归纳推理的多样性效应及其机制探索(5)
[15]Heit E, Hahn U. Diversity-Based Reasoning in Children. Cognitive Psychology, 2001, 43: 243~273
[16]Lo Y, Sides A, Rozelle J et al. Evidential diversity and premise probability in young children’s inductive judgment. Cognitive Science, 2002, 16: 181~206
[17]Kim N S, Keil F C. From symptoms to causes: Diversity effects in diagnostic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 2003, 31: 155~165
[18]Kincannon A, Spellman B A. The use of category and similarity information in limiting hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 2003, 31: 114~132
, 百拇医药
[19]陈安涛,李红,冯廷勇等. 分段设计条件下归纳推理的多样性效应. 中国科学C辑: 生命科学, 2005, 35(3): 275~283
[20]Heit E. A Bayesian analysis of some forms of inductive reasoning. In: Oaksford & Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998. 248~274
[21]Fong K, Nisbett. The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems, cognitive psychology, 1986, 18: 253~292
[22]Nisbett R E, Krantz D H, Jepson C et al. The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 1983, 90: 339~363
, 百拇医药
[23]Feeney A, Gardiner D R. Category size and category-based induction. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 2002. 292~297
[24]Quinn P C, Eimas P D, Rosenkrantz S L. Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 1993, 22: 463~475
[25]李红, 陈安涛. 从知觉到意义——婴儿分类能力与概念发展研究述评. 华东师范大学学报(教)，2003，2：78~86
, 百拇医药
[26]Starkey P, Spelke, E S, Gelman R. Numerical abstraction by human infants. Cognition, 1990, 36: 97~128
[27]Wynn K. Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 1992, 358: 749~751
[28]Wood J N，Spelke E S. Infants' Enumeration of Actions: Numerical Discrimination and its Signature Limits. Developmental Science, 2005, 8(2): 173~181
[29]Dehaene S, Akhavein R. Attention, Automatic, and levels of representation in Number processing. Journal or Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 1995, 21 (2): 314~326
, 百拇医药
[30]Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser M. The representations underlying infant's choice of more: object file versus analog magnitudes. Psychology science, 2002, 13(2): 150~156
[31]Heit E, Feeney A. Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2005, 12: 340~344
[ 上 页 ]
, 百拇医药(李富洪 李 红 陈安涛 等)
[16]Lo Y, Sides A, Rozelle J et al. Evidential diversity and premise probability in young children’s inductive judgment. Cognitive Science, 2002, 16: 181~206
[17]Kim N S, Keil F C. From symptoms to causes: Diversity effects in diagnostic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 2003, 31: 155~165
[18]Kincannon A, Spellman B A. The use of category and similarity information in limiting hypotheses. Memory & Cognition, 2003, 31: 114~132
, 百拇医药
[19]陈安涛,李红,冯廷勇等. 分段设计条件下归纳推理的多样性效应. 中国科学C辑: 生命科学, 2005, 35(3): 275~283
[20]Heit E. A Bayesian analysis of some forms of inductive reasoning. In: Oaksford & Chater (Eds.), Rational models of cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press, 1998. 248~274
[21]Fong K, Nisbett. The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems, cognitive psychology, 1986, 18: 253~292
[22]Nisbett R E, Krantz D H, Jepson C et al. The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review, 1983, 90: 339~363
, 百拇医药
[23]Feeney A, Gardiner D R. Category size and category-based induction. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, NJ: LEA, 2002. 292~297
[24]Quinn P C, Eimas P D, Rosenkrantz S L. Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 1993, 22: 463~475
[25]李红, 陈安涛. 从知觉到意义——婴儿分类能力与概念发展研究述评. 华东师范大学学报(教)，2003，2：78~86
, 百拇医药
[26]Starkey P, Spelke, E S, Gelman R. Numerical abstraction by human infants. Cognition, 1990, 36: 97~128
[27]Wynn K. Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature, 1992, 358: 749~751
[28]Wood J N，Spelke E S. Infants' Enumeration of Actions: Numerical Discrimination and its Signature Limits. Developmental Science, 2005, 8(2): 173~181
[29]Dehaene S, Akhavein R. Attention, Automatic, and levels of representation in Number processing. Journal or Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 1995, 21 (2): 314~326
, 百拇医药
[30]Feigenson L, Carey S, Hauser M. The representations underlying infant's choice of more: object file versus analog magnitudes. Psychology science, 2002, 13(2): 150~156
[31]Heit E, Feeney A. Relations between premise similarity and inductive strength. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2005, 12: 340~344
[ 上 页 ]
, 百拇医药(李富洪 李 红 陈安涛 等)