整体与切割评估法考察咨询会谈深度结果比较(1)
【摘 要】 目的：检验江光荣(2005)提出的心理咨询会谈深度的三维模型，考察对会谈深度采用整体评估法和切割评估法所得结果的差异。方法：对28个样本会谈的情感、个人化和此时此刻三个维度分别进行整体评分，考察三维度的评分与咨询师和当事人对会谈深度评价的关系，并与切割评估法所得结果进行比较。结果：两种方法对三维度的评分存在中度相关(r情感=0.56，P=0.002；r个人化=0.64，P=0.000；r此时此刻=0.63，P=0.000)。两种方法所得到的三个维度与当事人深度评价的关系不尽相同，切割评估法在三维度与当事人的深度评价间没有相关性，而整体评估法在排除了指导性较强的6个会谈后，在情感和此时此刻维度与当事人的深度评价间相关(r情感·深度评价=0.45，P=0.035；r此时此刻·深度评价=0.58，P=0.005)，且此时此刻维度对深度评价有一定的预测作用(深度评价=2.419+0.487×此时此刻，R2=0.501)。结论：两种评分方法既存在一致性，也有差异；会谈深度的三维模型存在一定程度的合理性；两种方法得到的结果不尽相同，还需要更多同类研究的探讨。
, 百拇医药
【关键词】 心理咨询；会谈深度；三维模型；整体评估法；切割评估法
中图分类号：B849、R749.055 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1000-6729(2008)001-0059-05
Investigation on Counseling Session Depth:Comparison of the Overall and the Portion Measuring Methods
HU Shu-Jing,JIANG Guang-Rong,ZHU XU
School of Psychology, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079
【Abstract】 Objective: To validate the three-dimension model of counseling depth which was proposed by Jiang Guangrong (2005), and to compare the results of two different methods measuring the three dimensions, one is the overall measuring method, and the other is the portion measuring method. Methods:Use the overall measuring method to measure the three dimensions (emotional, personal, here-and-now) of 28 sample sessions, and check the relation between the three dimensions and the evaluation of session depth by counselors and clients in the 28 sessions. Then compare it with the results of the portion measuring method. Results: Measuring results of the two methods got moderately positive correlation (r emotional=0.56，P=0.002；r personal=0.64，P=0.000；r here-and-now=0.63，P=0.000). The correlation between the three dimensions and the evaluation of counseling depth by clients was different in the two method s' measuring. There wasn't any relation while using the portion measuring method. However, when using the overall measuring method, it found some relation between the emotional dimension, the here-and-now dimension and the session depth after excluded 6 rather directive sessions (r emotionalodepth=0.45，P=0.035；r here-and-nowodepth=0.58，P=0.005). And the here-and-now dimension could predict the depth to some extent (depth=2.419+0.487* here-and-now，R2=0.501). Conclusion: There is some congruence in the two methods, but there are still differences between them. The three-dimension model is reasonable. The results of two methods of measuring are not all the same, and more researches are needed.
, 百拇医药
【Key Words】 counseling；session depth； three-dimension model；overall measuring method；portion measuring method
心理咨询是一个咨询师与当事人互动的过程，这一过程存在深浅之别。如果将心理咨询会谈互动的深浅称为会谈深度，则不同的咨询流派之间，同一咨询流派但不同水平的咨询师之间，同一咨询师与不同的当事人，乃至同一咨询师与同一当事人的不同会谈之间，都可能在会谈深度上存在差异。心理咨询会谈深度如何界定，上述种种差异从何而来，会谈如何深入，会谈深度与当事人的改变有没有关系，有什么关系等，对于心理咨询会谈深度的一系列问题，在理论和实证研究方面，研究者都关注不多。泽诺(Zaro)等从四个层次描述过咨询互动，分别是集中于事实内容交流的层次，涉及当事人行为模式的互动层次，以咨询关系为基点的互动层次和“个人与个人”的互动层次[1]。
江光荣提出了会谈深度的三维模型[2]。三个维度分别是情感维度(非情感的-情感的)、个人化维度(非个人的-个人的)和时间维度(非此时此刻的-此时此刻的)，会谈深度可以由这三个维度反映出来。情感维度指会谈是集中于陈述事实、观点、看法等，还是在表达情绪、感受。个人化维度指交流的内容是咨访双方(尤其是当事人)个人的还是非个人的。时间维度指思考、情绪体验、领悟是此时此刻正在经历的(或再经历的)，还是对过去的体验的陈述。交流越是触及个人，越是集中于情绪和感受，越是聚焦于此时此刻，互动的层次越深。会谈的深度随着非情感-情感、非个人化-个人化、非现在-现在的方向增加。, http://www.100md.com(胡姝婧 江光荣 朱 旭)
, 百拇医药
【关键词】 心理咨询；会谈深度；三维模型；整体评估法；切割评估法
中图分类号：B849、R749.055 文献标识码：A 文章编号：1000-6729(2008)001-0059-05
Investigation on Counseling Session Depth:Comparison of the Overall and the Portion Measuring Methods
HU Shu-Jing,JIANG Guang-Rong,ZHU XU
School of Psychology, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079
【Abstract】 Objective: To validate the three-dimension model of counseling depth which was proposed by Jiang Guangrong (2005), and to compare the results of two different methods measuring the three dimensions, one is the overall measuring method, and the other is the portion measuring method. Methods:Use the overall measuring method to measure the three dimensions (emotional, personal, here-and-now) of 28 sample sessions, and check the relation between the three dimensions and the evaluation of session depth by counselors and clients in the 28 sessions. Then compare it with the results of the portion measuring method. Results: Measuring results of the two methods got moderately positive correlation (r emotional=0.56，P=0.002；r personal=0.64，P=0.000；r here-and-now=0.63，P=0.000). The correlation between the three dimensions and the evaluation of counseling depth by clients was different in the two method s' measuring. There wasn't any relation while using the portion measuring method. However, when using the overall measuring method, it found some relation between the emotional dimension, the here-and-now dimension and the session depth after excluded 6 rather directive sessions (r emotionalodepth=0.45，P=0.035；r here-and-nowodepth=0.58，P=0.005). And the here-and-now dimension could predict the depth to some extent (depth=2.419+0.487* here-and-now，R2=0.501). Conclusion: There is some congruence in the two methods, but there are still differences between them. The three-dimension model is reasonable. The results of two methods of measuring are not all the same, and more researches are needed.
, 百拇医药
【Key Words】 counseling；session depth； three-dimension model；overall measuring method；portion measuring method
心理咨询是一个咨询师与当事人互动的过程，这一过程存在深浅之别。如果将心理咨询会谈互动的深浅称为会谈深度，则不同的咨询流派之间，同一咨询流派但不同水平的咨询师之间，同一咨询师与不同的当事人，乃至同一咨询师与同一当事人的不同会谈之间，都可能在会谈深度上存在差异。心理咨询会谈深度如何界定，上述种种差异从何而来，会谈如何深入，会谈深度与当事人的改变有没有关系，有什么关系等，对于心理咨询会谈深度的一系列问题，在理论和实证研究方面，研究者都关注不多。泽诺(Zaro)等从四个层次描述过咨询互动，分别是集中于事实内容交流的层次，涉及当事人行为模式的互动层次，以咨询关系为基点的互动层次和“个人与个人”的互动层次[1]。
江光荣提出了会谈深度的三维模型[2]。三个维度分别是情感维度(非情感的-情感的)、个人化维度(非个人的-个人的)和时间维度(非此时此刻的-此时此刻的)，会谈深度可以由这三个维度反映出来。情感维度指会谈是集中于陈述事实、观点、看法等，还是在表达情绪、感受。个人化维度指交流的内容是咨访双方(尤其是当事人)个人的还是非个人的。时间维度指思考、情绪体验、领悟是此时此刻正在经历的(或再经历的)，还是对过去的体验的陈述。交流越是触及个人，越是集中于情绪和感受，越是聚焦于此时此刻，互动的层次越深。会谈的深度随着非情感-情感、非个人化-个人化、非现在-现在的方向增加。, http://www.100md.com(胡姝婧 江光荣 朱 旭)