?3A. This is in spite of the fact that the ?3A?2 chimera (c) has more potential clathrin binding sites than wild-type ?3A (not only the clathrin-binding consensus sequence LLNLD in its hinge domain, but also three copies of another motif implicated in clathrin binding, DLL , as well as clathrin binding activity in its ear domain ). Constructs lacking a clathrin binding domain, like ?3A817AAA (d), did not look appreciably different from the other constructs: again, there were some yellow structures, as well as red and green. However, at the light microscope level, it is impossible to resolve two structures that are less than 0.2 μm apart from each other, so to quantify the true extent of overlap between AP-3 and clathrin in cells expressing the various constructs, it will be necessary to go to the electron microscope level.
Figure 6. Immunofluorescence of cell lines expressing each of the six constructs labeled with anti-. All of the cells show punctate labeling with some concentration in the perinuclear region, indicating that the AP-3 complexes assembled from all six constructs are recruited onto membranes. Bar, 20 μm.
Figure 7. Confocal micrographs showing double labeling for AP complexes and clathrin. pe cells expressing ?3A (a), ?3A?2 (c), or ?3A817AAA were double labeled with anti- (green) and anti-clathrin (red), and COS cells were double labeled with anti- (green) and anti-clathrin (red). Essentially all of the anti- labeling is also positive for clathrin (note how there are no green dots in b, only yellow). In contrast, in all three cell lines expressing ?3 constructs, much of the AP-3 labeling is negative for clathrin. (Transfected pe cells could not be double labeled with anti- and anti-clathrin because the anti- mAb only recognizes the protein in nonrodent cells.) Bar: (a and b) 10 μm; (c and d) 20 μm.
Functional rescue of pe cells
Having established that all six constructs are able to coassemble with the other AP-3 subunits and be recruited onto membranes, we went on to investigate their ability to rescue the LAMP-1 missorting phenotype. For these experiments, a rat monoclonal antibody against LAMP-1 was directly conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. Double-labeling immunofluorescence performed on a mixture of pe cells transfected with empty vector and pe cells expressing wild-type ?3A, incubated with the antibody for 6 h, showed that the nonexpressing cells took up significantly more antibody than the expressing cells (Fig. 8 a).
For quantitative studies, each stably transfected cell line was incubated for 6 h either with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody or with an isotype control antibody (anti-KLH), which also had been conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. The cells were then trypsinized, fixed, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Fig. 8 b shows the results obtained with one of the cell lines expressing wild-type ?3A. The peak marked "control" shows the fluorescence intensity of the ?3A-expressing cells incubated with the control antibody, which is likely to be taken up by fluid phase endocytosis only. The peaks marked "?3A" and "empty vector" show the levels of fluorescence intensity observed when the ?3A-expressing line and one of the cell lines transfected with empty vector were incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody. In both cases, the fluorescence intensity is higher than that observed with the control antibody, indicating that the anti–LAMP-1 has been taken up by receptor-mediated endocytosis as well as fluid-phase endocytosis. However, the fluorescence intensity of the ?3A-expressing line is 4.41 times that of the control. In contrast, the fluorescence intensity of the cell line transfected with empty vector is 16.61 times that of its own control (unpublished data, but similar results were obtained with all of the cell lines incubated with the control antibody). Thus, the amount of specific uptake of anti–LAMP-1 in the ?3A-expressing line is 27% of that in the empty vector–transfected line. This is comparable to results obtained by others who have investigated anti–LAMP-1 uptake in normal and AP-3-deficient primary fibroblasts from both mice and humans: wild-type cells were reported to internalize between 20 and 45% as much antibody as mutant cells (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999, 2000).
Fig. 8 c shows the extent of functional rescue obtained with all six constructs. In each case, three different cell lines stably expressing each of the six constructs were analyzed, as well as three cell lines transfected with empty vector. The experiments were repeated on different days and the results for each cell line were averaged. ?3A can be seen to give the best rescue, with anti–LAMP-1 uptake 4.89 ± 0.237 (SD), as compared with 17.25 ± 0.821 in cells transfected with empty vector. The ?3B construct also rescued well, with anti–LAMP-1 uptake 6.58 ± 0.421. Whether the difference between the ?3A- and ?3B-expressing cells reflects functional differences between the two ?3 isoforms, or whether it reflects other differences between the various cell lines (since wild-type cell lines can vary at least this much in their anti-LAMP-1 uptake), is not at present clear. The ?3A?2 chimera and the ?3A807–831 deletion mutant both partially rescued the missorting phenotype, with anti–LAMP-1 uptake 10.30 ± 2.620 and 10.48 ± 1.635 respectively. However, there was no significant difference in antibody uptake between cells expressing the truncation mutant, ?3A807stop (15.73 ± 3.512), and cells transfected with empty vector. Thus, the distal hinge and/or ear domain of the ?3 subunit appears to be required for AP-3 function, even though the construct lacking these domains is still able to assemble into AP-3 complexes and be recruited onto membranes.
There are at least two possible explanations for the intermediate level of functional rescue that we observed with the ?3A807–831 mutant. One possibility is that the clathrin-binding consensus sequence, which is missing from this construct, is required for full functional rescue. Alternatively, the construct might be defective in some other way: for instance, the ear might not be correctly folded. The point mutant ?3A817AAA enables us to distinguish between these two possibilities. Instead of a 25-amino acid deletion, this construct has only 3 amino acid substitutions, but (at least in vitro) it is unable to bind clathrin (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998). Fig. 8 c shows that when this construct is expressed in living cells, anti–LAMP-1 uptake is 7.49 ± 1.128, which is only slightly more than in ?3A-expressing cells and not significantly different from ?3B-expressing cells. Thus, although the hinge and/or ear domains of ?3A are needed for protein function, the clathrin-binding consensus sequence appears to be dispensable.
Discussion
The availability of mice with null, or effectively null, mutations in AP-3 subunits has enabled us to study AP-3 assembly and function in mammalian cells. In the past we and others have transfected mammalian cells with mutant AP-1 and AP-2 subunits for studies on both assembly and function, but interpretation of these studies has been complicated by the presence of endogenous wild-type subunits (Robinson, 1993; Page and Robinson, 1995). In the present study, we have been able to introduce mutant subunits into cells with little or no background.
We first investigated whether partial AP-3 complexes were able to assemble in the absence of a particular subunit. We found that mh cells, missing the subunit, assembled heterodimers from the ?3 and μ3 subunits, whereas the 3 subunit remained monomeric. The pe cells, which express very low levels of truncated ?3A, mainly assembled heterodimers consisting of and 3 subunits, as well as a very small amount of complete heterotetramer. All of the subunits were destabilized to some extent by the absence of either or ?3, but this was particularly striking in the case of the μ3 subunit, which seemed to exist only as a dimer with the ?3 subunit, even when the ?3 subunit was barely detectable.
In addition to the naturally occurring AP-3 mouse mutants, knockout mice have been generated which lack the AP-1 and μ1A subunits. Both mouse strains die during embryogenesis; however, a fibroblast line has been established from the μ1A knockout mice, and these cells were found to assemble a heterotrimer consisting of , ?1, and 1 subunits. This complex appears to be fairly stable, although (like the /3 heterodimer) it is unable to be recruited onto membranes (Meyer et al., 2000). The knockout mouse dies so early that it has not been possible to establish a null cell line, but cells from the heterozygote have been examined and found to express the subunit at 50% normal levels. Both ?1 and μ1 completely comigrate with by gel filtration in these cells, indicating that any excess ?1 and μ1 are unstable and get degraded (Zizioli et al., 1999). Similarly, our own studies show that in the absence of the subunit, the stability of ?3 and μ3 is greatly reduced. However, somewhat different findings have been reported in yeast. When the AP-3 , ?3, or 3 subunits are deleted, the stability of μ3 does not appear to be affected, although it fractionates differently by gel filtration, in particular in the ?3-disrupted strain, where it appears to be monomeric (Panek et al., 1997). In contrast, deleting the -like subunit of the AP-2–related complex in yeast does not affect the ?2 subunit, but it has a profound effect on the stability of 2 (Yeung et al., 1999). Thus, it is difficult to predict how a particular AP subunit will behave in a particular organism; however, all of these studies consistently show that there are strong interactions between the /// subunits and the subunits, and between the ? and μ subunits.
These same interactions can be detected using the yeast two-hybrid system. The interactions that we report between the and 3 subunits, and between the ?3 and μ3 subunits, are consistent with interactions that we and others have reported between the corresponding pairs of subunits in the AP-1, AP-2, and AP-4 complexes (Page and Robinson, 1995; Aguilar et al., 1997; Hirst et al., 1999; Takatsu et al., 2001). In addition, in a previous study using the yeast two-hybrid system, we were able to demonstrate interactions between the two large subunits of the AP-1 and AP-2 complexes, / and ? (Page and Robinson, 1995). However, interactions between the large subunits appear to be more difficult to reconstitute, and so far we have been unable to demonstrate any interactions between and ?3, or between the and ?4 subunits of the AP-4 complex (Hirst et al., 1999). and ?4 have been shown recently to interact in the presence of 4 using the yeast three-hybrid system, however (Takatsu et al., 2001), so it is possible that 3 may promote the interaction between and ?3. One observation that supports the notion that and ?3 interact in vivo is the finding that mh cells have greatly reduced levels of the ?3 and μ3 subunits. This suggests that ?3 may be unstable in the absence of , which in turn would destabilize μ3.
We also used the yeast two-hybrid system to investigate whether the ubiquitously expressed (A) and neuronal-specific (B) ?3 and μ3 subunits were capable of interacting with each other. Interactions were detected between ?3A and μ3A, between ?3A and μ3B, and between ?3B and μ3A, although surprisingly not between ?3B and μ3B. The ability of the A and B isoforms to interact under more physiological conditions was demonstrated in our transfection experiments. When pe cells were transfected with ?3B, they formed heterotetramers containing the ubiquitously expressed μ3A subunit. Heterotetramers were also assembled from the other five constructs, as expected since they all contained the ?3A NH2-terminal domain. Perhaps less predictable was the ability of all the constructs to be recruited equally well onto membranes. Although studies from our own lab and others indicate that the COOH-terminal hinge and ear domains of the adaptor large subunits are not absolutely essential for membrane association, AP complexes containing earless or are compromised in their ability to bind to their respective membranes (Robinson, 1993); however, the earless ?3A construct, ?3A807stop, showed no increased cytosolic background. We were also interested in the extent to which the various complexes colocalized with clathrin, in particular complexes containing the ?3A?2 chimera, since multiple clathrin binding sites have been identified and/or predicted in the ?2 COOH-terminal hinge and ear domains (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; Morgan et al., 2000; Owen et al., 2000). However, this construct, like the others, was at least partially localized to structures that were negative for clathrin. In contrast, AP-1 and AP-2 both show essentially complete colocalization with clathrin (Fig. 7; Robinson, 1987), indicating that the presence of the ?2 hinge and ear domains is not enough for a stable association with clathrin, and that there must be additional interactions, possibly involving the and subunits (Goodman and Keen, 1995; Morgan et al., 2000; Doray and Kornfeld, 2001).
Although all of the constructs assembled into complexes and were recruited onto membranes equally well, they varied widely in their ability to rescue the missorting phenotype of the pe cells. Using a quantitative assay for LAMP-1 mislocalization, we were able to show that ?3B gave nearly as good functional rescue as ?3A; indeed, the differences that we saw could simply be due to variability from one cell line to another (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999, 2000). However, although ?3B can functionally substitute for ?3A, the opposite may not be true. Synaptic-like microvesicle budding from endosomes has been shown to be dependent upon brain AP-3; liver AP-3 will not suffice (Faundez et al., 1998). This suggests that the neuronal-specific isoform of either ?3 or μ3, or both, is required for this activity. Brain AP-3 contains a mixture of A and B isoforms of both ?3 and μ3, while the stably transfected cells express only ?3B and μ3A; thus, it should be possible to test the relative importance of neuronal-specific ?3 and μ3 by determining whether AP-3 complexes from the transfected cells will substitute for brain AP-3 in the in vitro budding assay.
Two of our constructs gave partial rescue: the ?3A?2 chimera and the deletion mutant ?3A807–831. In contrast, the premature truncation mutant ?3A807stop was unable to rescue even partially. This finding indicates that the distal hinge and/or ear domains of ?3 are essential for function. In the ?3A807–831 mutant, part of the distal hinge is missing, and this fragment may either contribute directly to ?3 function, or alternatively may aid in the folding of the ear. Virtually nothing is known about the ear domain of ?3, although the ?2 ear has been shown to bind both clathrin and certain coated vesicle accessory proteins, including AP180, epsin, and Eps15 (Owen et al., 2000). We have shown that AP-3 complexes containing truncated ?3A are recruited onto the membrane, and presumably they are able to select cargo since they contain μ3A (Ohno et al., 1998). Thus, the lack of functional rescue suggests that they fail to produce coated vesicles, consistent with an inability to recruit structural or accessory proteins that might be essential for this event. The ability of the ?3A?2 construct to give partial rescue suggests that the ?3 and ?2 ears may recruit some of the same proteins. However, gels of GST pulldowns using the ?3A ear showed no obvious candidate binding partners, and clathrin could not be detected on Western blots of the pulldowns (D. Owen, personal communication; unpublished data). Thus, the precise function of the ?3 ear remains elusive. However, its importance is highlighted by its evolutionary conservation: the ?3 ear domains of both Drosophila and C. elegans are significantly homologous to the ear domains of mammalian ?3A and ?3B, although both S. cerevisiae and S. pombe ?3 subunits appear to lack any ear domain.
Yeast ?3 subunits also lack a clathrin-binding consensus sequence, but both C. elegans and Drosophila have such sequences in their ?3 distal hinge domains (LIDVD and LLDLD, respectively). However, we show here that it is possible to mutate this sequence to one that can no longer bind clathrin in vitro (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998), and yet still get functional rescue. This result can now be added to the weight of evidence against an obligatory coupling between AP-3 and clathrin. At present we cannot rule out the possibility that there might be other clathrin binding sites in AP-3, even though there are no obvious candidates (we have tested the hinge and ear domains of the subunit, but are unable to detect any clathrin in GST pulldowns ). Double labeling for AP-3 and clathrin at the electron microscope level should help to determine whether there is any colocalization between the two in cells expressing ?3 with a mutated clathrin binding domain. However, much of the evidence in support of an association between AP-3 and clathrin comes from studies on the LLDLD sequence, and the present study demonstrates that this sequence is not essential for AP-3 function in vivo.
The large subunits of the AP complexes contain a number of other intriguing motifs and domains, including the "KRIGY" and "WIIGEY" sequences (Hirst et al., 1999). These motifs are found not only in every member of the /// and ? families, but also in the very distantly related ?-COP and -COP subunits of the coatomer complex. So far nothing is known about their function, but we are currently mutating these motifs in both the and ?3 subunits. By taking advantage of the mh and pe cell lines, it should be possible to assess the importance of these and other sequences not only in the assembly and localization of coat protein complexes, but also in coated vesicle function.
Materials and methods
Cell lines
To generate an mh cell line, primary fibroblasts were first cultured by taking muscle from 1–3-d-old mice and mincing the tissue using a scalpel blade, then transferring the tissue to culture dishes containing DME supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 50 IU/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 52 μM mercaptoethanol. After 3–7 d the medium was changed on the cells. Once cells had grown out from the disrupted tissue, they were split and cultured in the above medium supplemented with 200 nM TPA. In some cases the cells changed from slow growth to fast, noncontact-inhibited growth, and one of the fast-growing cell lines was cloned and aliquots were frozen for further experiments.
An immortal pe cell line was donated by R. Swank (Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY). Although this line was generated from skin using methods designed to select for melanocytes, we were unable to detect the melanocyte-specific proteins tyrosinase and TRP-1 in these cells, indicating that they are another type of skin cell, most likely fibroblasts. The mouse melanocyte line, melan-a, was a gift from D. Bennett (St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK).
Antibody-based methods
Immunoprecipitations were performed both on nondenatured proteins and in the presence of SDS, using antibodies against both AP-3 and AP-1 subunits, as described previously (Simpson et al., 1996, 1997). Western blotting and immunofluorescence were also performed using previously published methods (Robinson and Pearse, 1986; Robinson, 1987). The polyclonal rabbit antibodies against AP-3 subunits have already been described (Simpson et al., 1996, 1997); in addition, a mouse monoclonal antibody was raised against the hinge domain (amino acids 608–800) of the AP-3 subunit. The construct was expressed as a GST fusion protein and used to immunize female BALB/c mice. Fusion of the spleen cells with myeloma cells and screening of the resulting antibodies were performed as described by Bock et al. (1997). Ascites fluid was prepared by Joseph Beirao (Josman Laboratories, Napa Valley, CA). The rabbit anticlathrin antibody has been described previously (Simpson et al., 1997). The monoclonal anti- antibody, mAb 100/3, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The anti–LAMP-1 antibody (1D4B) was initially obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences, Iowa City, IA.
Yeast two-hybrid analysis
Most molecular biology techniques were performed as described by Sambrook and Russell (2001). To construct the plasmids for yeast two-hybrid analysis, the AP-3 subunits , ?3A, ?3B, μ3A, μ3B, 3A, and 3B were all cloned into the yeast two-hybrid vectors pGBT9 and pGAD424 (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.), using PCR to amplify the coding sequences and to introduce appropriate restriction sites. All constructs that had been made using PCR were sequenced by John Lester (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK) to confirm that no errors had been introduced. Interactions were monitored by assaying for growth in the absence of histidine.
Expression in mammalian cells
All plasmids for expression in mammalian cells were constructed using the vector pMEP (Girotti and Banting, 1996). The ?3A?2 construct consists of the NH2-terminal 686 amino acids of ?3A fused to the last 334 amino acids of ?2. The deletion constructs and the point mutant were made by PCR and sequenced as above to confirm that they were error-free. Cells were transfected using QIAGEN SuperFect transfection reagent and selected in DME plus 10% fetal calf serum with Hygromycin (0.2 mg/ml). At least three cell lines were selected for each construct.
Flow cytometry
A quantitative assay for AP-3 dependent sorting was developed using flow cytometry. Two rat monoclonal antibodies, anti–LAMP-1 (1D4B) and a control anti-KLH antibody (both IgG2as) were supplied by BD PharMingen. The antibodies were directly conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 using the Molecular Probes Alexa 488 protein-labeling kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were then incubated with either anti–LAMP-1 or control antibody for 6 h at 37° in serum-free media. The cells were rinsed in PBS, trypsinized, fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed on a fluorescence-activated cell scanner (FACScalibur; Becton Dickinson). To ensure that differences in anti–LAMP-1 uptake were not due to differences in LAMP-1 expression levels, Western blots of each cell line were probed with the LAMP-1 antibody. Although there was some variability from one line to another, there was no correlation between LAMP-1 expression levels and the amount of anti–LAMP-1 uptake.
Footnotes
Andrew A. Peden and Rachel E. Rudge contributed equally to this paper.
Andrew A. Peden's present address is Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-5426.
* Abbreviations used in this paper: AP, adaptor proteins; HPS, Hermansky Pudlak syndrome.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Richard Scheller, who generously allowed us to use an unpublished monoclonal antibody against AP-3 raised in his lab. We thank Dick Swank for the pearl cell line, Dot Bennett for the melan-a cell line, and Margit Burmeister for advice on maintaining mocha mice. We also thank Paul Luzio, Matthew Seaman, David Owen, Rainer Duden, John Kilmartin, and members of the Robinson lab for reading the manuscript and for helpful discussions.
This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council.Revised: 4 December 2001References
Aguilar, R.C., H. Ohno, K.W. Roche, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1997. Functional domain mapping of the clathrin-associated adaptor medium chains μ1 and μ2. J. Biol. Chem. 272:27160–27166.
Bock, J.B., J. Klumperman, S. Davanger, and R.H. Scheller. 1997. Syntaxin 6 functions in trans-Golgi network vesicle trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:1261–1271.
Cowles, C.R., G. Odorizzi, G.S. Payne, and S.D. Emr. 1997. The AP-3 adaptor complex is essential for cargo-selective transport to the yeast vacuole. Cell. 91:109–118.
Dell'Angelica, E.C., J. Klumperman, W. Stoorvogel, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1998. Association of the AP-3 complex with clathrin. Science. 280:431–434.
Dell'Angelica, E.C., V. Shotelersuk, R.C. Aguilar, W.A. Gahl, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1999. Altered trafficking of lysosomal proteins in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome due to mutations in the ?3A subunit of the AP-3 adaptor. Mol. Cell. 3:11–21.
Dell'Angelica, E.C., R.C. Aguilar, N. Wolins, S. Hazelwood, and W.A. Gahl. 2000. Molecular characterization of the protein encoded by the Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 275:1300–1306.
Doray, B., and S. Kornfeld. 2001. subunit of the AP-1 adaptor binds clathrin: implications for cooperative binding in coated vesicle assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:1925–1935.
Drake, M.T., Y. Zhu, and S. Kornfeld. 2000. The assembly of AP-3 adaptor complex-containing clathrin-coated vesicles on synthetic liposomes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:3723–3736.
Faundez, V., J.T. Horng, and R.B. Kelly. 1998. A function for the AP3 coat in synaptic vesicle formation from endosomes. Cell. 93:423–432.
Feng, L., A.B. Seymour, S. Jiang, A. To, A.A. Peden, E.K. Novak, L. Zhen, M.E. Rusiniak, E.M. Eicher, M.S. Robinson, M.B. Gorin, and R.T. Swank. 1999. The ?3A subunit gene (Ap3b1) of the AP-3 adaptor complex is altered in the mouse hypopigmentation mutant pearl, a model for Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome and night blindness. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8:323–330.
Girotti, M., and G. Banting. 1996. TGN38-green fluorescent protein hybrid proteins expressed in stably transfected eukaryotic cells provide a tool for the real-time, in vivo studt of membrane traffic pathways and suggest a possible role for rat TGN38. J. Cell Sci. 109:2915–2925.
Goodman, O.B., and J.H. Keen. 1995. The chain of the AP-2 adaptor is a clathrin binding subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23768–23773.
Hirst, J., N.A. Bright, B. Rous, and M.S. Robinson. 1999. Characterization of a fourth adaptor-related protein complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:2787–2802.
Kantheti, P., X. Qiao, M.E. Diaz, A.A. Peden, G.E. Meyer, S.L. Carskadon, D. Kapfhamer, D. Sufalko, M.S. Robinson, J.L. Noebels, and M. Burmeister. 1998. Mutation in AP-3 in the mocha mouse links endosomal transport to storage deficiency in platelets, melanosomes, and synaptic vesicles. Neuron. 21:111–122.
Le Borgne, R., A. Alconda, U. Bauer, and B. Hoflack. 1998. The mammalian AP-3 adaptor-like complex mediates the intracellular transport of lysosomal membrane glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 273:29451–29461.
Meyer, C., D. Zizioli, S. Lausmann, E.L. Eskelinen, J. Hamann, P. Saftig, K. von Figura, and P. Schu. 2000. μ1A-adaptin-deficient mice: lethality, loss of AP-1 binding and rerouting of mannose 6-phsophate receptors. EMBO J. 19:2193–2203.
Morgan, J.R., K. Prasad, W. Hao, G.J. Augustine, and E.M. Lafer. 2000. A conserved clathrin assembly motif essential for synaptic vesicle endocytosis. J. Neurosci. 20:8667–8676.
Newman, L.S., M.O. McKeever, O.J. Hirotaka, and R.B. Darnell. 1995. ?-NAP, a cerebellar degeneration antigen, is a neuron-specific vesicle coat protein. Cell. 82:773–783.
Ohno, H., R.C. Aguilar, D. Yeh, D. Taura, T. Saito, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1998. The medium subunits of adaptor complexes recognize distinct but overlapping sets of tyrosine-based sorting signals. J. Biol. Chem. 273:25915–25921.
Ooi, C.E., J.E. Moreira, E.C. Dell'Angelica, G. Poy, D.A. Wassarman, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1997. Altered expression of a novel adaptin leads to defective pigment granule biogenesis in the Drosophila eye color mutant garnet. EMBO J. 16:4508–4518.
Owen, D.J., Y. Vallis, B.M.F. Pearse, H.T. McMahon, and P.R. Evans. 2000. The structure and function of the ?2-adaptin appendage domain. EMBO J. 19:4216–4227.
Page, L.J., and M.S. Robinson. 1995. Targeting signals and subunit interactions in coated vesicle adaptor complexes. J. Cell Biol. 131:619–630.
Panek, H.R., J.D. Stepp, H.M. Engle, K.M. Marks, P. Tan, S.K. Lemmon, and L.C. Robinson. 1997. Suppressors of YCK-encoded yeast casein kinase 1 define the four subunits of a novel clathrin AP-like complex. EMBO J. 16:4194–4204.
Robinson, M.S. 1987. 100-kD coated vesicle proteins: molecular heterogeneity and intracellular distribution studied with monoclonal antibodies. J. Cell Biol. 104:887–895.
Robinson, M.S. 1993. Assembly and targeting of adaptin chimeras in transfected cells. J. Cell Biol. 123:67–77.
Robinson, M.S., and J.S. Bonifacino. 2001. Adaptor-related proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:444–453.
Robinson, M.S., and B.M.F. Pearse. 1986. Immunofluorescent localization of 100K coated vesicle proteins. J. Cell Biol. 102:48–54.
Sambrook, J., and D.W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
Shi, G., V. Faundez, J. Roos, E.C. Dell'Angelica, and R.B. Kelly. 1998. Neuroendocrine synaptic vesicles are formed in vitro by both clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent pathways. J. Cell Biol. 143:947–955.
Simpson, F., N.A. Bright, M.A. West, L.S. Newman, R.B. Darnell, and M.S. Robinson. 1996. A novel adaptor-related protein complex. J. Cell Biol. 133:749–760.
Simpson, F., A.A. Peden, L. Christopoulou, and M.S. Robinson. 1997. Characterization of the adaptor-related protein complex, AP-3. J. Cell Biol. 137:835–845.
Stepp, J.D., K. Huang, and S.K. Lemmon. 1997. The yeast adaptor protein complex, AP-3, is essential for the efficient delivery of alkaline phosphatase by the alternate pathway to the vacuole. J. Cell Biol. 139:1761–1774.
Takatsu, H., M. Futatsumori, K. Yoshino, Y. Yoshida, H.W. Shin, and K. Nakayama. 2001. Similar subunit interactions contribute to assembly of clathrin adaptor complexes and copi complex: analysis using yeast three-hybrid system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 284:1083–1089.
ter Haar, E., S.C. Harrison, and T. Kirchhausen. 2000. Peptide-in-groove interactions link target proteins to the beta-propeller of clathrin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. 97:1096–1100.
Yeung, B.G., H.L. Phan, and G.S. Payne. 1999. Adaptor complex-independent clathrin function in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:3643–3659.
Zhen, L., S. Jiang, L. Feng, N.A. Bright, A.A. Peden, A.B. Seymour, E.K. Novak, R. Elliott, M.B. Gorin, M.S. Robinson, and R.T. Swank. 1999. Abnormal expression and subcellular distribution of subunit proteins of the AP-3 adaptor complex lead to platelet storage pool deficiency in the pearl mouse. Blood. 94:146–155.
Zizioli, D., C. Meyer, G. Guhde, P. Saftig, K. von Figura, and P. Schu. 1999. Early embryonic death of mice deficient in -adaptin. J. Biol. Chem. 274:5385–5390.(Andrew A. Peden, Rachel E. Rudge, Winnie)
Address correspondence to Margaret S. Robinson, University of Cambridge, CIMR, Wellcome Trust/MRC Building, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2XY, UK. Tel.: (44) 1223-330163. Fax: (44) 1223-762640. E-mail: msr12@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Abstract
The mouse mutants mocha and pearl are deficient in the AP-3 and ?3A subunits, respectively. We have used cells from these mice to investigate both the assembly of AP-3 complexes and AP-3 function. In mocha cells, the ?3 and μ3 subunits coassemble into a heterodimer, whereas the 3 subunit remains monomeric. In pearl cells, the and 3 subunits coassemble into a heterodimer, whereas μ3 gets destroyed. The yeast two hybrid system was used to confirm these interactions, and also to demonstrate that the A (ubiquitous) and B (neuronal-specific) isoforms of ?3 and μ3 can interact with each other. Pearl cell lines were generated that express ?3A, ?3B, a ?3A?2 chimera, two ?3A deletion mutants, and a ?3A point mutant lacking a functional clathrin binding site. All six constructs assembled into complexes and were recruited onto membranes. However, only ?3A, ?3B, and the point mutant gave full functional rescue, as assayed by LAMP-1 sorting. The ?3A?2 chimera and the ?3A short deletion mutant gave partial functional rescue, whereas the ?3A truncation mutant gave no functional rescue. These results indicate that the hinge and/or ear domains of ?3 are important for function, but the clathrin binding site is not needed.
Key Words: coated vesicles; adaptors; clathrin; mocha; pearl
Introduction
Adaptor proteins (APs)* are heterotetrameric complexes that facilitate cargo selection and coated vesicle budding from different membrane compartments. Four such complexes have been identified in mammals, all of which consist of two large subunits: a ? subunit and a more divergent, complex-specific subunit (, , , or ); a medium-sized or μ subunit; and a small or subunit. The subunits are assembled into a structure resembling Mickey Mouse, with a brick-like "head," consisting of the NH2-terminal domains of the two large subunits, the medium subunit, and the small subunit, out of which protrude the COOH-terminal "ear" domains of the large subunits, connected by flexible hinges. The AP-1 and AP-2 complexes were identified first as abundant components of clathrin-coated vesicles. More recently, the AP-3 and AP-4 complexes were identified, primarily by finding homologues of the AP-1 and AP-2 subunits in the EST database, raising antibodies against recombinant proteins, and showing by coimmunoprecipitation experiments that the proteins were assembled into two novel complexes (Robinson and Bonifacino, 2001).
Although the AP-3 complex was identified relatively recently, it has been much more amenable to genetic analysis than the AP-1 or AP-2 complexes. When the subunit of the complex was first cloned, it was found to be the mammalian homologue of the protein encoded in Drosophila by the garnet gene, one of the classical eye color genes (Ooi et al., 1997; Simpson et al., 1997). garnet mutants have defective pigment granules, and because of similarities between pigment granules and lysosomes, this suggested a role for the AP-3 complex in the trafficking of proteins destined for lysosomes and related organelles. Subsequent studies in yeast showed that deleting any of the four AP-3 subunit genes causes missorting of a subset of proteins normally destined for the vacuole, the yeast equivalent of the lysosome (Cowles et al., 1997; Stepp et al., 1997). Two naturally occurring mouse mutants have also been identified with mutations in AP-3 subunits. The mocha (mh) mouse has a null mutation in the subunit of the complex (Kantheti et al., 1998), whereas the pearl (pe) mouse has effectively a null mutation in the ?3A subunit (small amounts of mRNA can be detected which encode a trunctated protein, missing the last 125 amino acids, but the protein has not been detected on Western blots) (Feng et al., 1999; Zhen et al., 1999). The mouse mutants have a similar phenotype to the human genetic disorder Hermansky Pudlak syndrome (HPS), and indeed a subset of HPS patients has been identified with mutations in ?3A (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999). In both the mice and the humans, AP-3 deficiency results in hypopigmentation because of abnormalities in melanosomes, prolonged bleeding because of deficiencies in platelet dense granules, and reduced secretion of lysosomal enzymes into the urine. AP-3–deficient fibroblasts appear relatively normal, but several studies have revealed that lysosomal membrane proteins in these cells show increased trafficking via the plasma membrane (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999, 2000; Le Borgne et al., 1998). The mh mouse also has neurological defects, although the pe mouse and the ?3A-deficient humans are neurologically normal. This is presumably because there is a second ?3 isoform, ?3B, which is specifically expressed in neurons and neuroendocrine cells (Kantheti et al., 1998). Together, these findings indicate that the AP-3 complex facilitates the trafficking of certain types of cargo to lysosomes and lysosome-related organelles.
Whether or not AP-3 is associated with clathrin is still somewhat controversial. Unlike AP-1 and AP-2, AP-3 is not enriched in purified clathrin-coated vesicles (Newman et al., 1995; Simpson et al., 1996). However, a clathrin-binding consensus sequence, L, has been identified in the hinge domains of ?1 and ?2, and similar sequences are found in ?3A and ?3B which can interact with clathrin in vitro (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; ter Haar et al., 2000). AP-3 is also able to coassemble with clathrin in vitro and to support clathrin recruitment onto liposomes (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; Drake et al., 2000). On the other hand, an in vitro system for the budding of synaptic-like microvesicles from endosomes has been shown to require AP-3 but not clathrin (Shi et al., 1998), indicating that the two can function independently. In addition, gene deletion studies in yeast indicate that AP-3 and clathrin function on different pathways; however, yeast ?3 does not contain a clathrin binding motif. Immunolocalization studies, at both the light and the electron microscope level, have yielded conflicting results (Simpson et al., 1996, 1997; Dell'Angelica et al., 1998). Thus, the question of whether or not there is an obligatory coupling between AP-3 and clathrin in mammalian cells has not yet been resolved.
Here we have taken advantage of the mouse mutants to address two questions. First, what happens to the other AP-3 subunits if one of them is missing? And second, to what extent can we rescue the phenotype of mocha and pearl cells by transfecting them with either a wild-type copy of the missing subunit, or alternatively with one that has been altered in some manner? In particular, are ?3A subunits that no longer have the clathrin binding motif still functional? These studies provide insights into the assembly and function not only of the AP-3 complex, but of the other AP complexes as well.
Results
Assembly of AP-3 complexes in mh and pe cells
To investigate the mocha (mh) and pearl (pe) phenotypes at the cellular level, we have established an mh cell line and made use of a previously established pe cell line. Fig. 1 a shows Western blots of extracts from these cells probed for the four AP-3 subunits: , ?3, μ3, and 3. In the cells from the mocha homozygote (mh/mh), , ?3, and μ3 are all undetectable, while 3 is detectable but at reduced levels. In the pearl cells (pe/pe), ?3 and μ3 are both undetectable, while and 3 are both detectable at reduced levels. When the cells are labeled for immunofluorescence using a -specific antibody, the typical punctate pattern can be seen in control cells (+), the mh cells are unlabeled, and the pe cells show diffuse cytoplasmic labeling, indicating that although is present in pe cells, it is unable to associate with membranes in the absence of the ?3 and/or μ3 subunits (Fig. 1, b–d).
Figure 1. AP-3 subunits in mh and pe cells. (a) Western blots of lysates from the mh and pe cells, as well as a wild-type control cell line (melan-a cells), were probed with antibodies against all four AP-3 subunits and with an antibody against the AP-1 subunit as a control. Only the 3 subunit is detectable in the mh cells under these conditions, while only the and 3 subunits are detectable in the pe cells. (b–d) The same cells were labeled for immunofluorescence with an antibody against the AP-3 subunit. Control cells (b) have the typical punctate pattern, mh cells (c) show no labeling, and pe cells (d) have diffuse cytoplasmic labeling, indicating that although the subunit is detectable, it is cytosolic rather than membrane-associated. Bar, 20 μm.
Previous studies have shown that in mh and pe mice, mRNAs encoding the three nonmutated subunits are expressed normally, indicating that the subunits are synthesized at wild-type levels but then get degraded because they are unstable (Kantheti et al., 1998; Feng et al., 1999). Thus, trace amounts of the nonmutated subunits may be present in the mh and pe cells, which are below the limit of detection on whole cell Western blots. To try to concentrate the subunits, and to determine whether they are associated with each other, we immunoprecipitated cell extracts with antibodies against the , ?3, and 3 subunits under nondenaturing conditions, and with anti-μ3, which only recognizes the denatured protein, in samples that had been denatured by boiling in SDS. Western blots of the immunoprecipitates were then probed with antibodies against all four of the AP-3 subunits, as well as with an antibody against the subunit of AP-1 as a control.
Fig. 2 (left) shows that under these conditions both ?3 and μ3 can be detected in the mh cells, and furthermore that they assemble into a heterodimer since both subunits come down with anti-?3. In contrast, the 3 in these cells appears to exist as a monomer, since it does not coimmunoprecipitate with any of the other subunits. In the pe cells (Fig. 2, middle), and 3 form heterodimers which come down with antibodies against both subunits, and in addition, a small amount of μ3 can be detected which coprecipitates with the /3 dimers. This suggests either that the μ3 may be assembling with the and 3 subunits into a heterotrimer, or alternatively, since the pe mutation is not a true null, that there are small amounts of truncated ?3A expressed in these cells which can form heterotetramers. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we immunoprecipitated extracts from pe spleen under nondenaturing conditions with a ?3A-specific antibody (the reason for using spleen for this experiment is that it is possible to get a more highly concentrated extract from tissues than from cultured cells, and AP-3 is known to be expressed at particularly high levels in spleen). Fig. 2 (right) demonstrates that there are indeed small amounts of truncated ?3A made in pe cells which can coassemble with the other three subunits to form a heterotetramer, although we cannot rule out the possibility that some of the μ3 may also be assembled into a heterotrimer. Together, these studies indicate that ?3 and μ3 can interact with each other, forming heterodimers in mh cells, and that and 3 also interact with each other, forming heterodimers in pe cells. The interactions that we can detect in the mutant cells are shown diagrammatically in the bottom part of Fig. 2.
Figure 2. Immunoprecipitates and Western blots of AP-3 subunits from mh and pe cells. Extracts of cultured mh cells (left), cultured pe cells (middle), and spleens from both pe and control mice (right) were immunoprecipitated with the indicated antibody. Most immunoprecipitations were performed under nondenaturing conditions, with the exception of the anti-μ3 immunoprecipitations, which were performed in the presence of SDS. The gels were then blotted onto nitrocellulose and probed with the indicated antibody. An antibody against the AP-1 subunit was included as a control. The mh cells can be seen to express trace amounts of ?3 and μ3, which form a dimer, whereas the 3 subunit appears to be monomeric. The and 3 expressed in the pe cells also form a dimer, and in addition a small amount of complete heterotetramer is made. The various subcomplexes that form in the mh and pe cells are indicated diagrammatically.
Subunit interactions
To investigate interactions between the AP-3 subunits further, and also to determine whether the A and B isoforms of the various subunits can associate with each other, we cloned the cDNAs into the vectors pGBT9 and pGAD424 for analysis using the yeast two-hybrid system. Fig. 3, a and b, shows that interacts under these conditions with 3A and 3B, both of which are expressed ubiquitously. In addition, ?3A interacts both with the ubiquitously expressed μ3A and with the neuronal-specific μ3B (Fig. 3 c), and ?3B interacts with μ3A (Fig. 3 d). For reasons that are not clear, we were unable to detect any interaction between ?3B and μ3B (unpublished data). However, the observations that ?3A can interact with μ3B and that ?3B can interact with μ3A suggest that, instead of having a neuronal-specific complex and a nonneuronal-specific complex, the subunits can "mix and match" if they are coexpressed in the same cell. The interactions involving the AP-3 subunits appear to be complex-specific, as we could detect no interactions between ?3 and μ1 (Fig. 3 c), or between and 1 (unpublished data). Other pairs of subunits were also tested, but the only interactions we were able to detect were those shown in Fig. 3.
Figure 3. Subunit interactions between AP-3 subunits detected using the yeast two-hybrid system. Yeast cells were transformed with cDNAs in either pGBT9 or pGAD424, as indicated, and interactions were assayed by growth in the absence of histidine. Panels a and b show that the subunit interacts with both 3A and 3B, panel c shows that the ?3A subunit interacts with both μ3A and μ3B, and panel d shows that the ?3B subunit interacts with μ3A.
Sorting of lysosomal membrane proteins
Previous studies have shown that the steady-state distribution of lysosomal membrane proteins, such as LAMP-1, LIMP-2, and CD63, appears normal in AP-3–deficient cells, but that they follow different trafficking routes to the lysosome. Le Borgne et al. (1998) demonstrated that cells that had been depleted of μ3 by incubation with antisense oligonucleotides showed increased endocytosis of antibodies against LAMP-1 and LIMP-2 that had been added to the culture medium, indicating that these proteins had been rerouted to the cell surface. Dell'Angelica et al. (1999)( 2000) reported similar findings on primary cultures of fibroblasts from ?3A-deficient patients and from mh and pe mice. We have also found that antibodies against LAMP-1 are readily endocytosed by both the mh and the pe cell lines (see Figs. 4 and 8). However, because all cell lines are different from each other, we needed to confirm that the antibody endocytosis was a direct result of the AP-3 deficiency. Thus, we transiently transfected the cells with a wild-type copy of the defective subunit. Cells transfected with both the and the ?3A constructs could be identified with a -specific antibody: the nontransfected mh cells were unlabeled, whereas the nontransfected pe cells gave diffuse rather than punctate labeling with the anti- antibody (see Fig. 1). Fig. 4 shows transiently transfected mh cells labeled for (a), endocytosed anti-LAMP-1 (b), and endocytosed WGA (c). The cell expressing has taken up significantly less anti–LAMP-1 than its nontransfected neighbors, while all of the cells have taken up similar amounts of WGA, indicating that endocytosis in general is not impaired in the -expressing cell. Similar results were obtained with pe cells transfected with ?3A (see Fig. 8 a).
Figure 4. Phenotype of rescued and nonrescued mh cells. mh cells were transiently transfected with wild-type , then incubated with a mixture of rat anti–LAMP-1(b) and fluorescent WGA (c) for 6 h. Triple labeling shows that the cell in the field that is expressing has taken up less anti–LAMP-1 than its neighbors, indicating that there is less misrouting of LAMP-1 to the plasma membrane in this cell. Uptake of WGA is similar in all of the cells. Bar, 20 μm.
Figure 8. Functional rescue of pe cells by the various ?3 constructs. (a) A mixture of cells transfected with empty vector and cells expressing ?3A were incubated 6 h with anti–LAMP-1 directly conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488, then double labeled with anti-. ?3A-expressing cells (arrow), which could be identified by the punctate, perinuclear distribution of , took up less anti–LAMP-1 than cells transfected with empty vector. (b) Anti–LAMP-1 uptake analyzed by flow cytometry. The control peak shows the fluorescence intensity of a ?3A-expressing cell line incubated with a control antibody (anti-KLH) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. The empty-vector peak shows the level of fluorescence intensity when a nonexpressing pe cell line was incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody, whereas the ?3A peak shows the level of fluorescence intensity when the pe cell line expressing ?3A was incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody. Anti–LAMP-1 uptake in the ?3A-expressing cell line was 27% that of the empty vector–transfected line. (c) Graph of the results obtained by flow cytometry. In each case three different cell lines, stably expressing each of the six constructs were analyzed, as well as three cell lines transfected with empty vector. In each experiment, 10,000 cells were counted and the experiments were repeated on different days and the results for each cell line were averaged. The values were obtained by dividing the geometric mean fluorescent intensity of cells incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody by that of cells incubated with the control antibody. Error bars show the standard deviation from the mean. ?3A, ?3B, and ?3A817AAA constructs all gave good rescue (P 0.0001); ?3A?2 and ?3A807–831 both gave partial rescue (P = 0.0059 and P = 0.0015, respectively); and ?3A807 stop gave no significant rescue (P = 0.2523). P values were obtained using a one-tailed unpaired t test. Bar, 20 μm.
Introduction of altered subunits
The availability of an assay for AP-3–mediated sorting means that we can now test whether not only wild-type subunits, but also subunits that have been altered in some way, are functional. Because some such subunits might be expected to give intermediate rescue, we developed a quantitative assay based on FACS analysis for use on stably transfected cells (see below). Unfortunately, we have so far been unable to obtain any mh cell lines that were homogeneously expressing ; thus, we decided to concentrate on pe cells. In addition to cells expressing wild-type ?3A, we have established pe cell lines expressing ?3B, a ?3A-?2 chimera containing the ?3A NH2-terminal domain (amino acids 1–686) but the ?2 hinge and ear domains (?3A?2); two ?3A deletion mutants (?3A807–831 and ?3A807 stop); and a ?3A point mutant (?3A817AAA). The ?3A807–831 mutant is missing a fragment of the distal part of the hinge, including the clathrin binding domain (amino acids 817–822), whereas the ?3A807stop mutant is missing the distal part of the hinge, including the clathrin binding domain, and all of the ear. In the ?3A817AAA mutant, the clathrin binding motif has been mutated from SLLDLD to AAADLD. This same mutation has been shown to abolish clathrin binding in vitro (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; unpublished data). Schematic diagrams of the constructs are shown in Fig. 5 a.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic diagrams of six ?3-based constructs that were stably transfected into pe cells. (b) Extracts from cell lines expressing each of the six constructs, as well as a cell line stably transfected with empty vector, were immunoprecipitated with anti-, and blots were probed with antibodies against , the construct itself (in most cases anti-?3A, although the last two lanes were probed with antibodies against ?3B and ?2, respectively), μ3, and 3. Only and 3 can be detected in the immunoprecipitate from the cell line transfected with the empty vector, whereas all four subunits can be detected in the cell lines expressing the six constructs, indicating that complete heterotetramers have been formed.
We first investigated whether the constructs were capable of assembling into AP-3 complexes by immunoprecipitating cell extracts with an antibody against the subunit, then probing Western blots of the immunoprecipitates with antibodies against the other three subunits. Fig. 5 b shows that in the nontransfected cells, only 3 coprecipitated with at detectable levels (see also Figs. 1 and 2), while in cells transfected with ?3A, all three of the other subunits were detectable, indicating that the ?3A had assembled into complexes together with μ3, thus protecting the μ3 subunit from degradation. Similarly, in cells transfected with the other five constructs, the construct itself and the μ3 subunit came down with the and 3 subunits. These results are consistent with studies on the AP-1 and AP-2 complexes, which indicate that the NH2-terminal domains of the ? subunits are incorporated into the "head," where they can interact with the other subunits, while the hinge and ear domains have other functions. The μ3 subunit in all of the immunoprecipitates is presumably μ3A, since μ3B is only expressed in neurons and neuroendocrine cells. Thus, this result is consistent with results from the two-hybrid experiments, which indicate that although ?3B is normally only expressed in the same cells that express μ3B, it can interact with the ubiquitously expressed μ3A.
To determine whether the complexes could be recruited onto membranes, cells expressing each of the six constructs were labeled for immunofluorescence with anti-. In nontransfected pe cells, has a diffuse cytoplasmic distribution (Fig. 1 d); however, in cells expressing each of the five constructs, the labeling was punctate, indicating that it was associated with membranes (Fig. 6). We also compared the distribution of AP-3 in cells expressing the various constructs with that of clathrin, using a confocal microscope (Fig. 7; AP-3 is green and clathrin is red). In cells expressing wild-type ?3A, AP-3 and clathrin were found to have distinct distributions: (a) they are often in the same general vicinity, and in some cases there may be overlap (yellow), but much of the AP-3 labeling is negative for clathrin. In contrast, when cells are double labeled for the AP-1 adaptor complex and clathrin (b), essentially all of the structures that are positive for AP-1 (green) are also positive for clathrin (red; note that there is extensive yellow labeling and very little green). In cells expressing the various constructs, the extent of overlap between AP-3 and clathrin was very similar to that in cells expressing wild-type ?3A. This is in spite of the fact that the ?3A?2 chimera (c) has more potential clathrin binding sites than wild-type ?3A (not only the clathrin-binding consensus sequence LLNLD in its hinge domain, but also three copies of another motif implicated in clathrin binding, DLL , as well as clathrin binding activity in its ear domain ). Constructs lacking a clathrin binding domain, like ?3A817AAA (d), did not look appreciably different from the other constructs: again, there were some yellow structures, as well as red and green. However, at the light microscope level, it is impossible to resolve two structures that are less than 0.2 μm apart from each other, so to quantify the true extent of overlap between AP-3 and clathrin in cells expressing the various constructs, it will be necessary to go to the electron microscope level.
Figure 6. Immunofluorescence of cell lines expressing each of the six constructs labeled with anti-. All of the cells show punctate labeling with some concentration in the perinuclear region, indicating that the AP-3 complexes assembled from all six constructs are recruited onto membranes. Bar, 20 μm.
Figure 7. Confocal micrographs showing double labeling for AP complexes and clathrin. pe cells expressing ?3A (a), ?3A?2 (c), or ?3A817AAA were double labeled with anti- (green) and anti-clathrin (red), and COS cells were double labeled with anti- (green) and anti-clathrin (red). Essentially all of the anti- labeling is also positive for clathrin (note how there are no green dots in b, only yellow). In contrast, in all three cell lines expressing ?3 constructs, much of the AP-3 labeling is negative for clathrin. (Transfected pe cells could not be double labeled with anti- and anti-clathrin because the anti- mAb only recognizes the protein in nonrodent cells.) Bar: (a and b) 10 μm; (c and d) 20 μm.
Functional rescue of pe cells
Having established that all six constructs are able to coassemble with the other AP-3 subunits and be recruited onto membranes, we went on to investigate their ability to rescue the LAMP-1 missorting phenotype. For these experiments, a rat monoclonal antibody against LAMP-1 was directly conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. Double-labeling immunofluorescence performed on a mixture of pe cells transfected with empty vector and pe cells expressing wild-type ?3A, incubated with the antibody for 6 h, showed that the nonexpressing cells took up significantly more antibody than the expressing cells (Fig. 8 a).
For quantitative studies, each stably transfected cell line was incubated for 6 h either with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody or with an isotype control antibody (anti-KLH), which also had been conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488. The cells were then trypsinized, fixed, and analyzed by flow cytometry. Fig. 8 b shows the results obtained with one of the cell lines expressing wild-type ?3A. The peak marked "control" shows the fluorescence intensity of the ?3A-expressing cells incubated with the control antibody, which is likely to be taken up by fluid phase endocytosis only. The peaks marked "?3A" and "empty vector" show the levels of fluorescence intensity observed when the ?3A-expressing line and one of the cell lines transfected with empty vector were incubated with the anti–LAMP-1 antibody. In both cases, the fluorescence intensity is higher than that observed with the control antibody, indicating that the anti–LAMP-1 has been taken up by receptor-mediated endocytosis as well as fluid-phase endocytosis. However, the fluorescence intensity of the ?3A-expressing line is 4.41 times that of the control. In contrast, the fluorescence intensity of the cell line transfected with empty vector is 16.61 times that of its own control (unpublished data, but similar results were obtained with all of the cell lines incubated with the control antibody). Thus, the amount of specific uptake of anti–LAMP-1 in the ?3A-expressing line is 27% of that in the empty vector–transfected line. This is comparable to results obtained by others who have investigated anti–LAMP-1 uptake in normal and AP-3-deficient primary fibroblasts from both mice and humans: wild-type cells were reported to internalize between 20 and 45% as much antibody as mutant cells (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999, 2000).
Fig. 8 c shows the extent of functional rescue obtained with all six constructs. In each case, three different cell lines stably expressing each of the six constructs were analyzed, as well as three cell lines transfected with empty vector. The experiments were repeated on different days and the results for each cell line were averaged. ?3A can be seen to give the best rescue, with anti–LAMP-1 uptake 4.89 ± 0.237 (SD), as compared with 17.25 ± 0.821 in cells transfected with empty vector. The ?3B construct also rescued well, with anti–LAMP-1 uptake 6.58 ± 0.421. Whether the difference between the ?3A- and ?3B-expressing cells reflects functional differences between the two ?3 isoforms, or whether it reflects other differences between the various cell lines (since wild-type cell lines can vary at least this much in their anti-LAMP-1 uptake), is not at present clear. The ?3A?2 chimera and the ?3A807–831 deletion mutant both partially rescued the missorting phenotype, with anti–LAMP-1 uptake 10.30 ± 2.620 and 10.48 ± 1.635 respectively. However, there was no significant difference in antibody uptake between cells expressing the truncation mutant, ?3A807stop (15.73 ± 3.512), and cells transfected with empty vector. Thus, the distal hinge and/or ear domain of the ?3 subunit appears to be required for AP-3 function, even though the construct lacking these domains is still able to assemble into AP-3 complexes and be recruited onto membranes.
There are at least two possible explanations for the intermediate level of functional rescue that we observed with the ?3A807–831 mutant. One possibility is that the clathrin-binding consensus sequence, which is missing from this construct, is required for full functional rescue. Alternatively, the construct might be defective in some other way: for instance, the ear might not be correctly folded. The point mutant ?3A817AAA enables us to distinguish between these two possibilities. Instead of a 25-amino acid deletion, this construct has only 3 amino acid substitutions, but (at least in vitro) it is unable to bind clathrin (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998). Fig. 8 c shows that when this construct is expressed in living cells, anti–LAMP-1 uptake is 7.49 ± 1.128, which is only slightly more than in ?3A-expressing cells and not significantly different from ?3B-expressing cells. Thus, although the hinge and/or ear domains of ?3A are needed for protein function, the clathrin-binding consensus sequence appears to be dispensable.
Discussion
The availability of mice with null, or effectively null, mutations in AP-3 subunits has enabled us to study AP-3 assembly and function in mammalian cells. In the past we and others have transfected mammalian cells with mutant AP-1 and AP-2 subunits for studies on both assembly and function, but interpretation of these studies has been complicated by the presence of endogenous wild-type subunits (Robinson, 1993; Page and Robinson, 1995). In the present study, we have been able to introduce mutant subunits into cells with little or no background.
We first investigated whether partial AP-3 complexes were able to assemble in the absence of a particular subunit. We found that mh cells, missing the subunit, assembled heterodimers from the ?3 and μ3 subunits, whereas the 3 subunit remained monomeric. The pe cells, which express very low levels of truncated ?3A, mainly assembled heterodimers consisting of and 3 subunits, as well as a very small amount of complete heterotetramer. All of the subunits were destabilized to some extent by the absence of either or ?3, but this was particularly striking in the case of the μ3 subunit, which seemed to exist only as a dimer with the ?3 subunit, even when the ?3 subunit was barely detectable.
In addition to the naturally occurring AP-3 mouse mutants, knockout mice have been generated which lack the AP-1 and μ1A subunits. Both mouse strains die during embryogenesis; however, a fibroblast line has been established from the μ1A knockout mice, and these cells were found to assemble a heterotrimer consisting of , ?1, and 1 subunits. This complex appears to be fairly stable, although (like the /3 heterodimer) it is unable to be recruited onto membranes (Meyer et al., 2000). The knockout mouse dies so early that it has not been possible to establish a null cell line, but cells from the heterozygote have been examined and found to express the subunit at 50% normal levels. Both ?1 and μ1 completely comigrate with by gel filtration in these cells, indicating that any excess ?1 and μ1 are unstable and get degraded (Zizioli et al., 1999). Similarly, our own studies show that in the absence of the subunit, the stability of ?3 and μ3 is greatly reduced. However, somewhat different findings have been reported in yeast. When the AP-3 , ?3, or 3 subunits are deleted, the stability of μ3 does not appear to be affected, although it fractionates differently by gel filtration, in particular in the ?3-disrupted strain, where it appears to be monomeric (Panek et al., 1997). In contrast, deleting the -like subunit of the AP-2–related complex in yeast does not affect the ?2 subunit, but it has a profound effect on the stability of 2 (Yeung et al., 1999). Thus, it is difficult to predict how a particular AP subunit will behave in a particular organism; however, all of these studies consistently show that there are strong interactions between the /// subunits and the subunits, and between the ? and μ subunits.
These same interactions can be detected using the yeast two-hybrid system. The interactions that we report between the and 3 subunits, and between the ?3 and μ3 subunits, are consistent with interactions that we and others have reported between the corresponding pairs of subunits in the AP-1, AP-2, and AP-4 complexes (Page and Robinson, 1995; Aguilar et al., 1997; Hirst et al., 1999; Takatsu et al., 2001). In addition, in a previous study using the yeast two-hybrid system, we were able to demonstrate interactions between the two large subunits of the AP-1 and AP-2 complexes, / and ? (Page and Robinson, 1995). However, interactions between the large subunits appear to be more difficult to reconstitute, and so far we have been unable to demonstrate any interactions between and ?3, or between the and ?4 subunits of the AP-4 complex (Hirst et al., 1999). and ?4 have been shown recently to interact in the presence of 4 using the yeast three-hybrid system, however (Takatsu et al., 2001), so it is possible that 3 may promote the interaction between and ?3. One observation that supports the notion that and ?3 interact in vivo is the finding that mh cells have greatly reduced levels of the ?3 and μ3 subunits. This suggests that ?3 may be unstable in the absence of , which in turn would destabilize μ3.
We also used the yeast two-hybrid system to investigate whether the ubiquitously expressed (A) and neuronal-specific (B) ?3 and μ3 subunits were capable of interacting with each other. Interactions were detected between ?3A and μ3A, between ?3A and μ3B, and between ?3B and μ3A, although surprisingly not between ?3B and μ3B. The ability of the A and B isoforms to interact under more physiological conditions was demonstrated in our transfection experiments. When pe cells were transfected with ?3B, they formed heterotetramers containing the ubiquitously expressed μ3A subunit. Heterotetramers were also assembled from the other five constructs, as expected since they all contained the ?3A NH2-terminal domain. Perhaps less predictable was the ability of all the constructs to be recruited equally well onto membranes. Although studies from our own lab and others indicate that the COOH-terminal hinge and ear domains of the adaptor large subunits are not absolutely essential for membrane association, AP complexes containing earless or are compromised in their ability to bind to their respective membranes (Robinson, 1993); however, the earless ?3A construct, ?3A807stop, showed no increased cytosolic background. We were also interested in the extent to which the various complexes colocalized with clathrin, in particular complexes containing the ?3A?2 chimera, since multiple clathrin binding sites have been identified and/or predicted in the ?2 COOH-terminal hinge and ear domains (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998; Morgan et al., 2000; Owen et al., 2000). However, this construct, like the others, was at least partially localized to structures that were negative for clathrin. In contrast, AP-1 and AP-2 both show essentially complete colocalization with clathrin (Fig. 7; Robinson, 1987), indicating that the presence of the ?2 hinge and ear domains is not enough for a stable association with clathrin, and that there must be additional interactions, possibly involving the and subunits (Goodman and Keen, 1995; Morgan et al., 2000; Doray and Kornfeld, 2001).
Although all of the constructs assembled into complexes and were recruited onto membranes equally well, they varied widely in their ability to rescue the missorting phenotype of the pe cells. Using a quantitative assay for LAMP-1 mislocalization, we were able to show that ?3B gave nearly as good functional rescue as ?3A; indeed, the differences that we saw could simply be due to variability from one cell line to another (Dell'Angelica et al., 1999, 2000). However, although ?3B can functionally substitute for ?3A, the opposite may not be true. Synaptic-like microvesicle budding from endosomes has been shown to be dependent upon brain AP-3; liver AP-3 will not suffice (Faundez et al., 1998). This suggests that the neuronal-specific isoform of either ?3 or μ3, or both, is required for this activity. Brain AP-3 contains a mixture of A and B isoforms of both ?3 and μ3, while the stably transfected cells express only ?3B and μ3A; thus, it should be possible to test the relative importance of neuronal-specific ?3 and μ3 by determining whether AP-3 complexes from the transfected cells will substitute for brain AP-3 in the in vitro budding assay.
Two of our constructs gave partial rescue: the ?3A?2 chimera and the deletion mutant ?3A807–831. In contrast, the premature truncation mutant ?3A807stop was unable to rescue even partially. This finding indicates that the distal hinge and/or ear domains of ?3 are essential for function. In the ?3A807–831 mutant, part of the distal hinge is missing, and this fragment may either contribute directly to ?3 function, or alternatively may aid in the folding of the ear. Virtually nothing is known about the ear domain of ?3, although the ?2 ear has been shown to bind both clathrin and certain coated vesicle accessory proteins, including AP180, epsin, and Eps15 (Owen et al., 2000). We have shown that AP-3 complexes containing truncated ?3A are recruited onto the membrane, and presumably they are able to select cargo since they contain μ3A (Ohno et al., 1998). Thus, the lack of functional rescue suggests that they fail to produce coated vesicles, consistent with an inability to recruit structural or accessory proteins that might be essential for this event. The ability of the ?3A?2 construct to give partial rescue suggests that the ?3 and ?2 ears may recruit some of the same proteins. However, gels of GST pulldowns using the ?3A ear showed no obvious candidate binding partners, and clathrin could not be detected on Western blots of the pulldowns (D. Owen, personal communication; unpublished data). Thus, the precise function of the ?3 ear remains elusive. However, its importance is highlighted by its evolutionary conservation: the ?3 ear domains of both Drosophila and C. elegans are significantly homologous to the ear domains of mammalian ?3A and ?3B, although both S. cerevisiae and S. pombe ?3 subunits appear to lack any ear domain.
Yeast ?3 subunits also lack a clathrin-binding consensus sequence, but both C. elegans and Drosophila have such sequences in their ?3 distal hinge domains (LIDVD and LLDLD, respectively). However, we show here that it is possible to mutate this sequence to one that can no longer bind clathrin in vitro (Dell'Angelica et al., 1998), and yet still get functional rescue. This result can now be added to the weight of evidence against an obligatory coupling between AP-3 and clathrin. At present we cannot rule out the possibility that there might be other clathrin binding sites in AP-3, even though there are no obvious candidates (we have tested the hinge and ear domains of the subunit, but are unable to detect any clathrin in GST pulldowns ). Double labeling for AP-3 and clathrin at the electron microscope level should help to determine whether there is any colocalization between the two in cells expressing ?3 with a mutated clathrin binding domain. However, much of the evidence in support of an association between AP-3 and clathrin comes from studies on the LLDLD sequence, and the present study demonstrates that this sequence is not essential for AP-3 function in vivo.
The large subunits of the AP complexes contain a number of other intriguing motifs and domains, including the "KRIGY" and "WIIGEY" sequences (Hirst et al., 1999). These motifs are found not only in every member of the /// and ? families, but also in the very distantly related ?-COP and -COP subunits of the coatomer complex. So far nothing is known about their function, but we are currently mutating these motifs in both the and ?3 subunits. By taking advantage of the mh and pe cell lines, it should be possible to assess the importance of these and other sequences not only in the assembly and localization of coat protein complexes, but also in coated vesicle function.
Materials and methods
Cell lines
To generate an mh cell line, primary fibroblasts were first cultured by taking muscle from 1–3-d-old mice and mincing the tissue using a scalpel blade, then transferring the tissue to culture dishes containing DME supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, 50 IU/ml penicillin, 50 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 52 μM mercaptoethanol. After 3–7 d the medium was changed on the cells. Once cells had grown out from the disrupted tissue, they were split and cultured in the above medium supplemented with 200 nM TPA. In some cases the cells changed from slow growth to fast, noncontact-inhibited growth, and one of the fast-growing cell lines was cloned and aliquots were frozen for further experiments.
An immortal pe cell line was donated by R. Swank (Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY). Although this line was generated from skin using methods designed to select for melanocytes, we were unable to detect the melanocyte-specific proteins tyrosinase and TRP-1 in these cells, indicating that they are another type of skin cell, most likely fibroblasts. The mouse melanocyte line, melan-a, was a gift from D. Bennett (St. George's Hospital Medical School, London, UK).
Antibody-based methods
Immunoprecipitations were performed both on nondenatured proteins and in the presence of SDS, using antibodies against both AP-3 and AP-1 subunits, as described previously (Simpson et al., 1996, 1997). Western blotting and immunofluorescence were also performed using previously published methods (Robinson and Pearse, 1986; Robinson, 1987). The polyclonal rabbit antibodies against AP-3 subunits have already been described (Simpson et al., 1996, 1997); in addition, a mouse monoclonal antibody was raised against the hinge domain (amino acids 608–800) of the AP-3 subunit. The construct was expressed as a GST fusion protein and used to immunize female BALB/c mice. Fusion of the spleen cells with myeloma cells and screening of the resulting antibodies were performed as described by Bock et al. (1997). Ascites fluid was prepared by Joseph Beirao (Josman Laboratories, Napa Valley, CA). The rabbit anticlathrin antibody has been described previously (Simpson et al., 1997). The monoclonal anti- antibody, mAb 100/3, was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. The anti–LAMP-1 antibody (1D4B) was initially obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank developed under the auspices of the NICHD and maintained by The University of Iowa, Department of Biological Sciences, Iowa City, IA.
Yeast two-hybrid analysis
Most molecular biology techniques were performed as described by Sambrook and Russell (2001). To construct the plasmids for yeast two-hybrid analysis, the AP-3 subunits , ?3A, ?3B, μ3A, μ3B, 3A, and 3B were all cloned into the yeast two-hybrid vectors pGBT9 and pGAD424 (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.), using PCR to amplify the coding sequences and to introduce appropriate restriction sites. All constructs that had been made using PCR were sequenced by John Lester (University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK) to confirm that no errors had been introduced. Interactions were monitored by assaying for growth in the absence of histidine.
Expression in mammalian cells
All plasmids for expression in mammalian cells were constructed using the vector pMEP (Girotti and Banting, 1996). The ?3A?2 construct consists of the NH2-terminal 686 amino acids of ?3A fused to the last 334 amino acids of ?2. The deletion constructs and the point mutant were made by PCR and sequenced as above to confirm that they were error-free. Cells were transfected using QIAGEN SuperFect transfection reagent and selected in DME plus 10% fetal calf serum with Hygromycin (0.2 mg/ml). At least three cell lines were selected for each construct.
Flow cytometry
A quantitative assay for AP-3 dependent sorting was developed using flow cytometry. Two rat monoclonal antibodies, anti–LAMP-1 (1D4B) and a control anti-KLH antibody (both IgG2as) were supplied by BD PharMingen. The antibodies were directly conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 using the Molecular Probes Alexa 488 protein-labeling kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were then incubated with either anti–LAMP-1 or control antibody for 6 h at 37° in serum-free media. The cells were rinsed in PBS, trypsinized, fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde, and analyzed on a fluorescence-activated cell scanner (FACScalibur; Becton Dickinson). To ensure that differences in anti–LAMP-1 uptake were not due to differences in LAMP-1 expression levels, Western blots of each cell line were probed with the LAMP-1 antibody. Although there was some variability from one line to another, there was no correlation between LAMP-1 expression levels and the amount of anti–LAMP-1 uptake.
Footnotes
Andrew A. Peden and Rachel E. Rudge contributed equally to this paper.
Andrew A. Peden's present address is Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305-5426.
* Abbreviations used in this paper: AP, adaptor proteins; HPS, Hermansky Pudlak syndrome.
Acknowledgments
We are very grateful to Richard Scheller, who generously allowed us to use an unpublished monoclonal antibody against AP-3 raised in his lab. We thank Dick Swank for the pearl cell line, Dot Bennett for the melan-a cell line, and Margit Burmeister for advice on maintaining mocha mice. We also thank Paul Luzio, Matthew Seaman, David Owen, Rainer Duden, John Kilmartin, and members of the Robinson lab for reading the manuscript and for helpful discussions.
This work was supported by grants from the Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council.Revised: 4 December 2001References
Aguilar, R.C., H. Ohno, K.W. Roche, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1997. Functional domain mapping of the clathrin-associated adaptor medium chains μ1 and μ2. J. Biol. Chem. 272:27160–27166.
Bock, J.B., J. Klumperman, S. Davanger, and R.H. Scheller. 1997. Syntaxin 6 functions in trans-Golgi network vesicle trafficking. Mol. Biol. Cell. 8:1261–1271.
Cowles, C.R., G. Odorizzi, G.S. Payne, and S.D. Emr. 1997. The AP-3 adaptor complex is essential for cargo-selective transport to the yeast vacuole. Cell. 91:109–118.
Dell'Angelica, E.C., J. Klumperman, W. Stoorvogel, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1998. Association of the AP-3 complex with clathrin. Science. 280:431–434.
Dell'Angelica, E.C., V. Shotelersuk, R.C. Aguilar, W.A. Gahl, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1999. Altered trafficking of lysosomal proteins in Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome due to mutations in the ?3A subunit of the AP-3 adaptor. Mol. Cell. 3:11–21.
Dell'Angelica, E.C., R.C. Aguilar, N. Wolins, S. Hazelwood, and W.A. Gahl. 2000. Molecular characterization of the protein encoded by the Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome type 1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 275:1300–1306.
Doray, B., and S. Kornfeld. 2001. subunit of the AP-1 adaptor binds clathrin: implications for cooperative binding in coated vesicle assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell. 12:1925–1935.
Drake, M.T., Y. Zhu, and S. Kornfeld. 2000. The assembly of AP-3 adaptor complex-containing clathrin-coated vesicles on synthetic liposomes. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11:3723–3736.
Faundez, V., J.T. Horng, and R.B. Kelly. 1998. A function for the AP3 coat in synaptic vesicle formation from endosomes. Cell. 93:423–432.
Feng, L., A.B. Seymour, S. Jiang, A. To, A.A. Peden, E.K. Novak, L. Zhen, M.E. Rusiniak, E.M. Eicher, M.S. Robinson, M.B. Gorin, and R.T. Swank. 1999. The ?3A subunit gene (Ap3b1) of the AP-3 adaptor complex is altered in the mouse hypopigmentation mutant pearl, a model for Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome and night blindness. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8:323–330.
Girotti, M., and G. Banting. 1996. TGN38-green fluorescent protein hybrid proteins expressed in stably transfected eukaryotic cells provide a tool for the real-time, in vivo studt of membrane traffic pathways and suggest a possible role for rat TGN38. J. Cell Sci. 109:2915–2925.
Goodman, O.B., and J.H. Keen. 1995. The chain of the AP-2 adaptor is a clathrin binding subunit. J. Biol. Chem. 270:23768–23773.
Hirst, J., N.A. Bright, B. Rous, and M.S. Robinson. 1999. Characterization of a fourth adaptor-related protein complex. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:2787–2802.
Kantheti, P., X. Qiao, M.E. Diaz, A.A. Peden, G.E. Meyer, S.L. Carskadon, D. Kapfhamer, D. Sufalko, M.S. Robinson, J.L. Noebels, and M. Burmeister. 1998. Mutation in AP-3 in the mocha mouse links endosomal transport to storage deficiency in platelets, melanosomes, and synaptic vesicles. Neuron. 21:111–122.
Le Borgne, R., A. Alconda, U. Bauer, and B. Hoflack. 1998. The mammalian AP-3 adaptor-like complex mediates the intracellular transport of lysosomal membrane glycoproteins. J. Biol. Chem. 273:29451–29461.
Meyer, C., D. Zizioli, S. Lausmann, E.L. Eskelinen, J. Hamann, P. Saftig, K. von Figura, and P. Schu. 2000. μ1A-adaptin-deficient mice: lethality, loss of AP-1 binding and rerouting of mannose 6-phsophate receptors. EMBO J. 19:2193–2203.
Morgan, J.R., K. Prasad, W. Hao, G.J. Augustine, and E.M. Lafer. 2000. A conserved clathrin assembly motif essential for synaptic vesicle endocytosis. J. Neurosci. 20:8667–8676.
Newman, L.S., M.O. McKeever, O.J. Hirotaka, and R.B. Darnell. 1995. ?-NAP, a cerebellar degeneration antigen, is a neuron-specific vesicle coat protein. Cell. 82:773–783.
Ohno, H., R.C. Aguilar, D. Yeh, D. Taura, T. Saito, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1998. The medium subunits of adaptor complexes recognize distinct but overlapping sets of tyrosine-based sorting signals. J. Biol. Chem. 273:25915–25921.
Ooi, C.E., J.E. Moreira, E.C. Dell'Angelica, G. Poy, D.A. Wassarman, and J.S. Bonifacino. 1997. Altered expression of a novel adaptin leads to defective pigment granule biogenesis in the Drosophila eye color mutant garnet. EMBO J. 16:4508–4518.
Owen, D.J., Y. Vallis, B.M.F. Pearse, H.T. McMahon, and P.R. Evans. 2000. The structure and function of the ?2-adaptin appendage domain. EMBO J. 19:4216–4227.
Page, L.J., and M.S. Robinson. 1995. Targeting signals and subunit interactions in coated vesicle adaptor complexes. J. Cell Biol. 131:619–630.
Panek, H.R., J.D. Stepp, H.M. Engle, K.M. Marks, P. Tan, S.K. Lemmon, and L.C. Robinson. 1997. Suppressors of YCK-encoded yeast casein kinase 1 define the four subunits of a novel clathrin AP-like complex. EMBO J. 16:4194–4204.
Robinson, M.S. 1987. 100-kD coated vesicle proteins: molecular heterogeneity and intracellular distribution studied with monoclonal antibodies. J. Cell Biol. 104:887–895.
Robinson, M.S. 1993. Assembly and targeting of adaptin chimeras in transfected cells. J. Cell Biol. 123:67–77.
Robinson, M.S., and J.S. Bonifacino. 2001. Adaptor-related proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13:444–453.
Robinson, M.S., and B.M.F. Pearse. 1986. Immunofluorescent localization of 100K coated vesicle proteins. J. Cell Biol. 102:48–54.
Sambrook, J., and D.W. Russell. 2001. Molecular cloning, a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York.
Shi, G., V. Faundez, J. Roos, E.C. Dell'Angelica, and R.B. Kelly. 1998. Neuroendocrine synaptic vesicles are formed in vitro by both clathrin-dependent and clathrin-independent pathways. J. Cell Biol. 143:947–955.
Simpson, F., N.A. Bright, M.A. West, L.S. Newman, R.B. Darnell, and M.S. Robinson. 1996. A novel adaptor-related protein complex. J. Cell Biol. 133:749–760.
Simpson, F., A.A. Peden, L. Christopoulou, and M.S. Robinson. 1997. Characterization of the adaptor-related protein complex, AP-3. J. Cell Biol. 137:835–845.
Stepp, J.D., K. Huang, and S.K. Lemmon. 1997. The yeast adaptor protein complex, AP-3, is essential for the efficient delivery of alkaline phosphatase by the alternate pathway to the vacuole. J. Cell Biol. 139:1761–1774.
Takatsu, H., M. Futatsumori, K. Yoshino, Y. Yoshida, H.W. Shin, and K. Nakayama. 2001. Similar subunit interactions contribute to assembly of clathrin adaptor complexes and copi complex: analysis using yeast three-hybrid system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 284:1083–1089.
ter Haar, E., S.C. Harrison, and T. Kirchhausen. 2000. Peptide-in-groove interactions link target proteins to the beta-propeller of clathrin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA. 97:1096–1100.
Yeung, B.G., H.L. Phan, and G.S. Payne. 1999. Adaptor complex-independent clathrin function in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. 10:3643–3659.
Zhen, L., S. Jiang, L. Feng, N.A. Bright, A.A. Peden, A.B. Seymour, E.K. Novak, R. Elliott, M.B. Gorin, M.S. Robinson, and R.T. Swank. 1999. Abnormal expression and subcellular distribution of subunit proteins of the AP-3 adaptor complex lead to platelet storage pool deficiency in the pearl mouse. Blood. 94:146–155.
Zizioli, D., C. Meyer, G. Guhde, P. Saftig, K. von Figura, and P. Schu. 1999. Early embryonic death of mice deficient in -adaptin. J. Biol. Chem. 274:5385–5390.(Andrew A. Peden, Rachel E. Rudge, Winnie)